Literature DB >> 26163375

Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation.

Kirk F Grand1, Alessandro T Bruzi2, Ford B Dyke3, Maurice M Godwin4, Amber M Leiker5, Andrew G Thompson6, Taylor L Buchanan7, Matthew W Miller8.   

Abstract

It was tested whether learners who choose when to receive augmented feedback while practicing a motor skill exhibit enhanced augmented feedback processing and intrinsic motivation, along with superior learning, relative to learners who do not control their feedback. Accordingly, participants were assigned to either self-control (Self) or yoked groups and asked to practice a non-dominant arm beanbag toss. Self participants received augmented feedback at their discretion, whereas Yoked participants were given feedback schedules matched to Self counterparts. Participants' visual feedback was occluded, and when they received augmented feedback, their processing of it was indexed with the electroencephalography-derived feedback-related negativity (FRN). Participants self-reported intrinsic motivation via the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) after practice, and completed a retention and transfer test the next day to index learning. Results partially support the hypothesis. Specifically, Self participants reported higher IMI scores, exhibited larger FRNs, and demonstrated better accuracy on the transfer test, but not on the retention test, nor did they exhibit greater consistency on the retention or transfer tests. Additionally, post-hoc multiple regression analysis indicated FRN amplitude predicted transfer test accuracy (accounting for IMI score). Results suggest self-controlled feedback schedules enhance feedback processing, which enhances the transfer of a newly acquired motor skill.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback-related negativity; Intrinsic motivation; Self-controlled learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26163375     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  11 in total

1.  Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

2.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Victoria Smith; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-27

3.  Exercising choice over feedback schedules during practice is not advantageous for motor learning.

Authors:  Laura St Germain; Brad McKay; Andrew Poskus; Allison Williams; Olena Leshchyshen; Sherry Feldman; Joshua G A Cashaback; Michael J Carter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

4.  Neural correlates of negative expectancy and impaired social feedback processing in social anxiety.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Xiang Ao; Licheng Mo; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Self-Control of Haptic Assistance for Motor Learning: Influences of Frequency and Opinion of Utility.

Authors:  Camille K Williams; Victrine Tseung; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-04

6.  Transfer of improved movement technique after receiving verbal external focus and video instruction.

Authors:  Anne Benjaminse; Wouter Welling; Bert Otten; Alli Gokeler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Principles of Motor Learning to Support Neuroplasticity After ACL Injury: Implications for Optimizing Performance and Reducing Risk of Second ACL Injury.

Authors:  Alli Gokeler; Dorothee Neuhaus; Anne Benjaminse; Dustin R Grooms; Jochen Baumeister
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  EMG-based vibro-tactile biofeedback training: effective learning accelerator for children and adolescents with dystonia? A pilot crossover trial.

Authors:  Claudia Casellato; Emilia Ambrosini; Andrea Galbiati; Emilia Biffi; Ambra Cesareo; Elena Beretta; Francesca Lunardini; Giovanna Zorzi; Terence D Sanger; Alessandra Pedrocchi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Reduction of Feedback Availability Limits Self-Control Effects.

Authors:  Aaron D von Lindern; Jeffrey T Fairbrother
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-29

10.  Self-controlled practice and nudging during structural learning of a novel control interface.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Lee; Shanie A L Jayasinghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.