| Literature DB >> 28229037 |
Ann-Charlotte Grahn Kronhed1, Helena Salminen2.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to explore long-term effects seven years after the completion of a ten-year community-based osteoporosis intervention program in Vadstena, Sweden. The association between calcaneal bone mineral density and several life style factors, and the impact of risk factors for sustaining a fracture after the age of 50 were also studied. Previous participants in the intervention group, and matched subjects were invited to calcaneal bone mass measurement by a portable device including the dual X-ray and laser (DXL) technology by Calscan, and to complete a questionnaire in 2006. A total of 417 persons (63% of those invited) in the intervention (I) group, and 120 persons (47% of those invited) in the control (C) group participated. Mean age was 63 years (37-94 years). There was somewhat more knowledge of osteoporosis in the I-group (M = 18) than in the C-group (M = 17) (p < 0.05), and more use of shoe/cane spikes in elderly women in the I-group (67%) than in the C-group (40.5%). The fully adjusted model of logistic regression showed that participants with an osteoporotic DXL T-score (≤- 2.5) had a 3-fold increased risk (95%CI 1.48-6.89) of having a history of a self-reported fracture after the age of fifty compared to women with a calcaneal T-score >- 2.5. The long-term effects of a ten-year, community-based, osteoporosis intervention program on knowledge and behavior were modest seven years after its completion.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mineral density; Community-based; Fall; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Prevention
Year: 2017 PMID: 28229037 PMCID: PMC5312506 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med Rep ISSN: 2211-3355
Fig. 1Flowchart of participants in the intervention (I) and the control (C) groups (Vadstena; Kvarnholmen/Kalmar city centre, Sweden in 2006).
Mean (M) values and standard deviations (SD) for age, calcaneal bone mineral density (BMD), T- and Z-scores, body mass index (BMI), height and weight for women and men in the intervention (I) and the control (C) groups. (Vadstena; Kvarnholmen/Kalmar city centre, Sweden in 2006).
| Women | Men | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-group | C-group | I-group | C-group | |||
| M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | |||
| Number | 237 | 74 | 180 | 46 | ||
| Age | 64.2 (14.8) | 62.6 (12.0) | ns | 62.5 (12.9) | 64.4 (12.5) | ns |
| BMD (g/cm2) | 0.394 (0.095) | 0.400 (0.077) | ns | 0.504 (0.084) | 0.504 (0.096) | ns |
| T-score | − 1.5 (1.2) | − 1.4 (1.0) | ns | − 0.7 (1.1) | − 0.6 (1.2) | ns |
| Z-score | − 0.3 (0.9) | − 0.3 (0.7) | ns | 0.3 (1.0) | 0.3 (1.2) | ns |
| Number | 236 | 74 | 180 | 46 | ||
| BMI kg/(m)2 | 26.3 (4.7) | 25.7 (3.9) | ns | 27.3 (4.3) | 26.7 (3.6) | ns |
| Number | 233 | 74 | 178 | 46 | ||
| Height (cm) | 163.4 (6.4) | 163.8 (6.8) | ns | 176.3 (6.6) | 178.5 (8.2) | ns |
| Weight (kg) | 70.1 (12.0) | 69.2 (11.8) | ns | 85.1 (15.0) | 85.2 (13.8) | ns |
Reported falls, limitations due to a fall, fear of falling, and the use of spikes in percent and confidence intervals (CI) with 95% confidence level for each question in women and men aged ≥ 65 years in the intervention (I) and the control (C) groups. (Vadstena; Kvarnholmen/Kalmar city centre, Sweden in 2006).
| WOMEN | MEN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-group | C-group | I-group | C-group | |
| I had a fall last year | ||||
| Total respondents (n) | 105 | 36 | 72 | 21 |
| Percent and CI | 39% (0.296–0.485) | 27.8% (0.124–0.431) | 30.6% (0.197–0.415) | 33.3% (0.113–0.553) |
| I have limited my daily activities due to a fall | ||||
| Total respondents (n) | 46 | 11 | 24 | 8 |
| Percent and CI | 13% (0.033–0.228) | 9.1% (− 0.079–0.261) | 16.7% (0.018–0.316) | 12.5% (− 0.104–0.354) |
| I am worried about falling | ||||
| Total respondents (n) | 47 | 13 | 26 | 8 |
| Percent and CI | 66% (0.524–0.795) | 46.2% (0.191–0.733) | 34.6% (0.163–0.529) | 37.5% (0.040–0.710) |
| I use spikes in winter when it is slippery | ||||
| Total respondents (n) | 106 | 37 | 71 | 21 |
| Percent and CI | 67% | 40.5% (0.247–0.564) | 29.6% (0.190–0.402) | 23.8% (0.056–0.420) |
The difference between the groups is significant, if the 95% confidence intervals for women and men respectively do not overlap.
Regression coefficients for selected independent variables (age, BMI, leisure time physical activity levels, 30-min daily brisk walks in summer, sustained fractures in adulthood and community) and their associations with calcaneal bone mineral density (BMD) in women (n = 283) and men (n = 210) (Vadstena; Kvarnholmen/Kalmar city centre, Sweden in 2006).
| BMD women | BMD men | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-coefficients | β-coefficients | |||
| Intercept | 0.551 | 0.446 | ||
| Age (years) | − 0.004 | − 0.002 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.004 | 0.006 | ||
| Moderate leisure time activity | 0.013 | 0.234 | 0.032 | |
| High leisure time activity | 0.017 | 0.385 | 0.059 | |
| 30-min daily brisk walks in the summer | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.215 | |
| Fractures in adulthood | − 0.023 | − 0.030 | 0.061 | |
| Community | − 0.002 | 0.797 | − 0.009 | 0.537 |
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals of the risk for self-reported fracture after the age of 50 in women (n = 224) and men (n = 176). Two models were used and adjusted for several independent variables. Patients with missing data on BMI, leisure time physical activity level, 30-min daily brisk walks in summer were excluded from the analyses. (Vadstena; Kvarnholmen/Kalmar city centre, Sweden in 2006).
| Variable | Crude OR | Model 1: | Model 2: |
|---|---|---|---|
| DXL T-score | |||
| Normal/Osteopenia | 1.0 (Reference) | 1.0 (Reference) | 1.0 (Reference) |
| Osteoporosis | |||
| Age | |||
| Sex | |||
| Men | 1.0 (Reference) | 1.0 (Reference) | |
| Women | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.03 (0.97–1.11) | ||
| Leisure time physical activity | |||
| High activity | 1.0 (Reference) | ||
| Low activity; | 1.26 (0.13–11.89); | ||
| Moderate activity; | 1.38 (0.17–11.50); | ||
| 30-min daily brisk walks in summer | |||
| Yes | 1.0 (Reference) | ||
| No | 1.02 (0.53–1.95) | ||
| Community | |||
| Intervention group | 1.0 (Reference) | ||
| Control group | 1.20 (0.60–2.40) | ||