| Literature DB >> 27090891 |
Na Xu1, Yu-ling Li1, Xuan Li1, Xuan Zhou1, Rui Cao1, Huan Li1, Lin Li1, Zi-yuan Lu1, Ji-xian Huang1, Zhi-ping Fan1, Fen Huang1, Hong-sheng Zhou1, Song Zhang2, Zhi Liu3, Hong-qian Zhu4, Qi-fa Liu1, Xiao-li Liu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Frequency relapses are common in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) following tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). CDKN2A/B is believed to contribute to this chemotherapy resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CD20; CDKN2; Deletion; Philadelphia chromosome; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27090891 PMCID: PMC4836197 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-016-0270-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol Oncol ISSN: 1756-8722 Impact factor: 17.388
Fig. 1Representative of fluorescence images in situ hybridization. a Normal cells presented with double green and red signals; b hemizygous cells presented with loss of one red signal; c homozygous cells presented with a loss of both red signals (p16) and only retained with two green signals (chromosome 9); d red and green signal fusion (BCR/ABL+)
Patient characteristics (N = 135)
| Clinical characters | CDKN2 deletion | No CDKN2 deletion |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Adults (sample size) | 44 | 91 | |
| Male/female | 24/20 | 53/38 | 0.684 |
| Mean age (years) | 33.3 (18–64) | 35.4 (18–65) | 0.368 |
| WBC count (×109/L)a | 107.7 (1.6~302.0) | 69.8 (0.8~353.0) | 0.012 |
| Hepatosplenomegalya | 26 (59.1 %) | 31 (34.1 %) | 0.006 |
| Complete remission | 39 (88.6 %) | 85 (93.4 %) | 0.337 |
| Stem cell transplantation | 34 (77.3 %) | 62 (68.1 %) | 0.272 |
| Relapsea | 26 (59.1 %) | 32 (35.2 %) | 0.008 |
WBC white blood cell
aComparison between CDKN2 deletion carriers and non-carriers
Immunophenotype comparison between CDKN2 wild-type and deletion
| Positive antigens | CDKN2 deletion ( | No CDKN2 deletion ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CD34 | 40 (95.2 %) | 75 (88.2 %) | 0.334 |
| HLA-DR | 42 (100 %) | 81 (95.3 %) | 0.301 |
| CD45 | 20 (47.6 %) | 28 (32.9 %) | 0.109 |
| TdT | 2 (4.8 %) | 2 (2.4 %) | 0.599 |
| CD117 | 2 (4.8 %) | 1 (1.2 %) | 0.254 |
| CD10 | 40 (95.2 %) | 79 (92.9 %) | 1.000 |
| CD19 | 41 (97.6 %) | 82 (96.5 %) | 1.000 |
| CD20a | 25 (59.5 %) | 24 (28.2 %) | 0.001 |
| CD22 | 22 (52.4 %) | 53 (62.4) | 0.282 |
| CD13 | 24 (57.1 %) | 61 (71.8 %) | 0.099 |
| CD14 | 0 (0 %) | 3 (3.5 %) | 0.550 |
| CD15 | 0 (0 %) | 0 (0 %) | N/A |
| CD33 | 24 (57.1 %) | 34 (40 %) | 0.068 |
| CD2 | 3 (7.1 %) | 5 (5.9 %) | 1.000 |
| CD3 | 1 (2.4 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0.331 |
| CD7 | 0 (0 %) | 4 (4.7 %) | 0.301 |
| CD56 | 4 (9.5 %) | 4 (4.7 %) | 0.438 |
| CD64 | 2 (4.8 %) | 5 (5.9 %) | 1.000 |
| CD11b | 3 (7.1 %) | 3 (3.5 %) | 0.396 |
| cCD79a | 38 (90.5 %) | 67 (78.8 %) | 0.103 |
| cMPO | 0 (0 %) | 0 (0 %) | N/A |
aComparison between CDKN2 deletion carriers and non-carriers
Influence of CDKN2 deletion on complete molecular response (CMR)
| Patients (dele/wild) | CDKN2 deletion | Non CDKN2 deletion |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After inductiona | 39/85 | 6 (15.4 %) | 28 (32.9 %) | 0.042 |
| Pre-Allo-HSCTa | 34/62 | 18 (52.9 %) | 48 (77.4 %) | 0.013 |
| Post-Allo-HSCT | 31/58 | 27 (87 %) | 54 (93.1 %) | 0.442 |
Allo-HSCT allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
aComparison between CDKN2 deletion carriers and non-carriers
Influence of CDKN2 deletion by different TKI treatments
| Imatinib ( | Dasatinib ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CR after induction | 22/26 (84.6 %) | 17/18 (94.4 %) | 0.634 |
| CMR after induction | 2/23 (8.7 %) | 4/16 (25.0 %) | 0.205 |
| Transplantation | 19/26 (73.1 %) | 15/18 (83.3 %) | 0.489 |
| Relapse | 16/26 (61.5 %) | 10/18 (55.6 %) | 0.691 |
| OS (median time) | 16.5 (1.2–38.7) | 18.4 (3–41.9) | 0.508 |
| DFS (median time) | 12.9 (0–37.7) | 14.2 (0–41) | 0.555 |
CR complete remission, Allo-HSCT allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival
Fig. 2Overall survival comparison among Ph-positive patients. Kaplan–Meier Curve demonstrated significantly a shorter survival time in CDKN2 wild-type patients than in CDKN2 deletion patients (P = 0.004)
Fig. 3Disease-free survival comparison among Ph-positive patients. Kaplan–Meier Curve demonstrated a significantly shorter disease-free survival time in CDKN2 wild-type patients than in CDKN2 deletion patients (P = 0.005). CR complete remission
Fig. 4Overall survival comparison among CDKN2 deletion patients received immunophenotypic analysis. Kaplan–Meier Curve demonstrated significantly shorter survival time in CDKN2 deletion patients with CD20-positive patients than in CDKN2 deletion with CD20-negative patients (P = 0.013)
Fig. 5Disease-free survival comparison among CDKN2 deletion patients received immunophenotypic analysis. Kaplan–Meier Curve demonstrated a significantly shorter disease-free survival time in CDKN2 deletion patients with CD20-positive patients than in CDKN2 deletion with CD20-negative patients (P = 0.023). CR complete remission