Literature DB >> 29130272

Effects of Guideline and Formulary Changes on Statin Prescribing in the Veterans Affairs.

Adam A Markovitz1,2,3, Rob G Holleman1, Timothy P Hofer1,2,4, Eve A Kerr1,2,4, Mandi L Klamerus1, Jeremy B Sussman1,2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two sequential policy changes-the addition of a high-potency statin to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) formulary and the release of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol guidelines-on VA provider prescribing. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of 1,100,682 VA patients, 2011-2016. STUDY
DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis of changes in prescribing of moderate-to-high-intensity statins among high-risk patients and across high-risk subgroups. We also assessed changes in prescribing of atorvastatin and other statin drugs. We estimated marginal effects (ME) of formulary and guideline changes by comparing predicted and observed statin use. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Data from VA Corporate Data Warehouse. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The use of moderate-to-high-intensity statins increased by 2 percentage points following the formulary change (ME, 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 to 2.6) and less than 1 percentage point following the guideline change (ME, 0.8, 95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9). The formulary change led to approximately a 12 percentage-point increase in the use of moderate-to-high-intensity atorvastatin (ME, 11.5, 95% CI, 11.3 to 11.6). The relatively greater provider response to the formulary change occurred across all patient subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a high-potency statin to formulary affected provider prescribing more than the ACC/AHA guidelines. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Veterans Affairs; cardiovascular disease; pharmaceuticals; provider interventions; quality of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29130272      PMCID: PMC5682154          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  28 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

3.  The impact of a national prescription drug formulary on prices, market share, and spending: lessons for Medicare?

Authors:  Haiden A Huskamp; Arnold M Epstein; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A bitter pill: formulary variability and the challenge to prescribing physicians.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Susan L Ettner; Peter Glassman; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

5.  Impact of alternative interventions on changes in generic dispensing rates.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Richard G Frank; Atheer Kaddis; Barbara M Rothenberg; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Clinical practice guideline implementation strategy patterns in Veterans Affairs primary care clinics.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Richard G Best; Jacqueline A Pugh
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Economic implications of evidence-based prescribing for hypertension: can better care cost less?

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Trends in high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the United States, 1999-2006.

Authors:  Elena V Kuklina; Paula W Yoon; Nora L Keenan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The implications of choice: prescribing generic or preferred pharmaceuticals improves medication adherence for chronic conditions.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Tuyen Hoang; Susan L Ettner; Peter A Glassman; Kavita Nair; Dee DeLapp; June Dirstine; Jerry Avorn; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-13

Review 10.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review.

Authors:  Anneke L Francke; Marieke C Smit; Anke J E de Veer; Patriek Mistiaen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol blood values between 2012 and 2017 suggest sluggish adoption of the recent 2013 treatment guidelines.

Authors:  H Robert Superko; Paul T Williams; Michael Dansinger; Ernst Schaefer
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  A Cost-Consequence Analysis of Preemptive SLCO1B1 Testing for Statin Myopathy Risk Compared to Usual Care.

Authors:  Charles A Brunette; Olivia M Dong; Jason L Vassy; Morgan E Danowski; Nicholas Alexander; Ashley A Antwi; Kurt D Christensen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-10-31

3.  Impact of a change of bronchodilator medications in a hospital drug formulary on intra- and out-of-hospital drug prescriptions: interrupted time series design with comparison group.

Authors:  Raquel Vázquez-Mourelle; Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Understanding providers' attitudes and key concerns toward incorporating CVD risk prediction into clinical practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Linda Takamine; Jane Forman; Laura J Damschroder; Bradley Youles; Jeremy Sussman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.