Literature DB >> 28221108

pncA Gene Mutations Associated with Pyrazinamide Resistance in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, South Africa and Georgia.

Salim Allana, Elena Shashkina, Barun Mathema, Nino Bablishvili, Nestani Tukvadze, N Sarita Shah, Russell R Kempker, Henry M Blumberg, Pravi Moodley, Koleka Mlisana, James C M Brust, Neel R Gandhi.   

Abstract

Although pyrazinamide is commonly used for tuberculosis treatment, drug-susceptibility testing is not routinely available. We found polymorphisms in the pncA gene for 70% of multidrug-resistant and 96% of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from South Africa and Georgia. Assessment of pyrazinamide susceptibility may be prudent before using it in regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Georgia; South Africa; bacteria; drug resistance; pyrazinamide; sequencing; tuberculosis; tuberculosis and other mycobacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28221108      PMCID: PMC5382742          DOI: 10.3201/eid2303.161034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) poses a significant threat to global health, with an estimated 480,000 new cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) in 2014; 10% of these cases were classified as extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) (). MDR and XDR TB are associated with high mortality rates because of limited treatment options (,). Drug-susceptibility testing (DST) is critical for constructing MDR and XDR TB treatment regimens. Pyrazinamide is a critical component of first-line TB regimens but is also recommended for use in drug-resistant TB regimens (). Despite widespread use, phenotypic DST for pyrazinamide is not routinely performed because of the precise acidic conditions required (). However, acidic environments also inhibit the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, making phenotypic pyrazinamide DST challenging even in sophisticated TB laboratories. The need for pyrazinamide DST is underscored by the potential synergy between pyrazinamide and new TB drugs under study for treatment of drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB (). The development of rapid molecular tests has simplified testing for drug resistance. Assays detect resistance-conferring mutations in genes associated with phenotypic resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, fluoroquinolones, ethambutol, aminoglycosides, and capreomycin. Genotypic testing for pyrazinamide may provide a simpler method for assessing drug susceptibility (). Pyrazinamide resistance arises through genetic mutations in the pncA gene (). pncA encodes pyrazinamidase, which converts pyrazinamide into pyrazinoic acid for its antimycobacterial activity. However, data on the frequency and diversity of pncA mutations in clinical settings are limited. We characterized the frequency and diversity of polymorphisms in the pncA gene and estimated the prevalence of pyrazinamide resistance among patients with MDR and XDR TB in South Africa and the country of Georgia. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from Emory University, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, University of KwaZulu-Natal, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Study

We performed a cross-sectional study examining pncA polymorphisms in M. tuberculosis isolates from a convenience sample of patients with MDR or XDR TB who were prospectively enrolled in studies from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (n = 451, diagnosed 2011–2014), and Georgia (n = 103, diagnosed November 2011–April 2012) (Technical Appendix). Cultures and DST were performed at the provincial TB reference laboratory in Durban, South Africa, and the National Reference Laboratory in Tbilisi, Georgia. Samples underwent PCR amplification followed by standard capillary sequencing of the pncA promoter and coding DNA sequence at the Public Health Research Institute in Newark, New Jersey, USA, as previously described (). Polymorphisms were identified by alignment of nucleotide sequences to the H37Rv reference strain by using ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/). We calculated the frequency of each pncA polymorphism and classified mutations as synonymous or nonsynonymous. We compared polymorphisms with those reported in the literature to identify any that are known to be associated with phenotypic susceptibility and to determine the proportion that are likely to confer phenotypic resistance (–). To determine the effect of clonal expansion of MDR and XDR TB on the diversity of pncA mutations, we also compared IS6110-based restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns with pncA mutations for the isolates from South Africa (conducted at the Public Health Research Institute). The distribution of RFLP patterns among isolates with identical pncA mutations was examined to determine if the pncA mutation arose de novo or may have been transmitted. We completed targeted pncA gene sequencing for 554 unique patient-isolates [1 isolate/patient], 167 MDR TB and 387 XDR TB; of these, 99 (59%) of MDR TB and 215 (56%) of XDR TB patients had previously received treatment for TB. A pncA polymorphism was found in 117 (70%) MDR TB and 370 (96%) XDR TB isolates (Tables 1, 2). The proportion of MDR TB and XDR TB isolates with pncA polymorphisms did not differ significantly between those from South Africa and Georgia (MDR, 68% vs. 72%, p = 0.74; XDR, 96% vs. 90%, p = 0.73, respectively).
Table 1

pncA gene sequencing and RFLP results of 74 MDR TB and 377 XDR TB isolates from KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa*

MutationpncA mutation type†Frequency (no. isolates)RFLP‡
Mutations common to MDR TB and XDR TB isolates
1 Ins C after 456271 (MDR TB: 7; XDR TB: 264)MDR TB: HP
XDR TB: HP (263), mixed (1)
2TTG(L) 151 TCG(S)§19 (MDR TB: 8; XDR TB: 11)MDR TB: GY
XDR TB: GY
3AGG(R) 154 GGG(G)17 (MDR TB: 3; XDR TB: 14)MDR TB: AH
XDR TB: AH
4GCG(A) 102 GTG(V)§15 (MDR TB: 13; XDR TB: 2)MDR TB: BW (1), KO (12)
XDR TB: BM (1), KO (1)
5CAT(H) 71 TAT(Y)§13 (MDR TB: 3; XDR TB: 10)MDR TB: BH (1), BW (2)
XDR TB: BH (1), BW (8), HP (1)
6Ins A after 408§8 (MDR TB: 1; XDR TB: 7)MDR TB: CC
XDR TB: CC (6), GY (1)
7TCC(S) 59 CCC(P)§7 (MDR TB: 4; XDR TB: 3)MDR TB: BF
XDR TB: BF
8GGT(G) 132 GCT(A)§4 (MDR TB: 1; XDR TB: 3)MDR TB: HP
XDR TB: HP
9
GGT(G) 97 GAT(D)§
2 (MDR TB: 1; XDR TB: 1)
MDR TB: KM
XDR TB: M
Mutations specific to MDR TB isolates
10CTG(L) 35 CTA(L)¶1W
11CTG(L) 35 CTA(L)¶1GY
TTG(L) 151 TCG(S)
12TTC(F) 58 TCC(S)§1BH
13ACT(T) 76 ATT(I)§1CC
14GAG(E) 91 CAG(Q)1BH
15GGT(G) 97 TGT(C)§1H
16Ins A after 407§1CC
17Del CAGGGTGC at 4591W
18
Del T at 515§
1
GO
Mutations specific to XDR TB isolates
19insG after 51523MH
20TAC(Y) 34 GAC(D)§5BH
21GTG(V) 139 GGG(G)§3HP
22GTG(V) 130 GCG(A)#2W
23Del G at 385,
TTG(L) 151 TCG(S)2GY
24GAG(E) 15 GGG(G)1W
25ACC(T) 47 ATC(I)1KR
26CAC(H) 51 CCC(P) §1HP
27TCC(S) 65 TCT(S)¶,#1GD
28TGC(C) 104 CGC(R)1MH
29ACC(T) 153 CAC(H)§1HP
30AGG(R) 154 TGG(W)§1HP
31Ins G after 3121HP
32Ins G after 3131HP
33Del T at 3891HP
34
Ins C after 456,
CTG(L) 35 CTA(L)¶
1
HP
Wild-type40 (MDR TB: 24; XDR TB: 16)MDR TB: BE (2), BH (4), BM (1), BW (1), CC (2), FO (1), GO (1), GY (1), HZ (1), MH (2), W (8); 
XDR TB: AH (1), BM (1), BW (1), CC (1), GY (1), HP (2), MH (4), mixed (1), W (4)

*del, deletion; ins, insertion; MDR, multidrug resistant; RFLP, restriction fragment-length polymorphism; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; TB, tuberculosis; XDR, extensively drug-resistant. Row colors: pink, frameshift mutations (insertions or deletions); green, synonymous mutations or SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic susceptibility to pyrazinamide; gray, SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic resistance to pyrazinamide; blue, single-nucleotide polymorphisms not previously reported in the literature.
†Insertions and deletions are presented with the nucleotide position where the polymorphism occurred; SNPs are presented with the codon position and the original and mutated 3 nucleotides and amino acid.
‡The nomenclature used for classifying IS6110 RFLP patterns was as follows: 2 isolates with an identical IS6110 banding pattern were assigned the same arbitrary 1- or 2-letter code (e.g., W, HP, or AB), which started with the first observed cluster, strain A (several decades ago). IS6110 patterns that were similar but not identical were denoted by the addition of a number (e.g., BE1, W4, or HP81). This table shows only the letter designations; numbers have been omitted for simplicity. Strains within each of the 2-letter designations had similar RFLP patterns. 
§Reported in the literature as being associated with resistance to pyrazinamide.
¶Synonymous mutation.
#Reported in the literature as being associated with susceptibility to pyrazinamide.

Table 2

pncA gene sequencing results of 93 MDR TB and 10 XDR TB isolates from Georgia*

Mutation
pncA mutation type†
Frequency (no. isolates)
Mutations specific to MDR TB isolates
1CAG(Q) 141 CCG(P)‡20
2CAT(H) 71 CGT(R)‡8
3CAT(H) 71 CCT(P)‡6
4Ins C after 420, 421ΔA,
CAG(Q) 141 CCG(P)‡3
5TGG(W) 119 TTG(L)‡3
6ATC(I) 6 CTC(L)§2
7GAC(D) 49 GGC(G)‡2
8CCA(P) 69 CGA(R)‡2
9GTG(V) 155 GCG(A)§2
10TTG(L) 4 TGG(W)‡1
11ATC(I) 5 ACC(T)§1
12CTG(L) 27 CCG(P)‡1
13GAC(D) 49 GAG(E)‡1
14CAC(H) 51 TAC(Y)‡1
15CCG(P) 54 CAG(Q)‡1
16GAC(D) 63 GCC(A)‡1
17TCG(S) 66 CCG(P)‡1
18CAT(H) 71 CCT(P);
Ins G after 547 (after G in GTT)1
19GGT(G) 97 AGT(S)‡1
20TAC(Y) 103 TAA(Ter)‡1
21TAC(Y) 103 TAG(Ter)‡1
22GCC(A) 134 CCC(P)1
23ACG(T) 142 ATG(M)‡1
24GGT(G) 162 TGT(C)1
25TGA(Ter) 187 CGA(R)§1
26Del A at 2981
27Ins A after 389 (after T in GTG)1
28
Ins G after 449 (after sec G in GGC)
1
Wild type

26
Mutations specific to XDR TB isolates
1GTC(V) 7 GCC(A)‡2
2ACC(T) 47 AGC(S)‡2
3Ins TCT after 40 (after T In TGC)1
4GGC(G) 78 GAC(D)‡1
5GGT(G) 97 CGT(R)‡1
6TAC(Y) 103 GAC(D)‡1
7GGC(G) 105 CGC(R)1
Wild type1

*del, deletion; ins, insertion; MDR, multidrug resistant; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; TB, tuberculosis; XDR, extensively drug resistant. Row colors: pink, frameshift mutations: insertions or deletions; green, synonymous mutations or SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic susceptibility to pyrazinamide; gray, SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic resistance to pyrazinamide; blue, SNPs not previously reported in the literature.
†Insertion and deletions are presented with the nucleotide position where the polymorphism occurred; single nucleotide polymorphisms are presented with the codon position and the original and mutated three nucleotides and amino acid
‡Reported in the literature as being associated with resistance to pyrazinamide.
§Reported in the literature as being associated with susceptibility to pyrazinamide.

*del, deletion; ins, insertion; MDR, multidrug resistant; RFLP, restriction fragment-length polymorphism; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; TB, tuberculosis; XDR, extensively drug-resistant. Row colors: pink, frameshift mutations (insertions or deletions); green, synonymous mutations or SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic susceptibility to pyrazinamide; gray, SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic resistance to pyrazinamide; blue, single-nucleotide polymorphisms not previously reported in the literature.
†Insertions and deletions are presented with the nucleotide position where the polymorphism occurred; SNPs are presented with the codon position and the original and mutated 3 nucleotides and amino acid.
‡The nomenclature used for classifying IS6110 RFLP patterns was as follows: 2 isolates with an identical IS6110 banding pattern were assigned the same arbitrary 1- or 2-letter code (e.g., W, HP, or AB), which started with the first observed cluster, strain A (several decades ago). IS6110 patterns that were similar but not identical were denoted by the addition of a number (e.g., BE1, W4, or HP81). This table shows only the letter designations; numbers have been omitted for simplicity. Strains within each of the 2-letter designations had similar RFLP patterns. 
§Reported in the literature as being associated with resistance to pyrazinamide.
¶Synonymous mutation.
#Reported in the literature as being associated with susceptibility to pyrazinamide. *del, deletion; ins, insertion; MDR, multidrug resistant; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; TB, tuberculosis; XDR, extensively drug resistant. Row colors: pink, frameshift mutations: insertions or deletions; green, synonymous mutations or SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic susceptibility to pyrazinamide; gray, SNPs reported as being associated with phenotypic resistance to pyrazinamide; blue, SNPs not previously reported in the literature.
†Insertion and deletions are presented with the nucleotide position where the polymorphism occurred; single nucleotide polymorphisms are presented with the codon position and the original and mutated three nucleotides and amino acid
‡Reported in the literature as being associated with resistance to pyrazinamide.
§Reported in the literature as being associated with susceptibility to pyrazinamide. A total of 69 distinct pncA polymorphisms were identified (Tables 1 and 2). Of these, 12 were insertions (313 patient-isolates), 5 were deletions (6 patient-isolates), and 52 were single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; 168 patient-isolates); all but 2 of these were nonsynonymous. No polymorphism was found in common between the isolates from South Africa and Georgia. Among the pncA SNPs identified, only 6 (9 patient-isolates) have previously been associated with phenotypic pyrazinamide susceptibility (–); 40 SNPs have been associated with phenotypic pyrazinamide resistance (146 patient-isolates), and 7 SNPs were not previously reported (23 patient-isolates) (–). There were 34 polymorphisms identified from South Africa, of which 14 (41%, constituting 388 patient-isolates) were present in >1 patient (Table 1). We found that, for 382 (98%) of 388 patients, the RFLP pattern was identical to that of at least 1 other patient with the same pncA mutation (Table 1). Moreover, each pncA polymorphism was associated with only 1 RFLP pattern in 10 of the 14 polymorphisms. By comparison, 13 RFLP patterns were seen among the 40 patients with a wild-type pncA sequence.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that 70% of MDR TB and 96% XDR TB patient-isolates had pncA polymorphisms. Given the high likelihood of frameshift mutations resulting in resistance and the high specificity (94%–98%) of pncA SNPs for pyrazinamide resistance (,), we estimate that at least 56%–66% of MDR TB and 90%–95% of XDR TB cases from these settings are likely to be resistant to pyrazinamide. Only a small number of mutations were synonymous, previously associated with pyrazinamide susceptibility, or had an SNP for which phenotypic susceptibility has not been previously tested. This finding has implications regarding the effectiveness of empiric use of pyrazinamide for drug-resistant TB or novel treatment regimens. Further studies are needed to fully determine the association of pncA mutations with treatment outcomes. A diversity of pncA mutations—69 distinct polymorphisms—were observed among MDR and XDR TB patients, of which none were shared in common between the isolates from South Africa and Georgia. Most pncA polymorphisms were unique to individual patients. When the same pncA polymorphism was seen in >1 patient, the IS6110 RFLP pattern was nearly always similar, suggesting that the pncA mutation was acquired before transmission. The diversity of polymorphisms underscores previous findings that there is no clear hotspot for pncA mutations (), unlike resistance-conferring regions for other TB drugs (e.g., rpoB, katG) (). Development of rapid molecular tests for pyrazinamide susceptibility may be hampered by the lack of a hotspot for mutations; 1 assay has been developed to detect the full wildtype pncA sequence, but its diagnostic accuracy has not yet been adequately tested (). A limitation of our study is that phenotypic pyrazinamide susceptibility testing was not performed on the sequenced isolates. Nonetheless, correlation with phenotypic testing has been previously reported in the literature for most polymorphisms, enabling us to estimate the proportion likely to be pyrazinamide resistant (–). In addition, the studies that provided these isolates were not specifically designed to be representative of all diagnosed cases of drug-resistant TB; nonetheless, the study populations were carefully selected to provide a high level of generalizability to the broader population. National drug resistance surveys that include pyrazinamide genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility should be designed to confirm these findings. The high prevalence of pncA polymorphisms from geographically disparate countries suggests that guidelines to empirically use pyrazinamide in drug-resistant TB regimens, including shorter MDR TB regimens (), should be reconsidered. Simplified assays to test pyrazinamide susceptibility are needed, although they may be difficult to develop given the genotypic or phenotypic complexities. Considering the potential synergy of pyrazinamide with new TB drugs, routine assessment of pyrazinamide will be increasingly necessary and useful.

Technical Appendix

Supplemental methods for study of pncA gene mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance in drug-resistant tuberculosis, South Africa and Georgia.
  12 in total

1.  Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination.

Authors:  S Sreevatsan; X Pan; K E Stockbauer; N D Connell; B N Kreiswirth; T S Whittam; J M Musser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Conditions that may affect the results of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Sallie Permar; Zhonghe Sun
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis pncA Polymorphisms That Do Not Confer Pyrazinamide Resistance at a Breakpoint Concentration of 100 Micrograms per Milliliter in MGIT.

Authors:  Michael G Whitfield; Robin M Warren; Elizabeth M Streicher; Samantha L Sampson; Frik A Sirgel; Paul D van Helden; Alexandra Mercante; Melisa Willby; Kelsey Hughes; Kris Birkness; Glenn Morlock; Annelies van Rie; James E Posey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of pyrazinamide resistance among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Zhejiang, China.

Authors:  Qiang Xia; Li-Li Zhao; Feng Li; Yu-Mei Fan; Yuan-Yuan Chen; Bei-Bei Wu; Zheng-Wei Liu; Ai-Zhen Pan; Min Zhu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Systematic review of mutations in pyrazinamidase associated with pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates.

Authors:  Sarah M Ramirez-Busby; Faramarz Valafar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus.

Authors:  A Scorpio; Y Zhang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  HIV coinfection in multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis results in high early mortality.

Authors:  Neel R Gandhi; N Sarita Shah; Jason R Andrews; Venanzio Vella; Anthony P Moll; Michelle Scott; Darren Weissman; Claudio Marra; Umesh G Lalloo; Gerald H Friedland
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Development and evaluation of a line probe assay for rapid identification of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis strains.

Authors:  Jun-Ichiro Sekiguchi; Tomohiko Nakamura; Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama; Fumiko Kirikae; Intetsu Kobayashi; Ewa Augustynowicz-Kopec; Zofia Zwolska; Koji Morita; Toshinori Suetake; Hiroshi Yoshida; Seiya Kato; Toru Mori; Teruo Kirikae
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in the United States, 1993-2007.

Authors:  N Sarita Shah; Robert Pratt; Lori Armstrong; Valerie Robison; Kenneth G Castro; J Peter Cegielski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Tuberculosis drug resistance mutation database.

Authors:  Andreas Sandgren; Michael Strong; Preetika Muthukrishnan; Brian K Weiner; George M Church; Megan B Murray
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The Bewildering Antitubercular Action of Pyrazinamide.

Authors:  Elise A Lamont; Nicholas A Dillon; Anthony D Baughn
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  In silico evaluation of WHO-endorsed molecular methods to detect drug resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Alice Brankin; Marva Seifert; Sophia B Georghiou; Timothy M Walker; Swapna Uplekar; Anita Suresh; Rebecca E Colman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Receiving Bedaquiline- or Delamanid-Containing Regimens.

Authors:  R R Kempker; L Mikiashvili; Y Zhao; D Benkeser; K Barbakadze; N Bablishvili; Z Avaliani; C A Peloquin; H M Blumberg; M Kipiani
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Causal inference with multiple concurrent medications: A comparison of methods and an application in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Arman Alam Siddique; Mireille E Schnitzer; Asma Bahamyirou; Guanbo Wang; Timothy H Holtz; Giovanni B Migliori; Giovanni Sotgiu; Neel R Gandhi; Mario H Vargas; Dick Menzies; Andrea Benedetti
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Half of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolated from tuberculosis patients in Sub-Saharan Africa have concomitant resistance to pyrazinamide.

Authors:  Jean Claude Semuto Ngabonziza; Awa Ba Diallo; Elisa Tagliani; Bassirou Diarra; Abalo Essosimna Kadanga; Antieme Combo George Togo; Aliou Thiam; Willem Bram de Rijk; Riccardo Alagna; Sabine Houeto; Fatoumata Ba; Anoumou Yaotsè Dagnra; Emil Ivan; Dissou Affolabi; Valérie Schwoebel; Arnaud Trebucq; Bouke Catherine de Jong; Leen Rigouts; Géraldine Daneau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-term Follow-up Reveals High Posttreatment Mortality Rate Among Patients With Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the Country of Georgia.

Authors:  Melanie Frank; Natalia Adamashvili; Nino Lomtadze; Eka Kokhreidze; Zaza Avaliani; Russell R Kempker; Henry M Blumberg
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  MODS-Wayne, a Colorimetric Adaptation of the Microscopic-Observation Drug Susceptibility (MODS) Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pyrazinamide Resistance from Sputum Samples.

Authors:  Roberto Alcántara; Patricia Fuentes; Ricardo Antiparra; Marco Santos; Robert H Gilman; Daniela E Kirwan; Mirko Zimic; Patricia Sheen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Marine Natural Products and Drug Resistance in Latent Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Muhammad Tahir Khan; Aman Chandra Kaushik; Aamer Iqbal Bhatti; Yu-Juan Zhang; Shulin Zhang; Amie Jinghua Wei; Shaukat Iqbal Malik; Dong Qing Wei
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.118

9.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of pyrazinamide resistance among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Ningbo, China.

Authors:  Yang Che; Dingyi Bo; Xiang Lin; Tong Chen; Tianfeng He; Yi Lin
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pyrazinamidase function based on structural stability, physicochemical and geometrical descriptors.

Authors:  Rydberg Roman Supo-Escalante; Aldhair Médico; Eduardo Gushiken; Gustavo E Olivos-Ramírez; Yaneth Quispe; Fiorella Torres; Melissa Zamudio; Ricardo Antiparra; L Mario Amzel; Robert H Gilman; Patricia Sheen; Mirko Zimic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.