| Literature DB >> 28225009 |
Nena Pavlidi1,2, Anastasia Gioti1, Nicky Wybouw2, Wannes Dermauw3, Michael Ben-Yosef4, Boaz Yuval4, Edouard Jurkevich5, Anastasia Kampouraki1,6, Thomas Van Leeuwen2,3, John Vontas6,7.
Abstract
The olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae, is the most destructive pest of olive orchards worldwide. The monophagous larva has the unique capability of feeding on olive mesocarp, coping with high levels of phenolic compounds and utilizing non-hydrolyzed proteins present, particularly in the unripe, green olives. On the molecular level, the interaction between B. oleae and olives has not been investigated as yet. Nevertheless, it has been associated with the gut obligate symbiotic bacterium Candidatus Erwinia dacicola. Here, we used a B.oleae microarray to analyze the gene expression of larvae during their development in artificial diet, unripe (green) and ripe (black) olives. The expression profiles of Ca. E. dacicola were analyzed in parallel, using the Illumina platform. Several genes were found overexpressed in the olive fly larvae when feeding in green olives. Among these, a number of genes encoding detoxification and digestive enzymes, indicating a potential association with the ability of B. oleae to cope with green olives. In addition, a number of biological processes seem to be activated in Ca. E. dacicola during the development of larvae in olives, with the most notable being the activation of amino-acid metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28225009 PMCID: PMC5320501 DOI: 10.1038/srep42633
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Heatmap plot showing gene expression level ratios (relative to artificial diet) for B. oleae differentially expressed genes (n = 616) in the two olive regimes of this study. Orange and green sidebars indicate genes that code for enzymes predicted to digest food and detoxify plant metabolites, respectively. Clustering of the genes (Euclidean distance, Ward) was based on their relative transcript levels in the two transcriptomic comparisons. (B) PCA plot showing the four biological replicates of each feeding regime: black and green olives and artificial diet. PC1 and PC2 represent 30.00% and 20.04% of the total data variance, respectively. The PCA analysis was performed on the transcript levels of 17,797 genes B. oleae showing an FDR-corrected p¬-value < 0.05 in at least one feeding condition. (C) Scatterplot of significantly differentially expressed genes (n = 108) in both larvae feeding on green olives vs. artificial diet and green olives vs. black olives transcriptomic comparisons. Contig04001 is predicted to code for a UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT) (indicated in blue). The contigs 04849 and 01887 are predicted to code for digestive serine proteases (indicated in orange).
Figure 2Microarray validation of selected putative detoxification and digestive genes overexpressed in the 3 transcriptomic comparisons.
(A) Larvae fed upon green olives vs. larvae fed upon artificial diet. (B) Larvae fed upon black olives vs. larvae fed upon artificial diet. (C) Larvae fed upon green olives vs. larvae fed upon black olives. Error bars represent the standard deviation of four biological replicates. Microarray data are also presented. Contig04596: serine protease; contig03768: serine protease; contig04001: UDP-glucosyltransferase; contig04849: serine protease; contig03604: cytochrome P450; contig04090: serine protease; contig04528: serine protease; contig02711: serine protease; contig03020: N-acetyltransferase; contig01887: peptidase; contig00850: metalloprotease; contig06851: lysozyme; contig04367: serine protease; contig07649: protease.
Figure 3Gene set analysis of the biological processes coded by the differentially expressed genes in B. oleae larvae feeding on green olives, (A) compared to larvae reared on artificial diet and (B) black olives (log2FC > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05). Gene sets with gene members between 5 and 30 were used for analysis. Nodes and interconnecting lines represent gene sets and the inter-set overlap, respectively. Using larvae fed on artificial diet or black olives as the reference, blue and red node colors indicate that the gene members were under and over-expressed in the larvae feeding on green olives, respectively. The significantly enriched gene sets are indicated by an orange halo (BH-adjusted p-value < 0.05, obtained through piano) analysis and a green halo (Fisher’s exact test, BH-adjusted p-value < 0.05, obtained through Blast2GO analysis). The number of genes on the interconnecting lines ranged from 1 to 9 and 1 to 13 in panel A and panel B, respectively. Gene sets are named by their descriptive labels. The gene set map and directionality of differential expression was produced using the piano package66. For more a detailed list of GO-enriched terms, see Table S4.
Draft transcriptome assembly of Candidatus Erwinia dacicola.
| Feature (all – scaffolds > 200 bp) | Value |
|---|---|
| # scaffolds | 2,161–1,731 |
| Average scaffold length (bp) | 1,281–1,559 |
| N50 (bp) | 3,008–3,175 |
| Total length (bp) | 2,769,894–2,699,562 |
| Average scaffold coverage (x) | 1,073–437 |
| # coding genes | 3,206 |
| # tRNAs | 44 |
| Average coding gene length (bp) | 540 |
N50 is a weighted median statistic such that 50% of the entire assembly is contained in scaffolds equal to or larger than this value. #: number.