Literature DB >> 18046260

The cost and analysis of nonuse of cochlear implants.

Christopher H Raine1, Quentin Summerfield, David R Strachan, Jane M Martin, Catherine Totten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the cost implications and reasons for nonuse of cochlear implants in an established cochlear implant unit. STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively to construct a table of cochlear implant use over time to identify nonuse and to suggest the reasons for this.
SETTING: Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service is a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three hundred forty consecutively implanted patients from 1990 to 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Life table analysis showed that most children used their implant (p = 0.7 during 11 yr). However, 11 of 155 children and 2 of 185 adults became nonusers during the period of study. The 11 children stopped because of age at implant, educational placement, and family support. Two adults stopped because of psychological issues and inability to adapt to the signal. Surgical and implant costs have initial impact, with subsequent years' costs reflecting programming issues and maintenance. When considering nonuse, there are 2 effects: first, no more costs are incurred, and second, no more years of use are accumulated. Thus, nonuse reduces both costs and years. Costs of gaining a year of use as a function of time showed that there was little financial impact from the 11 children nonusers. As a ratio of "no nonuse" and observed "nonuse" in children, the ratio is 1.07 by 13 years of implantation (7%). The adult group was too few to analyze.
CONCLUSION: The nonuse added 7% to the average cost. Retrospective audit identifies that patient selection by a multidisciplinary team is crucial to reducing nonuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18046260     DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c25a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  13 in total

1.  Cochlear Implant Reliability: On the Reporting of Rates of Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Graham O'Neill; Neil S Tolley
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Genetic variants in the peripheral auditory system significantly affect adult cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  A Eliot Shearer; Robert W Eppsteiner; Kathy Frees; Viral Tejani; Christina M Sloan-Heggen; Carolyn Brown; Paul Abbas; Camille Dunn; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Prediction of cochlear implant performance by genetic mutation: the spiral ganglion hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; A Eliot Shearer; Michael S Hildebrand; Adam P Deluca; Haihong Ji; Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Black-Ziegelbein; Thomas L Casavant; Terry A Braun; Todd E Scheetz; Steven E Scherer; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Systematic review of the scientific literature on the economic evaluation of cochlear implants in paediatric patients.

Authors:  G Turchetti; S Bellelli; I Palla; F Forli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 5.  Systematic review of the scientific literature on the economic evaluation of cochlear implants in adult patients.

Authors:  G Turchetti; S Bellelli; I Palla; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Identifying Children With Poor Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Using Massively Parallel Sequencing.

Authors:  Chen-Chi Wu; Yin-Hung Lin; Tien-Chen Liu; Kai-Nan Lin; Wei-Shiung Yang; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Pei-Lung Chen; Che-Ming Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation in Rural China.

Authors:  Jianxin Qiu; Chongxian Yu; Thathya V Ariyaratne; Chris Foteff; Zhangmin Ke; Yi Sun; Li Zhang; Feifei Qin; Georgina Sanderson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

9.  Severe to profound deafness may be associated with MYH9-related disease: report of 4 patients.

Authors:  P Canzi; A Pecci; M Manfrin; E Rebecchi; C Zaninetti; V Bozzi; M Benazzo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Cochlear Implantation Outcome in Children with DFNB1 locus Pathogenic Variants.

Authors:  Dominika Oziębło; Anita Obrycka; Artur Lorens; Henryk Skarżyński; Monika Ołdak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.