| Literature DB >> 28246388 |
D de Gonzalo-Calvo1,2, R W van der Meer3, L J Rijzewijk4, J W A Smit5, E Revuelta-Lopez6,7, L Nasarre6,7, J C Escola-Gil8, H J Lamb3, V Llorente-Cortes9,10,11.
Abstract
Using in vitro, in vivo and patient-based approaches, we investigated the potential of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as surrogate biomarkers of myocardial steatosis, a hallmark of diabetic cardiomyopathy. We analysed the cardiomyocyte-enriched miRNA signature in serum from patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes and with verified absence of structural heart disease or inducible ischemia, and control volunteers of the same age range and BMI (N = 86), in serum from a high-fat diet-fed murine model, and in exosomes from lipid-loaded HL-1 cardiomyocytes. Circulating miR-1 and miR-133a levels were robustly associated with myocardial steatosis in type 2 diabetes patients, independently of confounding factors in both linear and logistic regression analyses (P < 0.050 for all models). Similar to myocardial steatosis, miR-133a levels were increased in type 2 diabetes patients as compared with healthy subjects (P < 0.050). Circulating miR-1 and miR-133a levels were significantly elevated in high-fat diet-fed mice (P < 0.050), which showed higher myocardial steatosis, as compared with control animals. miR-1 and miR-133a levels were higher in exosomes released from lipid-loaded HL-1 cardiomyocytes (P < 0.050). Circulating miR-1 and miR-133a are independent predictors of myocardial steatosis. Our results highlight the value of circulating miRNAs as diagnostic tools for subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28246388 PMCID: PMC5428350 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00070-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the uncomplicated type 2 diabetes patients.
| Variable | N = 72 |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Age (years) | 56.5 ± 5.6 |
| Male N (%) | 72 (100) |
| Time since diagnosis of diabetes (years) | 4.1 ± 2.7 |
| Current smoker N (%) | 15 (20.8) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.7 ± 3.4 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 104.4 ± 10.2 |
| Concomitant medication N (%) | |
| Statin | 35 (48.6) |
| Any antihypertensive medication | 32 (44.4) |
| β-Blocker | 7 (9.7) |
| Diuretic | 11 (15.3) |
| ACE inhibitor | 18 (25.0) |
| ARB | 8 (11.1) |
| Calcium antagonist | 4 (5.6) |
|
| |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.1 ± 1.0 |
| Plasma fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 8.6 ± 1.9 |
| Plasma fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 72.5 ± 37.1 |
| Visceral fat volume (mL) | 434.5 ± 203.2 |
| Subcutaneous fat volume (mL) | 681.7 ± 255.1 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.7 ± 0.9 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.8 ± 0.8 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| Non-HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.6 ± 1.0 |
| Plasma triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.8 ± 1.1 |
| Plasma NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| Leukocyte count (×103/μL) | 6.2 ± 1.8 |
| us-CRP (mg/L) | 8.6 ± 19.5 |
| NT-proBNP (ng/L) | 35.9 ± 27.6 |
|
| |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 130.0 ± 12.1 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 81.6 ± 8.1 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 65.6 ± 8.7 |
| LV mass (g) | 107.6 ± 17.0 |
| LV end-systolic volume (mL) | 63.0 ± 15.0 |
| LV end-diastolic volume (mL) | 157.0 ± 25.2 |
| Stroke volume (mL) | 93.9 ± 16.3 |
| Ejection Fraction (%) | 60.0 ± 5.7 |
| Cardiac index (L/min*m2) | 2.0 ± 0.8 |
| E peak filling rate (mL/s) | 415.6 ± 84.3 |
| E-decpeak (mL/s2 × 10−3) | −3.5 ± 1.0 |
| E-decmean (mL/s2 × 10−3) | −2.3 ± 0.7 |
| E/A peak flow | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
| E/Ea | 9.9 ± 3.9 |
| Myocardial steatosis (%) | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables.
ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; HbA1c: Glycated haemoglobin. For other abbreviations see the text.
Associations between serum cardiac-enriched miRNAs and characteristics of study population.
| miR-1 | miR-133a | miR-133b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β |
| β |
| β |
| |
|
| ||||||
| Age (years) | −0.106 | 0.438 | −0.105 | 0.415 | −0.076 | 0.533 |
| Time since diagnosis of diabetes (years) | 0.077 | 0.574 | −0.114 | 0.378 | 0.108 | 0.378 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | −0.076 | 0.575 | 0.105 | 0.416 | 0.027 | 0.827 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | −0.146 | 0.283 | 0.053 | 0.680 | −0.036 | 0.767 |
|
| ||||||
| HbA1c (%) | −0.013 | 0.922 | 0.065 | 0.614 | −0.023 | 0.853 |
| Plasma fasting glucose (mmol/L) | −0.147 | 0.280 | 0.048 | 0.709 | 0.094 | 0.444 |
| Plasma fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 0.057 | 0.678 | 0.145 | 0.263 | −0.027 | 0.826 |
| Visceral fat volume (mL) | 0.022 | 0.872 | 0.149 | 0.247 | −0.003 | 0.979 |
| Subcutaneous fat volume (mL) | −0.094 | 0.491 | −0.028 | 0.830 | 0.066 | 0.591 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.012 | 0.931 | −0.010 | 0.942 | −0.163 | 0.185 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | −0.021 | 0.881 | −0,115 | 0.386 | −0.135 | 0.278 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | −0.138 | 0.316 | −0.213 | 0.099 | 0.021 | 0.865 |
| Non-HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.045 | 0.746 | 0.043 | 0.744 | −0.161 | 0.190 |
| Plasma triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.094 | 0.495 | 0.263 | 0.041* | −0.114 | 0.354 |
| Plasma NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.033 | 0.813 | 0.024 | 0.855 | 0.186 | 0.132 |
| Leukocyte count (x 103/μL) | 0.036 | 0.797 | 0.064 | 0.625 | 0.011 | 0.932 |
| us-CRP (mg/L) | −0.038 | 0.784 | −0.021 | 0.874 | 0.018 | 0.887 |
| NT-proBNP (ng/L) | −0.146 | 0.282 | −0.080 | 0.537 | −0.122 | 0.316 |
|
| ||||||
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | −0.117 | 0.392 | 0.000 | 0.999 | 0.019 | 0.874 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.053 | 0.697 | 0.078 | 0.548 | 0.051 | 0.679 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 0.029 | 0.829 | −0.170 | 0.187 | 0.055 | 0.655 |
| LV mass (g) | −0.243 | 0.071 | −0.057 | 0.663 | −0.047 | 0.700 |
| LV end-systolic volume (mL) | −0.069 | 0.616 | −0.052 | 0.688 | 0.197 | 0.105 |
| LV end-diastolic volume (mL) | −0.018 | 0.896 | 0.038 | 0.771 | 0.151 | 0.215 |
| Stroke volume (mL) | 0.039 | 0.774 | 0.106 | 0.412 | 0.054 | 0.660 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 0.125 | 0.359 | 0.117 | 0.366 | −0.118 | 0.334 |
| Cardiac index (L/min*m2) | 0.169 | 0.214 | −0.001 | 0.993 | 0.065 | 0.596 |
| E peak filling rate (mL/s) | 0.090 | 0.511 | −0.027 | 0.836 | 0.100 | 0.412 |
| E-decpeak (mL/s2 × 10−3) | −0.079 | 0.564 | −0.102 | 0.431 | 0.055 | 0.656 |
| E-decmean (mL/s2 × 10−3) | −0.079 | 0.565 | −0.033 | 0.796 | 0.053 | 0.666 |
| E/A peak flow | 0.095 | 0.484 | 0.090 | 0.485 | −0.016 | 0.899 |
| E/Ea | −0.305 | 0.030* | 0.017 | 0.898 | 0.084 | 0.510 |
Data are expressed as standardized beta (β).
Association between myocardial steatosis and serum cardiomyocyte-enriched miRNA in patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes.
| β |
| β |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| miR-1 | 0.360 | 0.006 | miR-133a | 0.335 | 0.008 |
|
|
| ||||
| miR-1 | 0.371 | 0.004 | miR-133a | 0.349 | 0.006 |
| Age | 0.229 | 0.069 | Age | 0.277 | 0.024 |
| Visceral fat volume | 0.139 | 0.277 | Visceral fat volume | 0.106 | 0.389 |
| Non-HDL-cholesterol | 0.233 | 0.156 | Non-HDL-cholesterol | 0.272 | 0.080 |
| Plasma triglyceride | 0.008 | 0.963 | Plasma triglyceride | −0.045 | 0.775 |
|
|
| ||||
| Association between myocardial steatosis and serum miR-1 for model 2 and each of following variables: | Association between myocardial steatosis and serum miR-133a for model 2 and each of following variables: | ||||
| i) Plasma fasting glucose | 0.387 | 0.003 | i) Plasma fasting glucose | 0.352 | 0.006 |
| ii) Plasma fasting insulin | 0.370 | 0.004 | ii) Plasma fasting insulin | 0.355 | 0.006 |
| iii) BMI | 0.384 | 0.003 | iii) BMI | 0.349 | 0.007 |
| iv) HDL-cholesterol | 0.366 | 0.005 | iv) HDL-cholesterol | 0.346 | 0.007 |
| v) Plasma NEFA | 0.411 | 0.001 | v) Plasma NEFA | 0.355 | 0.007 |
| vi) NT-proBNP | 0.378 | 0.004 | vi) NT-proBNP | 0.349 | 0.007 |
| vii) us-CRP | 0.425 | 0.001 | vii) us-CRP | 0.401 | 0.002 |
| viii) LV mass | 0.351 | 0.009 | viii) LV mass | 0.337 | 0.009 |
| ix) Ejection fraction | 0.339 | 0.008 | ix) Ejection fraction | 0.333 | 0.009 |
| x) E/Ea | 0.413 | 0.005 | x) E/Ea | 0.385 | 0.006 |
Data are expressed as standardized beta (β).
Figure 1(A) Quantification by RT-qPCR of serum miR-1 and miR-133a levels in patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes in tertiles 1 and 2 (low-intermediate levels; N = 48) or 3 (high levels; N = 24) of myocardial steatosis. Relative quantification was performed using cel-miR-39-3p for normalization. Differences between groups were analysed using a Student’s t-test for independent samples. Data represent the mean + SD. *P < 0.050; **P < 0.010. (B) Association between myocardial steatosis and clinical parameters or serum cardiomyocyte-enriched miRNAs in patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the association between serum cardiomyocyte-enriched miRNA and myocardial steatosis as outcome. OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval. (C) ROC curves for the logistic regression models of myocardial steatosis. Model 1: age, plasma fasting glucose, visceral adipose tissue, plasma TG and non-HDL-cholesterol.
Figure 2(A) Metabolic parameters in mice fed with chow (N = 6) vs those fed on a Western diet (N = 6): glucose metabolism after 6 hours of fasting followed by intraperitoneal injection of glucose (2 g/kg BW); fasting plasma glucose levels; fasting plasma insulin levels; insulin-resistance index (HOMA-IR). (B) Myocardial steatosis in mice fed with chow vs those fed on a Western diet. (C) Quantification by RT-qPCR of serum miR-1 and miR-133a levels in mice fed with chow vs those fed on a Western diet. Relative quantification was performed using cel-miR-39-3p for normalization. (D) Quantification by RT-qPCR of myocardial miR-1 and miR-133a levels in mice fed with chow vs those fed on a Western diet. Relative quantification was performed using U6 for normalization. Differences between groups were analysed using a Student’s t-test for independent samples. Data represent the mean + SD. *P < 0.050; **P < 0.010; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3(A) Neutral lipid accumulation in HL-1 cells after exposure to VLDL+IDL. Data represent the mean ± SD. (B) Quantification by RT-qPCR of exosomal miR-1 and miR-133a levels after exposure to VLDL+IDL. Relative quantification was performed using cel-miR-39-3p for normalization. (C) Quantification by RT-qPCR of HL-1 miR-1 and miR-133a levels after exposure to VLDL+IDL. Relative quantification was performed using U6 for normalization. HL-1 cells were incubated for 24 hours in the absence or presence of VLDL+IDL (50 or 100 μg/mL). Differences between groups were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for comparison between each subgroup. Results are expressed as the mean + SD relative to control cells (incubated in the absence of VLDL+IDL). *P < 0.050; **P < 0.010; ***P < 0.001.