Literature DB >> 28242473

Task fMRI data analysis based on supervised stochastic coordinate coding.

Jinglei Lv1, Binbin Lin2, Qingyang Li3, Wei Zhang4, Yu Zhao4, Xi Jiang4, Lei Guo5, Junwei Han5, Xintao Hu5, Christine Guo6, Jieping Ye2, Tianming Liu7.   

Abstract

Task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely employed for brain activation detection and brain network analysis. Modeling rich information from spatially-organized collection of fMRI time series is challenging because of the intrinsic complexity. Hypothesis-driven methods, such as the general linear model (GLM), which regress exterior stimulus from voxel-wise functional brain activity, are limited due to overlooking the complexity of brain activities and the diversity of concurrent brain networks. Recently, sparse representation and dictionary learning methods have attracted increasing interests in task fMRI data analysis. The major advantage of this methodology is its promise in reconstructing concurrent brain networks systematically. However, this data-driven strategy is, to some extent, arbitrary and does not sufficiently utilize the prior information of task design and neuroscience knowledge. To bridge this gap, we here propose a novel supervised sparse representation and dictionary learning framework based on stochastic coordinate coding (SCC) algorithm for task fMRI data analysis, in which certain brain networks are learned with known information such as pre-defined temporal patterns and spatial network patterns, and at the same time other networks are learned automatically from data. Our proposed method has been applied to two independent task fMRI datasets, and qualitative and quantitative evaluations have shown that our method provides a new and effective framework for task fMRI data analysis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain networks; Supervised sparse coding; Task fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242473      PMCID: PMC5401655          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  18 in total

Review 1.  What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?

Authors:  David J Heeger; David Ress
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs.

Authors:  Bruno A Olshausen; David J Field
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  A data-driven sparse GLM for fMRI analysis using sparse dictionary learning with MDL criterion.

Authors:  Kangjoo Lee; Sungho Tak; Jong Chul Ye
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI signals for identification of functional networks.

Authors:  Jinglei Lv; Xi Jiang; Xiang Li; Dajiang Zhu; Hanbo Chen; Tuo Zhang; Shu Zhang; Xintao Hu; Junwei Han; Heng Huang; Jing Zhang; Lei Guo; Tianming Liu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Assessing effects of prenatal alcohol exposure using group-wise sparse representation of fMRI data.

Authors:  Jinglei Lv; Xi Jiang; Xiang Li; Dajiang Zhu; Shijie Zhao; Tuo Zhang; Xintao Hu; Junwei Han; Lei Guo; Zhihao Li; Claire Coles; Xiaoping Hu; Tianming Liu
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Gregory C Burgess; Michael P Harms; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Maurizio Corbetta; Matthew F Glasser; Sandra Curtiss; Sachin Dixit; Cindy Feldt; Dan Nolan; Edward Bryant; Tucker Hartley; Owen Footer; James M Bjork; Russ Poldrack; Steve Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Robust face recognition via sparse representation.

Authors:  John Wright; Allen Y Yang; Arvind Ganesh; S Shankar Sastry; Yi Ma
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 10.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems.

Authors:  Ed Bullmore; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  11 in total

1.  Modeling task-based fMRI data via deep belief network with neural architecture search.

Authors:  Ning Qiang; Qinglin Dong; Wei Zhang; Bao Ge; Fangfei Ge; Hongtao Liang; Yifei Sun; Jie Gao; Tianming Liu
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  MULTI-TASK SPARSE SCREENING FOR PREDICTING FUTURE CLINICAL SCORES USING LONGITUDINAL CORTICAL THICKNESS MEASURES.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Yanshuai Tu; Qingyang Li; Richard J Caselli; Paul M Thompson; Jieping Ye; Yalin Wang
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-05-24

3.  A Distributed Computing Platform for fMRI Big Data Analytics.

Authors:  Milad Makkie; Xiang Li; Shannon Quinn; Binbin Lin; Jieping Ye; Geoffrey Mon; Tianming Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2018-03-06

4.  Integrating Convolutional Neural Networks and Multi-Task Dictionary Learning for Cognitive Decline Prediction with Longitudinal Images.

Authors:  Qunxi Dong; Jie Zhang; Qingyang Li; Junwen Wang; Natasha Leporé; Paul M Thompson; Richard J Caselli; Jieping Ye; Yalin Wang
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Shift-Invariant Canonical Polyadic Decomposition of Complex-Valued Multi-Subject fMRI Data With a Phase Sparsity Constraint.

Authors:  Li-Dan Kuang; Qiu-Hua Lin; Xiao-Feng Gong; Fengyu Cong; Yu-Ping Wang; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Predicting future cognitive decline with hyperbolic stochastic coding.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Qunxi Dong; Jie Shi; Qingyang Li; Cynthia M Stonnington; Boris A Gutman; Kewei Chen; Eric M Reiman; Richard J Caselli; Paul M Thompson; Jieping Ye; Yalin Wang
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Predicting Brain Amyloid Using Multivariate Morphometry Statistics, Sparse Coding, and Correntropy: Validation in 1,101 Individuals From the ADNI and OASIS Databases.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wu; Qunxi Dong; Jie Gui; Jie Zhang; Yi Su; Kewei Chen; Paul M Thompson; Richard J Caselli; Eric M Reiman; Jieping Ye; Yalin Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Sparse Representation-Based Denoising for High-Resolution Brain Activation and Functional Connectivity Modeling: A Task fMRI Study.

Authors:  Seongah Jeong; Xiang Li; Jiarui Yang; Quanzheng Li; Vahid Tarokh
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.476

9.  Estimation of Dynamic Sparse Connectivity Patterns From Resting State fMRI.

Authors:  Biao Cai; Pascal Zille; Julia M Stephen; Tony W Wilson; Vince D Calhoun; Yu Ping Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Low-Rank Tucker-2 Model for Multi-Subject fMRI Data Decomposition With Spatial Sparsity Constraint.

Authors:  Yue Han; Qiu-Hua Lin; Li-Dan Kuang; Xiao-Feng Gong; Fengyu Cong; Yu-Ping Wang; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.