BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis is a hallmark of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and a potential substrate for arrhythmias and heart failure. Sarcomere mutations seem to induce profibrotic changes before left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) develops. To further evaluate these processes, we used cardiac magnetic resonance with T1 measurements on a genotyped HCM population to quantify myocardial extracellular volume (ECV). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sarcomere mutation carriers with LVH (G+/LVH+, n=37) and without LVH (G+/LVH-, n=29), patients with HCM without mutations (sarcomere-negative HCM, n=11), and healthy controls (n=11) underwent contrast cardiac magnetic resonance, measuring T1 times pre- and postgadolinium infusion. Concurrent echocardiography and serum biomarkers of collagen synthesis, hemodynamic stress, and myocardial injury were also available in a subset. Compared with controls, ECV was increased in patients with overt HCM, as well as G+/LVH- mutation carriers (ECV=0.36±0.01, 0.33±0.01, 0.27±0.01 in G+/LVH+, G+/LVH-, controls, respectively; P≤0.001 for all comparisons). ECV correlated with N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels (r=0.58; P<0.001) and global E' velocity (r=-0.48; P<0.001). Late gadolinium enhancement was present in >60% of overt patients with HCM but absent from G+/LVH- subjects. Both ECV and late gadolinium enhancement were more extensive in sarcomeric HCM than sarcomere-negative HCM. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ECV is increased in HCM sarcomere mutation carriers even in the absence of LVH. These data provide additional support that fibrotic remodeling is triggered early in disease pathogenesis. Quantifying ECV may help characterize the development of myocardial fibrosis in HCM and ultimately assist in developing novel disease-modifying therapy, targeting interstitial fibrosis.
BACKGROUND:Myocardial fibrosis is a hallmark of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and a potential substrate for arrhythmias and heart failure. Sarcomere mutations seem to induce profibrotic changes before left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) develops. To further evaluate these processes, we used cardiac magnetic resonance with T1 measurements on a genotyped HCM population to quantify myocardial extracellular volume (ECV). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sarcomere mutation carriers with LVH (G+/LVH+, n=37) and without LVH (G+/LVH-, n=29), patients with HCM without mutations (sarcomere-negative HCM, n=11), and healthy controls (n=11) underwent contrast cardiac magnetic resonance, measuring T1 times pre- and postgadolinium infusion. Concurrent echocardiography and serum biomarkers of collagen synthesis, hemodynamic stress, and myocardial injury were also available in a subset. Compared with controls, ECV was increased in patients with overt HCM, as well as G+/LVH- mutation carriers (ECV=0.36±0.01, 0.33±0.01, 0.27±0.01 in G+/LVH+, G+/LVH-, controls, respectively; P≤0.001 for all comparisons). ECV correlated with N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels (r=0.58; P<0.001) and global E' velocity (r=-0.48; P<0.001). Late gadolinium enhancement was present in >60% of overt patients with HCM but absent from G+/LVH- subjects. Both ECV and late gadolinium enhancement were more extensive in sarcomeric HCM than sarcomere-negative HCM. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ECV is increased in HCM sarcomere mutation carriers even in the absence of LVH. These data provide additional support that fibrotic remodeling is triggered early in disease pathogenesis. Quantifying ECV may help characterize the development of myocardial fibrosis in HCM and ultimately assist in developing novel disease-modifying therapy, targeting interstitial fibrosis.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: J C Moon; J Mogensen; P M Elliott; G C Smith; A G Elkington; S K Prasad; D J Pennell; W J McKenna Journal: Heart Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Michael Jerosch-Herold; David C Sheridan; Jessica D Kushner; Deirdre Nauman; Donna Burgess; Diana Dutton; Rami Alharethi; Duanxiang Li; Ray E Hershberger Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: A Selcuk Adabag; Barry J Maron; Evan Appelbaum; Caitlin J Harrigan; Jacqueline L Buros; C Michael Gibson; John R Lesser; Constance A Hanna; James E Udelson; Warren J Manning; Martin S Maron Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jae Bum Kim; Gregory J Porreca; Lei Song; Steven C Greenway; Joshua M Gorham; George M Church; Christine E Seidman; J G Seidman Journal: Science Date: 2007-06-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: N Kawel-Boehm; T Dellas Buser; A Greiser; O Bieri; J Bremerich; F Santini Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Anna Axelsson Raja; Hoshang Farhad; Anne Marie Valente; John-Paul Couce; John Lynn Jefferies; Henning Bundgaard; Kenneth Zahka; Harry Lever; Anne M Murphy; Euan Ashley; Sharlene M Day; Mark V Sherrid; Ling Shi; David A Bluemke; Charles E Canter; Steven D Colan; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pranoti Hiremath; Patrick R Lawler; Jennifer E Ho; Andrew W Correia; Siddique A Abbasi; Raymond Y Kwong; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Carolyn Y Ho; Susan Cheng Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 8.790