Literature DB >> 29716904

Identifying Barriers to Nurse-Facilitated Patient Mobility in the Intensive Care Unit.

Daniel L Young1, Jason Seltzer1, Mary Glover1, Caroline Outten1, Annette Lavezza1, Earl Mantheiy1, Ann M Parker1, Dale M Needham2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurse-facilitated mobility of patients in the intensive care unit can improve outcomes. However, a gap exists between research findings and their implementation as part of routine clinical practice. Such a gap is often attributed, in part, to the barrier of lack of time. The Translating Evidence Into Practice model provides a framework for research implementation, including recommendations for identifying barriers to implementation via direct observation of clinical care.
OBJECTIVES: To report on design, implementation, and outcomes of an approach to identify and understand lack of time as a barrier to nurse-facilitated mobility in the intensive care unit.
METHODS: An interprofessional team designed the observational process and evaluated the resulting data by using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: During three 4-hour observations of 2 nurses and 1 nursing technician, 194 distinct tasks were performed (ie, events). A total of 4 categories of nurses' work were identified: patient care (47% of observation time), provider communication (25%), documentation (18%), and down time (10%). In addition, 3 types of potential mobility events were identified: in bed, edge of bed, and out of bed. The 194 observed events included 34 instances (18%) of potential mobility events that could be implemented: in bed (53%), edge of bed (6%), and out of bed (41%).
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses have limited time for additional clinical activities but may miss potentially important opportunities for facilitating patient mobility during existing patient care. The proposed method is feasible and helpful in empirically investigating barriers to nurse-facilitated patient mobility in the intensive care unit.
© 2018 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29716904      PMCID: PMC6542285          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2018368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  54 in total

1.  The Surgical Optimal Mobility Score predicts mortality and length of stay in an Italian population of medical, surgical, and neurologic intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Simone Piva; Giancarlo Dora; Cosetta Minelli; Mariachiara Michelini; Fabio Turla; Stefania Mazza; Patrizia D'Ottavi; Ingrid Moreno-Duarte; Caterina Sottini; Matthias Eikermann; Nicola Latronico
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Sean M Berenholtz; Dale M Needham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-06

3.  Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients.

Authors:  Polly Bailey; George E Thomsen; Vicki J Spuhler; Robert Blair; James Jewkes; Louise Bezdjian; Kristy Veale; Larissa Rodriquez; Ramona O Hopkins
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Margaret S Herridge; Angela M Cheung; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matte-Martyn; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Fatma Al-Saidi; Andrew B Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Aiala Barr; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Margaret S Herridge; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matté; George Tomlinson; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Andrew Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Paul Kudlow; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky; Angela M Cheung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Safety of Patient Mobilization and Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Nydahl; Thiti Sricharoenchai; Saurabh Chandra; Firuzan Sari Kundt; Minxuan Huang; Magdalena Fischill; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-05

7.  The work of adult and pediatric intensive care unit nurses.

Authors:  Stephen Douglas; Randi Cartmill; Roger Brown; Peter Hoonakker; Jason Slagle; Kara Schultz Van Roy; James M Walker; Matthew Weinger; Tosha Wetterneck; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 8.  Barriers and Strategies for Early Mobilization of Patients in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Rolf Dubb; Peter Nydahl; Carsten Hermes; Norbert Schwabbauer; Amy Toonstra; Ann M Parker; Arnold Kaltwasser; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-05

9.  Reducing deep sedation and delirium in acute lung injury patients: a quality improvement project.

Authors:  David N Hager; Victor D Dinglas; Shilta Subhas; Annette M Rowden; Karin J Neufeld; O Joseph Bienvenu; Pegah Touradji; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Dereddi R S Reddy; Roy G Brower; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  The implementation of an early rehabilitation program is associated with reduced length of stay: A multi-ICU study.

Authors:  Romina Wahab; Natalie H Yip; Subani Chandra; Michael Nguyen; Katherine H Pavlovich; Thomas Benson; Denise Vilotijevic; Danielle M Rodier; Komal R Patel; Patricia Rychcik; Ernesto Perez-Mir; Suzanne M Boyle; David Berlin; Dale M Needham; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-09-21
View more
  6 in total

1.  Holding and Mobility of Pediatric Patients With Transthoracic Intracardiac Catheters.

Authors:  Amy Jo Lisanti; Stephanie Helman; Andrea Sorbello; Jamie Fitzgerald; Annemarie D'Amato; Xuemei Zhang; J William Gaynor
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Beliefs, attitudes and knowledge of cardiovascular healthcare providers on mobilization.

Authors:  Caroline Najjar; Diana Dima; Jane de Boer; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-05

3.  Cognitive Stimulation in an Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Evaluation of Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementation.

Authors:  Ann M Parker; Louay Aldabain; Narges Akhlaghi; Mary Glover; Stephanie Yost; Michael Velaetis; Annette Lavezza; Earl Mantheiy; Kelsey Albert; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Perceived Barriers to Mobility in a Medical ICU: The Patient Mobilization Attitudes & Beliefs Survey for the ICU.

Authors:  Carrie M Goodson; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Earl Mantheiy; Kevin Heckle; Annette Lavezza; Amy Toonstra; Ann M Parker; Jason Seltzer; Michael Velaetis; Mary Glover; Caroline Outten; Kit Schwartz; Antionette Jones; Sarah Coggins; Erik H Hoyer; Kitty S Chan; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.510

5.  Perceived barriers to early goal-directed mobility in the intensive care unit: Results of a quality improvement evaluation.

Authors:  Ann M Parker; Narges Akhlaghi; Albahi M Malik; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Earl Mantheiy; Kelsey Albert; Mary Glover; Sherry Dong; Annette Lavezza; Jason Seltzer; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.265

6.  Assessment of mobilization capacity in 10 different ICU scenarios by different professions.

Authors:  Carsten Hermes; Peter Nydahl; Manfred Blobner; Rolf Dubb; Silke Filipovic; Arnold Kaltwasser; Bernhard Ulm; Stefan J Schaller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.