| Literature DB >> 28231308 |
Qiang Zhang1,2, Xinguang Chen2, Zhitao Liu1, Deepthi S Varma2, Rong Wan1, Shiwen Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With rapid urbanization in the past decades, diet diversity continues to increase in China. The present cross-sectional study aims to explore the association between dietary diversity and nutritional status among adults in southwest China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28231308 PMCID: PMC5322886 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Socio-demographic characteristics and dietary diversity score of the participants.
| N | Unweighted (%) | Weighted (%) | DDS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ||||||
| AllGender | 1105 | 100 | 100 | 5.2 | 1.1 | |
| Sex | ||||||
| Men | 444 | 40.0 | 50.4 | 5.1 | 1.0 | <0.01 |
| Women | 661 | 60.0 | 49.6 | 5.3 | 1.1 | |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 18~ | 906 | 81.5 | 85.3 | 5.2 | 1.1 | <0.01 |
| 60~ | 199 | 18.5 | 14.7 | 4.8 | 1.0 | |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married | 1002 | 90.7 | 89.3 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| Unmarried | 103 | 9.3 | 10.7 | 5.0 | 1.0 | |
| Ethnic group | ||||||
| Han | 519 | 47.0 | 46.3 | 5.3 | 1.0 | <0.01 |
| Minorities | 586 | 53.0 | 53.7 | 5.1 | 1.1 | |
| Education level | ||||||
| Low | 790 | 71.7 | 68.9 | 5.1 | 1.0 | <0.01 |
| High | 315 | 28.3 | 31.1 | 5.4 | 1.0 | |
| Income (Yuan) | ||||||
| <5000 | 767 | 69.6 | 68.7 | 5.1 | 1.0 | <0.01 |
| 10000- | 338 | 30.4 | 31.3 | 5.3 | 1.1 | |
Dietary intakes of the participants by dietary diversity score groups.
| DDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (2–4) | Medium (5) | High (6–8) | ||
| (N = 279, 25.2%) | (N = 421, 38.1%) | (N = 405, 36.7%) | ||
| Food groups (g/d) | ||||
| Grains | 523 (41, 681) | 520(401, 705) | 520(400, 678) | 200–400 |
| Vegetables | 197(122, 297) | 189(119, 295) | 183 (104, 295) | 300–500 |
| Fruits | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 46(0, 140) | 200–400 |
| Beans | 0 (0, 0) | 0(0, 25) | 15 (4, 34) | 30–50 |
| Meats | 77(0, 173) | 114 (65, 188) | 116 (68, 176) | 50–75 |
| Dairy | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 300 |
| Eggs | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 16) | 18(0, 38) | 25–50 |
| Fish | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 19) | 50–100 |
| Oil | 23(13, 45) | 33(17, 52) | 36 (19, 58) | 25 |
| Energy from fat (%) | 18.5 | 22.5 | 24.5 | <30 |
Note: The amounts of food intakes are expressed as Median (quartile range)
NARs of 16 individual nutrients in the participants’ diet by dietary diversity score groups.
| DDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (2–4) | Medium (5) | High (6–8) | ||
| NAR | ||||
| Energy | 1.02±0.32 | 1.13±0.34 | 1.18±0.33 | <0.01 |
| Protein | 0.94±0.33 | 1.12±00.36 | 1.23±0.39 | <0.01 |
| P | 1.21±0.40 | 1.37±0.40 | 1.51±0.43 | <0.01 |
| Sodium | 2.33±1.25 | 2.35±1.27 | 2.49±1.37 | 0.21 |
| Fe | 1.09±0.47 | 1.35±0.50 | 1.47±0.52 | <0.01 |
| Niacin | 1.09±0.43 | 1.28±0.50 | 1.32±0.54 | <0.01 |
| Zn | 0.95±0.33 | 1.06±0.33 | 1.13±0.36 | <0.01 |
| Vitamin E | 0.99±0.88 | 1.43±1.22 | 1.86±1.43 | <0.01 |
| Mg | 0.80±0.29 | 0.88±0.27 | 0.97±0.30 | <0.01 |
| K | 0.72±0.30 | 0.83±0.32 | 0.96±0.34 | <0.01 |
| Thiamine | 0.73±0.32 | 0.82±0.32 | 0.87±0.33 | <0.01 |
| Riboflavin | 0.44±0.17 | 0.52±0.20 | 0.60±0.24 | <0.01 |
| Vitamin C | 0.75±0.47 | 0.72±0.43 | 0.87±0.46 | 0.72 |
| Se | 0.48±0.21 | 0.50±0.32 | 0.78±0.32 | <0.01 |
| Vitamin A | 0.32±0.29 | 0.50±0.32 | 0.50±0.33 | <0.01 |
| Ca | 0.26±0.12 | 0.30±0.13 | 0.37±0.17 | <0.01 |
Note: Values are expressed as Mean±SD.
Multivariate-adjusted odds ratio and 95% CI for having general obesity and central obesity.
| DDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (2–4) | Medium (5) | High (6–8) | ||
| General obesity | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.0 | 2.1(1.1–4.0) | 2.2 (1.2–4.0) | <0.01 |
| Model 2 | 1.0 | 2.0 (1.0–3.8) | 2.1 (1.1–3.9) | <0.01 |
| Model 3 | 1.0 | 1.7 (0.9–3.3) | 1.9 (1.1–3.7) | <0.01 |
| Central obesity | ||||
| Model 1 | 1.0 | 1.5(1.1–2.2) | 2.2 (1.5–3.1) | <0.01 |
| Model 2 | 1.0 | 1.(1.1–2.2) | 2.1(1.4–3.1) | <0.01 |
| Model 3 | 1.0 | 1.4(1.0–2.1) | 1.9 (1.3–2.8) | <0.01 |
Note: Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, ethnic groups, education and income. Model 2: model 1 with additional adjusted for energy intake and physical activity. Model 3: model 2 with additional adjusted for smoke and drink.