Peter Nydahl1, A Parker Ruhl, Gabriele Bartoszek, Rolf Dubb, Silke Filipovic, Hans-Jürgen Flohr, Arnold Kaltwasser, Hendrik Mende, Oliver Rothaug, Danny Schuchhardt, Norbert Schwabbauer, Dale M Needham. 1. 1Nursing Research, Nursing and Patient Service, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. 2Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 3Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD. 4Faculty of Nursing Science, University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany. 5Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Katharinenhospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 6Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg GmbH, Marburg, Germany. 7Work and Life Educational Association, Göttingen, Germany. 8Department of Continuing Education of Critical Care Nursing, District Hospital of Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany. 9Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH, Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen, Germany. 10Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 11Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany. 12Department of Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 13Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is growing evidence to support early mobilization of adult mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs. However, there is little knowledge regarding early mobilization in routine ICU practice. Hence, the interdisciplinary German ICU Network for Early Mobilization undertook a 1-day point-prevalence survey across Germany. DESIGN: One-day point-prevalence study. SETTING: One hundred sixteen ICUs in Germany in 2011. PATIENTS: All adult mechanically ventilated patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For a 24-hour period, data were abstracted on hospital and ICU characteristics, the level of patient mobilization and associated barriers, and complications occurring during mobilization. One hundred sixteen participating ICUs provided data for 783 patients. Overall, 185 patients (24%) were mobilized out of bed (i.e., sitting on the edge of the bed or higher level of mobilization). Among patients with an endotracheal tube, tracheostomy, and noninvasive ventilation, 8%, 39%, and 53% were mobilized out of bed, respectively (p < 0.001 for difference between three groups). The most common perceived barriers to mobilizing patients out of bed were cardiovascular instability (17%) and deep sedation (15%). Mobilization out of bed versus remaining in bed was not associated with a higher frequency of complications, with no falls or extubations occurring in those mobilized out of bed. CONCLUSIONS: In this 1-day point-prevalence study conducted across Germany, only 24% of all mechanically ventilated patients and only 8% of patients with an endotracheal tube were mobilized out of bed as part of routine care. Addressing modifiable barriers for mobilization, such as deep sedation, will be important to increase mobilization in German ICUs.
OBJECTIVES: There is growing evidence to support early mobilization of adult mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs. However, there is little knowledge regarding early mobilization in routine ICU practice. Hence, the interdisciplinary German ICU Network for Early Mobilization undertook a 1-day point-prevalence survey across Germany. DESIGN: One-day point-prevalence study. SETTING: One hundred sixteen ICUs in Germany in 2011. PATIENTS: All adult mechanically ventilated patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For a 24-hour period, data were abstracted on hospital and ICU characteristics, the level of patient mobilization and associated barriers, and complications occurring during mobilization. One hundred sixteen participating ICUs provided data for 783 patients. Overall, 185 patients (24%) were mobilized out of bed (i.e., sitting on the edge of the bed or higher level of mobilization). Among patients with an endotracheal tube, tracheostomy, and noninvasive ventilation, 8%, 39%, and 53% were mobilized out of bed, respectively (p < 0.001 for difference between three groups). The most common perceived barriers to mobilizing patients out of bed were cardiovascular instability (17%) and deep sedation (15%). Mobilization out of bed versus remaining in bed was not associated with a higher frequency of complications, with no falls or extubations occurring in those mobilized out of bed. CONCLUSIONS: In this 1-day point-prevalence study conducted across Germany, only 24% of all mechanically ventilated patients and only 8% of patients with an endotracheal tube were mobilized out of bed as part of routine care. Addressing modifiable barriers for mobilization, such as deep sedation, will be important to increase mobilization in German ICUs.
Authors: Selina M Parry; Laura D Knight; Bronwen Connolly; Claire Baldwin; Zudin Puthucheary; Peter Morris; Jessica Mortimore; Nicholas Hart; Linda Denehy; Catherine L Granger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Marc Moss; Amy Nordon-Craft; Dan Malone; David Van Pelt; Stephen K Frankel; Mary Laird Warner; Wendy Kriekels; Monica McNulty; Diane L Fairclough; Margaret Schenkman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Karen K Y Koo; Karen Choong; Deborah J Cook; Margaret Herridge; Anastasia Newman; Vincent Lo; Gordon Guyatt; Fran Priestap; Eileen Campbell; Karen E A Burns; FranÇois Lamontagne; Maureen O Meade Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2016-08-18
Authors: Victor D Dinglas; Ann M Parker; Dereddi Raja S Reddy; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Jennifer M Zanni; Alison E Turnbull; Archana Nelliot; Nancy Ciesla; Dale M Needham Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-10
Authors: D Clark Files; Chun Liu; Andrea Pereyra; Zhong-Min Wang; Neil R Aggarwal; Franco R D'Alessio; Brian T Garibaldi; Jason R Mock; Benjamin D Singer; Xin Feng; Raghunatha R Yammani; Tan Zhang; Amy L Lee; Sydney Philpott; Stephanie Lussier; Lina Purcell; Jeff Chou; Michael Seeds; Landon S King; Peter E Morris; Osvaldo Delbono Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Sarah Elizabeth Jolley; Marc Moss; Dale M Needham; Ellen Caldwell; Peter E Morris; Russell R Miller; Nancy Ringwood; Megan Anders; Karen K Koo; Stephanie E Gundel; Selina M Parry; Catherine L Hough Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.598