Sajjad Hossain1, Elizabeth M Boon1. 1. Graduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, ‡Department of Chemistry, and §Institute of Chemical Biology & Drug Discovery, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is a radical diatomic gas molecule that, at low concentrations, plays important signaling roles in both eukaryotes and bacteria. In recent years, it has become evident that bacteria respond to low levels of NO in order to modulate their group behavior. Many bacteria respond via NO ligation to a well-established NO sensor called H-NOX (heme-nitric oxide/oxygen binding domain). Many others, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, lack an annotated hnoX gene in their genome yet are able to respond to low levels of NO to disperse their biofilms. This suggests the existence of a previously uncharacterized NO sensor. In this study, we describe the discovery of a novel nitric oxide binding protein (NosP; NO-sensing protein), which is much more widely conserved in bacteria than H-NOX, as well as a novel NO-responsive pathway in P. aeruginosa. We demonstrate that biofilms of a P. aeruginosa mutant lacking components of the NosP pathway lose the ability to disperse in response to NO. Upon cloning, expressing, and purifying NosP, we find it binds heme and ligates to NO with a dissociation rate constant that is comparable to that of other well-established NO-sensing proteins. Moreover, we show that NO-bound NosP is able to regulate the phosphorelay activity of a hybrid histidine kinase that is involved in biofilm regulation in P. aeruginosa. Thus, here, we present evidence of a novel NO-responsive pathway that regulates biofilm in P. aeruginosa.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a radical diatomic gas molecule that, at low concentrations, plays important signaling roles in both eukaryotes and bacteria. In recent years, it has become evident that bacteria respond to low levels of NO in order to modulate their group behavior. Many bacteria respond via NO ligation to a well-established NO sensor called H-NOX (heme-nitric oxide/oxygen binding domain). Many others, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, lack an annotated hnoX gene in their genome yet are able to respond to low levels of NO to disperse their biofilms. This suggests the existence of a previously uncharacterized NO sensor. In this study, we describe the discovery of a novel nitric oxide binding protein (NosP; NO-sensing protein), which is much more widely conserved in bacteria than H-NOX, as well as a novel NO-responsive pathway in P. aeruginosa. We demonstrate that biofilms of a P. aeruginosa mutant lacking components of the NosP pathway lose the ability to disperse in response to NO. Upon cloning, expressing, and purifying NosP, we find it binds heme and ligates to NO with a dissociation rate constant that is comparable to that of other well-established NO-sensing proteins. Moreover, we show that NO-bound NosP is able to regulate the phosphorelay activity of a hybrid histidine kinase that is involved in biofilm regulation in P. aeruginosa. Thus, here, we present evidence of a novel NO-responsive pathway that regulates biofilm in P. aeruginosa.
Bacterial
biofilm formation occurs when free swimming bacteria aggregate in
a community, usually on a solid surface, within a self-secreted exopolysaccharide
matrix. Biofilming bacteria are responsible for many chronic humaninfections as well as nosocomial diseases; they also pose a significant
threat to food and water safety, civilian and military naval operations,
irrigation, and more.[1−6] Bacteria residing in biofilms are recalcitrant to conventional therapeutics
because they are highly resistant to antibiotics, host defenses, and
even some harsh chemical treatments.[7−10]The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa has drawn special attention
in microbiology because it readily forms biofilms and, as such, is
a major cause of hospital-acquired infection.[11,12]P. aeruginosa biofilm infections
in the lung are the leading cause of death in cystic fibrosispatients.[13] Although P. aeruginosa is a model biofilming organism, assembly and dispersal of biofilm
in P. aeruginosa is still poorly understood.The diatomic gas nitric oxide (NO) is well-documented as a signaling
molecule that directs P. aeruginosa to disperse from biofilms; as low as picomolar concentrations of
NO have been shown to cause P. aeruginosa to leave biofilms.[14] The details underlying
this phenomenon are not well-understood, but some aspects of NO signaling
in P. aeruginosa have been reported.
It has been documented that NO-mediated biofilm dispersal is correlated
with increased cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterase activity, resulting
in decreased cyclic-di-GMP levels.[15] This
is expected because decreased levels of cyclic-di-GMP are tightly
correlated with biofilm dispersal in many bacterial species.[14−18] The chemotaxis transducer BdlA has been implicated in cyclic-di-GMP
degradation and biofilm dispersal upon NO detection, through a currently
unknown mechanism.[19] A domain of BdlA called
PASa can bind heme, which likely binds NO.[20] However, BdlA appears also to respond to many environmental cues
in addition to NO, including succinate, Ag+, Hg2+, and As3+. The cyclic-di-GMP synthase GcbA has also been
implicated in NO-induced biofilm dispersal because it contributes
to the activation of BdlA, but it does not appear to bind NO itself.
The cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterases DipA[21] and NbdA[22] have been linked to decreasing
cyclic-di-GMP concentrations upon exposure to NO. Further, bioinformatics
data suggest that NbdA could coordinate copper, a potential NO binding
site.[23] However, the mechanism of action
for both is NO-induced upregulation of dipA and nbdA expression, suggesting action downstream of initial
NO sensing. DNR (dissimilative nitrate respiration regulators), a
transcription factor in P. aeruginosa, was hypothesized to be the primary NO sensor in P. aeruginosa.[24] However,
its affinity for NO was found to be in the range of 88–350
μM, which is inconsistent with the pico- to nanomolar concentrations
of NO shown to cause biofilm regulation in P. aeruginosa. To date, a primary sensitive NO sensor in P. aeruginosa has yet to be established.The molecular basis for NO-mediated
biofilm regulation has been demonstrated in some bacteria, including Legionella pneumophila,[25]Shewanella oneidensis,[26]Shewanella woodyi,[27]Vibrio harveyi,[28,29] and Silicibacter sp. strain TrichCH4B.[30] In these bacteria,
the NO sensor H-NOX (heme-nitric oxide/oxygen binding protein) affects
biofilm formation by regulating intracellular cyclic-di-GMP concentrations
or quorum sensing.[31,32]P. aeruginosa does not encode an hnoX gene, however.Here,
we describe the discovery of a new family of heme-based NO biniding
proteins in bacteria called NosP (NO-sensing protein). In P. aeruginosa, NosP binds heme and, upon ligating
to NO at the hemeiron, modulates the activity of a cocistronic kinase,
which subsequently controls the phosphorylation of a histidine-containing
phosphotransfer domain that ultimately contributes to NO-responsive
biofilm regulation.
Results and Discussion
Discovery of NosP
The primary NO sensor involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm regulation has not been identified. We became interested
in an uncharacterized protein domain, sometimes called FIST (F-box
and intracellular signal transduction proteins), that is widely distributed
in bacteria [found in about 620 independent sequenced species (i.e.,
if multiple strains of the same species have been sequenced, the species
was only counted once in this analysis); see supplemental Figure 1A]. This domain is found in some eukaryotic genomes
and a few archaeal species, but it is predominately found in bacterial
genomes.This domain was previously predicted to be a sensory
domain by Borziak et al.,[33] due to its
appearance of the N-terminal to MCP (methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein)
domains in some proteins. Upon a more detailed look into the genomes
of bacteria coding for these domains, however, it is evident that
they are most commonly encoded in bacterial genomes in operons with
signaling proteins like histidine kinases, diguanylate cyclases, and
cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterases (supplementary Figure 1B). Interestingly, the signaling proteins cocistronic
with these FIST domains generally lack an annotated sensory domain,
suggesting an alternate regulatory domain could function in
trans. In fact, this genomic arrangement is highly reminiscent
of the H-NOX family of NO-sensing proteins. Thus, we hypothesized
that FIST could be an uncharacterized bacterial-sensing protein, perhaps
an NO sensor involved in biofilm formation.In support of this
hypothesis, in Vibrio cholerae, a FIST
domain is N-terminal to a cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterase (Vc0130)
that has been shown to be involved in cyclic-di-GMP-mediated biofilm
regulation.[34] In Shewanella
oneidensis, this domain (SO_2542) is upstream of a
histidine kinase that is involved in NO-mediated biofilm regulation.[26] In addition, the FIST domain (lpg0279) in Legionella pneumophila is coded for in the same operon
with a histidine kinase (lpg0278) and a cyclic-di-GMP metabolizing
enzyme (lpg0277) with a receiver domain at its N-terminus. In a recent
publication, it was demonstrated that deletion of the homologue of
lpg0277 in the Legionella pneumophila Lens strain (lpl1054) results in a hyper-biofilm phenotype,[35] suggesting involvement of FIST in biofilm regulation.
Most relevant to this study, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a FIST domain (Pa1975) is cocistronic with the hybrid histidine
kinase Pa1976 (supplementary Figure 1B).
Notably, Pa1976 has been implicated in biofilm regulation in previous
studies.[36] The specific stimulus for this
kinase has not yet been determined, but as cocistronic proteins often
function together in the same pathway in bacteria, we hypothesized
that Pa1975 might interact with Pa1976 and thereby be involved in
biofilm regulation in P. aeruginosa. Interestingly, Pa1976 is predicted to be soluble, which is consistent
with a role in NO signaling: NO is a membrane-permeable gas; indeed,
most known NO sensors are soluble.[26−29,31,32] Therefore, we hypothesized this uncharacterized
protein domain could be a missing primary NO sensor in P. aeruginosa.
Purified NosP Shows Ligand-Binding
Properties That Are Consistent with NO Sensing
In order to
test our hypothesis that NosP is a NO-sensing protein, we cloned and
expressed P. aeruginosa NosP (Pa1975;
42 kDa) in Escherichia coli. Upon purification,
we found that it has the yellow-orange color common for hemoproteins
(Figure A). In order
to confirm that NosP is a heme protein, we performed a heme pulldown
assay. As illustrated in Figure B, E. coli lysate containing
overexpressed NosP, but not lysate without NosP, contains a 42 kDa
protein that binds tightly to heme-agarose. These data are consistent
with heme affinity for NosP.
Figure 1
NosP is a hemoprotein that ligates NO. (A) Purified
hexaHis-tagged NosP is yellow-orange in color. Top: NosP fractions
as eluted from IMAC. Bottom: Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of the same
purified fractions. (B) E. coli lysate
with overexpressed NosP (lanes 2 and 3), but not lysate from cells
transformed with NosP but without expression induction (lane 1), contains
a 42 kDa protein that binds heme-agarose. Lane 3 shows the presence
of the same protein band with more stringent wash steps. (C) NosP
has the ligand binding specificity of a NO sensor. UV/vis absorption
spectra at 20 °C of ferric NosP (solid gray line) with a λmax at 410 nm, ferrous NosP (solid black line) with a λmax at 420 nm, CO-ligated NosP (dashed line) with a λmax at 416 nm, and NO-ligated NosP (dotted line) with a λmax at 396 nm. (D,E) Example of an experiment to measure the
dissociation rate for the FeII–NO complex of NosP
at 20 °C measured by UV/vis absorption spectroscopy with saturating
CO and 30 mM dithionite as a trap for the released NO. Measured rates
and amplitudes [k1 = koff = (1.8 ± 0.5) × 10–4 s–1, k2 = (13 ± 2) ×
10–4 s–1] were independent of
CO and dithionite at all concentrations tested (3–300 mM).
(D) Absorbance difference spectrum (the spectrum at time = 0 min is
subtracted from the spectrum at each subsequent time point) of the
FeII–CO complex growing in over time is shown as
well as (E) a plot of the change in absorbance at 417 nm minus 387
nm (the maximum and the minimum in the difference spectrum) versus
time along with the exponential fit of those data. (F) N-terminal
domain of NosP is sufficient to bind heme. UV/vis absorption spectra
of ferrous NosP (black line) and ferrous NosP-NT (dashed line), with
a λmax at 420 nm.
NosP is a hemoprotein that ligates NO. (A) Purified
hexaHis-tagged NosP is yellow-orange in color. Top: NosP fractions
as eluted from IMAC. Bottom: Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of the same
purified fractions. (B) E. coli lysate
with overexpressed NosP (lanes 2 and 3), but not lysate from cells
transformed with NosP but without expression induction (lane 1), contains
a 42 kDa protein that binds heme-agarose. Lane 3 shows the presence
of the same protein band with more stringent wash steps. (C) NosP
has the ligand binding specificity of a NO sensor. UV/vis absorption
spectra at 20 °C of ferric NosP (solid gray line) with a λmax at 410 nm, ferrous NosP (solid black line) with a λmax at 420 nm, CO-ligated NosP (dashed line) with a λmax at 416 nm, and NO-ligated NosP (dotted line) with a λmax at 396 nm. (D,E) Example of an experiment to measure the
dissociation rate for the FeII–NO complex of NosP
at 20 °C measured by UV/vis absorption spectroscopy with saturating
CO and 30 mM dithionite as a trap for the released NO. Measured rates
and amplitudes [k1 = koff = (1.8 ± 0.5) × 10–4 s–1, k2 = (13 ± 2) ×
10–4 s–1] were independent of
CO and dithionite at all concentrations tested (3–300 mM).
(D) Absorbance difference spectrum (the spectrum at time = 0 min is
subtracted from the spectrum at each subsequent time point) of the
FeII–CO complex growing in over time is shown as
well as (E) a plot of the change in absorbance at 417 nm minus 387
nm (the maximum and the minimum in the difference spectrum) versus
time along with the exponential fit of those data. (F) N-terminal
domain of NosP is sufficient to bind heme. UV/vis absorption spectra
of ferrous NosP (black line) and ferrous NosP-NT (dashed line), with
a λmax at 420 nm.The π electrons of the tetrapyrrole in the porphyrin
ring of heme-bound proteins are known to absorb energy in the UV/vis
range, resulting in a π→π* transition. This UV/vis
transition gives rise to a characteristic absorbance peak known as
the Soret band.[37] Depending on the oxidation
and ligation state of the iron at the heme core, the Soret band can
appear between ∼350 and ∼450 nm. UV/vis spectra of NosP
as the FeII, FeII–CO, and FeII–NO complexes at room temperature are shown in Figure and are compared with those
of H-NOX and other histidyl-ligated heme proteins in Table .
Table 1
UV/Vis
Peak Positions and NO Disassociation Kinetics
protein
Soret (nm)
β (nm)
α (nm)
ref
FeII
sGC
431
555
(46)
VcH-NOX
429
568
(44)
CooA
425.5
529.5
559.5
(38, 39, 41)
cyt c
420
526
556
(40, 42)
NosP
420
524
554
this article
NosP-NT
420
524
554
this article
FeII–CO
sGC
423
541
567
(46)
VcH-NOX
429
541
566
(44)
CooA
422
539.5
569
(37−41)
NosP
416
538
565
this article
FeII–NO
sGC
398
537
571
(46)
VcH-NOX
398
540
573
(44)
NosP
396
534
574
this article
koff NO
sGC
(3.6 ± 0.8) × 10–4 s–1
(46)
SwH-NOX
(15.2 ± 3.5) × 10–4 s–1
(27)
VhH-NOX
(4.6 ± 0.9) × 10–4 s–1
(28)
NosP
(1.8 ± 0.5) × 10–4 s–1
this article
NosP is purified
with a Soret maximum of 413 nm, which is presumably a mixture of ferrous
and ferric complexes. Treatment of purified NosP with ferricyanide
to form the ferric state results in a complex that is indicative of
a histidine-ligated, high-spin, five-coordinate complex with a Soret
maximum at 410 nm. Anaerobic treatment of ferric NosP with sodium
dithionite reduces the protein and shifts the Soret maximum to 422
nm with split α/β bands at 554 and 524 nm (Figure C). This spectrum is similar
to those of hexa-coordinated hemoproteins, such as CooA, cytochrome c′, and the truncated globins, where the iron is
ligated to two axial ligands, usually histidine and an additional
amino acid (see Table ).[38−42] These spectra differ from H-NOX proteins, which form high-spin,
five-coordinate complexes in their ferrous state with a single broad
α/β around 555 nm, consistent with one axial histidine
ligand.[43−45] When carbon monoxide (CO) is added to the FeII NosP protein, the Soret maximum shifts to 416 nm, suggestive
of a histidine- and CO-ligated, low-spin, six-coordinate complex.
Binding of NO to the FeII protein shifts the Soret maximum
to 396 nm, indicative of a high-spin, five-coordinate complex with
NO. The CO and NO complexes are similar to other histidine-ligated
hemoproteins, including the H-NOX and globin families. Therefore,
the data suggest that ferrous NosP ligates histidine as well as an
additional ligand, probably an amino acid side chain or water. This
additional ligand is displaced upon binding CO or NO.
NosP N-Terminal
Domain Is Sufficient for Heme Binding
P. aeruginosa NosP is annotated to contain an N-terminal domain and a C-terminal
domain. In efforts to understand whether both domains are needed for
heme binding, we made a truncated mutant of NosP (NosP-NT) that contains
the first 235 residues (the N-terminal domain) with a C-terminal hexaHis-tag.
When this mutant was purified, it retained its yellow-orange color,
indicating that it is bound to heme, similar to the full-length protein.
The UV/vis spectroscopy of this mutant is consistent with the full-length
protein, indicating that heme binding is contained within the N-terminus
of NosP (Figure E
and Table ).
NosP NO
Dissociation Rate Is Slow
We investigated the NO dissociation
rate of NosP using a standard CO and dithionite trap[43,45] for released NO, consisting of saturating CO and 30 mM dithionite,
to minimize rebinding of dissociated NO. The NO dissociation rate
was followed by the formation of the FeII–CO complex
at 416 nm. This rate was independent of CO and dithionite at all concentrations
tested (3, 30, and 300 mM dithionite). Representative data are shown
in Figure D, and Table compares these data
with other FeII–NO heme proteins.Figure E shows the data
fit with two parallel exponentials (k1 = (1.8 ± 0.5) × 10–4 s–1, k2 = (13 ± 2) × 10–4 s–1) of the form f(x) = Ax(1 – e–). We used two exponential functions because a single
exponential fit resulted in very high residuals. The second rate is
possibly due to association of the unknown second axial ligand to
the ferrous-unligated form of NosP after NO dissociation. This additional
rate cannot be CO association, as our measured rate is independent
of CO addition to the dithionite trap. We report the NO dissociation
rate as the slower of the two exponentials because this is the overall
slowest step in the NO dissociation mechanism, although at this time,
we cannot assign that rate to the molecular step of NO dissociation.
Our reported NOoff rate of 1.8 × 10–4 s–1 for NosP is very similar to that of sGC (3.6
× 10–4 s–1)[46] and other H-NOX domains (Table ), indicating NosP has ligand binding properties
consistent with an NO sensor.[27,28,44,45] We are currently measuring the
NO association rate constant in order to determine the thermodynamic
dissociation binding constant for NO to NosP. Although we have not
yet measured the NO association rate constant, we expect it will fall
between 104 and 108 M–1 s–1, as is typical for histidine-ligated hemoproteins.[47] Therefore, the NO thermodynamic dissociation
binding constant is likely to be low nanomolar to picomolar.
NO-Mediated
Biofilm Dispersal Requires NahK
NO is well-understood to
regulate biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa. In order to determine whether NosP regulates biofilm formation,
we sought to generate a NosP mutant and study its effect on biofilm
formation. We chose to generate strains of P. aeruginosa PAO1-T7 that were defective in nosP or its cocistronic
kinase (Pa1976; named nahK for NosP-associated histidine
kinase), using targeted type II intron disruption (TargeTron).[48] In these studies, we employed a strain of P. aeruginosa PAO1 that stably expresses the T7 polymerase
(P. aeruginosa strain PAO1-T7), in
order to be able to induce expression of proteins from recombinant
plasmids using isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG) in wild-type and mutant backgrounds.Therefore, we identified
potential insertion sites for both nosP and nahK and engineered retargeted L1.LtrB introns to disrupt
these genes. Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful in generating the nosP-disrupted mutant. Interestingly, the commercially available
library of P. aeruginosa PAO1 mutants
(http://www.gs.washington.edu/labs/manoil/libraryindex.htm)
also does not contain a disruption of pa1975. At
present, however, we do not believe nosP is essential
in P. aeruginosa. Many nonessential
genes are not represented in transposon libraries due to gene length,
GC content, etc. Furthermore, nosP has never been
found in any essential gene data sets derived from P. aeruginosa mutant libraries.[49] Finally, the nosP-disrupted PA14 mutant
is available in a commercial library; to our knowledge, there are
no examples of genes that are essential in only PA14 or PAO1. It is
possible, however, that there are suppressor mutations in the commercial nosP-disrupted PA14 mutant. Nonetheless, to address this
issue, in future studies, we plan to make and complement clean deletions
of nosP and nahK.We were
able to target nahK (pa1976) with
L1.LtrA to generate the strain PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK. We complemented PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK with an IPTG-inducible
vector that expresses NahK (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK/pHK) with a C-terminal hexaHis-tag. We characterized these constructs
by evaluating the induction of nahK with IPTG in
both PaO1-T7 and in the PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK strains.
The results indicate that the induction and expression of NahK takes
place only when IPTG is added to the growth media (Figure A lane 4 and Figure B lane 4).
Figure 2
NO-mediated biofilm dispersal
requires NahK. (A,B) Western blot analyses with an anti-hexaHis-tag
antibody (HRP). (A) NahK can be expressed in P. aeruginosa strain PaO1-T7. Anti-His Western blot of NahK in PaO1-T7 and PaO1-T7
that is transformed with an IPTG-inducible plasmid expressing NahK
(PaO1-T7/pnahK), with and without 200 μM IPTG
added to the media for induction of expression of NahK. (B) NahK expression
was disrupted in P. aeruginosa strain
PaO1-T7. Anti-His Western blot of uninduced and induced (+200 μM
IPTG) NahK in strains PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK (nahK-disrupted),
PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pHK (nahK-disrupted
and complemented back with wild-type nahK), and PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pDA (nahK-disrupted and complemented back
with inactive nahK). A band for NahK is only visible
in the complemented strains in the presence of IPTG. (C,D) Biofilms
of wild-type and nahK-disrupted P.
aeruginosa formed at the liquid–air interface
of PVC plates after 24 h of growth, in the presence and absence of
NO, as quantified by crystal violet staining. (C) Disruption of the nosP operon in P. aeruginosa results in loss of the NO phenotype compared with the wild-type
strain. NO (∼5 nM) causes a decrease in PAO1-T7 biofilm thickness
(left set of columns). This NO-dependent decrease in biofilm is not
seen in a pa1976-disrupted mutant (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK;
second set of columns). The decrease in biofilm thickness in the presence
of NO is dependent on pa1976 expression. Biofilm
formation in the pa1976-disrupted strain transformed
with pa1976 on an IPTG-inducible plasmid (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK/pHK) depends upon the addition of IPTG and NO (third group
of columns); i.e., IPTG-induced expression of pa1976 from plasmid pJLQ restores a wild-type-like response to NO. (D)
When the pa1976-disrupted strain is transformed with
an inactive mutant of pa1976 (D809A) on an IPTG-inducible
plasmid (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pDA), NO sensitivity is
lost, independent of IPTG addition, indicating that NO signaling requires
PA1976 activity. Error bars are one standard deviation from the mean
of triplicate experiments; ★ = p ≤
0.005 compared to wild-type PaO1-T7; ★★ = p ≤ 0.005 compared to PaO1-T7::L1LtraHK/pHK before IPTG addition.
NO-mediated biofilm dispersal
requires NahK. (A,B) Western blot analyses with an anti-hexaHis-tag
antibody (HRP). (A) NahK can be expressed in P. aeruginosa strain PaO1-T7. Anti-His Western blot of NahK in PaO1-T7 and PaO1-T7
that is transformed with an IPTG-inducible plasmid expressing NahK
(PaO1-T7/pnahK), with and without 200 μM IPTG
added to the media for induction of expression of NahK. (B) NahK expression
was disrupted in P. aeruginosa strain
PaO1-T7. Anti-His Western blot of uninduced and induced (+200 μM
IPTG) NahK in strains PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK (nahK-disrupted),
PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pHK (nahK-disrupted
and complemented back with wild-type nahK), and PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pDA (nahK-disrupted and complemented back
with inactive nahK). A band for NahK is only visible
in the complemented strains in the presence of IPTG. (C,D) Biofilms
of wild-type and nahK-disrupted P.
aeruginosa formed at the liquid–air interface
of PVC plates after 24 h of growth, in the presence and absence of
NO, as quantified by crystal violet staining. (C) Disruption of the nosP operon in P. aeruginosa results in loss of the NO phenotype compared with the wild-type
strain. NO (∼5 nM) causes a decrease in PAO1-T7 biofilm thickness
(left set of columns). This NO-dependent decrease in biofilm is not
seen in a pa1976-disrupted mutant (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK;
second set of columns). The decrease in biofilm thickness in the presence
of NO is dependent on pa1976 expression. Biofilm
formation in the pa1976-disrupted strain transformed
with pa1976 on an IPTG-inducible plasmid (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK/pHK) depends upon the addition of IPTG and NO (third group
of columns); i.e., IPTG-induced expression of pa1976 from plasmid pJLQ restores a wild-type-like response to NO. (D)
When the pa1976-disrupted strain is transformed with
an inactive mutant of pa1976 (D809A) on an IPTG-inducible
plasmid (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pDA), NO sensitivity is
lost, independent of IPTG addition, indicating that NO signaling requires
PA1976 activity. Error bars are one standard deviation from the mean
of triplicate experiments; ★ = p ≤
0.005 compared to wild-type PaO1-T7; ★★ = p ≤ 0.005 compared to PaO1-T7::L1LtraHK/pHK before IPTG addition.To characterize the biofilming characteristics of these strains,
we conducted a static biofilm assay. As illustrated in Figure C, wild-type PaO1-T7 forms
less biofilm in the presence of NO (from 500 nM DETA NONOate, ∼5
nM NO). This is expected and has been observed many times in studies
of P. aeruginosa biofilm formation.[13,50] PaO1-T7::L1.LtrAHK, the kinase-disrupted mutant,
is able to form biofilm, but it does not display an NO phenotype,
as demonstrated in Figure C. The NahK kinase-complemented strain recovers the NO phenotype
but only once IPTG is added to the medium to induce pa1976 expression (Figure C). Additionally, when PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA is complemented with a Pa1976
construct with a mutation of the conserved aspartate (D809A) in its
receiver domain (PaO1-T7::L1.LtrA/pDA), so as to
prevent downstream signaling, it fails to recover the NO phenotype,
despite addition of IPTG (illustrated in Figure D). These data confirm that expressed and
active NahK is required for NO-mediated biofilm regulation in P. aeruginosa.
Pa1976 Is a NosP-Associated
Histidine Kinase
NosP is in a putative gene operon with a
hybrid histidine kinase (Pa1976; named NahK for NosP-associated histidine
kinase). Frequently cocistronic proteins (proteins encoded within
the same gene cluster) function together, thus we decided to study
the kinase activity of NahK to determine if it is regulated by NosP.
First we cloned Pa1976 with a C-terminal hexaHis-tag. However, the
full-length protein expressed and purified extremely poorly from E. coli. A previous study of Pa1976 had indicated
that a truncated version of Pa1976 can be purified to study phosphorelay,[36] but this truncated mutant lacks the PAS (per-arnt-sim)
and PAC (motif C-terminal to PAS) domains, which are likely protein–protein
interaction domains (Figure A). Thus, we decided to clone a truncated variant of the kinase
with all three PAS/PAC domains but lacking the first 84 amino acids
on the N-terminus, which are predicted to be mostly unstructured with
a coiled-coil motif. We named this variant NahKΔN84. This truncated
construct did not express or purify well, but sufficient quantities
were obtained to continue with the study.
Figure 3
NO/NosP regulates NahK.
(A) Schematic of predicted domain organization of NahK (pa1976). The
N-terminus is predicted to be coiled-coil followed by three PAS domains,
a PAC domain, a HisKA domain [His kinase A (phosphoacceptor) domain],
a HATPase_c domain (histidine kinase-like ATPases), and a REC domain.
(B) In vitro autophosphorylation of NahKΔN84 over time. Radiolabeled
phosphoproteins were detected by SDS-PAGE (bottom) and autoradiography
(top). (C,D) NahKΔN84 transfers phosphate to HptB. (C) Phosphotransfer
from NahKΔN84 to HptB, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, is inhibited by
NosP. Bottom: Protein loading detected by Coomassie staining. Top:
Detection of radiolabeled HptB by autoradiography. Lanes 1–3,
the following proteins were incubated with 32P-labeled
ATP and monitored over time: lane 1, NahKΔN84 + HptB; lane 2,
NahKΔN84 + HptB + ferrous NosP; lane 3, NahKΔN84 + HptB
+ NO-bound NosP. (D) NahKΔN84DA cannot transfer phosphate to
HptB, indicating Asp809 is necessary for phosphotransfer from NahKΔN84
to HptB. Top: Protein loading detected by Coomassie staining. Bottom:
Detection of radiolabeled HptB by autoradiography. Lanes 1–6,
the following proteins were incubated with 32P-labeled
ATP and monitored over time: lane 1, NahKΔN84; lane 2, NahKΔN84
+ HptB; lane 3, NahKΔN84 + NO-bound NosP; lane 4, NahKΔN84
+ HptB + NO-bound NosP; lane 5, NahKΔN84DA; lane 6, NahKΔN84DA
+ HptB.
NO/NosP regulates NahK.
(A) Schematic of predicted domain organization of NahK (pa1976). The
N-terminus is predicted to be coiled-coil followed by three PAS domains,
a PAC domain, a HisKA domain [His kinase A (phosphoacceptor) domain],
a HATPase_c domain (histidine kinase-like ATPases), and a REC domain.
(B) In vitro autophosphorylation of NahKΔN84 over time. Radiolabeled
phosphoproteins were detected by SDS-PAGE (bottom) and autoradiography
(top). (C,D) NahKΔN84 transfers phosphate to HptB. (C) Phosphotransfer
from NahKΔN84 to HptB, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, is inhibited by
NosP. Bottom: Protein loading detected by Coomassie staining. Top:
Detection of radiolabeled HptB by autoradiography. Lanes 1–3,
the following proteins were incubated with 32P-labeled
ATP and monitored over time: lane 1, NahKΔN84 + HptB; lane 2,
NahKΔN84 + HptB + ferrous NosP; lane 3, NahKΔN84 + HptB
+ NO-bound NosP. (D) NahKΔN84DA cannot transfer phosphate to
HptB, indicating Asp809 is necessary for phosphotransfer from NahKΔN84
to HptB. Top: Protein loading detected by Coomassie staining. Bottom:
Detection of radiolabeled HptB by autoradiography. Lanes 1–6,
the following proteins were incubated with 32P-labeled
ATP and monitored over time: lane 1, NahKΔN84; lane 2, NahKΔN84
+ HptB; lane 3, NahKΔN84 + NO-bound NosP; lane 4, NahKΔN84
+ HptB + NO-bound NosP; lane 5, NahKΔN84DA; lane 6, NahKΔN84DA
+ HptB.Figure B shows the autokinase activity of NahKΔN84
over time. NahK is a hybrid histidine kinase with a receiver domain
at its C-terminus. Hybrid histidine kinases usually contain dual activities:
autophosphorylation of a conserved histidine catalyzed by the kinase
domain and dephosphorylation and phosphotransfer from this histidine
residue to a conserved aspartate within the receiver domain catalyzed
by the receiver domain.[51,52] Due to phosphatase
activity,[53] phosphotranferase activity,
and/or the intrinsic chemical instability of phosphorylated aspartate,
it is often difficult to detect phosphorylated hybrid histidine kinases
in typical biochemical assays. The autophosphorylation assay in Figure C, however, demonstrates
stable phosphorylation of NahKΔN84 over 30 min.Hybrid
histidine kinases typically transfer phosphate from the aspartate
in the receiver domain to a histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein
(HPT) in order to continue in signal transduction.[52]P. aeruginosa has three
annotated HPTs, of which Pa3345 (HptB) has been shown to accept phosphate
from NahK.[36] Thus, we cloned, expressed,
and purified HptB in order to study phosphotransfer from NahK to HptB.
Upon incubation of purified HptB with phosphorylated NahK, phosphotransfer
is evident, as illustrated in Figure C, lane 1. We made a mutant of NahKΔN84, NahKΔN84DA,
in which the conserved aspartate (D809) in the receiver domain is
mutated to alanine to prevent phosphotransfer from the histidine residue,
thus trapping phosphate on the histidine residue. As expected, no
phosphotransfer to HptB was observed when NahKΔN84DA was used
instead of NahKΔN84 in the phosphorelay assay (Figure D).
NosP/NahK Signaling Is
NO-Sensitive
We hypothesized that NO/NosP might regulate
the kinase and signal transduction activities of NahK. To evaluate
this hypothesis, ferrous and NO-bound NosP were added to the phosphorelay
assay described above (Figure C). Inhibition of NahKΔN84 autophosphorylation was observed
when excess NosP, as either the FeII or the FeII–NO complex, was added to the phosphorelay assay, but the
greatest inhibition of NahKΔN84 was observed in the presence
of NO-bound NosP (Figure C, lane 3). Indeed, excess (∼30-fold) NO-bound NosP
is able to completely inhibit phosphotransfer to HptB (Figure D, lane 3).Interestingly,
this pattern of kinase inhibition is similar to the inhibition of
histidine kinase activity observed in H-NOX/HahK (H-NOX and H-NOX-associated
histidine kinase) signaling in Vibrio harveyi,[28]Psedualteromonas atlantica,[54]Shewanella oneidensis,[26] and Silicibacter sp. strain TrichCH4B.[30] In all of these
systems, FeIIH-NOX inhibits HahK activity somewhat and
FeII–NO inhibits it more. This is possibly due to
the fact that, in all of these systems, the sensor (H-NOX or NosP)
is encoded on a separate polypeptide from its associated kinase. Perhaps,
the act of sensor/kinase binding results in some inhibition that is
enhanced upon ligation of NO. We hypothesize that in cells the sensor
may always be bound to its associated kinase, such that the activity
of the FeII complex is the physiologically relevant baseline
kinase activity, which is then inhibited upon NO binding.We
are currently investigating the possibility that rather than inhibiting
the kinase activity of NahK, NosP enhances the phosphatase activity
of the receiver domain of NahK in the presence of NO-bound NosP. HptB
receives phosphate from NahK as well as at least three other kinases
[Pa1611, Pa2824 (SagS; surface attachment and growth sensor histidine
kinase), and Pa4856] that are modulated by stimuli yet to be identified.[36] Enhanced phosphatase activity of NahK might
result in more dramatic modulation of the phosphorylated state of
not only HptB but also Pa1611, Pa2824, and/or PA4856 when NO is present
in the environment, thus leading to an amplified effect on HptB signaling
in the presence of NO.The accepted signaling mechanism downstream
of HptB has not been tied to cyclic-di-GMP regulation, although NO-mediated
biofilm dispersal has been linked to cyclic-di-GMP levels.[15] In short, the SagS, NahK, Pa1611, and Pa4856
kinases initiate a phosphorelay cascade in P. aeruginosa through HptB to the bifunctional protein Pa3346. Pa3346 possesses
both kinase and phosphatase activities, depending on the phosphorylation
state of the protein. It has been demonstrated that HptB, through
its interaction with Pa3347, can modulate flagella-related gene expression
and thus is able to regulate biofilm. According to Hsu et al.,[36] biofilm formation is dependent on HptB and biofilm
dispersal is correlated with phosphorylated HptB, which at first seems
to be inconsistent with our data.However, in a recent publication,
Xu et al.[55] demonstrated HptB-mediated
biofilm regulation in P. aeruginosa to be more complicated. The authors showed that a PilZ protein [Pa2799
or HapZ (histidine kinase associated PilZ)] could down-regulate phosphotransfer
from SagS (Pa2824) to HptB by directly interacting with the SagS receiver
domain. This down-regulation of phosphotransfer was further inhibited
in the presence of cyclic-di-GMP. Essentially, SagS phosphorylation
of HptB in vitro is significantly reduced in the presence of HapZ
or cyclic-di-GMP/HapZ. Based on these results, deletion of HapZ, in
principle, should result in increased phospho-HptB, which should result
in biofilm formation. Regardless, the ΔhapZ mutant was shown to be deficient in biofilm formation, due to an
early attachment defect, as demonstrated by a flow cell biofilm assay.[55] Therefore, despite the phosphorylation state
of HptB, upon deleting HapZ, a lack of biofilm formation is observed.Similarly, in our study, we find NO/NosP reduces phosphorelay from
NahK to HptB, yet the phenotype we observe is less biofilm formation.
Evidently, more proteins must be involved in this biofilm regulation
pathway. It is possible that NahK is involved in protein–protein
interactions with partners aside from NosP, similar to the situation
with SagS described above. It is also possible that NosP or NahK might
interact with other kinases and/or effector proteins to modulate total
cyclic-di-GMP concentrations downstream of NO sensing. We are currently
investigating the possibility of HptB-mediated regulation of receiver
domain-containing diguanylate cyclases or cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterases,
as well as possible NosP interactions with these types of proteins
or orphan kinases in P. aeruginosa.With the data presented here, we propose that NosP is a hemoprotein
that ligates NO. In the presence of NO, NO/NosP is able to suppress
NahK-mediated phosphorelay to HptB, which ultimately leads to modulation
of biofilm in P. aeruginosa (Figure ). In conclusion,
we have identified a novel family of bacterial primary NO binding
proteins and a NO-responsive signaling pathway in P.
aeruginosa that regulates biofilm formation. Although
a role for NO/NosP has yet to be established in organisms other than P. aeruginosa, we speculate a possible role for NO/NosP
in biofilm regulation in S. oneidensis,[26] where the histidine kinase cocistronic
with NosP is directly involved in regulating S. oneidensis biofilm. Furthermore, NosP is clearly involved in biofilm regulation
in V. cholerae and in L. pneumophila: in V. cholerae, a NosP-fused cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterase protein has been shown
to be involved in V. cholerae biofilm
formation by regulating cyclic-di-GMP concentrations,[34] and a NosP-co-cistronic bifunctional diguanylate
cyclase/cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterase enzyme has been shown to be
involved in L. pneumophila(35) biofilm formation. We are currently working
to evaluate the role for NO/NosP is these and other bacterial systems.
Figure 4
Schematic
representation of NO-mediated biofilm dispersal through HptB. In the
absence of NO, NosP has no effect on NahK activity. As a result, NahK
can autophosphorylate its conserved histidine residue, transfer phosphate
intramolecularly to its receiver domain, and then engage in phosphotransfer
with the HptB protein (Pa3345). We hypothesize that NosP, HptB, and
NahK can interact with effector proteins that are yet to be identified,
but their activity leads to biofilm formation. When NO is present,
NO/NosP inhibits NahK activity, ultimately yielding a decrease in
phosphate flow through the pathway and resulting in biofilm dispersal.
Schematic
representation of NO-mediated biofilm dispersal through HptB. In the
absence of NO, NosP has no effect on NahK activity. As a result, NahK
can autophosphorylate its conserved histidine residue, transfer phosphate
intramolecularly to its receiver domain, and then engage in phosphotransfer
with the HptB protein (Pa3345). We hypothesize that NosP, HptB, and
NahK can interact with effector proteins that are yet to be identified,
but their activity leads to biofilm formation. When NO is present,
NO/NosP inhibits NahK activity, ultimately yielding a decrease in
phosphate flow through the pathway and resulting in biofilm dispersal.
Methods
More detailed
methods can be found in the Supporting Information.
Cloning and Genetics
See Table S1. nosP, nosP-NT, nahK, nahKΔN84, and hptB were
each cloned into pET20(b) vectors (Novagen) via the NdeI and XhoI
restriction sites. Mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis.
The PaO1-T7::L1LtrAHK gene disruption strain was constructed according
to Yao et al.[56]nahK was
subcloned into the broad-host-range vector pLJQhis[57] via NdeI and XhoI restriction sites and introduced into
PaO1-T7::L1LtrA with the Benchmarks BioTechnique protocol[58] to make the PaO1-T7::L1LtrAHK/pHK strain. All
plasmids were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Protein Expression and
Analysis
NosP expression and purification was adapted from
Boon et al.,[44] and NahK purification was
adapted from Hsu et al.[36] The Anti-6X His-tag
antibody (HRP) from Abcam (ab1187) was used according to the manufacturer’s
specifications for Western blot analysis. Kinase assay conditions
were adapted from Hsu et al.[36] Autoradiographs
were analyzed with ImageJ software. All UV/vis spectra were recorded
on a Cary 100 spectrophotometer equipped with a constant temperature
bath. NosP complexes were prepared in an oxygen-free glovebag, and
NO dissociation kinetics were measured as previously described.[44]
Heme Agarose Pulldown Assay
Hemin-agarose
(Sigma; 40 μL) was equilibrated with 500 μL of assay buffer
(20 mM Tris·HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1% Triton X-100, pH
8.0). Cleared lysate (1 mL) from an induced, nonspecific protein was
used as a control along with lysate from induced NosP. Microcentrifuge
tubes containing lysate with beads were then incubated with rocking
for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were collected by centrifugation.
The lysate supernatant fraction was discarded, and the beads were
washed three times with 1 mL of the assay buffer containing either
10 or 100 mM imidazole. Following the wash steps, 50 μL of SDS
loading dye was added directly to the beads and they were boiled for
3 min at 95 °C. Samples were centrifuged again to settle the
beads, and 10 μL of the supernatant fraction was analyzed via SDS-PAGE.
Biofilm Analysis
PaO1-T7 wild-type and mutants were analyzed using the microtiter
dish assay described elsewhere.[59]
Authors: Lisa-Marie Nisbett; Lucas Binnenkade; Bezalel Bacon; Sajjad Hossain; Nicholas J Kotloski; Evan D Brutinel; Raimo Hartmann; Knut Drescher; Dhruv P Arora; Sandhya Muralidharan; Kai M Thormann; Jeffrey A Gralnick; Elizabeth M Boon Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 3.162