Literature DB >> 28223884

Effects of Reduced Compression in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Pain, Anxiety, and Image Quality.

Siti Aishah Abdullah Suhaimi1, Afifah Mohamed1, Mahadir Ahmad2, Kanaga Kumari Chelliah1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most women are reluctant to undergo breast cancer screenings due to the pain and anxiety they experience. Sectional three-dimensional (3-D) breasttomosynthesis was introduced to improve cancer detection, but breast compression is still used for the acquisition of images. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of reduced compression force on pain, anxiety and image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).
METHODS: A total of 130 women underwent screening mammography using convenience sampling with standard and reduced compression force at the breast clinic. A validated questionnaire of 20 items on the state anxiety level and a 4-point verbal rating scale on the pain level were conducted after the mammography. Craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections were performed with standard compression, but only the CC view was performed with reduced compression. Two independent radiologists evaluated the images using image criteria scores (ICS) and the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
RESULTS: Standard compression exhibited significantly increased scores for pain and anxiety levels compared with reduced compression (P < 0.001). Both radiologists scored the standard and reduced compression images as equal, with scores of 87.5% and 92.5% for ICS and BI-RADS scoring, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced compression force in DBT reduces anxiety and pain levels without compromising image quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; breast; compression; pain; reduction

Year:  2015        PMID: 28223884      PMCID: PMC5295750     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  18 in total

1.  Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening.

Authors:  M E Keemers-Gels; R P Groenendijk; J H van den Heuvel; C Boetes; P G Peer; T H Wobbes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Does mammography hurt?

Authors:  Rama Sapir; Michael Patlas; Shalom David Strano; Irit Hadas-Halpern; Nathan I Cherny
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Breast cancer worry among women awaiting mammography: is it unfounded? Does prior counseling help?

Authors:  Susan K Steinemann; Maria B J Chun; Dustin H Huynh; Katherine Loui
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-07

5.  Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study. A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Psychiatric morbidity after screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Dean; M M Roberts; K French; S Robinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases.

Authors:  D Förnvik; I Andersson; T Svahn; P Timberg; S Zackrisson; A Tingberg
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Reported pain following mammography screening.

Authors:  Penny C Sharp; Robert Michielutte; Rita Freimanis; Louise Cunningham; John Spangler; Virginia Burnette
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-14

10.  What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Rodway; M Baum
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patients' and radiographers' experiences of dose reducing abdominal compression in radiographic examinations-A qualitative study.

Authors:  Oili Piippo-Huotari; Eva Funk; Håkan Geijer; Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-01-07

2.  Effect of x-ray energy on the radiological image quality in propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography of the breast.

Authors:  Sarina Wan; Benedicta D Arhatari; Yakov I Nesterets; Sheridan C Mayo; Darren Thompson; Jane Fox; Beena Kumar; Zdenka Prodanovic; Daniel Hausermann; Anton Maksimenko; Christopher Hall; Matthew Dimmock; Konstantin M Pavlov; Darren Lockie; Mary Rickard; Ziba Gadomkar; Alaleh Aminzadeh; Elham Vafa; Andrew Peele; Harry M Quiney; Sarah Lewis; Timur E Gureyev; Patrick C Brennan; Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.