Literature DB >> 28250147

Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression.

Hanna Gertz1, Dimitris Voudouris2, Katja Fiehler2.   

Abstract

Tactile stimuli on moving limbs are typically attenuated during reach planning and execution. This phenomenon has been related to internal forward models that predict the sensory consequences of a movement. Tactile suppression is considered to occur due to a match between the actual and predicted sensory consequences of a movement, which might free capacities to process novel or task-relevant sensory signals. Here, we examined whether and how tactile suppression depends on the relevance of somatosensory information for reaching. Participants reached with their left or right index finger to the unseen index finger of their other hand (body target) or an unseen pad on a screen (external target). In the body target condition, somatosensory signals from the static hand were available for localizing the reach target. Vibrotactile stimuli were presented on the moving index finger before or during reaching or in a separate no-movement baseline block, and participants indicated whether they detected a stimulus. As expected, detection thresholds before or during reaching were higher compared with baseline. Tactile suppression was also stronger for reaches to body targets than external targets, as reflected by higher detection thresholds and lower precision of detectability. Moreover, detection thresholds were higher when reaching with the left than with the right hand. Our results suggest that tactile suppression is modulated by position signals from the target limb that are required to reach successfully to the own body. Moreover, limb dominance seems to affect tactile suppression, presumably due to disparate uncertainty of feedback signals from the moving limb.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Tactile suppression on a moving limb has been suggested to release computational resources for processing other relevant sensory events. In the current study, we show that tactile sensitivity on the moving limb decreases more when reaching to body targets than external targets. This indicates that tactile perception can be modulated by allocating processing capacities to movement-relevant somatosensory information at the target location. Our results contribute to understanding tactile processing and predictive mechanisms in the brain.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  psychophysics; reaching; sensory suppression; tactile perception; task relevance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28250147      PMCID: PMC5461667          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00052.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  22 in total

1.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks.

Authors:  Stephan R Williams; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Independent allocation of attention to eye and hand targets in coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26

4.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  S R Williams; J Shenasa; C E Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Dynamic dominance persists during unsupported reaching.

Authors:  Tucker Tomlinson; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Enhancement and suppression of tactile signals during reaching.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tactile suppression stems from specific sensorimotor predictions.

Authors:  Elena Fuehrer; Dimitris Voudouris; Alexandra Lezkan; Knut Drewing; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Dynamic temporal modulation of somatosensory processing during reaching.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Local Neuronal Responses to Intracortical Microstimulation in Rats' Barrel Cortex Are Dependent on Behavioral Context.

Authors:  Sergejus Butovas; Cornelius Schwarz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Predictive attenuation of touch and tactile gating are distinct perceptual phenomena.

Authors:  Konstantina Kilteni; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-14

5.  The role of visual processing on tactile suppression.

Authors:  Hanna Gertz; Katja Fiehler; Dimitris Voudouris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Vision facilitates tactile perception when grasping an object.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Francisco L Colino; Xhino Meleqi; Gordon Binsted; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.