| Literature DB >> 28239114 |
Aitziber Ojanguren1, Josune Ayo2.
Abstract
Industrial processes that apply high temperatures in the presence of oxygen may compromise the stability of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) bioactive isomers. Statistical techniques are used in this study to model and predict, on a laboratory scale, the oxidative behaviour of oil with high CLA content, controlling the limiting factors of food processing. This modelling aims to estimate the impact of an industrial frying process (140 °C, 7 L/h air) on the oxidation of CLA oil for use as frying oil instead of sunflower oil. A factorial design was constructed within a temperature (80-200 °C) and air flow (7-20 L/h) range. Oil stability index (Rancimat method) was used as a measure of oxidation. Three-level full factorial design was used to obtain a quadratic model for CLA oil, enabling the oxidative behaviour to be predicted under predetermined process conditions (temperature and air flow). It is deduced that temperatures applied in food processes affect the oxidation of CLA to a greater extent than air flow. As a result, it is estimated that the oxidative stability of CLA oil is less resistant to industrial frying than sunflower oil. In conclusion, thanks to the mathematical model, a good choice of the appropriate industrial food process can be selected to avoid the oxidation of the bioactive isomers of CLA, ensuring its functionality in novel applications.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive conjugated isomers; frying; three-level full factorial design; oil stability index (OSI)
Year: 2013 PMID: 28239114 PMCID: PMC5302268 DOI: 10.3390/foods2020274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Three level factorial design for the induction period of the conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) oil’s stability index, with corresponding observed and predicted values.
| Run | Variable codes | Process variables | Log(OSI) for CLA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | Temperature (°C) | AF (L/h) | Observed | Predicted | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 200 | 20 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0 | −1 | 140 | 7 | 1.50 ± 0.03 | 1.49 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 140 | 20 | 1.47 ± 0.03 | 1.37 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 13 | 1.45 ± 0.03 | 1.43 |
| 5 | 1 | −1 | 200 | 7 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 1.01 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 13 | 1.37 ± 0.06 | 1.43 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 13 | 1.37 ± 0.05 | 1.43 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | 80 | 7 | 3.49 ± 0.01 | 3.47 |
| 9 | −1 | 0 | 80 | 13 | 3.52 ± 0.01 | 3.51 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 13 | 0.89 ± 0.03 | 0.85 |
| 11 | −1 | 1 | 80 | 20 | 3.53 ± 0.01 | 3.55 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 13 | 1.40 ± 0.01 | 1.43 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 140 | 13 | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 1.43 |
AF = Air Flow.
Figure 1Curve showing predicted response surface of log oil stability index of CLA as a function of temperature (°C) and air flow (L/h).