An Efficient Synthesis of Novel Bioactive Thiazolyl-Phthalazinediones under Ultrasound Irradiation.

Novel 2-thiazolylphthalazine derivatives were efficiently synthesized under ultrasound irradiation, resulting in high yields and short reaction times after optimization of the reaction conditions. All prepared compounds were fully characterized using spectroscopic methods. They were screened for their antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as for antifungal activity. The antimicrobial activity profile of the tested compounds showed some promising results. The potent activity of compounds 4d, 7b (117% zone inhibition) and 7c (105% zone inhibition) against Salmonella sp., exceeding that of the reference drug Gentamycin is particularly noteworthy. In general, the newly synthesized thiazolylphthalazine derivatives showed higher antimicrobial activity against the tested Gram-negative bacteria than against Gram-positive bacteria and fungi.

1. Introduction

There are only two naturally occurring phthalazine derivatives, namely azamerone (I, Figure 1), which was isolated in 2006 from amarine-derived Streptomyces species [1], and 6-azidotetrazolo[5,1-a]phthalazine (II, Figure 1), which was isolated in 1985 from Gymnodiniumbreve, a toxic red-tide dinoflagellate [2]. Some phthalazine derivatives have been reported to possess anticonvulsant [3], antitumor [4,5,6], anti-inflammatory [7], and antidiabetic and vasorelaxant activities [8]. Phthalazines have also shown interesting vasodialatory and antihypertensive properties [9]. It is important to point out that phthalazine moiety is at the core of many commercial drugs. For example, zopolrestat (III, Figure 1) is a drug used to decrease blood glucose levels, while hydralazine (IV, Figure 1) and budralazine (V, Figure 1) display vasodilating effects.

Figure 1

Natural products and marketing drugs containing phthalazine moiety.

One of the most pivotal contributions of phthalazine derivatives is their antimicrobial activity. According to the literature, the most common substitution pattern of the target phthalazine skeleton is 1-,2- and 4- on the diazine part of the bicyclic system [10,11,12]. One extensive study illustrated the remarkable antifungal activity of 4-substituted-2-methylphthalazines, which as a result could be considered good lead compounds [13].

Moreover, the bicyclic phthalazine skeleton has been proven to display appreciable broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi [14]. In a recent study [15], various phthalazine derivatives bearing aliphatic, aryl, and heteroaryl side chains at the C2 position of the phthalazine skeleton exhibited potent antimicrobial effects. In addition, some sugar-based phthalazine compounds also act as broad spectrum antimicrobial agents [15].

Another important heterocyclic ring is the thiazole ring, which is an interesting building block found in a range of natural products and part of many potent biologically active molecules such as vitamin B1, the epothilones, penicillins, myxothiazol and bleomycin (Figure 2).

Figure 2

The structures of vitamin B1, the epothilones, penicillins, myxothiazol and bleomycin.

The value of the thiazolyl moiety as an antimicrobial agent has been reported in many studies. Some thiazolyl-based scaffolds with alkyl chains or aromatic rings at C5 also display potent antimicrobial activity [16].

Ultrasound-promoted synthesis has attracted much attention during the past few decades as a clean and useful procedure protocol in organic synthesis compared with traditional methods [17,18,19]. This is due to the method’s cavitation process, which causes the formation, expansion, and collapse of a huge number of bubbles within short time, inducing rapid and violent implosions that create hot spots with very high local temperatures and pressures that which can be thought of as microreactors in which the sound energy is converted into a chemically useful form [17]. Considering the preceding reports, and in continuation of our work on the synthesis of bioactive compounds [20,21,22,23,24,25,26] and considering the worldwide antibiotic resistance crisis [27], we report herein our synthesis of a new series of thiazolylphthalazines using ultrasound irradiation with the aim of decreasing the reaction times and increasing the yields of the reaction products. In the synthesis described in this work we have adopted a molecular hybridization approach for the purpose of designing novel and more potent antimicrobial agents. To this end the target nuclei are hybrid thiazolyl scaffold-based phthalazine moieties, in which the phthalazine system is linked to different substituted thiazolyl nuclei at the C2 atom.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

In continuation of our previous work on the synthesis of bioactive heterocyclic compounds under mild conditions [28,29,30], we report here simple and efficient procedures for the synthesis of some novel thiazolylphthalazinedione compounds via the reaction of 1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydro-phthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1) with different halogenated compounds under ultrasound irradiation. In order to optimize the reaction conditions, the reaction between compound 1 and hydrazonoyl chloride 2a was carried out using different solvents at two different temperatures (room temperature and 50 °C) under ultrasound irradiation (Table 1). In those experiments, we observed that the reactions were solvent dependent and, as shown in Table 1, the most suitable conditions involved ethanol as a solvent at 50 °C.

Table 1

Optimization of the synthesis of 2-(4-methyl-5-(phenyl-diazenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydro- phthalazine-1,4-dione (4a) under ultrasonic irradiation.

Entry	Solvent	Temperature (°C)	Time (min)	Yield (%)
1	EtOH	r.t.	40	90
2	EtOH	50	35	92
3	Dioxane	r.t.	60	82
4	Dioxane	50	45	87
5	DMF	r.t.	40	85
6	DMF	50	35	85
7	Benzene	r.t.	45	89
8	Benzene	50	40	91
9	Toluene	r.t.	60	87
10	Toluene	50	50	90

In addition, we compare the efficiency of ultrasound conditions with conventional heating, considering there action yield and time. Table 2 shows that our method is simpler, more efficient, and less time consuming for the synthesis of thiazolylphthalazine derivatives.

Table 2

Comparison of synthesis of thiazolylphthalazines 4 and 7 under ultrasound irradiation and conventional heating.

Product No.	Conventional		Sonication
	Time (h)	Yield (%)	Time (min)	Yield (%)
4a	4	68	35	92
4b	4	69	50	84
4c	6	70	50	88
4d	4	71	40	86
4e	4	74	55	88
4f	3	67	45	87
7a	6	65	60	85
7b	5	67	40	83
7c	5	68	50	85
7d	4	69	55	83

The reaction between 1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1) and acetyl hydrazonoyl chloride derivatives 2 in ethanol, in the presence of a base catalyst under optimized conditions, yielded only one isolated product (Scheme 1). The spectroscopic information confirmed the formation of products 4, likely produced via intermediates 3 by elimination of a water molecule (Scheme 1). For example, the 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 4a–f, which exhibited singlet signals at δ 2.55–2.60 ppm (CH3) and one D2O exchangeable peak at δ 9.18–10.71 ppm corresponding to the phthalazine-NH.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of the thiazole derivatives 4.

In an identical way, when carbothioamide 1 was allowed to react with the ethyl (N-arylhydrazono)-chloroacetates 5 under the same reaction conditions, it yielded in each case a single product, namely, the 2-(4-oxo-5-(2-arylhydrazono)-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione 7 (Scheme 2). The structure of compounds 7a–d was proved using spectral data and elemental analyses (see Section 3). The carbothioicacidamide 1 seemed to be useful synthon for the synthesis of different heterocyclic compounds. Thus, the reaction of compound 1 with halogenated ketones 8–11 afforded new thiazole derivatives 12–15 (Scheme 3). These reactions were carried out under ultrasound irradiation and gave excellent yield in short reaction times (Table 3). The structure of compounds 12–15 was determined using spectroscopic data. For example, the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 15 showed the following signals: 7.37–8.65 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 8.36 (s, 1H, coumarine-H4), 8.64 (s, 1H, thiazole-H5), 8.87 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable). The mass spectrum of the thiazolylphthalazine derivative 13 revealed the existence of a molecular ion peak at m/z = 401. Also, the infrared spectra of thiazoles 12–15 were free from any absorption bands characteristic of the NH2 group.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of thiazole derivatives 7.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of the thiazole derivatives (12–15).

Table 3

Comparison of synthesis of thiazolylphthalazines 12–15 and 18, 19 under ultrasound irradiation and conventional heating.

Product No.	Conventional		Sonication
	Time (h)	Yield (%)	Time (min)	Yield (%)
12	5	70	35	84
13	4	67	50	82
14	4	72	60	88
15	6	69	40	84
18	5	70	55	85
19	7	68	45	83

From literature reports [31,32,33] we found that compounds bearing more than one thiazole ring unit also exhibit good biological activities. For example, myxothiazol (Figure 2) is an inhibitor of the mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex, and bleomycins is an anti-cancer agent, containing 2,4′-bis-thiazole system. From the above findings, we thought it is useful to synthesize a heterocyclic ring system carrying bis-thiazole moiety incorporated with a phthalazine ring. This aim was achieved via the reaction of bis-bromoketones 16 and 17 with the carbothioic acid amide 1, also under ultrasound irradiation to afford a good yield of the bis-thiazoles 18 and 19 (Scheme 4, Table 3). The structure of compounds 18 and 19 was proved using spectral data and elemental analyses (Section 3).

Scheme 4

Synthesis of the bis-thiazole derivatives 18 and 19.

2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

The protocol of antimicrobial screening adopted an agar diffusion technique [34] at the Regional Center of Mycology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. All synthesized compounds were screened for their antifungal and antibacterial activities (gram-positive and gram-negative) at concentrations of 5 mg/mL. Amphotericine B, ampicillin and gentamycin were used as standard antifungal and antibacterial agents (gram-positive and gram-negative) respectively. The tested fungi were Aspergillus fumigates and Candida albicans. Tested gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, while gram-negative were Salmonella sp. and Escherichia coli. Susceptibilities of microbial isolates to the test compounds were recorded by measuring the average diameter of bacterial growth inhibition zones surrounding the well (in millimeters) compared to those surrounding the reference drugs. The obtained data indicated variable responses of cultured microorganisms towards the test compounds 1, 4a–f, 7a–d, 12–15, 18, and 19. So, diverse inhibitory zones ranges (0 to 21 mm) resulted, compared to the reference drugs. The inhibitory zone profile of the microbial isolates is shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Antimicrobial activity of the new compounds compared to reference drug.

Compd. No. a	Inhibition Zone Diameter in mm and (%) Value
	Gram-Positive Bacteria		Gram-Negative Bacteria		Fungi
	SA	BS	S SP.	EC	AF	CA
1	NA	12 (37%)	16 (94%)	NA	8 (34%)	13 (52%)
4a	8 (34%)	11 (34%)	15 (88%)	11 (57%)	NA	11 (44%)
4b	16 (69%)	16 (50%)	15 (88%)	16 (84%)	10 (43%)	NA
4c	11 (47%)	13 (40%)	14 (82%)	13 (68%)	12 (52%)	15 (60%)
4d	10 (43%)	13 (40%)	20 (117%)	10 (52%)	NA	13 (52%)
4e	12 (52%)	NA	9 (52%)	NA	NA	12 (48%)
4f	14 (60%)	12 (37%)	15 (88%)	15 (78%)	12 (52%)	15 (60%)
7a	NA	10 (31%)	NA	NA	NA	10 (40%)
7b	NA	9 (28%)	20 (117%)	9 (47%)	8 (34%)	12 (48%)
7c	NA	12 (37%)	18 (105%)	10 (52%)	9 (39%)	14 (56%)
7d	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
12	NA	11 (34%)	NA	NA	NA	11 (44%)
13	NA	12 (37%)	NA	NA	NA	NA
14	12 (52%)	NA	12 (70%)	16 (84%)	14 (60%)	NA
15	14 (60%)	12 (37%)	9 (52%)	9 (47%)	16 (69%)	NA
18	15 (65%)	15 (46%)	15 (88%)	15 (78%)	15 (65%)	21 (84%)
19	11 (47%)	11 (34%)	10 (58%)	NA	8 (34%)	15 (60%)
AmphotericinB	-	-	-	-	23 (100%)	25 (100%)
Ampicillin	23 (100%)	32 (100%)	-	-	-	-
Gentamycin	-	-	17 (100%)	19 (100%)	-	-

a conc.=5 mg·mL−1, negative control (DMSO). NA (indicates no activity). Tested fungi: Aspergillus fumigates (AF) and Candida albicans (CA). Tested gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Bacillus subtilis (BS). Tested gram-negative bacteria: Salmonella sp. (S SP.), Esherichia coli (EC). The experiment was carried out in triplicate and the values represent the average zone of inhibition.

2.2.1. Antibacterial Activity

The performance of the test compounds against Gram-positive S. aureus did not exceed that of the ampicillin used as a reference standard. Noticeably, compounds 4b and 18 exerted moderate activity (69% and 65% inhibition zones, respectively) compared to ampicillin. Compounds 4f and 15 exerted a 60% inhibition zone ratio compared to ampicillin. On the other hand, 1, 7a–d, 12, and 13 were devoid of any activities against S. aureus. Bacillus subtilis exhibited higher resistance rates towards the test compounds. Compound 4b was the only one that exhibited a 50% inhibition zone ratio compared to ampicillin. The activity profile against Gram-negative bacteria indicated remarkable activity against Salmonella sp. Among the test compounds, four pthalazine derivatives exceeded the activity of gentamycin as a reference standard. Thus, the relative inhibition zone of 7c was 105% and those of 4d and 7b were 117%, compared to that of gentamycin. Compounds 4a, 4b, 4f, and 18 were equipotent, exerting high activity with an 88% inhibition zone ratio. The activities of 4c and 14 were appreciable, with 82% and 70% inhibition zone ratios, respectively (Table 4). However, the profiles against the second Gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, were quite different. Escherichia coli cultures displayed a higher resistance rate than Salmonella sp. Only compounds 4b, 14 (84% inhibition zone each), and 18 (78% inhibition zone) exerted high activity rates compared to gentamycin.

2.2.2. Antifungal Activity

The recorded data reflected weaker antifungal profiles for the test compounds 1,4a–f, 7a–d, 12–15, 18, and 19 than as antibacterial agents. Aspergillus fumigates exhibited a high resistance rate, as only compounds 14, 15, and 18 showed moderate activity ranging from 60%–69% inhibition zone ratios compared to Amphotericin B. On the other hand, compounds 1,4b, 4c, 4f, 7b, 7c, and 19 exhibited mild-to-weak activity, showing an inhibition zone percentage range of 34%–52%. The rest of the test compounds were in active.

In contrast, Candida albicans showed greater sensitivity toward compound 18, which exhibited high antifungal activity with an 84% inhibition zone rate compared to Amphotericin B. Compounds 4c, 4f, and 19 showed moderate activity with a 60% inhibition zone, while others showed poor-to-negative effects. In conclusion, the antimicrobial profile of the test compound included some promising results. Noticeably, compound 18 demonstrated abroad antimicrobial spectrum. It exhibited high antibacterial activity against Salmonella sp. (88% potency), with concomitant good antifungal activity against Candida albicans (84% potency). Also, it exerted moderate activities against Escherichia coli (78% potency) and S. aureus (65% potency). Compound 4b was potent against Salmonella sp. (88% potency) with concomitant good activity against Escherichia coli (84% potency) and moderate activity against S. aureus (69% potency). In particular, the remarkable activity of 4f against Salmonella sp. (88% potency) could not be ignored. An interesting issue is the potent activity of 4d, 7b (117% zone inhibition), and 7c (105% zone inhibition) against Salmonella sp., exceeding that of the reference drug gentamycin. Generally, the profiles of the newly synthesized thiazolylphthalazine derivatives exhibited higher antimicrobial activity against the tested Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive ones andfungi.Thetestcompoundsshouldbesubjectedtofurtherinvestigationto identify selective lead compounds.

2.2.3. Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR)

Adopting the hybridization approach, a new series of novel thiazolylphthalazine hybrids was synthesized. The test compounds are mapped into four structure profiles: A (4a–f), B (7a–d), C (12–15), and D (18,19) employing phthalazinecarbothioamide 1 as a starting precursor (Figure 3). The successful synthesis of effective antimicrobial agents was demonstrated by the significant effects against gram-negative bacteria (Salmonella sp.) seen in the screening. The recorded data confirmed compounds 4b, 4d, and 4f as the most potent derivatives in group A against Salmonella sp. compared to gentamycin. Precursor 1 exerted high antimicrobial activity (94% inhibition zone) that increased remarkably to a 117% inhibition zone in compound 4d. This result was resulted after incorporating the non-cyclic thiamido group in 1 in to the heterocyclic thiazolyl moiety in 4d. Also, the SAR study illustrated the positive effect of a p-methoxyphenyl group linked to the diazine moiety at C5 of the thiazole ring. On the other hand, 4a, 4b, and 4f possess similar structures, differing in the substitution the p-OCH3 moiety by a p-H, p-CH3 or p-NO2, respectively, which each resulted in 88% activity, so the SAR comparison demonstrated that incorporation of a hydrophilic electron-donating group in the para position, for example the p-OCH3 group in 4d, greatly increased the antimicrobial activity. Also, switching from p-CH3 in 4b to o-CH3 in 4c slightly decreased the inhibition zone activity from 88% to 82%. Finally, the existence of a p-chloro group in 4e abruptly decreased activity against Salmonella sp. To an inhibition zone of only 52%. Regarding the second group, B (compounds 7a–d), Gram-negative bacteria, for example Salmonella sp., were the most sensitive organisms to this group. Compounds 7b and 7c exerted potent activity, with 117% and 105% inhibition zones, respectively. Their structural profiles included a hydrazone moiety as a linker. Noticeably, when the p-CH3 group in 7b was switched to o-CH3 in 7c, a concomitant slight decrease in activity was noted. Similarly, switching the CH3 moiety in group A between 4b and 4c slightly affected their activity.

Figure 3

Structural profile map of the test compounds.

Thus, it seemed that the steric effect of the phenyl group in 4b,c, and 7b,c did not play agreat role in the antimicrobial activity against Salmonella sp. Again, p-chlorosubstitution in 7d completely abolished the activity and the plain phenyl group in 8a as good. Group C (compounds 12–15) proved the vital role of either diazine or hydrazone linkers. Noticeably, direct linking between the thiazolylpthalazine hybrid and the aryl/heteroaryl moieties exerted a negative impact on the antimicrobial activity. Compound 15 in group C showed a slight improvement of activity, which could be attributed to the existence of the coumarin nucleus [35]. Further, the bimolecular system in group D (compounds 18 and 19) possesses appreciable antimicrobial activity. Compound 18, bearing a phenyl group linker between the bimolecular thiazolylphthalazine hybrids, exhibited better activity. It selectively inhibited the growth of Candida albicans and Salmonella sp. (84% and 88% inhibition zones, respectively). Among the four groups, 18 was the only compound that showed high antifungal activity against Candida albicans.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Melting points were measured with an IA 9000-series digital melting-point apparatus (Bibby Sci. Lim. Stone, Staffordshire, UK). IR spectra were recorded in potassium bromide discs on FTIR 8101 PC infrared spectrophotometers (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). NMR spectra were recorded on a Mercury VX-300 NMR spectrometer (Varian, Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany) operating at 300 MHz (1H-NMR) and run in deuterated dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d6). Chemical shifts were related to that of the solvent. Mass spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu GCeMS-QP1000 EX mass spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan) at 70 eV. Elemental analyses were measured using an ElementarVario LIII CHNS analyzer (elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). Ultrasonication was carried out in an ElmaRD-7700 apparatus (Singen, Germany). The electric supply was 230 V, A.C. 50 Hz, 1 phase; the ultrasonic frequency was 36 KHz and the ultrasonic power 100 W. 1,4-Dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1) [36] and hydrazonoyl halides 2 and 5 [37] were prepared as previously reported in the respective literature.

3.2. Synthesis of Thiazole Derivatives and

3.2.1. Method A

A mixture of 1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1, 0.221 g, 1 mmol) and the appropriate hydrazonoyl halides 2a–f or 5a–d (1 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) containing triethylamine (0.1 g, 1 mmol) was refluxed for 3–6 h (monitored by TLC). The formed precipitate was isolated by filtration, washed with methanol, dried, and recrystallized from the appropriate solvent to give products 4a–f and 7a–d, respectively. The physical properties and spectral data of the obtained products are listed below.

3.2.2. Method B

To a mixture of equimolar amounts of compound 1 (0.221 g, 1 mmol) and the appropriate hydrazonoyl halides 2a–f or 5a–d (1 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL), was added TEA (0.1 g). The reaction mixture was irradiated by an ultrasonic generator in a water bath at 50 °C for 30–60 min (irradiation was continued till all of the starting materials had disappeared and the product was formed, as monitored by TLC). The solid that formed after cooling was filtered and recrystallized from appropriate solvent to give compounds 4a–f and 7a–d, respectively.

2-(4-Methyl-5-(phenyldiazenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (4a). Red solid; m.p. 213–215 °C (Dioxane); IR (KBr): v 3411 (NH), 3049, 2931 (C-H), 1668, 1654 (2C=O), 1598 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.55 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.02–7.91 (m, 9H, Ar-H), 10.42 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 16.1, 106.1, 114.3, 115.5, 115.7, 126.4, 128.4, 129.6, 132.5, 146.2, 155.8, 155.9, 160.2, 162.0, 162.5, 165.0. MS m/z (%): 363 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C18H13N5O2S (363.08): C, 59.49; H, 3.61; N, 19.27. Found: C, 59.42; H, 3.58; N, 19.14%.

2-(4-Methyl-5-(p-tolyldiazenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (4b). Red solid; m.p. 187–189 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3423 (NH), 3027, 2918 (C-H), 1670, 1654 (2C=O), 1603 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.10–8.06 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 9.18 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 377 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C19H15N5O2S (377.09): C, 60.46; H, 4.01; N, 18.56. Found: C, 60.39; H, 4.07; N, 18.44%.

2-(4-Methyl-5-(o-tolyldiazenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (4c). Red solid; m.p. 206–208 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3426 (NH), 3031, 2921 (C-H), 1667, 1559 (2C=O), 1590 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.18–7.94 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 10.47 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 377 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C19H15N5O2S (377.09): C, 60.46; H, 4.01; N, 18.56. Found: C, 60.42; H, 4.00; N, 18.47%.

2-(5-((4-Methoxyphenyl)diazenyl)-4-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (4d). Red solid; m.p. 177–178 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3429 (NH), 3029, 2922 (C-H), 1683, 1650 (2C=O), 1598 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.93–8.05 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 10.27 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 393 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C19H15N5O3S (393.09): C, 58.01; H, 3.84; N, 17.80. Found: C, 57.87; H, 3.75; N, 17.69%.

2-(5-((4-Chlorophenyl)diazenyl)-4-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (4e). Red solid; m.p. 237–239 °C (DMF); IR (KBr): v 3423 (NH), 3042, 2924 (C-H), 1671, 1640 (2C=O), 1591 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.58 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.23–7.89 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 10.04 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 397 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C18H12ClN5O2S (397.04): C, 54.34; H, 3.04; N, 17.60. Found: C, 54.24; H, 3.05; N, 17.47%.

2-(4-Methyl-5-((4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (4f). Red solid; m.p. 225–227 °C (DMF); IR (KBr): v 3425 (NH), 3042, 2925 (C-H), 1673, 1655 (2C=O), 1594 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.38–8.20 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 10.71 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 408 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C18H12N6O4S (408.06): C, 52.94; H, 2.96; N, 20.58. Found: C, 52.80; H, 2.90; N, 20.49%.

2-(4-Oxo-5-(2-phenylhydrazono)-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (7a). Yellow solid; m.p. 168–170 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3371, 3178 (2NH), 3051, 2978 (C-H), 1705, 1644, 1621 (3C=O), 1600 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.94–7.96 (m, 9H, Ar-H), 8.63, 10.64 (2s, br, 2H, 2NH, D2O-exchangeable); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 121.5, 126.8, 128.8, 129.3, 130.5, 132.1, 136.4, 138.1, 143.3, 147.4, 149.2, 151.5, 162.2, 164.7, 188.1. MS m/z (%): 365 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C17H11N5O3S (365.06): C, 55.88; H, 3.03; N, 19.17. Found: C, 55.73; H, 3.02; N, 19.11%.

2-(4-Oxo-5-(2-(p-tolyl)hydrazono)-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (7b). Yellow solid; m.p. 179–181 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3426, 3178 (2NH), 3030, 2922 (C-H), 1703, 1649, 1632 (3C=O), 1601 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.26 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.99–7.97 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 10.54, 10.79 (2s, br, 2H, 2NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 379 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C18H13N5O3S (379.07): C, 56.98; H, 3.45; N,18.46. Found: C, 56.75; H, 3.40; N, 18.36%.

2-(4-Oxo-5-(2-(o-tolyl)hydrazono)-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (7c). Yellow solid; m.p. 157–159 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3428, 3179 (NH), 3049, 2925 (C-H), 1738, 1650, 1627 (3C=O), 1598 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.17 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.97–7.93 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 9.93, 10.25 (2s, br, 2H, 2NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 379 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C18H13N5O3S (379.07): C, 56.98; H, 3.45; N, 18.46. Found: C, 56.84; H, 3.40; N, 18.35%.

2-(5-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)hydrazono)-4-oxo-4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (7d). Yellow solid; m.p. 185–187 °C (EtOH/DMF); IR (KBr): v 3429, 3183 (NH), 3054, 2926 (C-H), 1735, 1657, 1629 (3C=O), 1599 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.33–7.97 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 10.27, 10.83 (2s, br, 2H, 2NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 399 (M+). Anal. Calcd. For C17H10ClN5O3S (399.02): C, 51.07; H, 2.52; N, 17.52. Found: C, 51.01; H, 2.39; N, 17.42%.

3.3. Synthesis of Thiazole Derivatives

3.3.1. Method A

A mixture of 1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1, 0.221 g, 1 mmol) and α-bromoketones 8–11 (1 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) was refluxed for 4–6 h (monitored by TLC). The product started to separate out during the course of reaction. The solid product was filtered, washed with water, dried and recrystallized from appropriate solvent to give the corresponding thiazoles 12–15, respectively.

3.3.2. Method B

A equimolar mixture of compound 1 (0.221 g, 1 mmol) and the appropriate and α-bromoketones 8–11 (1 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) was irradiated by an ultrasonic generator in a water bath at 50 °C for 30–60 min (irradiation was continued until all of the starting materials disappeared and the product was formed, as monitored by TLC). The solid that formed after cooling was filtered and recrystallized from an appropriate solvent to give the corresponding thiazoles 12–15, respectively.

2-(4-(4-Nitrophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (12). Yellow solid; m.p. 193–195 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3430 (NH), 3047, 2922 (C-H), 1658, 1643 (2C=O), 1597 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.98–8.38 (m, 9H, Ar-H and thiazole-H5), 8.81 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 112.4, 116.1, 125.8, 127.9, 129.3, 129.6, 130.3, 133.0, 134.7, 138.5, 145.3, 148.4, 149.9, 160.6, 163.0. MS m/z (%): 366 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C17H10N4O4S (366.04): C, 55.73; H, 2.75; N, 15.29. Found: C, 55.59; H, 2.72; N, 15.15%.

2-(4-(5-Methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (13). Yellow solid; m.p. 230–232 °C (dioxane); IR (KBr): v 3425 (NH), 3040, 2925 (C-H), 1673, 1649 (2C=O), 1596 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.59 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.46–7.62 (m, 6H, Ar-H and thiazole-H5), 7.78 (s, 1H, pyrazole-H3), 7.91–8.15 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 9.88 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 401 (M+). Anal. Calcd. For C21H15N5O2S (401.09): C, 62.83; H, 3.77; N, 17.45. Found: C, 62.77; H, 3.64; N, 17.38%.

2-(4-(Pyridin-2-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (14). Yellow solid; m.p. 200–202 °C (EtOH); IR (KBr): v 3427 (NH), 3048, 2924 (C-H), 1666, 1643 (2C=O), 1589 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.23–8.65 (m, 9H, Ar-H), 8.90 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 106.5, 115.5, 115.7, 125.2, 126.2, 126.3, 129.8, 131.9, 132.6, 135.2, 146.6, 155.7, 156.1, 159.4, 162.6, 165.1. MS m/z (%): 322 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C16H10N4O2S (322.05): C, 59.62; H, 3.13; N, 17.38. Found: C, 59.51; H, 3.10; N, 17.25%.

2-(4-(2-Oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)thiazol-2-yl)-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione (15). Yellow solid; m.p. 253–255 °C (Dioxane); IR (KBr): v 3429 (NH), 3032, 2928 (C-H), 1721, 1670, 1656 (3C=O), 1606 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.37–8.65 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 8.36 (s, 1H, coumarine-H4), 8.64 (s, 1H, thiazole-H5), 8.87 (s, br, 1H, NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 389 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C20H11N3O4S (389.05): C, 61.69; H, 2.85; N, 10.79. Found: C, 61.64; H, 2.79; N, 10.58%.

3.4. Synthesis of Bis-thiazole Derivatives and

3.4.1. Method A

A mixture of 1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1, 0.221 g, 1 mmol) and bis-α-bromoketones 16 and compound 17 (2 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) was refluxed for 4–7 h (monitored by TLC). The product started to separate out during the course of the reaction. The solid product was filtered, washed with water, dried and recrystallized from DMF to give the corresponding bis-thiazoles 18 and 19, respectively.

3.4.2. Method B

A mixture of 1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazine-2(1H)-carbothioamide (1, 0.221 g, 1 mmol) and bis-α-bromoketones 16 and compound 17 (2 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) was irradiated by an ultrasonic generator in a water bath at 50 °C for 30–60 min. (irradiation was continued until all of the starting materials have been disappeared and the product was formed, monitored by TLC). The solid that formed after cooling was filtered and recrystallized from DMF to give the corresponding bisthiazoles 18 and 19, respectively.

2,2′-(4,4′-(1,4-Phenylene)bis(thiazole-4,2-diyl))bis(2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione) (18). Yellow solid; m.p. 309–311 °C; IR (KBr): v 3427 (NH), 3039, 2924 (C-H), 1669, 1648 (2C=O), 1610 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.11–8.02 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 8.11 (s, 2H, thiazole-H5), 8.87 (s, br, 2H, 2NH, D2O-exchangeable); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 112.8, 116.0, 119.2, 125.8, 128.4, 129.5, 130.8, 131.1, 135.3, 143.8, 148.8, 160.4, 162.8. MS m/z (%): 564 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C28H16N6O4S2 (564.07): C, 59.56; H, 2.86; N, 14.89. Found: C, 59.69; H, 2.74; N, 14.75%.

2,2'-(4,4'-(3,4-Dimethylthieno[2,3-b]thiophene-2,5-diyl)bis(thiazole-4,2-diyl))bis(2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione) (19). Brown solid; m.p. 276–278 °C; IR (KBr): v 3429 (NH), 3062, 2921 (C-H), 1670, 1652 (2C=O), 1601 (C=N) cm−1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.37 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 7.06–8.07 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 8.38 (s, 2H, thiazole-H5), 9.23 (s, br, 2H, 2NH, D2O-exchangeable); MS m/z (%): 654 (M+). Anal. Calcd. for C30H18N6O4S4 (654.03): C, 55.03; H, 2.77; N, 12.84. Found: C, 54.86; H, 2.61; N, 12.73%.

3.5. Agar Diffusion Medium Biological Assays

All compounds were screened in vitro for their antimicrobial activity, applying an agar diffusion method [34]. A suspension of the organisms was added to sterile nutrient agar media at 45 °C and the mixture was transferred to sterile Petri dishes and allowed to solidify. Holes of 6 mm in diameter were made using a cork borer. The samples of the test compounds and of reference drugs, were dissolved in DMSO to give a solution of 5 mg·mL−1. The amount tested of either the synthesized compounds or reference drugs was 100 µL. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a negative control. The plates were left for 1h at room temperature as a period of pre-incubation diffusion to minimize the effects of variation in time between the applications of the different solutions. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and observed for antimicrobial activity. The diameters of inhibition zone were measured and compared with those of the reference drugs. The observed inhibition zones were measured in millimeters beyond good diameters. Also, the percentage values of inhibition zones as compared to reference drugs were recorded (Table 4).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a new green methodology and synthesized several novel 2-thiazolylphthalazine derivatives using ultrasound irradiation, resulting in high and efficient yields in short reaction times. The antimicrobial activities of all prepared compounds were evaluated and the results revealed the promising activities of compounds 4d, 7b (117% zone inhibition), and 7c (105% zone inhibition) against Salmonella sp., exceeding the inhibition zones of the reference drug Gentamycin.