Selina M Parry1, Laura D Knight2, Bronwen Connolly3,4,5, Claire Baldwin6, Zudin Puthucheary4,7, Peter Morris8, Jessica Mortimore3,5, Nicholas Hart3,5,9, Linda Denehy10, Catherine L Granger10,2,11. 1. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Level 7 Alan Gilbert Building, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. selina.parry@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK. 4. Centre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. 5. Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 6. International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE) and the Sansom Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 7. Division of Critical Care, Institute of Sports and Exercise Health, University College Hospitals, London, UK. 8. Department of Critical Care, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA. 9. Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London, UK. 10. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Level 7 Alan Gilbert Building, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. 11. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify, evaluate and synthesise studies examining the barriers and enablers for survivors of critical illness to participate in physical activity in the ICU and post-ICU settings from the perspective of patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. METHODS: Systematic review of articles using five electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus. Quantitative and qualitative studies that were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal and assessed barriers or enablers for survivors of critical illness to perform physical activity were included. Prospero ID: CRD42016035454. RESULTS: Eighty-nine papers were included. Five major themes and 28 sub-themes were identified, encompassing: (1) patient physical and psychological capability to perform physical activity, including delirium, sedation, illness severity, comorbidities, weakness, anxiety, confidence and motivation; (2) safety influences, including physiological stability and concern for lines, e.g. risk of dislodgement; (3) culture and team influences, including leadership, interprofessional communication, administrative buy-in, clinician expertise and knowledge; (4) motivation and beliefs regarding the benefits/risks; and (5) environmental influences, including funding, access to rehabilitation programs, staffing and equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The main barriers identified were patient physical and psychological capability to perform physical activity, safety concerns, lack of leadership and ICU culture of mobility, lack of interprofessional communication, expertise and knowledge, and lack of staffing/equipment and funding to provide rehabilitation programs. Barriers and enablers are multidimensional and span diverse factors. The majority of these barriers are modifiable and can be targeted in future clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To identify, evaluate and synthesise studies examining the barriers and enablers for survivors of critical illness to participate in physical activity in the ICU and post-ICU settings from the perspective of patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. METHODS: Systematic review of articles using five electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus. Quantitative and qualitative studies that were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal and assessed barriers or enablers for survivors of critical illness to perform physical activity were included. Prospero ID: CRD42016035454. RESULTS: Eighty-nine papers were included. Five major themes and 28 sub-themes were identified, encompassing: (1) patient physical and psychological capability to perform physical activity, including delirium, sedation, illness severity, comorbidities, weakness, anxiety, confidence and motivation; (2) safety influences, including physiological stability and concern for lines, e.g. risk of dislodgement; (3) culture and team influences, including leadership, interprofessional communication, administrative buy-in, clinician expertise and knowledge; (4) motivation and beliefs regarding the benefits/risks; and (5) environmental influences, including funding, access to rehabilitation programs, staffing and equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The main barriers identified were patient physical and psychological capability to perform physical activity, safety concerns, lack of leadership and ICU culture of mobility, lack of interprofessional communication, expertise and knowledge, and lack of staffing/equipment and funding to provide rehabilitation programs. Barriers and enablers are multidimensional and span diverse factors. The majority of these barriers are modifiable and can be targeted in future clinical practice.
Authors: Peter Nydahl; A Parker Ruhl; Gabriele Bartoszek; Rolf Dubb; Silke Filipovic; Hans-Jürgen Flohr; Arnold Kaltwasser; Hendrik Mende; Oliver Rothaug; Danny Schuchhardt; Norbert Schwabbauer; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Polly Bailey; George E Thomsen; Vicki J Spuhler; Robert Blair; James Jewkes; Louise Bezdjian; Kristy Veale; Larissa Rodriquez; Ramona O Hopkins Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Anna I Czerwonka; Margaret S Herridge; Linda Chan; Leslie Michele Chu; Andrea Matte; Jill I Cameron Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Kathleen M Carrothers; Juliana Barr; Bruce Spurlock; M Susan Ridgely; Cheryl L Damberg; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Romina Wahab; Natalie H Yip; Subani Chandra; Michael Nguyen; Katherine H Pavlovich; Thomas Benson; Denise Vilotijevic; Danielle M Rodier; Komal R Patel; Patricia Rychcik; Ernesto Perez-Mir; Suzanne M Boyle; David Berlin; Dale M Needham; Daniel Brodie Journal: J Intensive Care Soc Date: 2015-09-21
Authors: Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Victor D Dinglas; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Nancy Ciesla; Jonathan E Sevransky; Carl Shanholtz; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Daniel L Young; Jason Seltzer; Mary Glover; Caroline Outten; Annette Lavezza; Earl Mantheiy; Ann M Parker; Dale M Needham Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Rebecca Cusack; Andrew Bates; Kay Mitchell; Zoe van Willigen; Linda Denehy; Nicholas Hart; Ahilanandan Dushianthan; Isabel Reading; Maria Chorozoglou; Gordon Sturmey; Iain Davey; Michael Grocott Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Carrie M Goodson; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Earl Mantheiy; Kevin Heckle; Annette Lavezza; Amy Toonstra; Ann M Parker; Jason Seltzer; Michael Velaetis; Mary Glover; Caroline Outten; Kit Schwartz; Antionette Jones; Sarah Coggins; Erik H Hoyer; Kitty S Chan; Dale M Needham Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Julie Stutzbach; Jacqueline Jones; Anna Taber; John Recicar; Robert E Burke; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 3.966