Literature DB >> 28215821

Holistic versus feature-based binding in the medial temporal lobe.

Rebecca N van den Honert1, Gregory McCarthy2, Marcia K Johnson2.   

Abstract

A central question for cognitive neuroscience is how feature-combinations that give rise to episodic/source memories are encoded in the brain. Although there is much evidence that the hippocampus (HIP) is involved in feature binding, and some evidence that other brain regions are as well, there is relatively little evidence about the nature of the resulting representations in different brain regions. We used multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to investigate how feature combinations might be represented, contrasting two possibilities, feature-based versus holistic. Participants viewed stimuli that were composed of three source features - a person (face or body), a scene (indoor or outdoor), and an object (bike or luggage) - which were combined to make eight unique stimulus identities. We reasoned that regions that can classify the eight identities (a multiclass classification) but not the individual features (a binary classification) likely have a holistic representation of each identity. In contrast, regions that can classify the eight identities and can classify each feature are likely to contain feature-based representations of these identities. To further probe the extent of feature-based or holistic classification in each region, we developed and validated a novel approach that directly compares binary and multiclass classification. We found clear evidence for holistic representation in the parahippocampal cortex (PHC), consistent with theories that posit that pattern-separation-like binding mechanisms are not unique to the HIP. Further clarifying the mechanisms of feature binding should benefit from systematic comparisons of multi-feature representations and whether they vary with task, type of stimulus, and/or experience.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanisms of binding; Pattern-separation; Representation; Source memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215821      PMCID: PMC5446797          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  56 in total

Review 1.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; J C Gore; T Allison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; A Belger; T Allison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: avoiding a trade-off.

Authors:  R C O'Reilly; J L McClelland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 5.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Creating Concepts from Converging Features in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Marc N Coutanche; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Alison Harris; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Associative Processing Is Inherent in Scene Perception.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decoding neuronal ensembles in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Demis Hassabis; Carlton Chu; Geraint Rees; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Peter D Molyneux; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interaction between attentional systems and episodic memory encoding: the impact of conflict on binding of information.

Authors:  Marco Sperduti; Allan Armougum; Dominique Makowski; Philippe Blondé; Pascale Piolino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Feature-coding transitions to conjunction-coding with progression through human visual cortex.

Authors:  Rosemary A Cowell; Krystal R Leger; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Mnemonic Similarity Task: A Tool for Assessing Hippocampal Integrity.

Authors:  Shauna M Stark; C Brock Kirwan; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Real-World Objects Are Represented in Visual Long-Term Memory Both as Unbound Features and as Bound Objects.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-07

5.  Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuri A Markov; Igor S Utochkin; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.