Literature DB >> 29372481

The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Timothy J Suchomel1, Sophia Nimphius2, Christopher R Bellon3, Michael H Stone4.   

Abstract

This review covers underlying physiological characteristics and training considerations that may affect muscular strength including improving maximal force expression and time-limited force expression. Strength is underpinned by a combination of morphological and neural factors including muscle cross-sectional area and architecture, musculotendinous stiffness, motor unit recruitment, rate coding, motor unit synchronization, and neuromuscular inhibition. Although single- and multi-targeted block periodization models may produce the greatest strength-power benefits, concepts within each model must be considered within the limitations of the sport, athletes, and schedules. Bilateral training, eccentric training and accentuated eccentric loading, and variable resistance training may produce the greatest comprehensive strength adaptations. Bodyweight exercise, isolation exercises, plyometric exercise, unilateral exercise, and kettlebell training may be limited in their potential to improve maximal strength but are still relevant to strength development by challenging time-limited force expression and differentially challenging motor demands. Training to failure may not be necessary to improve maximum muscular strength and is likely not necessary for maximum gains in strength. Indeed, programming that combines heavy and light loads may improve strength and underpin other strength-power characteristics. Multiple sets appear to produce superior training benefits compared to single sets; however, an athlete's training status and the dose-response relationship must be considered. While 2- to 5-min interset rest intervals may produce the greatest strength-power benefits, rest interval length may vary based an athlete's training age, fiber type, and genetics. Weaker athletes should focus on developing strength before emphasizing power-type training. Stronger athletes may begin to emphasize power-type training while maintaining/improving their strength. Future research should investigate how best to implement accentuated eccentric loading and variable resistance training and examine how initial strength affects an athlete's ability to improve their performance following various training methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372481     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0862-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  195 in total

Review 1.  Training-induced changes in neural function.

Authors:  Per Aagaard
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean.

Authors:  Justin P Hardee; N Travis Triplett; Alan C Utter; Kevin A Zwetsloot; Jeffrey M Mcbride
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Muscle activation strategies during strength training with heavy loading vs. repetitions to failure.

Authors:  Emil Sundstrup; Markus D Jakobsen; Christoffer H Andersen; Mette K Zebis; Ole S Mortensen; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Olympic weightlifting training improves vertical jump height in sportspeople: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Hackett; Tim Davies; Najeebullah Soomro; Mark Halaki
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Matthew R Rhea; Brent A Alvar
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Strength increases in upper and lower body are larger with longer inter-set rest intervals in trained men.

Authors:  Belmiro Freitas de Salles; Roberto Simão; Humberto Miranda; Martim Bottaro; Fabio Fontana; Jeffrey M Willardson
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Glenn A Wright; Thomas W Kernozek; Dennis E Kline
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Different Cluster Set Structures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James J Tufano; Lee E Brown; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Hypertrophic Effects of Concentric vs. Eccentric Muscle Actions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld; Dan I Ogborn; Andrew D Vigotsky; Martino V Franchi; James W Krieger
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Power and power potentiation among strength-power athletes: preliminary study.

Authors:  Michael H Stone; William A Sands; Kyle C Pierce; Michael W Ramsey; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.010

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.

Authors:  Ryo Kataoka; Ecaterina Vasenina; Jeremy Loenneke; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Offseason Workout Recommendations for Baseball Players.

Authors:  Brooks Klein; Daniel Cobian; Goldy Simmons; Michael Reinold
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  The Generality of Strength: Relationship between Different Measures of Muscular Strength in Older Women.

Authors:  JoÃo Pedro Nunes; Paolo M Cunha; Melissa Antunes; Bruna D V Costa; Witalo Kassiano; Gabriel Kunevaliki; Alex S Ribeiro; Edilson S Cyrino
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 4.  Strength and Power Training in Rehabilitation: Underpinning Principles and Practical Strategies to Return Athletes to High Performance.

Authors:  Luca Maestroni; Paul Read; Chris Bishop; Anthony Turner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Critical speed and finite distance capacity: norms for athletic and non-athletic groups.

Authors:  Mark Kramer; E J Thomas; R W Pettitt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Physical Activity, Yoga, and Exercise Prescription for Postpartum and Midlife Weight Management: A Practical Review for Clinicians.

Authors:  Piyush Ranjan; Ananta Gopal Kuanar Baboo; Wareesha Anwar; Archana Kumari; Balaram Pradhan; Satyapriya Maharana; Srikumar Venkataraman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 8.  The Influence of Caffeine Supplementation on Resistance Exercise: A Review.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Pavle Mikulic; Brad J Schoenfeld; David J Bishop; Zeljko Pedisic
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Acute Effects of Cluster and Rest Redistribution Set Structures on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Fatigue During and After Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  The Effects of Set Structure Manipulation on Chronic Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Bas Van Hooren; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.