Literature DB >> 32676367

Circulating miR-1 as a potential predictor of left ventricular remodeling following acute ST-segment myocardial infarction using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Quanmei Ma1, Yue Ma1, Xiaonan Wang1, Shanshan Li1, Tongtong Yu2, Weili Duan2, Jiake Wu2, Zongyu Wen2, Yundi Jiao2, Zhaoqing Sun2, Yang Hou1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of patients with a high likelihood of left ventricular (LV) remodeling with a high-risk prognosis has critical implications for risk stratification after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between circulating miR-1 and 6-month post-infarct LV remodeling based on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.
METHODS: A total of 80 patients with a first STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who underwent CMR imaging 1 week and 6 months after STEMI were evaluated. The percentage changes of LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESV) at 1 week and 6 months after PCI (%ΔLVEF, %ΔLVEDV and %ΔLVESV) were calculated. miR-1 was measured using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technologies in plasma samples that were collected at admission. The study group was divided into two groups based on a 10% cutoff value for the percentage of change in the LV end-diastolic volume (%ΔLVEDV): remodeling at high risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (%ΔLVEDV ≥10%, termed the LV remodeling group) and remodeling at lower risk of MACEs (%ΔLVEDV <10%, termed the non-LV remodeling group). The associations of miR-1 expression with the %ΔLVEDV, percentage change in the LV end-systolic volume (%ΔLVESV), and percentage change in the LV ejection fraction at follow-up were estimated.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (27.5%) showed adverse LV remodeling, and 58 patients (72.5%) did not show adverse LV remodeling at the 6-month follow-up of CMR. The mean LVEF, LVEDV index, and LVESV index values at 1 week were 50.6%±8.2%, 74.6±12.8 mL/m2, and 37.2±10.2 mL/m2, respectively. Mean LVEF at follow-up (53.5%±10.6%) was increased compared with baseline (P<0.001). There were significant decreases in LVEDV index and LVESV index values at follow-up (72.0±14.9 mL/m2 and 33.7±11.0 mL/m2, respectively; P=0.009 and P<0.001, respectively). The expression of miR-1 at admission was positively correlated with the %ΔLVEDV (r=0.611, P<0.001) and %ΔLVESV (r=0.268, P=0.016). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that miR-1 expression predicted LV remodeling with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56-0.78). Compared with the clinical factors of peak creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) and peak troponin T level, peak logNT-proBNP showed the highest predictive power, with an AUC value of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64-0.84). A model including the clinical, CMR, and miR-1 factors showed greater predictive power (P=0.034) than a model including only clinical and CMR factors, with AUCs of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.89), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Circulating miR-1 at admission is an independent predictor of LV remodeling 6 months after STEMI. miR-1 showed incremental value in predicting LV remodeling compared with the clinical and CMR measurements. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circulating microRNA; hsa-miR-1; left ventricular (LV) remodeling; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction (MI)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32676367      PMCID: PMC7358417          DOI: 10.21037/qims-19-829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  59 in total

1.  Relationship between the temporal profile of plasma microRNA and left ventricular remodeling in patients after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael R Zile; Shannon M Mehurg; Jazmine E Arroyo; Robert E Stroud; Stacia M DeSantis; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2011-09-28

Review 2.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard R Chaitman; Jeroen J Bax; David A Morrow; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Assessing myocardial recovery following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: short- and long-term perspectives using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Gert Klug; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2013-02

Review 4.  MicroRNAs in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Reinier A Boon; Stefanie Dimmeler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  MicroRNA-1 negatively regulates expression of the hypertrophy-associated calmodulin and Mef2a genes.

Authors:  Sadakatsu Ikeda; Aibin He; Sek Won Kong; Jun Lu; Rafael Bejar; Natalya Bodyak; Kyu-Ho Lee; Qing Ma; Peter M Kang; Todd R Golub; William T Pu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Inhibition of miR-154 Protects Against Cardiac Dysfunction and Fibrosis in a Mouse Model of Pressure Overload.

Authors:  Bianca C Bernardo; Sally S Nguyen; Xiao-Ming Gao; Yow Keat Tham; Jenny Y Y Ooi; Natalie L Patterson; Helen Kiriazis; Yidan Su; Colleen J Thomas; Ruby C Y Lin; Xiao-Jun Du; Julie R McMullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Postinfarct Left Ventricular Remodelling: A Prevailing Cause of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Alessio Galli; Federico Lombardi
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Bioinformatic screening for key miRNAs and genes associated with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ke Wu; Qiang Zhao; Zhengmei Li; Nannan Li; Qiang Xiao; Xiuchang Li; Quanming Zhao
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.693

9.  MicroRNA-1-Mediated Inhibition of Cardiac Fibroblast Proliferation Through Targeting Cyclin D2 and CDK6.

Authors:  Nedyalka Valkov; Michelle E King; Jacob Moeller; Hong Liu; Xiaofei Li; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-05-17

10.  Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR.

Authors:  Natalie Beitner; Jonas Jenner; Peder Sörensson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-04-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Myocardial extracellular volume fraction quantification in an animal model of the doxorubicin-induced myocardial fibrosis: a synthetic hematocrit method using 3T cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Zhen Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Wang; Yi Liu; Dongxu Lu; Zhonghua Sun; Guang Yang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

Review 2.  MicroRNAs in Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction-A New Tool for Diagnosis and Prognosis: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Alina Ioana Scărlătescu; Miruna Mihaela Micheu; Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea; Maria Dorobanțu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Thickness Measured Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Revascularization in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Quanmei Ma; Xiaonan Wang; Tongtong Yu; Yuxue Dang; Jin Shang; Guangxiao Li; Yang Hou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Long non-coding RNA SENCR alleviates hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and inflammatory response by sponging miR-1.

Authors:  Minghe Chen; Yini Guo; Zongli Sun; Xiangjiang Meng
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 5.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of miRNAs after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review.

Authors:  Ewelina Błażejowska; Tomasz Urbanowicz; Aleksandra Gąsecka; Anna Olasińska-Wiśniewska; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Radosław Targoński; Łukasz Szarpak; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Bartłomiej Perek; Marek Jemielity
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.