P Treerat1, O Prince1, A Cruz-Lagunas2, M Muñoz-Torrico2, M A Salazar-Lezama2, M Selman2, B Fallert-Junecko3, T A Reinhardt3, J F Alcorn4, D Kaushal5, J Zuñiga2, J Rangel-Moreno6, J K Kolls7, S A Khader1. 1. Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA. 2. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosio Villegas", Mexico City, Mexico. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Division of Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Divisions of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Centre, Covington, Louisiana, USA. 6. Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Centre, Rochester, New York, USA. 7. Richard King Mellon Institute for Pediatric Research, Department of Pediatrics and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
Approximately 2 billion people are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), resulting in 1.4 million deaths every year. Among Mtb-infected individuals, clinical isolates belonging to the W-Beijing lineage are increasingly prevalent, associated with drug resistance, and cause severe disease immunopathology in animal models. Therefore, it is exceedingly important to identify the immune mechanisms that mediate protection against rapidly emerging Mtb strains, such as W-Beijing lineage. IL-22 is a member of the IL-10 family of cytokines with both protective and pathological functions at mucosal surfaces. Thus far, collective data show that IL-22 deficient mice are not more susceptible to aerosolized infection with less virulent Mtb strains. Thus, in this study we addressed the functional role for the IL-22 pathway in immunity to emerging Mtb isolates, using W-Beijing lineage member, Mtb HN878 as a prototype. We show that Mtb HN878 stimulates IL-22 production in TLR2 dependent manner and IL-22 mediates protective immunity during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection in mice. Interestingly, IL-22-dependent pathways in both epithelial cells and macrophages mediate protective mechanisms for Mtb HN878 control. Thus, our results project a new protective role for IL-22 in emerging Mtb infections.
Approximately 2 billion people are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), resulting in 1.4 million deaths every year. Among Mtb-infected individuals, clinical isolates belonging to the W-Beijing lineage are increasingly prevalent, associated with drug resistance, and cause severe disease immunopathology in animal models. Therefore, it is exceedingly important to identify the immune mechanisms that mediate protection against rapidly emerging Mtb strains, such as W-Beijing lineage. IL-22 is a member of the IL-10 family of cytokines with both protective and pathological functions at mucosal surfaces. Thus far, collective data show that IL-22 deficient mice are not more susceptible to aerosolized infection with less virulent Mtb strains. Thus, in this study we addressed the functional role for the IL-22 pathway in immunity to emerging Mtb isolates, using W-Beijing lineage member, MtbHN878 as a prototype. We show that MtbHN878 stimulates IL-22 production in TLR2 dependent manner and IL-22 mediates protective immunity during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection in mice. Interestingly, IL-22-dependent pathways in both epithelial cells and macrophages mediate protective mechanisms for MtbHN878 control. Thus, our results project a new protective role for IL-22 in emerging Mtb infections.
Approximately 2 billion people are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), resulting in 1.4 million deaths every year[1]. Most infected people develop latent TB (LTB) and remain asymptomatic, although they have a 10% lifetime risk of progressing into active pulmonary TB (ATB). Among Mtb-infected individuals, clinical Mtb strains belonging to the W-Beijing lineage are increasingly prevalent[2,3], are over-represented among drug resistant isolates[4,5], and associated with humanimmunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in humans[6]. In animal models, infection with MtbHN878, a prototype of the W-Beijing lineage, is considered to be “hyper-virulent” due to increased mortality and severe disease immunopathology[7,8]. Therefore, it is important to identify the immune mechanisms that mediate protection against rapidly emerging Mtb strains, such as those belonging to the W-Beijing Mtb lineage.The immune responses that mediate protective immunity against Mtb infections are thought to be through the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as Interferon gamma (IFNγ) and Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), cytokines that activate macrophages to mediate Mtb control[9]. This is consistent with the finding that Mtb HN878 infection induces a Type I Interferon response[10] and T regulatory cells[8], both of which limit protective T helper type 1 (Th1) responses[8]. Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is another pro-inflammatory cytokine, with a well described role in inducing cytokines and chemokines to mediate recruitment of immune cells for control of pulmonary extracellular pathogens[11]. Interestingly, while IL-17 is not required for protective immunity against less virulent Mtb strains such as H37Rv[12,13], we recently demonstrated that IL-17 is required for protective immunity against infection with MtbHN878[14]. These results bring into question whether the immune parameters required for protective immunity against emerging Mtb strains are different from immune parameters required for protection against less virulent Mtb strains.IL-22 is a member of the IL-10 family of cytokines, and is primarily produced by T cells, γδ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells[15]. IL-22 acts through its heterodimeric receptor complex composed of IL-22R1 and IL-10R2 subunits and activates signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway[15]. Although IL-22 receptor (IL-22R) is primarily expressed on epithelial cells at mucosal sites[16,17], emerging data suggests that myeloid cells can also respond to IL-22[18,19]. IL-22 has dual roles and play protective as well as pathological functions at mucosal sites[15]. For example, IL-22 overexpression can play a pathological role in several inflammatory conditions and lead to hyper-proliferation, exacerbated production of inflammatory mediators, and recruitment of pathologic effector cells[15]. In contrast, IL-22 has beneficial roles in resolution of injury by promoting epithelial repair and accelerating cellular turnover[20-22], and preventing apoptosis by induction of pro-apoptotic factors such as BclIII[20]. IL-22 also induces antimicrobial proteins such as β-defensins, S100A8/A9 proteins, lipocalin (Lcn) and Regenerating islet-3-gamma (Reg3γ) to mediate protection against extracellular pathogens[16,17]. Despite the extensive body of literature on the role of IL-22 at mucosal sites[15], it is unclear and controversial whether IL-22 has a protective or pathological role in immunity against Mtb. Some studies demonstrate increased IL-22 expression at disease sites in ATBpatients[23,24] and in TBpatients undergoing Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS)[25], suggesting a pathological role for IL-22 in TB. In contrast, other studies show increased IL-22 in serum of LTB patients[26], and anti-tuberculosis treatment enhances IL-22 antigen-specific T cell responses in pulmonary active TBpatients[27]. More recently, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter region of the IL-22 gene (rs2227473) which drives increased IL-22 production and is associated with reduced susceptibility to TB[28], suggesting a protective role for IL-22 in TB. Interestingly, IL-22 treatment of Mtb infected human macrophages in vitro enhanced Mtb killing[18,29,30] and correlated with induction of S100A8/9 proteins, Rab proteins and promoted phagolysosomal activation[18]. Thus, the role for IL-22 in humanTB is controversial, with some human studies suggesting a pathological role, while other studies project a protective role for IL-22 during TB. Mouse model studies published thus far have not been particularly informative, as IL-22 deficient mice are not more susceptible to aerosolized infection with less virulent Mtb strains such as H37Rv and Erdman[31,32]. Thus, in this study we addressed the functional role for IL-22 pathway in immunity to emerging Mtb strains, using MtbHN878 as an example. Our data show that W-Beijing isolate MtbHN878 engages Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) to induce increased IL-22 production and mediates protective immunity during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection. Interestingly, activation of IL-22-dependent pathways in both epithelial cells and macrophages together mediate protective mechanisms against Mtb HN878 infection. IL-22 functions to induce antimicrobial proteins in epithelial cells, while also inducing C-C Motif-ligand 2 (CCL2), to mediate macrophage recruitment to the infected lung during chronic disease. In addition, IL-22 can also directly activate macrophages by inducing TNFα production and mediating Mtb control. Together, these results project a new protective role for IL-22 in immunity to emerging Mtb infections, especially during chronic infection.
Materials and Methods
Human tissue samples and patient diagnosis
Archival paraffin samples of human lung biopsies with diagnosis of TB were collected under a protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Respiratory Diseases (INER), Mexico. Subjects were of similar socioeconomic status and unrelated to the third generation as determined by a questionnaire. TBpatients had evident symptoms (weight loss >10 kg, cough, fever, night sweats for >1 month, or cervical or axillary lymphadenopathy) and chest radiographic findings consistent with recent pulmonary TB. TB was confirmed with a positive sputum acid-fast smear and culture. Fresh blood samples from ATBpatients were obtained from patients recruited to the TuberculosisOutpatient Clinic, INER, Mexico prior to anti-Mtb treatment and did not present co-morbidities such as diabetes, HIV, cancer and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from ATBpatients were isolated by Ficoll Hypaque gradient (Lymphoprep; Axis-Shield POC AS, Oslo, Norway). PBMCs (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were plated in 24-well plates and incubated at 37ºC in presence of cell wall extract (20 μg/ml) from MtbH37Rv or MtbHN878. After a 4-day incubation period, cells were harvested and culture supernatants were used to determinate the levels of IL-22 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
Mtb infection in Non-Human Primates (NHPs)
Groups of NHPs (Indian rhesus macaques) were used in this study at the Tulane National Primate Research Centre as previously described following the recommendations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For latently infected NHPs, NHPs were infected with a low dose of MtbCDC1551 (200–500 CFU) by the aerosol route[33]. MtbCDC1551 exposure was confirmed in NHPs by positive tuberculin skin test and PRIMAGAM (Prionics), a quantiferon-type IFN-γ release assay specifically designed to confirm Mtbinfection in NHPs. The NHPs with latency did not exhibit any clinical signs of TB, as evident from normal body temperatures and weights, chest x-rays and serum levels of acute phase proteins[34]. For pulmonary TB in NHPs, NHPs were infected with a high dose of MtbCDC1551 via aerosol infection (∼5,000 CFU). Mtb exposure was confirmed by positive tuberculin skin test and PRIMAGAM and the NHPs exhibited clinical signs of TB, as evident from body temperatures, weights and chest x-rays[34]. Depending on disease severity, NHPs with ATB were necropsied at different time points with the average time to euthanasia being 37 days. Latently infected NHPs were necropsied at varying time points due to experimental and ethical considerations rather than disease severity (as latently infected NHPs are otherwise normal), and the average time to necropsy was 141 days.
Mice
C57BL/6 (B6), Il1r on the B6 background were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and bred at Washington University in St. Louis animal facility. Il22mice[16] were obtained from Dr. Wenjun Ouyang and bred in-house. Experimental mice were age- and sex-matched and used between the ages of 6–8 weeks. All mice were maintained and used in accordance with the approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines at Washington University in St. Louis.
Bacterial strains and cell wall preparations
Mtb strains H37Rv (Trudeau Institute) and HN878 (BEI Resources, and a kind gift from Dr. Gilla Kaplan, PHRI) were cultured in Proskauer Beck medium containing 0.05% Tween 80 to mid-log phase and frozen in 2 ml aliquots at -80°C. Mice were aerosol infected with approximately 100 or 500 Mtb colony forming units (CFU) as before[14]. At given time points, organs were harvested, homogenized and serial dilutions of tissue homogenates plated on 7H11 agar plates and CFU determined.H37Rv (NR14828) or HN878 (NR14830) cell wall preparations were commercially obtained from BEI Resources, under National Institutes of Health [NIH] contract AI-75320. Mtb cultures were harvested at late-log phase in glycerol-alanine-salts medium, washed with PBS pH 7.4, and subsequently inactivated by gamma irradiation. The bacilli were broken in a French Press pressure cell at 4°C. The cell wall was isolated by centrifugation at 27,000 × g for one hour and washed two times in PBS. The final cell wall pellet was suspended and dialyzed in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate, quantified by BCA protein assay for protein content.
Preparation of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs)
BMDMs were generated from the bone marrow of B6 or gene deficient mice as described previously[14]. On day 7, adherent cells were collected and used as BMDMs which were used to perform either in vitro infection or treatment with bacterial cell wall preparations (10 μg/ml each, BEI Resources, obtained under National Institutes of Health [NIH] contract AI-75320).
Preparation of lung cell suspensions
Lung cell suspension was prepared from the lungs of B6 and gene deficient mice as described previously[14]. Briefly, lungs were taken and perfused with cold saline containing heparin prior to sectioning in chilled DMEM using sterile razor blades. Dissected lung tissue was then incubated in DMEM containing collagenase (0.7 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) and DNase (30 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C, 7.5% CO2 for 30 min. Digested lung tissue was dispersed by passage through a 70 μm pore size nylon tissue strainer (Falcon; BD Biosciences). Single cell suspension was treated with Gey's solution to lyse any residual red blood cells and washed twice before counting.
In vitro Mtb infection
BMDMs and total lung cells were prepared as described above and plated at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml and rested at 37°C, 7.5% CO2 overnight. Non-tumorigenic lung epithelial cell line, C10 was cultured to 100% confluence prior to infection or pretreatment with recombinant IL-22 (R &D Biosystems), or the cleaved form of Reg3γ[35]. A representative well was taken for counting using a haemocytometer and to calculate the multiplicity of infection (MOI). Cells were subsequently infected with MtbHN878 at a MOI of 1 for BMDMs and C10 cells, and MOI of 0.1 for lung cells. Infected cells were cultured in antibiotic-free DMEM (with 10% fetal bovine serum) at 37°C, 7.5% CO2 for 6 days. Plates were then centrifuged, and culture supernatant stored at -80°C for further analysis. The infected BMDMs were washed once with sterile PBS and lysed with 0.05% SDS, following which serial dilutions were plated on 7H11 plates and CFU determined[14].Following a 48 hour pretreatment with rIL-22 (100 ng/ml), BMDMs or C10 cells were assessed for mycobacterial uptake using MtbHN878:GFP for infection at a MOI of 1 for 4 hours. After removal of the supernatants by centrifugation, single cell suspensions of infected cells were generated using .25% trypsin (Gibco) treatment for 4 minutes followed by equal volume of DMEM (with 10% fetal bovine serum). Suspensions were analysed for GFP+ cells against uninfected controls using the BD FACs Jazz cell sorter and post run analysis using FlowJo (Tree Star Inc, CA). Data are reported as %Mtb-GFP uptake.
Flow cytometry
Lung cell suspensions were prepared, stained, collected and analysed for flow cytometry as described earlier[12]. Fluorochrome-labeled antibodies specific for CD3ɛ (500A2), CD4 (RM4-5), CB8α (53-6.7), CD44 (IM7), IFNγ (XMG1.2), IL-17 (TC11-18H10), IL-22 (1H8PWSR), CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (HL3), NK1.1 (PK136), TCRγ δ (GL3) and Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), or isotype control antibodies were used in this study. Cells were collected using a Fortessa ×20 Cytometer with FACS Diva software. Cell populations were gated based on their forward by side scatter characteristics and the frequency of specific cell types was calculated using FlowJo (Tree Star Inc, CA). Lung alveolar macrophages were gated as CD11c+ CD11b-, lung myeloid dendritic cells were gated on CD11c+ CD11b+, neutrophils as CD11b+ Gr-1hi, recruited macrophages were annotated as CD11b+ Gr-1lo, and monocytes were gated on CD11b+ Gr1int cells as before[36].
Lung morphometric analysis and immunofluorescence
Mouse lung lobes were processed as described previously[12]. Lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and inflammatory features were blinded and evaluated by light microscopy. Formalin-fixed lung sections were cut, stained and performed immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously[14]. Regions of inflammatory accumulation were delineated with the automated tool of the Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss) and average size in squared microns calculated. Sections were probed with F4/80 (MCA497GA, Serotec) to detect activated macrophages within inflammatory lesions, and goat anti-mouseE-cadherin (AF748, R&D systems) to detect epithelial cells. Quantification of E-cadherin from lung FFPE sections was determined measuring the area covered by E-cadherin fluorescence in medium size bronchi (<150 μm in diameter) using the automated tool of the Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss). Rabbit anti-mouseIL-22Rα (ab5984, abcam) or rat anti-mouseIL-22Rα1 (clone 496514, R&D systems) was used to visualize IL-22R expression. Non-human primate (NHP) and human sections were probed with mouse anti-human macrophages (clone MAC387, AbD serotec) to detect activated macrophages within inflammatory lesions, anti-human cadherin (AF648, R&D systems) to stain for epithelial cells, mouse monoclonal anti-humanIL22R alpha 1 (MAB2770, R&D systems) to observe IL-22R expression or mouse monoclonal anti-humanCD68/Macrosialin (clone PG-M1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for evaluating macrophage accumulation in infected lungs.
Real-time PCR
RNA was extracted and cDNA was generated as previously described[12]. cDNA was then amplified using TaqMan reagents on the Applied Biosystems ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The log10 fold induction of mRNA in experimental samples was calculated over expression levels in uninfected samples was determined using the ΔΔct calculation recommended by manufacturer. The primer and probe sequences for murineglyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were previously published[14]. The primer and probes for murine Reg3γ, S100A8, Lcn2, CCL2, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and IL-22R were purchased from Applied Biosystems.
Quantification of protein production
Mouse IL-1β ELISA set (BD Biosciences) and mouse TNFα ELISPOT pair (BD Biosciences) was used to detect IL-1β and TNFα protein levels in the supernatant samples according to the manufacturer's protocol. IL-22, G-CSF and chemokine protein levels were measured using a mouse Luminex assay (Linco/Millipore).
In situ hybridization (ISH)
Paraffin embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized and prepared for performing in situ hybridization as previously described[37]. In brief, stringent in situ hybridization (50°C with 0.1 M DTT in the hybridization mix) was performed with 35S-labeled riboprobes as previously described[37]. Tissue sections were coated with NTB emulsion (Carestream/Kodak), exposed at 10°C for 14 days, counterstained with hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories) and mounted with Permount (Fisher). Images were visualized using Leica DMC2900 and captured using LAS V4.5 program (Diagnostics Instruments).
Statistical analysis
Differences between the means of two groups were analysed using the two tailed Student's t test or between multiple groups using one- or two-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 5 (La Jolla, CA). Differences with a P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Mtb HN878 infection drives IL-22 production through a TLR2 dependent IL-1β pathway
IL-22 deficient mice or IL-22 neutralization does not impact TB disease pathogenesis in mice infected with the less virulent Mtb strain, MtbH37Rv[13]. However, we recently found that immune requirements for protection against MtbHN878, are not the same as following infection with the less virulent, MtbH37Rv[14]. Thus, we first tested whether IL-22 production by lung cells following Mtbinfection is dependent on the infecting Mtb strain. As recently shown[14], infection with MtbHN878 resulted in increased IL-1β production in cultured murine lung cells, when compared to infection with MtbH37Rv (Figure 1a). We found that the induction of IL-1β is TLR2 dependent[14], as infection of Tlr2-/- in vitro cultured lung cells with either MtbH37Rv or MtbHN878 did not result in induction of IL-1β production (Figure 1a). Coinciding with increased IL-1β production, we found that lung cells infected with MtbHN878 induced substantially increased levels of IL-22 protein, when compared to infection with MtbH37Rv (Figure 1b). In addition, Mtbinfection-induced IL-22 production was dependent on IL-1R signalling and TLR2 pathway (Figure 1b). Thus, our data demonstrate that hyper-virulent Mtb HN878 infection induces increased IL-1β production through a TLR2 mechanism, thus driving increased IL-22 production.
Figure 1
Infection with Mtb HN878 triggers increased IL-22 production through a TLR2-dependent pathway
Lung cells isolated from B6, Il1r-/- and Tlr2-/- mice were infected with either Mtb H37Rv (Rv) or Mtb HN878 (HN) at MOI of 0.1 for 7 days, and the protein levels of (a) IL-1β and (b) IL-22 were assessed in culture supernatants by ELISA and luminex assay, respectively. Lung cells isolated from B6 mice were treated with cell wall extracted from Mtb H37Rv (Rv) or Mtb HN878 (HN), (10μg/ml each). Protein levels of (c) IL-1β and (d) IL-22 were assessed by ELISA and luminex assay respectively. PBMCs were isolated from ATB patients and were stimulated with Mtb H37Rv (Rv) or Mtb HN878 (HN) cell wall extracts (20 μg/ml each) and the protein levels of (e) IL-22 were measured by luminex assays. Error bars represent means ± s.e.m. n = 3-5 for a-d. n = 17 for human ATB patients for e. ND, not detected; UI, uninfected; UN, untreated. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 by (a,b) one-way ANOVA, (c,d) Student's t test (e) two-way ANOVA
Mtb strains are characterized by differential expression of virulence factors, in particular, the complex lipid components in bacterial cell wall, which play a crucial role in host-pathogen interaction contributing to inflammatory responses[7]. MtbHN878 but not MtbH37Rv, has an intact pks gene, which is required for the synthesis of the phenolic glycolipid (PGL), a complex branched lipid involved in host immunogenicity modulation and bacterial virulence[7]. In agreement with the unique composition of mycobacterial cell wall, we found that treatment of murine lung cells with MtbHN878 cell wall extracts induced higher production of IL-1β and IL-22, when compared to lung cells treated with cell wall extracts purified from MtbH37Rv (Figure 1c,d). Importantly, we found that PBMCs isolated from ATBpatients also responded to exposure with MtbHN878 cell wall extracts by producing significantly increased levels of IL-22 production (Figure 1e), when compared to PBMCs stimulated with cell walls prepared from MtbH37Rv. Thus, our data show that increased induction of IL-22 in murine cells, and human PBMCs from ATBpatients is dependent on exposure to MtbHN878 cell wall associated factors.
IL-22 plays a protective role during chronic stages of Mtb infection
As Mtb HN878 infection in vitro induced much higher levels of IL-22 production, we then assessed if IL-22 was required for protection against Mtb HN878 infection in an aerosol mouse model of infection. While Il22mice were not more susceptible during acute phases of infection, Il22mice exhibited higher bacterial burden in the lungs during chronic stages whether mice were infected with either low (100 CFU) or medium (500 CFU) doses of MtbHN878 (Figure 2a,b). The increased Mtb lung CFU during chronic Mtb HN878 infection in Il22mice, also coincided with increased Mtb dissemination to the spleen in both low and medium doses of infection (Figure 2a,b). These data together suggest that the absence of IL-22 results in increased susceptibility to Mtbinfection during the chronic stages of infection, but IL-22 is dispensable during the acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection.
Figure 2
IL-22 is required for protection during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection
Il22 and B6 mice were aerosol infected with (a) ∼100 CFU, or (b) ∼500 CFU, of Mtb HN878. Bacterial burden in the lungs and spleens was assessed by plating after (a,b) 30 and 100 days post infection (p.i),. Error bars represent means ± SD n = 5-14 mice for each time point. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 by (a,b) Student's t test.
IL-22 signals through the receptor IL-22R, which is composed of two distinct subunits, IL-22R1 and IL-10R2[15]. IL-22R is thought to be mainly expressed on non-hematopoietic cells, in particular, epithelial cells[16]. However, more recent studies project macrophages as IL-22 responders[18,29]. To address the major cell type responsive to IL-22 during acute and chronic Mtb HN878 infection, we analysed the expression of IL-22R expression in the lungs of MtbHN878-infectedmice. IL-22R expression was predominantly expressed on epithelial cells during acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection (Figure 3a). In contrast, during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection, IL-22R was expressed on both epithelial cells expressing E-cadherin (Figure 3b, bronchus), and recruited immune cells within TB granulomas (Figure 3a, granuloma), specifically F4/80 expressing macrophages accumulating within TB granulomas (Figure 3b, granuloma). Importantly, we found that within humanTB granulomas from active TBpatients, IL-22R expressing cells were predominantly CD68-expressing macrophages (Figure 3c), while IL-22R+ E-cadherin expressing epithelial cells were fewer and preferentially localized to the pulmonary epithelium (Figure 3d). These data together suggest that while IL-22 responsive cells during acute Mtbinfection are primarily epithelial cells, both epithelial and accumulating macrophages within TB granulomas express IL-22R during chronic disease in mouse and humanTB.
Figure 3
Epithelial cells and macrophages express IL-22R during Mtb infection
B6 mice were aerosol infected with ∼500 CFU Mtb HN878 and lungs were harvested following acute (day 20 and 50 p.i.) or chronic (day 80 and 100 p.i.) stages of infection and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Serial sections from FFPE sections were processed for immunofluorescence using antibodies specific for (a) CD3 (red) and IL-22R (green), (b) E-cadherin (red) or F4/80 (red) and IL-22R (green). (c) FFPE lung sections from active TB patients were processed for immunofluorescence using antibodies specific for CD68 (green) and IL-22R (red) and (d) E-cadherin (red) and IL-22R (green). All sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue). White arrows indicate cells that co-localize expression of IL-22R with CD68 or E-cadherin. n = 4-6. Original magnification for (a,b) 200×; (c,d left) 4×4 200× mosaic; (c,d right) 200×. One representative image shown.
To further address if accumulation of IL-22R-expressing macrophages is associated with Mtb control or disease progression, we assessed IL-22R expression during TB latency and TB disease in Non-human Primates (NHPs) infected with CDC1551, a clinical Mtb strain isolated from a TB outbreak in the United States[38]. In the NHP model of TB, similar to humaninfection, Mtbinfection can result in immune control and establishment of latent TB, or progression to TB disease. Following infection with MtbCDC1551, we found that IL-22R-expressing macrophages were predominantly located within the non-necrotic granulomas of latently infected NHPs (Figure 4a). In contrast, IL-22R-expressing macrophage accumulation was reduced, and mainly localized on the rim of necrotic granulomas of NHPs with ATB disease (Figure 4b). We also found higher mRNA expression of IL-22R1 in TB granulomas from latently infected NHPs, when compared to IL-22R1 mRNA expression within TB granulomas from NHPs exhibiting ATB disease (Figure 4c). Interestingly, no significant induction of IL-10R2 mRNA was detected in either ATB or latently infected TB granulomas from NHPs (Figure 4c). Together, our data suggest that IL-22 responsive macrophages accumulate during infection with clinical Mtb strains and may participate in immune protective control during TB.
Figure 4
Preferential accumulation of IL-22+ macrophages within granulomas of latent TB
NHPs were aerosol infected with Mtb CDC1551 and lungs were harvested from NHPs with (a) latent and (b) acute TB. FFPE lung sections were prepared and stained for (left) H&E or immunofluorescence with antibodies specific for (middle) E-cadherin (red) and IL-22R (green), or (right) macrophage (green) and IL-22R (red). All sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue). White arrows indicate co-localization of IL-22R with macrophage or epithelial markers. Original magnification for (left) H& E panel is 100×, (middle & right) immunofluorescence panels 200×. (c) Induction of IL-22RA1 and IL-10RA was measured by real-time PCR and fold induction in either latently or actively infected NHP lungs over levels expressed in control lungs is shown. n = 4-6. Error bars represent means ± s.e.m. ND, not detected.
IL-22 is required for induction of Reg3γ and anti-mycobacterial control in epithelial cells
We found that both macrophages and epithelial cells express IL-22R during Mtbinfection in animal models and humanTB granulomas. Thus, we first assessed if the epithelial barrier was dysregulated in the absence of IL-22 during chronic Mtb HN878 infection. We observed that while lungs from B6 mice infected with either low or medium doses of MtbHN878 during the chronic stages, exhibited well maintained epithelial barrier integrity, the epithelial barrier in the lungs of Il22HN878-infectedmice was aberrant and discontinuous (Figure 5a,b). In addition, we found that the mRNA induction of IL-22-dependent antimicrobial genes, such as S100A8 and Reg3γ, was decreased in the lungs of medium dose Il22HN878-infectedmice, when compared to B6 MtbHN878-infectedmice, while expression of Lcn2 mRNA was not significantly different (Figure 5c). Interestingly, these differences in epithelial barrier integrity or decreased induction of IL-22-dependent antimicrobial genes did not impact overall inflammation associated with the chronic infection in medium dose Il22HN878-infectedmice, when compared to inflammatory changes in lungs of B6 MtbHN878-infectedmice (Figure 5d). To further address if IL-22 has a direct anti-mycobacterial function at the epithelial barrier, we treated non-tumorigenic lung epithelial cell line, C10, with recombinant (r) IL-22 and found that this resulted in mRNA induction of antimicrobial proteins including Reg3γ, S100A8 proteins and Lcn2 (Figure 5e). Furthermore, we found that pre-treatment of C10 cells with rIL-22, resulted in improved MtbHN878 control by epithelial cells (Figure 5f). Consistent with improved Mtb control upon rIL-22 treatment, rIL-22 pre-treatment also decreased MtbHN878 uptake in C10 cells (Figure 5g). Additionally, we found that rReg3γ treatment of Mtb HN878-infected C10 cells also resulted in improved MtbHN878 control, albeit not to the extent seen with rIL-22 treatment (Figure 5h). These data together suggest during the chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection, IL-22 plays an important in epithelial barrier structure and function, likely through the induction of antimicrobials.
Figure 5
IL-22 regulates epithelial cell function following infection with Mtb HN878
Il22 and B6 mice were aerosol infected with a 100 or 500 CFU Mtb HN878 and on day 100 p.i, lungs were harvested. FFPE lung sections were processed for performing (a) H&E staining and immunofluorescent staining with antibodies specific for E-cadherin (red). All sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Circles indicate areas shown for immunofluorescent images. (b) Quantification of E-cadherin from lung FFPE sections was determined measuring the area covered by E-cadherin fluorescence in medium size bronchi (<150 μm in diameter). (c) Induction of Reg3γ and S100A8 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR and fold induction of mRNA shown. (d) Percentage of granulomatous inflammation in the lungs was assessed using an automated tool of the Zeiss microscope. (e) C10 cells were incubated with rIL-22 (100 ng/ml) and induction of Reg3γ, S100A8 and Lcn2 mRNA was measured by real-time PCR and fold induction over untreated cells is shown. C10 cells (6×105 -9×105) were infected with Mtb HN878 (MOI of 1) and treated with either (f) rIL-22 (100 ng/ml) or (g) recombinant cleaved Reg3γ (25 μg/ml) and bacterial burden assessed at 6 days following infection. n = 4-6. Error bars represent standard deviation (± SD). (h) C10 cells were pretreated with rIL-22 (100 ng/ml) for 48 hours and then infected with HN878:GFP at a MOI of 1 (5×105 C10 cells) for an additional 4 hours, and assessed for percent Mtb:GFP+ uptake. NS, not significant; ND, not detected; UN, untreated. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 by (c,d,f,g,h) Student's t test.
IL-22 is required for macrophage recruitment during chronic Mtb HN878 infection
Our new data show that macrophages are one of the predominant recruited cell types expressing IL-22R during chronic Mtbinfection in animal models and humanTB granulomas. Thus, we next addressed whether the accumulation of recruited macrophages were impacted in Il22HN878-infectedmice during either acute or chronic stages of Mtbinfection. We found that following low dose (Supplementary Figure 1a-c) or medium dose (Figure 6a-c) Mtb HN878 infection, the number of alveolar macrophages, monocytes and recruited macrophages in the lungs were comparable between B6 and Il22mice during acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection. In contrast, following both low and medium doses of Mtb HN878 infection, we observed decreased number of recruited macrophages accumulating within Il22HN878-infected lungs, when compared to wild type infected lungs. Additionally, during the chronic stages, alveolar macrophage numbers were reduced in infected Il22mice following low dose Mtb HN878 infection (Supplementary figure1a), while monocytes were reduced in medium dose MtbHN878-infectedIl22mice (Figure 6b). Neutrophilic accumulation at low or medium dose Mtb HN878 infection during acute and chronic stages of infection was not statistically different between wild type and Il22 -infected lungs (Figure 6d, Supplementary figure 1d). These results were further confirmed histologically, as decreased accumulation of IL-22R+-expressing F4/80 macrophages were observed within TB granulomas in chronically infected Il22mice, irrespective of whether mice were infected with low or medium dose MtbHN878 (Figure 6e,f). The number of IFNγ-producing activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in Il22mice infected with medium doses of MtbHN878 show increases during acute infection but no significant difference when compared to B6 during chronic stages of infection (Supplementary Figure 2). In contrast, IL-17+ activated CD8 T cells in Il22mice was increased during acute and chronic stages of infection (Supplementary figure 2). Similar results were observed during low dose Mtb HN878 infection of Il22-/- mice (data not shown). Together, our data indicate that Il22mice infected with MtbHN878 show defects in recruitment and accumulation of IL-22R-expressing macrophages within TB granulomas during chronic Mtbinfection.
Figure 6
IL-22 is required for macrophage and monocyte recruitment during the chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection
Il22 and B6 mice were aerosol infected with ∼500 CFU of Mtb HN878 and lungs harvested at different time points p.i. The total number of (a) alveolar macrophages (AMs), (b) monocytes (Mn), (c) recruited macrophages (RM), (d) neutrophils (Neu) were determined by flow cytometry. (e) FFPE lung sections were processed for lung pathology and immunofluorescence using antibodies specific for F4/80 (red) and IL-22R (green). All sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Circles indicate region of interest for F4/80+ and IL-22R+ within the granulomas. (f) Quantification of IL22R+ cells in lung sections from (e) were counted /200× field. Error bars represent standard deviations (± s.d.). n = 5 mice, Representative individual experiments are shown from at least one experiment. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by Student's t test.
To determine the cellular source of IL-22 following Mtb HN878 infection, we infected total lung cells in vitro with MtbHN878 and found that while both CD4+ and CD8+ cells are the primary producers of IL22 (Supplementary Figure 3a), innate cells such as natural killer (NK) cells, NK T cells, and TCRγδ cells also produce IL-22 (Supplementary Figure 3b). Thus, our data suggest that both innate cells as well as adaptive cells can produce IL-22 in response to Mtb HN878 infection.We next addressed whether IL-22 can act on epithelial cells in order to induce chemokines that mediate macrophage recruitment into granulomas. We treated C10 epithelial cells with rIL-22, and observed that along with induction of antimicrobial proteins (Figure 5e), rIL-22 treatment resulted in induction of mRNA and protein levels of several chemokines including neutrophil-attracting chemokines, such as CXCL1, CXCL5 and G-CSF in epithelial cells (Figure 7a,b). Importantly, we also found that rIL-22 treatment of C10 cells induced CCL2, a macrophage recruiting chemokine in TB[39] (Figure 7a,b). Coincident with ability of rIL-22 to induce CCL2, we also found decreased CCL2 mRNA localization within lungs of Il22HN878-infectedmice, when compared to lungs of B6 MtbHN878-infected during chronic stages of infection (Figure 7c). These data suggest that IL-22 can act on epithelial cells to induce both neutrophil and macrophage attracting chemokines. These findings are consistent with the reduced recruitment of macrophages during chronic infection in MtbHN878-infectedIl22-/- mice, suggesting an important role for IL-22 in myeloid cell recruitment during chronic TB.
Figure 7
IL-22 activates macrophages for Mtb control
Non-tumorigenic lung epithelial cell line C10 was treated with rIL-22 and (a) chemokines mRNA was determined by real-time PCR, and fold induction over untreated cells was determined or (b) protein levels were determined in culture supernatants by luminex assays. (c) Il22 and B6 mice were aerosol infected with ∼500 CFU of Mtb HN878 and on day 100 p.i., formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded lung sections were analysed by ISH to determine localization of CCL2 mRNA expression within the lung. Black arrows indicate the localization of CCL2 mRNA within granulomas. Original magnification, × 10. BMDMs derived from B6 mice were treated with rIL-22 and infected with Mtb HN878 (MOI of 1) and (d) intracellular Mtb burden was determined by plating and (e) the protein levels of TNFα production was determined in culture supernatants by ELISA. n = 4-6. (f) B6 macrophages were pretreated with rIL-22 (100 ng/ml) for 48 hrs and then infected with HN878:GFP at an MOI of 1 for an additional 4 hours, percent Mtb:GFP uptake was assessed. ND, not detected; UI, uninfected; UN, untreated; NS = not significant. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 by (d,e) one-way ANOVA or (b,f) students t test. Error bars represent standard deviation. Representative individual experiments are shown from at least one experiment.
To further understand whether IL-22 can directly modulate macrophage function during Mtbinfection[18], we then treated Mtb-infected macrophages with rIL-22 and assessed intracellular Mtb control. Similar to rIFNγ treatment of macrophages, we found that rIL-22 treatment also decreased intracellular Mtb burden in macrophages (Figure 7d). Similar to rIFNγ treatment of BMDMs, improved Mtb control in rIL-22 treated Mtb-infected macrophages coincided with increased TNFα production (Figure 7e). In contrast, rIL-22 treatment did not affect MtbHN878 uptake by macrophages (Figure 7f). These data suggest that IL-22 directly induces TNFα to activate macrophages, enhancing intracellular killing mechanisms to control Mtb growth. Thus, our novel data show that IL-22 induces chemokine production in epithelial cells to recruit monocytes and macrophages, and stimulates IL-22-responsive macrophages to directly induce TNFα for macrophage activation and Mtb control.
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated the functional role of IL-22 in host immune responses to infection with emerging “hyper-virulent” MtbHN878. Unlike infection with less virulent MtbH37Rvinfection[13], we report that IL-22 promotes protective immunity during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection. We show that IL-22 acts on lung epithelial cells to induce antimicrobial proteins as well as monocyte and macrophage recruiting chemokines like CCL2, to mediate control of MtbHN878. In addition, we show that IL-22R is expressed on macrophages that accumulate within lung TB granulomas, and that IL-22 can directly induce TNFα production and activate macrophages to mediate mycobacterial control. Together, our results describe a functional role for IL-22 in mediating protective immunity to TB, with involvement from both epithelial cells and macrophages in mediating IL-22-dependent protective mechanisms in TB. Thus, our results demonstrate that immune requirement for emerging clinically relevant Mtb strains such as HN878, may be different from those required for control of lab-adapted Mtb strains such as H37Rv.When compared to infection with MtbH37Rv, our data show that Mtb HN878 infection of murine lung cells is more potent at inducing IL-1β and IL-22 production. In addition, the induction of IL-22 in lung cells in response to Mtb HN878 infection is dependent on IL-1R pathway, projecting increased IL-1β induction by MtbHN878 as a critical step in driving increased production of both IL-17[14] as shown before, and IL-22, as shown here. MtbHN878 uniquely expresses phenolic glycolipids (PGLs), a major lipid component of the mycobacterial cell wall[7,10,40]. Increased induction of both IL-1β and IL-22 production upon exposure to cell wall components of MtbHN878 in murine and human cells, suggests that production of PGLs by MtbHN878 may be a possible pathway for induction of high levels of IL-22. Future studies delineating the molecular host-pathogen interactions that mediate differential induction of IL-22 following infection with different Mtb lineages would thus be critical in fully understanding the role of IL-22 in TB.The low induction of IL-22 in response to MtbH37Rvinfection in vitro, coincides with a redundant role for IL-22 in mediating protective immunity against less virulent Mtb strains[13,31]. Accordingly, following induction of high levels of IL-22 in response to Mtb HN878 infection in vitro, we show that IL-22 plays an important role in mediating protective immunity to Mtb HN878 infection during chronic infection in mice. Interestingly, Il22mice are not more susceptible to MtbHN878 during acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection, but show increased susceptibility during the chronic stages of infection. This is in contrast to Il17mice that show increased susceptibility during acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection[14]. Our published studies show that Il17mice have reduced CXCL13 mRNA localization in the lung, decreased formation of lymphoid containing granulomas and decreased activation of macrophages in Il17HN878 infected mice[14]. Thus, it is possible that early increased IL-17 induced in the lung is sufficient to maintain protective immunity during acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection in Il22mice. Interestingly, and in contrast to a protective role for IL-17 during early stages of Mtb HN878 infection[14], IL-17 production in T cells during chronic infection in Il22mice does not appear to be sufficient for protective immunity. Furthermore, while we did not observe differences in overall lung inflammation in B6 and Il22-HN878 infected mice, we observed both dysregulated epithelial barrier function and decreased macrophage recruitment in chronically infected Il22mice. Interestingly, infection of epithelial cells with MtbHN878 results in greater uptake and infection of epithelial cells[41], suggesting that the epithelial barrier may have an important role to play in protective immunity to emerging Mtb strains. It is interesting that treatment of epithelial cells with rIL-22 can reduce uptake and control MtbHN878 growth in epithelial cells. Similarly, treatment with Reg3γ can also reduce MtbHN878 growth in epithelial cells, albeit not to levels induced by rIL-22 treatment. These results suggest that IL-22 dependent induction of antimicrobial peptides including Reg3γ, Lcn2 and S100A8 proteins can likely mediate direct anti-mycobacterial control at the epithelial barrier. A role for IL-22 during chronic stages of Mtbinfection coincides with decreased induction of CCL2 mRNA within TB granulomas and associated reduction in recruitment of macrophages within TB granulomas. IL-22 treatment of epithelial cells also drives induction of G-CSF and chemokines associated with neutrophil responses. However, as differences in neutrophilic accumulation during chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection in Il22-/- and B6mice were not dramatic, we predict that IL-17 may be playing a compensatory role in driving neutrophil responses in the Il22-/- infected mice. It is thus likely that the major protective effects of IL-22 in vivo during chronic infection are mediated through the accumulation of newly recruited macrophages, rather than through direct anti-mycobacterial mechanisms at the epithelial barrier or neutrophil mediated control. The future availability of IL-22R deficient floxed mice that specifically lack IL-22R expression either on epithelial cells or macrophages and neutrophils will allow us to define the role of epithelial cell versus myeloid cells in IL-22-dependent immunity to TB.IL-22R is thought to be expressed primarily on epithelial cells at mucosal sites[16,17]. However, emerging evidence projects myeloid cells as novel responders to IL-22[18,19]. We found that during the acute stages of Mtb HN878 infection in mice, IL-22R was primarily expressed on epithelial cells. However, during progression into chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection in mice, we observed localization of F4/80-expressing macrophages that also expressed IL-22R within TB granulomas. Importantly, we also observed that the predominant cells expressing IL-22R within humanTB granulomas and latently infected NHPs was also CD68-expressing macrophages. As NHPs infected with MtbCDC1551, and mice infected with MtbHN878, both exhibited accumulation of IL-22R-expressing macrophages within TB granulomas, suggesting that the IL-22R-expressing macrophage accumulation with TB granulomas is a more general response to Mtbinfection with clinical strains. These data are consistent with direct IL-22-dependent induction of TNFα in macrophages, and improved intracellular Mtb control. Previous studies have also shown that IL-22 can act on Mtb-infected human macrophages to induce S100A8/A9 proteins, enhance phagolysosomal fusion and improve Mtb killing[18,30]. Thus, IL-22 has an emerging role in activating macrophages to mediate anti-mycobacterial killing mechanisms to mediate protective immunity to TB.Increased IL-22 expression is observed at disease sites in ATBpatients[23,24], and accumulation of IL-22–producing T cells have been documented within TB granulomas in NHPs[42]. In addition, both innate and adaptive immune cells produce IL-22, as NK 1.1+ cells[29,43], CD4+ T cells[23,26] and granulocytes[26] have all been reported to produce IL-22 during TB. This is consistent with our studies which show that both innate and adaptive cells in the lung produce IL-22 upon Mtb HN878 infection. Based on our results, we thus speculate that increased level of IL-22 observed in serum of LTB patients[26] functions protectively and is able to limit disease progression. However, overexpression of IL-22 in pulmonary disease sites[23,24] may mediate exacerbated pathology during active TB. Considering that anti-tuberculosis treatment enhances IL-22 antigen-specific T cell responses in ATBpatients[27], it is possible that enhancing IL-22 T cell responses by vaccine strategies will benefit host immunity to control Mtb. Furthermore, as identification of a SNP that drives increased IL-22 production in humans is associated with reduced susceptibility to TB[28], our results together project a protective role for IL-22 in TB.In conclusion, in the current study we demonstrate a novel role for IL-22 in mediating protective immunity to TB, especially following infection with emerging Mtb strains, specifically at the chronic stages of infection. Interestingly, IL-22-dependent pathways in both epithelial cells and macrophages together mediate protective mechanisms against Mtb HN878 infection. Together, these results project a novel protective role for IL-22 in emerging Mtb infections.
Loss of IL-22 during chronic infection leads to decreases in alveolar and recruited macrophage populations
Il22 and B6 mice were aerosol infected with ∼100 CFU of MtbHN878 and lungs harvested at day 30 and 100 p.i.. The total number of (a) alveolar macrophages (AMs), myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) (b) monocytes (Mn), (c) recruited macrophages (RM), and (d) neutrophils (Neu) are reported. n=5-6. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, Student's t test.
Loss of IL-22 increases IL17+ lymphocytes during acute and chronic stages of Mtb HN878 infection
Il22 and B6 mice were aerosol infected with ∼500 CFU of MtbHN878 and lungs harvested at day 30 and 100 p.i. The total number of (a) CD3+CD4+CD44hiIFNγ+, (b) CD3+CD8+CD44hiIFNγ+ (c) CD3+CD4+CD44hIL17+, (d) CD3+CD8+CD44hiIL17+. n=5. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, Student's t test.
Multiple cell types contribute to IL-22 production during HN878 infection in vitro
B6 lung cells (1×106 cells) were infected with MtbHN878 at a MOI of 0.1 and analysed for (a,b) IL-22+ lymphocytes cells at day 3 and 6 p.i.. n=3-4 for each time point. All comparisons are to base line uninfected samples. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, Student's t test.
Authors: Shabaana A Khader; Lokesh Guglani; Javier Rangel-Moreno; Radha Gopal; Beth A Fallert Junecko; Jeffrey J Fountain; Cynthia Martino; John E Pearl; Michael Tighe; Yin-yao Lin; Samantha Slight; Jay K Kolls; Todd A Reinhart; Troy D Randall; Andrea M Cooper Journal: J Immunol Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Mark S Wilson; Carl G Feng; Daniel L Barber; Felix Yarovinsky; Allen W Cheever; Alan Sher; Michael Grigg; Mary Collins; Lynette Fouser; Thomas A Wynn Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Derek A Pociask; Erich V Scheller; Sivanarayana Mandalapu; Kevin J McHugh; Richard I Enelow; Cheryl L Fattman; Jay K Kolls; John F Alcorn Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Gregory F Sonnenberg; Meera G Nair; Thomas J Kirn; Colby Zaph; Lynette A Fouser; David Artis Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Rebecca Tadokera; Katalin A Wilkinson; Graeme A Meintjes; Keira H Skolimowska; Kerryn Matthews; Ronnett Seldon; Molebogeng X Rangaka; Gary Maartens; Robert J Wilkinson Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Giraldina Trevejo-Nunez; Waleed Elsegeiny; Felix E Y Aggor; Jamie L Tweedle; Zoe Kaplan; Pranali Gandhi; Patricia Castillo; Annabel Ferguson; John F Alcorn; Kong Chen; Jay K Kolls; Sarah L Gaffen Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Satona Tanaka; Jason M Gauthier; Anja Fuchs; Wenjun Li; Alice Y Tong; Margaret S Harrison; Ryuji Higashikubo; Yuriko Terada; Ramsey R Hachem; Daniel Ruiz-Perez; Jon H Ritter; Marina Cella; Marco Colonna; Isaiah R Turnbull; Alexander S Krupnick; Andrew E Gelman; Daniel Kreisel Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Rubina Bunjun; Fidilia M A Omondi; Mohau S Makatsa; Roanne Keeton; Jerome M Wendoh; Tracey L Müller; Caryn S L Prentice; Robert J Wilkinson; Catherine Riou; Wendy A Burgers Journal: J Immunol Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jessica L Barnes; Maximilian W Plank; Kelly Asquith; Steven Maltby; Lorena R Sabino; Gerard E Kaiko; Alyssa Lochrin; Jay C Horvat; Jemma R Mayall; Richard Y Kim; Philip M Hansbro; Simon Keely; Gabrielle T Belz; Hock L Tay; Paul S Foster Journal: Mucosal Immunol Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 7.313