Yashashwi Pokharel1, Fengming Tang2, Philip G Jones2, Vijay Nambi3, Vera A Bittner4, Ravi S Hira5, Khurram Nasir6, Paul S Chan1, Thomas M Maddox7, William J Oetgen8, Paul A Heidenreich9, William B Borden10, John A Spertus1, Laura A Petersen11, Christie M Ballantyne12, Salim S Virani13. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Research, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri2Department of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Research, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri. 3. Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas4Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas5Center of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 5. Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle. 6. Center for Prevention and Wellness Research, Miami Beach, Florida. 7. Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Colorado Health Care System and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver. 8. American College of Cardiology, Washington DC. 9. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 10. Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC. 11. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas13Health Policy, Quality and Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Houston, Texas. 12. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas5Center of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas. 13. Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas4Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas5Center of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas13Health Policy, Quality and Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
Importance: The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Management Guideline recommends moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin therapy in eligible patients. Objective: To examine adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline in US cardiology practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: Among 161 cardiology practices, trends in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) were analyzed before (September 1, 2012, to November 1, 2013) and after (February 1, 2014, to April 1, 2015) publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline among 4 mutually exclusive risk groups within the ACC Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate for differences in trend in use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT use in hierarchical logistic regression models. Participants were a population-based sample of 1 105 356 preguideline patients (2 431 192 patient encounters) and 1 116 472 postguideline patients (2 377 219 patient encounters). Approximately 97% of patients had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Exposures: Moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT use before and after publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time trend in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT. Results: In the study cohort, the mean (SD) age was 69.6 (12.1) years among 1 105 356 patients (40.2% female) before publication of the guideline and 70.0 (11.9) years among 1 116 472 patients (39.8% female) after publication of the guideline. Although there was a trend toward increasing use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins overall and in the ASCVD cohort, such a trend was already present before publication of the guideline. No significant difference in trend in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins was observed in other groups. The use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin therapy was 62.1% (before publication of the guideline) and 66.6% (after publication of the guideline) in the overall cohort, 62.7% (before publication) and 67.0% (after publication) in the ASCVD cohort, 50.6% (before publication) and 52.3% (after publication) in the cohort with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (ie, ≥190 mg/dL), 52.4% (before publication) and 55.2% (after publication) in the diabetes cohort, and 41.9% (before publication) and 46.9% (after publication) in the remaining group with 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% or higher. In hierarchical logistic regression models, there was a significant increase in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins in the overall cohort (4.8%) and in the ASCVD cohort (4.3%) (P < .01 for slope for both). There was no significant change for other risk cohorts. Nonstatin LLT use remained unchanged in the preguideline and postguideline periods in the hierarchical logistic regression models for all of the risk groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Management Guideline in cardiology practices was modest. Timely interventions are needed to improve guideline-concordant practice to reduce the burden of ASCVD.
Importance: The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Management Guideline recommends moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin therapy in eligible patients. Objective: To examine adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline in US cardiology practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: Among 161 cardiology practices, trends in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) were analyzed before (September 1, 2012, to November 1, 2013) and after (February 1, 2014, to April 1, 2015) publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline among 4 mutually exclusive risk groups within the ACC Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate for differences in trend in use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT use in hierarchical logistic regression models. Participants were a population-based sample of 1 105 356 preguideline patients (2 431 192 patient encounters) and 1 116 472 postguideline patients (2 377 219 patient encounters). Approximately 97% of patients had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Exposures: Moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT use before and after publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time trend in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin and nonstatin LLT. Results: In the study cohort, the mean (SD) age was 69.6 (12.1) years among 1 105 356 patients (40.2% female) before publication of the guideline and 70.0 (11.9) years among 1 116 472 patients (39.8% female) after publication of the guideline. Although there was a trend toward increasing use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins overall and in the ASCVD cohort, such a trend was already present before publication of the guideline. No significant difference in trend in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins was observed in other groups. The use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statin therapy was 62.1% (before publication of the guideline) and 66.6% (after publication of the guideline) in the overall cohort, 62.7% (before publication) and 67.0% (after publication) in the ASCVD cohort, 50.6% (before publication) and 52.3% (after publication) in the cohort with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (ie, ≥190 mg/dL), 52.4% (before publication) and 55.2% (after publication) in the diabetes cohort, and 41.9% (before publication) and 46.9% (after publication) in the remaining group with 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% or higher. In hierarchical logistic regression models, there was a significant increase in the use of moderate-intensity to high-intensity statins in the overall cohort (4.8%) and in the ASCVD cohort (4.3%) (P < .01 for slope for both). There was no significant change for other risk cohorts. Nonstatin LLT use remained unchanged in the preguideline and postguideline periods in the hierarchical logistic regression models for all of the risk groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Adoption of the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Management Guideline in cardiology practices was modest. Timely interventions are needed to improve guideline-concordant practice to reduce the burden of ASCVD.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul S Chan; William J Oetgen; Donna Buchanan; Kristi Mitchell; Fran F Fiocchi; Fengming Tang; Philip G Jones; Tracie Breeding; Duane Thrutchley; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrew P DeFilippis; Rebekah Young; Christopher J Carrubba; John W McEvoy; Matthew J Budoff; Roger S Blumenthal; Richard A Kronmal; Robyn L McClelland; Khurram Nasir; Michael J Blaha Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael D Miedema; Faye L Lopez; Michael J Blaha; Salim S Virani; Josef Coresh; Christie M Ballantyne; Aaron R Folsom Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Salim S Virani; LeChauncy D Woodard; David J Ramsey; Tracy H Urech; Julia M Akeroyd; Tina Shah; Anita Deswal; Biykem Bozkurt; Christie M Ballantyne; Laura A Petersen Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Salim S Virani; LeChauncy D Woodard; Julia M Akeroyd; David J Ramsey; Christie M Ballantyne; Laura A Petersen Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Nivee P Amin; Seth S Martin; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Erin D Michos Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Khurram Nasir; Marcio S Bittencourt; Michael J Blaha; Ron Blankstein; Arthur S Agatson; Juan J Rivera; Michael D Miedema; Michael D Miemdema; Christopher T Sibley; Leslee J Shaw; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Adam A Markovitz; Rob G Holleman; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr; Mandi L Klamerus; Jeremy B Sussman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Adam J Nelson; Kevin Haynes; Sonali Shambhu; Zubin Eapen; Mark J Cziraky; Michael G Nanna; Sara B Calvert; Kerrin Gallagher; Neha J Pagidipati; Christopher B Granger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 27.203
Authors: Yevgeniy Khariton; Krishna K Patel; Paul S Chan; Yashashwi Pokharel; Jingyan Wang; John A Spertus; David M Safley; William R Hiatt; Kim G Smolderen Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Zak Loring; Peter Shrader; Larry A Allen; Rosalia Blanco; Paul S Chan; Michael D Ezekowitz; Gregg C Fonarow; James V Freeman; Bernard J Gersh; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Gerald V Naccarelli; Karen Pieper; James A Reiffel; Daniel E Singer; Benjamin A Steinberg; Laine E Thomas; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Laney K Jones; Samuel S Gidding; Terry L Seaton; Anne Goldberg; Christina Gregor; Amy C Sturm; Ross C Brownson; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Marc S Williams Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2019-06-15
Authors: Vera Bittner; Lisandro D Colantonio; Yuling Dai; Mark Woodward; Matthew T Mefford; Robert S Rosenson; Paul Muntner; Keri L Monda; Meredith L Kilgore; Byron C Jaeger; Emily B Levitan Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jeremy R Van't Hof; Sue Duval; Niki C Oldenburg; Jeffrey R Misialek; Milton Mickey Eder; Clarence Jones; John R Finnegan; Russell V Luepker Journal: Prev Med Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.637
Authors: Sae Takada; Allison J Ober; Judith S Currier; Noah J Goldstein; Tamara B Horwich; Brian S Mittman; Suzanne B Shu; Chi-Hong Tseng; Tara Vijayan; Soma Wali; William E Cunningham; Joseph A Ladapo Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 8.194