Michael T Halpern1, Mallorie H Fiero2, Melanie L Bell2. 1. Health Services Administration and Policy, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., #533, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. michael.halpern@temple.edu. 2. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Informal caregivers of individuals with cancer may experience substantial burdens. To develop interventions to support these caregivers, it is crucial to quantify and understand the domains of burdens potentially experienced by caregivers and factors contributing to each domain. METHODS: Using data from two national surveys, the National Survey of Caregiving (NSOC) linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (NHATS), we identified all participants in the NHATS diagnosed with cancer who had a caregiver participating in the NSOC. Guided by a theoretical model, twenty-two items in the NSOC related to caregiver health, mood and outlook were included in factor analysis to develop scales capturing domains of burden. Multivariable regression analyses examined whether activities performed by caregivers and supports for caregivers were associated with these burden scales. RESULTS: Analysis of responses from 373 caregivers of cancer patients identified three scales: emotional burden; psychological burden; and relationship with the patient. Providing assistance managing medical care was associated with increased emotional and psychological burden, while assistance with non-medical issues increased psychological burden and worsened relationships with patients. Caregiver provision of direct patient care activities was also associated with increased burden but improved relationships with patients. Use of caregiver supports showed mixed associations with burden. CONCLUSIONS: Using a nationally-representative sample of cancer patients and their caregivers and brief publicly-available survey questions, we present three scales addressing different aspects of caregiver burden that are responsive to caregiver activities and social supports. This may assist in developing and evaluating intervention to decrease caregiver burden.
PURPOSE: Informal caregivers of individuals with cancer may experience substantial burdens. To develop interventions to support these caregivers, it is crucial to quantify and understand the domains of burdens potentially experienced by caregivers and factors contributing to each domain. METHODS: Using data from two national surveys, the National Survey of Caregiving (NSOC) linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (NHATS), we identified all participants in the NHATS diagnosed with cancer who had a caregiver participating in the NSOC. Guided by a theoretical model, twenty-two items in the NSOC related to caregiver health, mood and outlook were included in factor analysis to develop scales capturing domains of burden. Multivariable regression analyses examined whether activities performed by caregivers and supports for caregivers were associated with these burden scales. RESULTS: Analysis of responses from 373 caregivers of cancerpatients identified three scales: emotional burden; psychological burden; and relationship with the patient. Providing assistance managing medical care was associated with increased emotional and psychological burden, while assistance with non-medical issues increased psychological burden and worsened relationships with patients. Caregiver provision of direct patient care activities was also associated with increased burden but improved relationships with patients. Use of caregiver supports showed mixed associations with burden. CONCLUSIONS: Using a nationally-representative sample of cancerpatients and their caregivers and brief publicly-available survey questions, we present three scales addressing different aspects of caregiver burden that are responsive to caregiver activities and social supports. This may assist in developing and evaluating intervention to decrease caregiver burden.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Caregivers; Factor analysis; Interpersonal relations; Social support
Authors: Allison M Burton; Jessica M Sautter; James A Tulsky; Jennifer Hoff Lindquist; Judith C Hays; Maren K Olsen; Sheryl I Zimmerman; Karen E Steinhauser Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Halina Sklenarova; Arne Krümpelmann; Markus W Haun; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Johannes Huber; Michael Thomas; Eva C Winkler; Wolfgang Herzog; Mechthild Hartmann Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jessica M Sautter; James A Tulsky; Kimberly S Johnson; Maren K Olsen; Allison M Burton-Chase; Jennifer Hoff Lindquist; Sheryl Zimmerman; Karen E Steinhauser Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Phyllis N Butow; Melanie A Price; Melanie L Bell; Penelope M Webb; Anna deFazio; Michael Friedlander Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Tina Hsu; Matthew Loscalzo; Rupal Ramani; Stephen Forman; Leslie Popplewell; Karen Clark; Vani Katheria; Tao Feng; Rex Strowbridge; Redmond Rinehart; Dan Smith; Keith Matthews; Jeff Dillehunt; Arti Hurria Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Chiara Marzorati; Chiara Renzi; Samuel William Russell-Edu; Gabriella Pravettoni Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Sarah I Detaille; Annet de Lange; Josephine Engels; Mirthe Pijnappels; Nathan Hutting; Eghe Osagie; Adela Reig-Botella Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Susanne A Elsner; Sam S Salek; Andrew Y Finlay; Anna Hagemeier; Catherine J Bottomley; Alexander Katalinic; Annika Waldmann Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 3.186