| Literature DB >> 28212635 |
Umberto M Musazzi1, Benedetta Santini2, Francesca Selmin1, Valentina Marini1, Fabio Corsi3, Raffaele Allevi3, Anna M Ferretti4, Davide Prosperi2, Francesco Cilurzo1, Miriam Colombo5, Paola Minghetti6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This work aimed to provide useful information on the incidence of the choice of formulation in semi-solid preparations of iron-oxide nanoparticles (IONs). The appropriate analytical methods to assess the IONs physical stability and the effect of the semi-solid preparations on IONs human skin penetration were discussed. The physical stability of IONs (Dh = 31 ± 4 nm; ζ = -65 ± 5 mV) loaded in five semi-solid preparations (0.3% w/v), namely Carbopol gel (CP), hydroxyethyl cellulose gel (HEC), carboxymethylcellulose gel (CMC), cetomacrogol cream (Cet) and cold cream was assessed by combining DLS and low-field pulsed NMR data. The in vitro penetration of IONs was studied using human epidermis or isolated stratum corneum (SC).Entities:
Keywords: Iron oxide nanoparticles; Nanoparticle stability; Polymer coating; Semi-solid preparation; Skin penetration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28212635 PMCID: PMC5316225 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-017-0249-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1TEM images and dynamic light scattering (DLS) of iron oxide NPs (IONs) in organic solvent and water phase transfer using PMA amphiphilic polymer (PMA-IONs). Scale bars 10 nm
Physical characterisation of PMA-IONs and PMA-IONs-loaded hydrogels (mean ± SD, n = 3)
| Formulation | Dh (nm) | PDI | ξ (mV) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMA-IONs | 31 ± 4 | 0.15 ± 0.04 | −64.80 ± 4.91 | 7.0 |
| HEC | 29 ± 15 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | −42.17 ± 1.68 | 5.0 |
| CMC | 47 ± 7 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | −79.77 ± 2.00 | 6.5 |
| CP | 52 ± 4 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | −72.83 ± 5.25 | 6.0 |
HEC hydroxyethyl cellulose, CMC sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, CP carbomer 974P
Fig. 2Variation of the r 2 (a) and Dh values (b) of PMA-IONs loaded in hydrogels made of HEC (grey, solid line), CMC (grey, dash line) and CP (black, solid line) over time. The water suspension of PMA-IONs (black, dash line) was used as control
Fig. 3Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of skin samples treated with semisolid-formulations loaded by PMA-IONs. Nanoparticles (arrows) singularly or in cluster were found in stratum corneum (A), in stratum lucidum (B), in stratum granulosum (C), in stratum spinosum close to desmosomes (D), in stratum basale (E) and in proximity of desmosomes (F). d desmosomes, h hemidesmosomes
Fig. 4On the left a STEM image of HE tissue with some IONs; b enlargement of image a: the white squares highlight the areas of the EDX spectra. On the right the EDX spectra taken from the nanoparticles highlighted in b. The copper signals come from the TEM grid
Results of permeation (Q24) and retention (Qret) studies of aqueous suspensions and semisolid preparations containing 3 mg/mL of PMA-IONs
| Formulation | Qret | Q24 | Qret/Q24,HE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (μg/cm2) | N | A (μg/cm2) | N | ||
| Water suspension | 2.91 ± 1.04 | 1.98 ± 0.70 | 4.35 ± 0.74 | 2.30 ± 0.14 | 0.67 |
| HEC hydrogel | 1.73 ± 0.34 | 1.18 ± 0.23 | 3.48 ± 0.30 | 1.84 ± 0.16 | 0.50 |
| CP hydrogel | 4.70 ± 0.25 | 3.19 ± 0.17 | 7.22 ± 2.40 | 3.83 ± 1.27 | 0.65 |
| Cet cream | 1.98 ± 0.57 | 1.34 ± 0.39 | 10.51 ± 2.46 | 5.57 ± 1.30 | 0.19 |
| Cold cream | 5.30 ± 0.74 | 3.60 ± 0.50 | 8.05 ± 4.50 | 4.26 ± 2.39 | 0.66 |
| Blank | 1.47 ± 0.08 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.89 ± 0.26 | 1.00 ± 0.14 | – |
The data were reported as absolute values (A) or as normalize values with respect to blank (N) (mean ± SD; n = 3)
HEC hydroxyethyl cellulose, CMC sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, CP carbomer 974P, Cet cetomacrogol