Literature DB >> 28209515

Cell-type specific role of the RNA-binding protein, NONO, in the DNA double-strand break response in the mouse testes.

Shuyi Li1, Feng-Jue Shu2, Zhentian Li2, Lahcen Jaafar2, Shourong Zhao3, William S Dynan4.   

Abstract

The tandem RNA recognition motif protein, NONO, was previously identified as a candidate DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair factor in a biochemical screen for proteins with end-joining stimulatory activity. Subsequent work showed that NONO and its binding partner, SFPQ, have many of the properties expected for bona fide repair factors in cell-based assays. Their contribution to the DNA damage response in intact tissue in vivo has not, however, been demonstrated. Here we compare DNA damage sensitivity in the testes of wild-type mice versus mice bearing a null allele of the NONO homologue (Nono gt). In wild-type mice, NONO protein was present in Sertoli, peritubular myoid, and interstitial cells, with an increase in expression following induction of DNA damage. As expected for the product of an X-linked gene, NONO was not detected in germ cells. The Nono gt/0 mice had at most a mild testis developmental phenotype in the absence of genotoxic stress. However, following irradiation at sublethal, 2-4 Gy doses, Nono gt/0 mice displayed a number of indicators of radiosensitivity as compared to their wild-type counterparts. These included higher levels of persistent DSB repair foci, increased numbers of apoptotic cells in the seminiferous tubules, and partial degeneration of the blood-testis barrier. There was also an almost complete loss of germ cells at later times following irradiation, evidently arising as an indirect effect reflecting loss of stromal support. Results demonstrate a role for NONO protein in protection against direct and indirect biological effects of ionizing radiation in the whole animal.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-strand break repair; Ionizing radiation; Knockout mouse; NHEJ; NONO; Testes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28209515      PMCID: PMC5379473          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  46 in total

1.  Human 100-kDa homologous DNA-pairing protein is the splicing factor PSF and promotes DNA strand invasion.

Authors:  A T Akhmedov; B S Lopez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Cisplatin-induced long-term failure of spermatogenesis in adult C57/Bl/6J mice.

Authors:  Pragati Sawhney; C John Giammona; Marvin L Meistrich; John H Richburg
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  Whitesnake/sfpq is required for cell survival and neuronal development in the zebrafish.

Authors:  Laura Anne Lowery; Jamie Rubin; Hazel Sive
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Requirement for Ku80 in growth and immunoglobulin V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  A Nussenzweig; C Chen; V da Costa Soares; M Sanchez; K Sokol; M C Nussenzweig; G C Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Roles of PSF protein and VL30 RNA in reversible gene regulation.

Authors:  Xu Song; Ying Sun; Alan Garen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  p54nrb is a transcriptional corepressor of the progesterone receptor that modulates transcription of the labor-associated gene, connexin 43 (Gja1).

Authors:  Xuesen Dong; Celeste Yu; Oksana Shynlova; John R G Challis; Paul S Rennie; Stephen J Lye
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-07

7.  Chemical genetic discovery of PARP targets reveals a role for PARP-1 in transcription elongation.

Authors:  Bryan A Gibson; Yajie Zhang; Hong Jiang; Kristine M Hussey; Jonathan H Shrimp; Hening Lin; Frank Schwede; Yonghao Yu; W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  NONO couples the circadian clock to the cell cycle.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kowalska; Juergen A Ripperger; Dominik C Hoegger; Pascal Bruegger; Thorsten Buch; Thomas Birchler; Anke Mueller; Urs Albrecht; Claudio Contaldo; Steven A Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  SFPQ•NONO and XLF function separately and together to promote DNA double-strand break repair via canonical nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Lahcen Jaafar; Zhentian Li; Shuyi Li; William S Dynan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mutations in the NHEJ component XRCC4 cause primordial dwarfism.

Authors:  Jennie E Murray; Mirjam van der Burg; Hanna IJspeert; Paula Carroll; Qian Wu; Takashi Ochi; Andrea Leitch; Edward S Miller; Boris Kysela; Alireza Jawad; Armand Bottani; Francesco Brancati; Marco Cappa; Valerie Cormier-Daire; Charu Deshpande; Eissa A Faqeih; Gail E Graham; Emmanuelle Ranza; Tom L Blundell; Andrew P Jackson; Grant S Stewart; Louise S Bicknell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  Bailin Zhao; Eli Rothenberg; Dale A Ramsden; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  The evolving complexity of DNA damage foci: RNA, condensates and chromatin in DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Carel Fijen; Eli Rothenberg
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-06-30

3.  The RXFP3 receptor is functionally associated with cellular responses to oxidative stress and DNA damage.

Authors:  Jaana van Gastel; Hanne Leysen; Paula Santos-Otte; Jhana O Hendrickx; Abdelkrim Azmi; Bronwen Martin; Stuart Maudsley
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Hyperosmolality in CHO cell culture: effects on the proteome.

Authors:  Nadiya Romanova; Louise Schelletter; Raimund Hoffrogge; Thomas Noll
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  RNF8 mediates NONO degradation following UV-induced DNA damage to properly terminate ATR-CHK1 checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Rakesh Deshar; Wonjin Yoo; Eun-Bee Cho; Sungjoo Kim; Jong-Bok Yoon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Nono deficiency compromises TET1 chromatin association and impedes neuronal differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Wenjing Li; Violetta Karwacki-Neisius; Chun Ma; Li Tan; Yang Shi; Feizhen Wu; Yujiang Geno Shi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.