Literature DB >> 28245838

Spectrum of somatic mutations detected by targeted next-generation sequencing and their prognostic significance in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Juan Feng1,2, Yan Li1, Yujiao Jia1, Qiuyun Fang1, Xiaoyuan Gong1, Xiaobao Dong1, Kun Ru1, Qinghua Li1, Xingli Zhao1, Kaiqi Liu1, Min Wang2, Zheng Tian2, Yannan Jia1,2, Ying Wang1, Dong Lin1, Hui Wei1,2, Kejing Tang2, Yingchang Mi3,4, Jianxiang Wang5,6.   

Abstract

Target-specific next-generation sequencing technology was used to analyze 112 genes in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This sequencing mainly focused on the specific mutational hotspots. Among the 121 patients, 93 patients were B-ALL (76.9%), and 28 patients (23.1%) were T-ALL. Of the 121 patients, 110 (90.9%) harbored at least one mutation. The five most frequently mutated genes in T-ALL are NOTCH1, JAK3, FBXW7, FAT1, and NRAS. In B-ALL, FAT1, SF1, CRLF2, TET2, and PTPN1 have higher incidence of mutations. Gene mutations are different between Ph+ALL and Ph-ALL patients. B-ALL patients with PTPN11 mutation and T-ALL patients with NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 mutations showed better survival. But B-ALL with JAK1/JAK2 mutations showed worse survival. The results suggest that gene mutations exist in adult ALL patients universally, they are related with prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Next-generation sequencing; Prognostic significance; Somatic mutations

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28245838      PMCID: PMC5331692          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-017-0431-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   17.388


To the editor

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents one of the most common malignant diseases of childhood, accounts for about 15 ~ 25% of acute leukemia in adults [1]. Adult ALL is generally characterized by diverse biological features, evident clinical heterogeneity, and worse prognosis than pediatric ALL [2]. With the development of genetics in ALL, several new subtypes of ALL and a series of prognostic-related molecular markers are put forward [3-5]. In the recent years, with the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, genomics has been extensively developed in both pediatric and adult ALL patients [6]. Samples and clinical information were collected from 121 adult ALL patients (Additional file 1:Table S1) with informed consent (ethical approval serial number is KT2015001-EC-1). These patients were from the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Target regions of 112 genes (Additional file 2: Table S2) were selected on the basis of known or suspected involvement in the pathogenesis of malignant hematologic disorder and were enriched and analyzed using a custom targeted NGS gene panel (Additional file 3). Then, the relationships between the mutations with higher incidence and the prognosis of ALL patients were analyzed (Additional file 4). Of the 121 patients, a total of 110 patients (90.9%) harbored at least one gene mutation with a median of 2 (0–7) mutations per sample. Thirty-nine patients (32.2%) had more than 3 gene mutations (Additional file 5: Figure S1). Sixty genes were considered as possible pathogenic mutations when compared against multiple databases (Fig. 1a. The top 38 mutated genes were listed). The five most frequently mutated genes were FAT1, NOTCH1, SF1, CRLF2, and NRAS (mutated in >8% of the cases).
Fig. 1

Frequency of gene mutations and related signal pathways in ALL subtypes. a Frequency of the top 38 gene mutations in different ALL subtypes, which are shown in indicated colors. b Frequency of gene mutations involved in different functional pathways

Frequency of gene mutations and related signal pathways in ALL subtypes. a Frequency of the top 38 gene mutations in different ALL subtypes, which are shown in indicated colors. b Frequency of gene mutations involved in different functional pathways In 28 T-ALL cases, the most common mutated gene was NOTCH1, with a mutation rate of 39.3% (n = 11), then JAK3, FBXW7, FAT1, NRAS, CREBBP, DNM2 (mutated in >10% of the cases) (Additional file 6: Figure S2A). In B-ALL, FAT1 was the most accepted mutated gene (10.75%), then SF1, CRLF2, TET2, PTPN11, NRAS, CREBBP, JAK2, DIS3, MPL, and KML2D (mutated in >5% of the cases) (Additional file 6: Figure S2B). In Ph+ B-ALL, FAT1, CRLF2, SF1, EP300, and CREBBP genes mutated at higher incidences (Additional file 6: Figure S2C). However, PTPN11, SF1, TET2, NRAS, JAK2, DIS3, and FAT1 gene mutations occurred popularly in Ph−B-ALL (Additional file 6: Figure S2D). The main signaling pathways involved in this targeted NGS gene panel were transcription factor/regulator, Ras/protein phosphatase/MARK signaling pathway, JAK-STAT pathway, splicing and mRNA processing regulation, epigenetic modulators, and so on [7-9]. Frequencies of different signaling pathways involved are listed in Fig. 1b. Genes involved in these signaling pathways are listed in Additional file 7:Table S3. In full cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 34.88 (1.25–74.55) months, median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 30.85 (0–73.55) months and 3-year OS and RFS rates were 49%. In the full cohort, patients with PTPN11 mutation had a better prognosis compared with patients without PTPN11 mutation (p = 0.040, p = 0.047), and the patients with JAK2 mutation (7/117) had a worse prognosis compared with patients without JAK2 mutation (p = 0.031, p = 0.018) (Additional file 8: Figure S3). B-ALL patients with PTPN11 mutation (7/93) had a better OS and RFS compared with those without PTPN11 mutation (p = 0.041, p = 0.047) (Additional file 9: Figure S4). In T-ALL, patients with NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 mutations had a better OS and RFS than patients without these mutations (p = 0.035, p = 0.048) (Additional file 10: Figure S5). Multivariate analysis of OS and RFS showed that the prognostic factors included JAK2 mutations (OS; p= 0.045, RFS; p = 0.021) in the total adult ALL patients cohort. JAK1 mutations (OS; p = 0.004, RFS; p = 0.005) and JAK2 mutations (OS; p = 0.049, RFS; p = 0.044) for Ph−B-ALL. The data was summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS and RFS

OSRFS
HR2 P valueHR2 P value
Univarite analysis (mut/all)
 PTPN11 mut; positive vs negative in full cohort (8/117)0.0430.0400.0440.047
  In B-ALL (7/92)0.0420.0410.0420.047
  In PhB-ALL (7/54)0.0350.0300.0370.047
 JAK2 Mut; positive vs negative in full cohort (7/117)3.020.0313.3090.018
  In B-ALL (5/92)3.0330.0613.1450.051
  In PhB-ALL (5/54)3.7280.0353.7800.031
 JAK1 mut; positive vs negative in PhB-ALL (4/54)6.8080.0016.5620.001
 NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 mut; positive vs negative
  In T-ALL (12/25)0.2040.0350.2230.048
Multivariate analysis
 PTPN11 mut; positive vs negative in full cohort0.0430.0520.0440.056
  In B-ALL0.0420.0630.0420.056
  In PhB-ALL0.0350.1780.0370.212
 JAK2 mut; positive vs negative in full cohort3.020.0453.3090.021
  In PhB-ALL3.7280.0493.7800.044
 JAK1 mut; positive vs negative in PhB-ALL6.8080.0046.5620.005
 NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 mut; positive vs negative
  In T-ALL0.2040.0550.2230.069
Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS and RFS In summary, our study suggests that gene mutations exists in adult ALL patients universally, involving a variety of signaling pathways. The frequency and species are varied in different types of ALL. B-ALL patients were accompanied with PTPN11 mutation for good prognosis, while abnormal JAK family often indicates poor prognosis. In T-ALL, mutation of NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 indicates good prognosis.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genomics in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: insights and treatment implications.

Authors:  Kathryn G Roberts; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) in adolescents and adults: a high-risk subtype.

Authors:  Nitin Jain; Audrey V Lamb; Susan O'Brien; Farhad Ravandi; Marina Konopleva; Elias Jabbour; Zhuang Zuo; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Pei Lin; Sherry Pierce; Deborah Thomas; Michael Rytting; Gautam Borthakur; Tapan Kadia; Jorge Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Joseph D Khoury
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  BCR-ABL1 lymphoblastic leukaemia is characterized by the deletion of Ikaros.

Authors:  Charles G Mullighan; Christopher B Miller; Ina Radtke; Letha A Phillips; James Dalton; Jing Ma; Deborah White; Timothy P Hughes; Michelle M Le Beau; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling; Sheila A Shurtleff; James R Downing
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Charles G Mullighan; Salil Goorha; Ina Radtke; Christopher B Miller; Elaine Coustan-Smith; James D Dalton; Kevin Girtman; Susan Mathew; Jing Ma; Stanley B Pounds; Xiaoping Su; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling; William E Evans; Sheila A Shurtleff; James R Downing
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mutational spectrum of adult T-ALL.

Authors:  Martin Neumann; Sebastian Vosberg; Cornelia Schlee; Sandra Heesch; Stefan Schwartz; Nicola Gökbuget; Dieter Hoelzer; Alexander Graf; Stefan Krebs; Isabelle Bartram; Helmut Blum; Monika Brüggemann; Jochen Hecht; Stefan K Bohlander; Philipp A Greif; Claudia D Baldus
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-02-20

6.  Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  T Haferlach; Y Nagata; V Grossmann; Y Okuno; U Bacher; G Nagae; S Schnittger; M Sanada; A Kon; T Alpermann; K Yoshida; A Roller; N Nadarajah; Y Shiraishi; Y Shiozawa; K Chiba; H Tanaka; H P Koeffler; H-U Klein; M Dugas; H Aburatani; A Kohlmann; S Miyano; C Haferlach; W Kern; S Ogawa
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types.

Authors:  Cyriac Kandoth; Michael D McLellan; Fabio Vandin; Kai Ye; Beifang Niu; Charles Lu; Mingchao Xie; Qunyuan Zhang; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Mark D M Leiserson; Christopher A Miller; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Michael C Wendl; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Correlation between deletion of the CDKN2 gene and tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Na Xu; Yu-ling Li; Xuan Li; Xuan Zhou; Rui Cao; Huan Li; Lin Li; Zi-yuan Lu; Ji-xian Huang; Zhi-ping Fan; Fen Huang; Hong-sheng Zhou; Song Zhang; Zhi Liu; Hong-qian Zhu; Qi-fa Liu; Xiao-li Liu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 17.388

9.  Silencing of GATA3 defines a novel stem cell-like subgroup of ETP-ALL.

Authors:  L Fransecky; M Neumann; S Heesch; C Schlee; J Ortiz-Tanchez; S Heller; M Mossner; S Schwartz; L H Mochmann; K Isaakidis; L Bastian; U R Kees; T Herold; K Spiekermann; N Gökbuget; C D Baldus
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 17.388

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  [The role and research progress of NOTCH1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

Authors:  S S Guo; J Q Mi; J Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-14

2.  A Novel Risk Defining System for Pediatric T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia From CCCG-ALL-2015 Group.

Authors:  Xiaoming Liu; Yao Zou; Li Zhang; Ye Guo; Yumei Chen; Wenyu Yang; Xiaojuan Chen; Shuchun Wang; Yingchi Zhang; Min Ruan; Lixian Chang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Beibei Zhao; Ranran Zhang; Aoli Zhang; Lipeng Liu; Luyang Zhang; Meihui Yi; Xiaofan Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Genomic and Clinical Analysis of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Hailiqiguli Nuriding; Li Zhao; Xuemei Wang; Yingbin Yue; Yue Song; Mei Yan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  A novel variant translocation (1;9)(p22;q34) resulting in a DEK/NUP214 fusion gene in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia: A case report.

Authors:  Qishan Hao; Qi Zhang; Chengwen Li; Shuning Wei; Qinghua Li; Yang Song; Yingchang Mi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  New Challenges in Targeting Signaling Pathways in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by NGS Approaches: An Update.

Authors:  Adrián Montaño; Maribel Forero-Castro; Darnel Marchena-Mendoza; Rocío Benito; Jesús María Hernández-Rivas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Venetoclax in Combination with Decitabine for Relapsed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Authors:  Leena T Rahmat; Anna Nguyen; Haifaa Abdulhaq; Sonam Prakash; Aaron C Logan; Gabriel N Mannis
Journal:  Case Rep Hematol       Date:  2018-08-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.