Raju Ghosh1, Avijit Tarafdar1, Mamta Sharma1. 1. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad, Telangana 502324, India.
Abstract
Dry root rot (DRR) caused by the fungus Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler, is an emerging disease in chickpea. The disease is often mistaken with other root rots like Fusarium wilt, collar rot and black root rot in chickpea. Therefore, its timely and specific detection is important. Current detection protocols are either based on mycological methods or on protocols involving DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Here we report the rapid and specific detection of R. bataticola using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting fungal specific 5.8S rDNA sequence for visual detection of R. bataticola. The reaction was optimized at 63 °C for 75 min using minimum 10 fg of DNA. After adding SYBR Green I in LAMP products, the amplification was found to be highly specific in all the 94 isolates of R. bataticola collected from diverse geographical regions as well as DRR infected plants and sick soil. No reaction was found in other pathogenic fungi infecting chickpea (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii and Fusarium solani) and pigeonpea (Fusarium udum and Phytophthora cajani). The standardised LAMP assay with its simplicity, rapidity and specificity is very useful for the visual detection of this emerging disease in chickpea.
Dry root rot (DRR) caused by the fungus Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler, is an emerging disease in chickpea. The disease is often mistaken with other root rots like Fusarium wilt, collar rot and black root rot in chickpea. Therefore, its timely and specific detection is important. Current detection protocols are either based on mycological methods or on protocols involving DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Here we report the rapid and specific detection of R. bataticola using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting fungal specific 5.8S rDNA sequence for visual detection of R. bataticola. The reaction was optimized at 63 °C for 75 min using minimum 10 fg of DNA. After adding SYBR Green I in LAMP products, the amplification was found to be highly specific in all the 94 isolates of R. bataticola collected from diverse geographical regions as well as DRR infected plants and sick soil. No reaction was found in other pathogenic fungi infecting chickpea (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii and Fusarium solani) and pigeonpea (Fusarium udum and Phytophthora cajani). The standardised LAMP assay with its simplicity, rapidity and specificity is very useful for the visual detection of this emerging disease in chickpea.
Dry root rot (DRR) caused by soil borne necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler [Synonyms: Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid] is an emerging disease in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)1. The DRR is more dominant when the crop is exposed to moisture stress conditions2 and can cause 50 to 100% yield loss under favourable conditions3. In recent years, Rhizoctonia bataticola is becoming more prevalent in agricultural areas where climate change is leading to higher temperatures. It is reported that R. bataticola can infect more than 284 plant species including monocot and dicot plant hosts4. Due to availability of wide range of natural host, R. bataticola can easily sustain in the dry climatic area and persist in soil for prolonged period even after rotation of the crops.In chickpea, DRR is often mistaken with Fusarium wilt and other root rot diseases (collar rot, black root rot etc.), as the general symptoms of these diseases are nearly similar and visually undistinguishable in field conditions1. In all the cases, affected plants show foliar chlorosis and ultimately cause plant collapse. Therefore, there is a real need of an advance rapid, reliable and easy detection method for diagnosis of R. bataticola for better management of DRR. In recent years, PCR based methods like conventional PCR and real time PCR is being employed to detect fungal species and other microorganism567, but it is not cost effective and need high-quality DNA due to the effects of inhibitors on PCR sensitivity89. Also molecular expertise is required for true diagnosis of pathogens. Now a days, Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has been developed as an alternative and reliable method for the detection of microbial pathogens and diagnosis of plant diseases1011121314. The advantages and simplicity of LAMP assay is that the reaction could be easily judged as positive or negative by naked eye through assessing of increased turbidity or colour change1516, and for that it does not require any expensive instruments like thermal cycler.The LAMP is highly sensitive, less time-consuming than conventional PCR-based methods, and less prone to inhibition from DNA preparations17. Reliability of primer sets and DNA sequences of interest are the most important factors in development of molecular detection of targeted organisms. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear rRNA genes is suitable targets for species diversity analysis within the fungal communities181920. The characteristic of high sequence variability within the ITS region makes itself a valuable and ideal target for developing of genus and species specific PCR primers to identify an organism. Since LAMP assay has been reported to be very useful for quick detection and identification of a broad range of microorganisms, including viruses21, bacteria8, and fungi1011, the present study was proposed to develop highly specific and very sensitive LAMP assay for the detection of R. bataticola from infected plants and soil.
Materials and Methods
Materials studied
Fungal strains
A total 94 isolates of R. bataticola representing different chickpea growing geographical region of India were taken in this study. Other major fungal strains infecting chickpea (e.g. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii and Fusarium solani) and other legume crop pigeonpea (Fusarium udum and Phytophthora cajani) were taken for validation of studies (Table 1).
Table 1
Details of thee fungal isolates, plant and soil samples used in the LAMP detection assay.
Samples
Collection site
State
LAMP detection
Conventional PCR
Florescence
Agarose gel
RB_F3/RB_B3
ITS1/ITS4
R. bataticola isolates (chickpea)
RB1
Kanpur
Uttar Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB2
Coimbatore
Tamil Nadu
+
+
+
+
RB3
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB4
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB5
ICRISAT, BP 4
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB6
ICRISAT, BP 10
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB7
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB8
ICRISAT, BUS 03
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB9
ICRISAT, BR 05
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB10
ICRISAT, BIL 02
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB11
ICRISAT, BIL 02
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB12
Pati
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB13
ICRISAT, BP 02
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB14
Jodhpur
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB15
Jabalpur
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB16
Delhi
Delhi
+
+
+
+
RB17
Damoh 1
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB18
Damoh 2
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB19
Damoh 3
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB20
Damoh 4
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB21
Damoh 5
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB22
Damoh 6
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB23
Damoh 7
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB24
ICRISAT, BUS 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB25
ICRISAT, BUS 07
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB26
ICRISAT, BIL 02
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB27
ICRISAT, BUS 07
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB28
ICRISAT, BR 04H
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB29
ICRISAT, BUS 03
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB30
ICRISAT, BIL 02D
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB31
ICRISAT, BUS 03
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB32
ICRISAT, BIL 05
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB33
ICRISAT, BP 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB34
ICRISAT, BR 05D
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB35
ICRISAT, BUS 03
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB36
ICRISAT, BR 04F
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB37
ICRISAT, BP 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB38
ICRISAT, BR 04F
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB39
ICRISAT, BM 14
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB40
ICRISAT, BR 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB41
ICRISAT, BP 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB42
ICRISAT, BR 04F
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB43
ICRISAT, BW 01A
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB44
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB45
ICRISAT, BW 03
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB46
ICRISAT, BW 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB47
ICRISAT, BR 04I
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB48
ICRISAT, BR 04H
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB49
Jabalpur 1
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB50
Jabalpur 5
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB51
Jabalpur 6
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB52
Jabalpur 8
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB53
Brampuri, Damoh 8
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB54
Brampuri, Damoh 9
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB55
Katni
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB56
JNKVV, Jabalpur
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB57
Rewa
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB58
Bachara. Satna
Madhya Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB59
IIPR, Kanpur
Uttar Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB60
ICRISAT, BIL 02
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB61
Dhaulakuan
Himachal Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB62
Ramnagar, Pantnagar
Uttarakhand
+
+
+
+
RB63
BAU, Ranchi
Jharkhand
+
+
+
+
RB64
ICRISAT, BP 02C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB65
ICRISAT, BP 15
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB66
ICRISAT, BP 03B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB67
ICRISAT, BP 03C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB68
ICRISAT, BP 08A
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB69
ICRISAT, BP 08B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB70
ICRISAT, BR 05D
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB71
ICRISAT, BR 05B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB72
ICRISAT, BL 04A
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB73
ICRISAT, BL0 4
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB74
ICRISAT, BM 13
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB75
ICRISAT, BM 13
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB76
ICRISAT, BM 08C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB77
ICRISAT, BW 02A
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB78
ICRISAT, BW 02B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB79
ICRISAT, BW 02C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB80
ICRISAT, BW 04A
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB81
ICRISAT, BW 05A
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB82
ICRISAT, BW 05B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB83
ICRISAT, BW 08
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB84
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB85
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB86
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB87
ICRISAT, BIL 03C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB88
ICRISAT, BIL 03
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB89
ICRISAT, BIL 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB90
ICRISAT, BIL 05B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB91
ICRISAT, BIL 05C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB92
ICRISAT, BIL 05C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB93
ICRISAT, JM 08B
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
RB94
ICRISAT, BR 05C
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
DRR infected chickpea plants (field)
Sample 1
ICRISAT, BIL 02
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
Sample 2
ICRISAT, BW 08
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
Sample 3
ICRISAT, BM 13
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
Sample 4
ICRISAT, BP 15
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
Sample 5
ICRISAT, BIL 01
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
+
Healthy
ICRISAT, BIL 02
Andhra Pradesh
−
−
−
−
DRR infected chickpea plants (greenhouse)
Sample 1
Experimental sample
ICRISAT
+
+
+
+
Sample 2
Experimental sample
ICRISAT
+
+
+
+
Sample 3
Experimental sample
ICRISAT
+
+
+
+
Sample 4
Experimental sample
ICRISAT
+
+
+
+
Healthy
Experimental sample
ICRISAT
−
−
−
−
Sick soil (DRR)
Rhizospheric black soil
ICRISAT, BP 04
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
MBa
Rhizospheric red soil
ICRISAT, RL17
Andhra Pradesh
+
+
+
MB
Sick soil (non-rhizospheric)
Experimental sick plot
ICRISAT
+
+
+
+
Other fungal pathogens
F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (chickpea)
In vitro culture
ICRISAT
−
−
−
+
R. solani (chickpea)
In vitro culture
ICRISAT
−
−
−
+
S. rolfsii (chickpea)
In vitro culture
ICRISAT
−
−
−
+
F. solani (chickpea)
In vitro culture
ICRISAT
−
−
−
+
F. udum (pigeonpea)
In vitro culture
ICRISAT
−
−
−
+
P. cajani (pigeonpea)
In vitro culture
ICRISAT
−
−
−
+
aMultiple bands.
Plant and soil samples
Healthy and infected DRR chickpea plant samples were collected from greenhouse and experimental fields of International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Telangana State, India. The soil samples taken in this study were collected from screening plot for R. bataticola and from rhizosphere of DRR infected chickpea plants in field (Table 1).
DNA extraction
Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from all the fungal isolates and DRR infected plants using PureLink Plant Total DNA Purification kit (Invitogen, USA) as per manufacturer’s protocol. About 100 mg of frozen mycelial tissue/plant tissue was grounded in liquid N2 and resuspended in 250 μL Resuspension Buffer (supplied in the kit). Total gDNA was eluted in 50 μL of nuclease free water and stored at −20 °C for further downstream application. The soil DNA was extracted from 100 mg of R. bataticola sick soil and DRR infected chickpea rhizospheric soil using SoilMaster™ DNA Extraction Kit (Epicentre, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The obtained DNA was suspended in 200 μL of elution buffer. The purified DNA was evaluated in 0.8% agarose gel as well as by UV spectrophotometry.
Primer design
As R. bataticola is an important plant pathogen with a broad host range and causes disease in diverse commercial crops, primers for the LAMP assay were designed from the conserved region in the partial ITS and 5.8S rRNA sequences of R. bataticola and M. phaseolina identified by multiple sequence alignment of representative isolates from different crops (Table 2 and Fig. 1). A set of six primers for LAMP assay, comprising two outer primers (RB_F3 and RB_B3), two innermost primers (RB_FIP and RB_BIP), and two loop primers (RB_LoopF and RB_LoopB) were designed manually by following the directions of Torres et al.22. The FIP was made with the complementary sequence of F1 (F1c) and F2, and the BIP made with the complementary sequence of R1 (B1c) and B2 (Table 3). The organization and position of the LAMP primers and their complementarity to target DNA used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. The designed primers were nBLAST searched on NCBI for analysing the sequence specificity and to get chance of cross reaction with other sibling species if environmental samples will assay in LAMP reaction (Table 4). To avoid the false positive reaction by cross reactivity within the primers, the secondary structures (hairpin, self-dimer and hetero-dimer) of the primers and their corresponding stability with ΔG were reviewed2324 in OligoAnalyzer 3.1 tool (http://eu.idtdna.com/calc/analyzer) and were determined (Table 5). The universal primer pair ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and RB_F3 and RB_B3 were used for conventional PCR.
Table 2
Nucleotide sequence analysis of representative Rhizoctonia bataticola/Macrophomina phaseolina isolates infecting economically important plants and their disease list.
Pathogen
Host
Disease
Acc. No.
Country source
Sequence alignment analysis for Acc. No. HQ392814 (QC/ID in per cent)*
Common name
Scientific name
Complete sequence
Sequence fragment taken for primer design
Rhizoctonia bataticola
Chickpea
Cicer arientinum
Dry root rot
HQ392814
India
100/99
100/100
Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajan
Dry root rot
KJ629078
India
95/99
100/100
Linseed
Linum usitatissimum
Wilt
KM247370
India
95/98
100/99
Spider lily
Crinum asiaticum
Leaf disease
KX447538
Malaysia
99/98
100/100
Macrophomina phaseolina
Impatiens
Impatiens sp.
Root disease complex
KU726237
USA
98/99
100/100
Sorghum
Sorghum bicolor
Charcoal rot
KU856652
Denmark
98/99
100/100
Olive
Olea europea
Die-back
KU863545
Tunisia
98/99
100/100
Sunflower
Helianthus annuus
Charcoal rot
KT862032
Mongolia
95/99
100/100
Potato
Solanum tuberosum
Charcoal rot/tuber blemishes
KU721993
South Africa
85/100
100/100
Common bean
Phaseolus vulgaris
Charcoal rot/leaf blight
KU831500
Tunisia
94/99
100/100
Indian jasmine
Jasminum multiflorum
Root rot
KT768135
India
98/99
100/100
Cowpea
Vigna unguiculata
Charcoal rot
KF951783
Senegal
92/99
100/100
Peanut
Arachis hypogae
Dry root rot/charcoal rot
KF951759
Senegal
96/99
100/100
Lady’s fingers
Abelmoschus esculentas
Dry root and foot rot
KF951754
Senegal
97/99
100/100
Roselle
Hibiscus sabdarifa
Charcoal rot
KF951701
Louga, Senegal
97/99
100/100
Pearl millet
Pennisetum glaucum
Dry root rot
KF951691
Niger
92/99
100/100
Black gram
Phaseolus mungo
Charcoal rot
KF951637
Denmark
93/99
100/100
Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum sp.
Charcoal rot
KF951633
USA
92/99
100/100
Sugarcane
Saccharum officinarum
Charcoal rot
KF951631
India
97/99
100/100
Pigeonpea
Cajanus indicus
Dry root rot
KF951628
Sri Lanka
93/99
100/100
Maize
Zea mays
Charcoal rot
KF951627
Palestine
92/99
100/100
Sesamum
Sesamum indicum
Charcoal rot
KF951624
Uganda
93/99
100/100
Derris legume
Derris elliptica
Charcoal rot
KF951623
Malaysia
93/99
100/100
Black cottonwood
Populus trichocarpa
Charcoal rot
KF428466
USA
97/99
100/100
Cumin
Cuminum cyminum
Charcoal rot
KF453968
Turkey
95/99
100/100
Strawberry
Fragaria sp.
Crown rot
KC822431
China
98/99
100/100
Pectilis orchid
Pectilis susannae
Charcoal rot
KC920477
India
78/100
100/100
Soybean
Glycin max
Charcoal rot
KC202823
Iran
93/99
100/100
Sweet potato
Ipomoea batatas
Charcoal rot
JX945170
USA
98/99
100/100
Turmeric
Carcuma longa
Charcoal rot
JX535007
India
96/99
100/100
Mungbean
Vigna radiata
Root rot and leaf blight
HQ660594
China
98/99
100/100
Golden samphire
Inula crithmoides
Root rot
HQ649832
Spain
93/99
100/100
*Values of QC (quarry coverage) and identity (ID) scores of all sequence segments retrieve from NCBI nucleotide sequence database that matched the query sequence (HQ392814).
Figure 1
Nucleotide sequence alignment of partial ITS and 5.8S rDNA region of Rhizoctonia bataticola and Macrophomina phaseolina of different legumes.
The shades sequences in different colour indicate the regions of primer development for LAMP assay. The primer sequences are specified by red colour and arrows are the direction of amplification.
Table 3
Information of the primers used for the LAMP reaction.
Primers name
Sequences (5′-3′)
Type
Primer position (nt)
Length (bp)
GC (%)
Tm
RB_F3
CCTCCCACCCTTTGTATACCTACC
Forward outer
1–24
24
54.2
58.4
RB_B3
CGCAAAGGACGGTGCCCAA
Backward outer
336–354
19
63.2
61.4
RB_FIP (F1c+F2)
CTGCAACGTTTACTGACTGGAGTTTG-CCGATTTTGGGGGGTGGCTAGT
Forward inner
(104–129) + (65–86)
26 + 22
46.2–59.1
58.2–61.7
RB_BIP (B1c + B2)
CGGATCTCTTGGTTCTGGCATCG-GAAATGACGCTCGAACAGGCATG
Backward inner
(168–190) + (291–313)
23 + 23
54.2–52.2
60.9–58.8
RB_LoopF
TCCTCTGGCGGGCACTAG
Forward loop forming
82–99
18
66.7
59.4
RB_LoopB
ACATTGCGCCCCTTGGGATT
Backward loop forming
263–282
20
55
60.2
Table 4
In silico specificity and cross reactivity analysis of LAMP primers through NCBI database and details of 100 hits generated in nBLAST.
List of primers
R. bataticola/M. phaseolina
Other microbes
Identity (%)
Number of hits
Identity (%)
Number of hits
Name of the dominant microbes hit in primer blast (numbers in the parentheses denote the number of hits)
Uncultured fungal strains (36), Lasiodiplodia theobromae, (10), Russula sp. (4), Mesorhizobium (3), Uncultured Helotiales sp (2) and remaining hits are of different microbes with single entry
*Not hit in nBLAST analysis, but sequences are 100% similar with R. bataticola/M. phaseolina (Table 2 and Fig. 1).
Table 5
In silico hairpin, self-dimer or hetero-dimer analysis of primers used in LAMP assay.
List of primers
ΔG for hetero-dimer
ΔG for self-dimer
Hairpin
RB_B3
RB_FIP
RB_BIP
RB_LoopF
RB_LoopB
ΔG
Tm
RB_F3
−10.51
−12.51
−5.02
−6.14
−9.67
−6.08
0.23
22.3
RB_B3
—
−10.04
−8.16
−12.57
−10.65
−5.09
−0.59
31.6
RB_FIP
—
—
−9.73
−8.16
−9.21
−10.18
−1.75
43.0
RB_BIP
—
—
—
−6.75
−6.75
−6.76
−1.97
36.5
RB_Loop_F
—
—
—
—
−9.82
−4.16
0.3
17.1
RB_Loop_B
—
—
—
—
—
−9.89
−1.69
50.5
LAMP reaction
The constituents of the LAMP assay were optimized using total gDNA extracted from R. bataticola fungal culture (positive control) and two negative controls (without DNA and DNA from a healthy chickpea plant). The LAMP reaction was performed in a 25 μL volume contained 2.0 μL primer mixture (20 μM each of FIP, BIP, Loop F, and Loop B primers, and 2.5 μM each of F3 and B3 primers), 1 mM dNTPs, 4 mM MgCl2, 2.5 μL of 10X ThermoPol Reaction Buffer (1X reaction buffer (pH 8.8) contained 20 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100), 8 U of Bst DNA polymerase (NEB, UK), 1.5 μL target DNA (about 100 ng). After completing the isothermal amplification 1 μL of SYBR Green I (Invitrogen, USA) was added for visual assay of the amplification. The reaction was carried out at 63 °C for 60 min followed by incubation at 80 °C for 10 min to inactivate the Bst DNA polymerase. The reactions were performed in a 0.5 mL microcentrifuge in a water bath for temperature control.
Optimization of LAMP reaction condition
To optimize the LAMP reaction conditions, the reaction was carried out at different temperatures, 57 °C, 60 °C, 63 °C, 66 °C and 69 °C using a gradient thermo cycler (ARKTIK Thermal Cycler, Thermo Scientific, USA). The LAMP reaction mixture was incubated at the different temperatures for different time periods, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 75 min and 90 min to optimize the temperature and time/duration for the LAMP reaction. The reactions were terminated by heat inactivation at 80 °C for 10 min. The LAMP reaction was assessed visually based on colour change after adding SYBR Green I and under UV light. The LAMP amplified products were then analysed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Specificity of the LAMP
To determine the specificity of LAMP assay, the reaction was carried out with the extracted DNA from other legume infecting pathogenic fungi discussed previously in fungal strain section. The LAMP assay was done as described earlier at optimized temperature and time duration. The assays were visualized based on SYBR Green I colour change and then by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Individual fungal sample was tested by three replications and the experiment was repeated three times.
Sensitivity of the LAMP method
The sensitivity of the LAMP assay was determined using 10 fold serially diluted R. bataticola DNA ranged from 10 ng to 0.1 fg. Reaction mixture without DNA template was included as a negative control. The LAMP amplification products were analysed visually by addition of 1 μL SYBR Green I under UV light or by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. To compare the sensitivities and specificities between LAMP assay and PCR; PCR was performed with the extracted DNA from all fungal isolates using ITS primers (Table 2). The PCR reaction was carried using the protocol detailed in Ghosh et al. (2015). The PCR amplified products were then analysed in 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The experiment was repeated thrice. The detection limit in LAMP assay was defined as the last dilution with positive reaction.
Validation of the LAMP assay
To validate the LAMP assay, the DNA from DRR infected chickpea plants and soil samples were tested for the presence of R. bataticola. Based on colour change and gel electrophoresis as described above, the LAMP reaction was visualised. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and samples were considered as positive if two of the replicates showed positive response.
Results
Selection of LAMP primers
All R. bataticola isolates were identified by amplifying and sequencing of approximately 544 bp of partial ITS and 5.8S region using universal primers, ITS1 and ITS4 (Table 1). For designing of LAMP assay primers for R. bataticola, the conserve region of the partial ITS and 5.8S sequences was identified by multiple sequence alignment of corresponding nucleotide sequences of representative isolates in different crops (Table 2) and a set of six primers were designed (Table 3). The primers were analysed in silico against the nBLAST search tool using the NCBI sequence database. The BLAST results revealed that except both parts (B1c and B2) of BIP primer all primers were significantly hits the target sequences of R. bataticola and M. phaseolina with 100% identity (Table 4), although the sequence of BIP primer is 100% similar with the target sequences (Fig. 1). The hit also resulted in 100% similarity with other non-pathogenic microbes of chickpea (Table 4). During the design of LAMP primers, ΔG values were determined and the values were fixed around −9 kcal/mole or more positive than −9 kcal/mole (Table 5). For hairpins, the Tm of the hairpin was kept below of 50 °C and lower than the annealing temperature for the LAMP reaction as the strongest hairpin should be at least 50 °C (Table 5).
Optimization of LAMP assay
To determine the optimum temperature and reaction time of LAMP assay, the assay was tested within a wide range of temperatures (57 °C–69 °C) and time (15 min–90 min) using pure DNA of R. bataticola culture. The assay showed positive reaction at all temperatures, whether assessment was based on visual fluorescence detection or in gel electrophoresis. The characteristic ladder like bands were evident in the gel when the reaction was positive, but not if the reaction was negative. However, the high intense ladder-like band pattern was obtained in gel electrophoresis at 63 °C (Fig. 2a). Fluorescence detection result was consistent with the results from 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. For optimizing time, the LAMP reaction was conducted at 63 °C for various time duration mentioned above. The positive reaction was found in all the time duration, but strong band pattern was observed after 75 min of reaction (Fig. 2b). Therefore, 63 °C for 75 min is the optimized temperature and time for LAMP reaction for detection of DRR pathogen.
Figure 2
Optimization of LAMP reaction for detection of Rhizoctonia bataticola.
(a) Optimization of temperature of LAMP. M GeneRulerTM 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder; lanes 57 °C–69 °C indicated the reaction temperatures of LAMP. (b) Optimization of time duration of LAMP. M GeneRulerTM 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder; lanes 15 m–90 m indicated the reaction time duration of LAMP. All the products were detected on the basis of 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
LAMP assay specificity
LAMP specificity was examined using DNA templates extracted from total 94 R. bataticola isolates collected from diverse geographical region in India. Six pathogenic wilt and root rot pathogens viz., Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, Fusarium solani, Fusarium udum and Phytophthora cajani infecting chickpea and pigeonpea were also taken for testing specificity (Table 1). DNA template of R. bataticola isolates gave positive reaction, whereas no amplification was observed for the other fungal species after incubation at 63 °C for 75 min. The LAMP reaction was assessed using 2% agarose (Fig. 3) and SYBR Green I visualisation. The result indicated that the LAMP assay developed in this study is highly specific to R. bataticola. Furthermore, to confirm the specificity of the LAMP primers, a PCR was carried out using primer pair, RB_F3 and RB_B3. All the R. bataticola isolates were amplified with a unique DNA fragment of 354 bp. However, these primers did not produce any band when DNA templates from other pathogenic fungi were used. However, primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 gave amplification of expected size of DNA fragment (Table 1).
Figure 3
Specificity of LAMP assay for detection of Rhizoctonia bataticola.
Approximately 10 ng of fungal genomic DNA was used in LAMP reaction. M GeneRulerTM 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder; lane 1–7 DNA of Rhizoctonia bataticola, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, Fusarium solani, Fusarium udum and Phytophthora cajani, respectively.
Sensitivity of LAMP assay
To determine the detection limit, the sensitivity of the LAMP reaction was assessed using 10-fold serially diluted R. bataticola DNA template. The amplicons were detected in both, by visual assessment using SYBR Green I (Fig. 4a) and 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 4b). No positive signal was produced when less than 10 fg DNA of R. bataticola was used in LAMP reaction, indicating the potential detection limit of R. bataticola up to 10 fg of DNA. It was noticed that the amplified DNA fragments were slightly faint in 10 fg than those produced by a less diluted DNA (>10 fg). On the other hand, when same amount of DNA was used in conventional PCR, no such amplification was obtained after 1.0 pg of dilution (Fig. 4c). Results of visual detection correlated with agarose gel electrophoresis.
Figure 4
Sensitivity of LAMP assay vs. conventional PCR for detection of Rhizoctonia bataticola using similar concentration of DNA template.
(a) Visual assessment of LAMP assay using SYBR Green I. (b) LAMP assay on the basis of 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. (c) Result of conventional PCR using ITS1 and ITS4 primers. M GeneRulerTM 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder; lane 101–10−7 indicated the DNA concentration in LAMP reaction starting from 10 ng (101 ng) to subsequent 10 fold diluted DNA up to 0.1 fg (10−7 ng), respectively.
Evaluation of the LAMP assays with plant and soil sample
To validate the applicability of the LAMP assay at field level, the developed LAMP assay was evaluated with R. bataticola infested chickpea plants and soil samples as well. The plants showing typical symptom of DRR were collected from different experimental fields of ICRISAT. The LAMP assay was carried out at optimised condition to detect the presence of R. bataticola in tested samples. The positive LAMP reaction was found when DNA templates from the R. bataticola infected chickpea plants were assessed, and the products turned green in colour with SYBR Green I. Moreover, none of the DNA template from healthy plants gave positive signals, and remained orange in colour. Furthermore, the LAMP assay conducted with the DNA from rhizospheric soil of DRR infected chickpea plants as well as R. bataticola inoculated sick soil was also found to be positive (Fig. 5). The LAMP result was consistent when the assays were repeated. Results were consistent with PCR method.
Figure 5
Evaluation of the LAMP assay for detection of Rhizoctonia bataticola in optimized conditions (63 °C for 75 min) using DNA template from infected chickpea plants and rhizospheric soil.
M GeneRulerTM 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder; lane 1–5 Dry root rot infected chickpea plants sampled from different fields; 6 Healthy chickpea plant from field; 7–10R. bataticola inoculated chickpea plants sampled from green house; 11 healthy chickpea plant from greenhouse; 12 Rhizospheric black soil from field; 13 Rhizospheric red soil from field; 14 Sick soil from greenhouse; 15 Negative control without any DNA template; 16 Positive control with genomic DNA of R. bataticola.
Discussion
In this report, we have demonstrated and optimized the LAMP for the detection of R. bataticola, the fungus that cause DRR disease in chickpea. LAMP assay reported here is rapid, highly sensitive, less time-consuming than conventional PCR-based DNA amplification method. It has been applied for the detection of a wide range of microorganisms including viral1325, bacterial2627, phytoplasma28, mycoplasma29, fungal101112 and parasitic agents30.In our study, we used SYBR Green I in LAMP assay as florescent dye which is non-mutagenic and eco-friendly in nature, as the replacement of other potential human mutagen florescent dyes like ethidium bromide. Subsequently, uses of Bst DNA polymerase in LAMP reaction, it permits to strand displacement DNA synthesis and the reactions can be performed under isothermal conditions using a simple incubator, such as a water bath or heating block. With taking these advantages, LAMP detection technique can be employed in diagnosis of disease in field level even also in remote area where the laboratories are not well equipped.We validated our developed LAMP assay using the primers generated from partial ITS and 5.8S rDNA gene for quick detection of R. bataticola from varied samples viz. fungal culture, diseased plants and soil samples. The highly sensitive and variable ITS region is idle target rather than other single-copy genes in genomic DNA to sufficient discriminate of some closely related fungal species3132 because of its presence in 100 or more copies in the fungal genome and has competence to give amplification from a very small number of micro-organisms33. Then again, to avoid secondary structures in primers with abundant G-C bonds e.g. hairpins, self-dimer and heterodimer, the ΔG of the primers were kept more positive than −9 kcal/mole or very less negative than the same value2324 as those can give false positive reaction in assay. When the LAMP primers were analysed in silico for its specificity, it showed significant hit with our target organisms R. bataticola and M. phaseolina in nBLAST. For confirming the specificity of our developed LAMP primers, we assayed those primers with DNA isolated from 94 R. bataticola isolates along with six other plant pathogenic fungi. During this LAMP assay, except all R. bataticola DNA, no colour change was obtained with DNA of other six pathogenic fungus. Thus, this result indicated that the designed primers and LAMP assay were highly specific for R. bataticola, as it correctly distinguished between R. bataticola and the other pathogens. The reaction mixture without DNA also showed no change in colour during LAMP assay. Previously, the primers from rDNA-ITS gene have been used to successfully detect Pythium aphanidermatum in infected tomatoes34 and Phytophthora capsici in infected peppers, tomatoes, and other agronomic and ornamental crops of the Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae families35.The detection limit in our study was found to be 10 fg DNA of R. bataticola, below this level no colour change was noticed. This detection limit was lower than previously reported LAMP methods used to detect other fungal pathogens e.g. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum12, Phytophthora sojae36, P. ramorum and P. kernoviae37, indicating greater sensitivity. Comparison of LAMP assay with the conventional PCR showed the LAMP assay using SYBR Green I dye significantly improved the detection efficiency of R. bataticola. This result of LAMP assay was significant and concordant with the reports published previously for the detection of some plant pathogens123637.Positive reaction in LAMP assay with the DNA isolated from R. bataticola infected chickpea plants sampled from field, further validated our results. DNA from healthy plants gave no reaction. It has previously been used in detection/screening of plant pathogens like Phytophthora capsici35, P. ramorum38, Pythium aphanidermatum34, Meloidogyne enterolobii39 from infected plants in field and soil samples. In this study, we have designed LAMP primers using sequence of R. bataticola/M. phaseolina isolates infecting chickpea as well as other crops from worldwide and in silico analyses of ITS sequences showed low genetic diversity within the Indian and global isolates, hence the utility of our developed LAMP assay will be equally useful for detection of R. bataticola isolates in any other crops globally. In future, LAMP diagnostic kit will be very useful for monitoring the disease complex in the fields, further helpful in developing the timely management strategies.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Ghosh, R. et al. Rapid and sensitive diagnoses of dry root rot pathogen of chickpea (Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler) using loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Sci. Rep.
7, 42737; doi: 10.1038/srep42737 (2017).Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.