Literature DB >> 28243728

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Michael J Carter1,2, Victoria Smith3, Anthony N Carlsen3, Diane M Ste-Marie3.   

Abstract

A distinct learning advantage has been shown when participants control their knowledge of results (KR) scheduling during practice compared to when the same KR schedule is imposed on the learner without choice (i.e., yoked schedules). Although the learning advantages of self-controlled KR schedules are well-documented, the brain regions contributing to these advantages remain unknown. Identifying key brain regions would not only advance our theoretical understanding of the mechanisms underlying self-controlled learning advantages, but would also highlight regions that could be targeted in more applied settings to boost the already beneficial effects of self-controlled KR schedules. Here, we investigated whether applying anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the primary motor cortex (M1) would enhance the typically found benefits of learning a novel motor skill with a self-controlled KR schedule. Participants practiced a spatiotemporal task in one of four groups using a factorial combination of KR schedule (self-controlled vs. yoked) and tDCS (anodal vs. sham). Testing occurred on two consecutive days with spatial and temporal accuracy measured on both days and learning was assessed using 24-h retention and transfer tests without KR. All groups improved their performance in practice and a significant effect for practicing with a self-controlled KR schedule compared to a yoked schedule was found for temporal accuracy in transfer, but a similar advantage was not evident in retention. There were no significant differences as a function of KR schedule or tDCS for spatial accuracy in retention or transfer. The lack of a significant tDCS effect suggests that M1 may not strongly contribute to self-controlled KR learning advantages; however, caution is advised with this interpretation as typical self-controlled learning benefits were not strongly replicated in the present experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28243728     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0846-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  77 in total

1.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals.

Authors:  Jae T Patterson; Michael Carter
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the supplementary motor area delays spontaneous antiphase-to-in-phase transitions.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation.

Authors:  Kirk F Grand; Alessandro T Bruzi; Ford B Dyke; Maurice M Godwin; Amber M Leiker; Andrew G Thompson; Taylor L Buchanan; Matthew W Miller
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 8.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  G Batsikadze; V Moliadze; W Paulus; M-F Kuo; M A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Fairbrother; David D Laughlin; Timothy V Nguyen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex Changes Intertemporal Choice for Loss: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study.

Authors:  Guanxing Xiong; Xi Li; Zhiqiang Dong; Shenggang Cai; Jianye Huang; Qian Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.