Literature DB >> 28204924

Genome-wide analysis of transposable elements in the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): description of novel families.

Eric M Hernandez-Hernandez1, Rita Daniela Fernández-Medina2, Lucio Navarro-Escalante3,4, Jonathan Nuñez5, Pablo Benavides-Machado3, Claudia M A Carareto6.   

Abstract

The coffee berry borer (CBB) Hypothenemus hampei is the most limiting pest of coffee production worldwide. The CBB genome has been recently sequenced; however, information regarding the presence and characteristics of transposable elements (TEs) was not provided. Using systematic searching strategies based on both de novo and homology-based approaches, we present a library of TEs from the draft genome of CBB sequenced by the Colombian Coffee Growers Federation. The library consists of 880 sequences classified as 66% Class I (LTRs: 46%, non-LTRs: 20%) and 34% Class II (DNA transposons: 8%, Helitrons: 16% and MITEs: 10%) elements, including families of the three main LTR (Gypsy, Bel-Pao and Copia) and non-LTR (CR1, Daphne, I/Nimb, Jockey, Kiri, R1, R2 and R4) clades and DNA superfamilies (Tc1-mariner, hAT, Merlin, P, PIF-Harbinger, PiggyBac and Helitron). We propose the existence of novel families: Hypo, belonging to the LTR Gypsy superfamily; Hamp, belonging to non-LTRs; and rosa, belonging to Class II or DNA transposons. Although the rosa clade has been previously described, it was considered to be a basal subfamily of the mariner family. Based on our phylogenetic analysis, including Tc1, mariner, pogo, rosa and Lsra elements from other insects, we propose that rosa and Lsra elements are subfamilies of an independent family of Class II elements termed rosa. The annotations obtained indicate that a low percentage of the assembled CBB genome (approximately 8.2%) consists of TEs. Although these TEs display high diversity, most sequences are degenerate, with few full-length copies of LTR and DNA transposons and several complete and putatively active copies of non-LTR elements. MITEs constitute approximately 50% of the total TEs content, with a high proportion associated with DNA transposons in the Tc1-mariner superfamily.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coffee berry borer; De novo TEs annotation; Hypothenemus hampei; Transposable element library

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28204924     DOI: 10.1007/s00438-017-1291-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  63 in total

1.  The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  H S Malik; W D Burke; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements.

Authors:  Thomas Wicker; François Sabot; Aurélie Hua-Van; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Pierre Capy; Boulos Chalhoub; Andrew Flavell; Philippe Leroy; Michele Morgante; Olivier Panaud; Etienne Paux; Phillip SanMiguel; Alan H Schulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  HelitronScanner uncovers a large overlooked cache of Helitron transposons in many plant genomes.

Authors:  Wenwei Xiong; Limei He; Jinsheng Lai; Hugo K Dooner; Chunguang Du
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  MITE-Hunter: a program for discovering miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements from genomic sequences.

Authors:  Yujun Han; Susan R Wessler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Considering transposable element diversification in de novo annotation approaches.

Authors:  Timothée Flutre; Elodie Duprat; Catherine Feuillet; Hadi Quesneville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Gypsy Database (GyDB) of mobile genetic elements: release 2.0.

Authors:  Carlos Llorens; Ricardo Futami; Laura Covelli; Laura Domínguez-Escribá; Jose M Viu; Daniel Tamarit; Jose Aguilar-Rodríguez; Miguel Vicente-Ripolles; Gonzalo Fuster; Guillermo P Bernet; Florian Maumus; Alfonso Munoz-Pomer; Jose M Sempere; Amparo Latorre; Andres Moya
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Technology transfer from worms and flies to vertebrates: transposition-based genome manipulations and their future perspectives.

Authors:  Lajos Mátés; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Accurate Transposable Element Annotation Is Vital When Analyzing New Genome Assemblies.

Authors:  Roy N Platt; Laura Blanco-Berdugo; David A Ray
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Draft Genome of the Scarab Beetle Oryctes borbonicus on La Réunion Island.

Authors:  Jan M Meyer; Gabriel V Markov; Praveen Baskaran; Matthias Herrmann; Ralf J Sommer; Christian Rödelsperger
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

View more
  3 in total

1.  An Analysis of IS630/Tc1/mariner Transposons in the Genome of a Pacific Oyster, Crassostrea gigas.

Authors:  M V Puzakov; L V Puzakova; S V Cheresiz
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Phylogenetic analysis of the Tc1/mariner superfamily reveals the unexplored diversity of pogo-like elements.

Authors:  Mathilde Dupeyron; Tobias Baril; Chris Bass; Alexander Hayward
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-06-29

3.  A coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) genome assembly reveals a reduced chemosensory receptor gene repertoire and male-specific genome sequences.

Authors:  Lucio Navarro-Escalante; Erick M Hernandez-Hernandez; Jonathan Nuñez; Flor E Acevedo; Alejandro Berrio; Luis M Constantino; Beatriz E Padilla-Hurtado; Diana Molina; Carmenza Gongora; Ricardo Acuña; Jeff Stuart; Pablo Benavides
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.