Amanda M Barberio1, Nureen Sumar2, Kathy Trieu3, Diane L Lorenzetti1,4, Valerie Tarasuk5, Jacqui Webster3, Norman R C Campbell1, Lindsay McLaren1. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences. 2. Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 3. Food Policy, George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. 4. Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 5. Department of Nutritional Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
Background: Worldwide, excessive salt consumption is common and is a leading cause of high blood pressure. Our objectives were to assess the overall and differential impact (by social and economic indicators) of population-level interventions for dietary sodium reduction in government jurisdictions worldwide. Methods: This is a Cochrane systematic review. We searched nine peer-reviewed databases, seven grey literature resources and contacted national programme leaders. We appraised studies using an adapted version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool. To assess impact, we computed the mean change in salt intake (g/day) from before to after intervention. Results: Fifteen initiatives met the inclusion criteria and 10 provided sufficient data for quantitative analysis of impact. Of these, five showed a mean decrease in salt intake from before to after intervention including: China, Finland (Kuopio area), France, Ireland and the UK. When the sample was constrained to the seven initiatives that were multicomponent and incorporated activities of a structural nature (e.g. procurement policy), most (4/7) showed a mean decrease in salt intake. A reduction in salt intake was more apparent among men than women. There was insufficient information to assess differential impact by other social and economic axes. Although many initiatives had methodological strengths, all scored as having a high risk of bias reflecting the observational design. Study heterogeneity was high, reflecting different contexts and initiative characteristics. Conclusions: Population-level dietary sodium reduction initiatives have the potential to reduce dietary salt intake, especially if they are multicomponent and incorporate intervention activities of a structural nature. It is important to consider data infrastructure to permit monitoring of these initiatives.
Background: Worldwide, excessive salt consumption is common and is a leading cause of high blood pressure. Our objectives were to assess the overall and differential impact (by social and economic indicators) of population-level interventions for dietary sodium reduction in government jurisdictions worldwide. Methods: This is a Cochrane systematic review. We searched nine peer-reviewed databases, seven grey literature resources and contacted national programme leaders. We appraised studies using an adapted version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool. To assess impact, we computed the mean change in salt intake (g/day) from before to after intervention. Results: Fifteen initiatives met the inclusion criteria and 10 provided sufficient data for quantitative analysis of impact. Of these, five showed a mean decrease in salt intake from before to after intervention including: China, Finland (Kuopio area), France, Ireland and the UK. When the sample was constrained to the seven initiatives that were multicomponent and incorporated activities of a structural nature (e.g. procurement policy), most (4/7) showed a mean decrease in salt intake. A reduction in salt intake was more apparent among men than women. There was insufficient information to assess differential impact by other social and economic axes. Although many initiatives had methodological strengths, all scored as having a high risk of bias reflecting the observational design. Study heterogeneity was high, reflecting different contexts and initiative characteristics. Conclusions: Population-level dietary sodium reduction initiatives have the potential to reduce dietary salt intake, especially if they are multicomponent and incorporate intervention activities of a structural nature. It is important to consider data infrastructure to permit monitoring of these initiatives.
Authors: Crystal M Smith-Spangler; Jessie L Juusola; Eva A Enns; Douglas K Owens; Alan M Garber Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anne Illemann Christensen; Ola Ekholm; Charlotte Glümer; Anne Helms Andreasen; Michael Falk Hvidberg; Peter Lund Kristensen; Finn Breinholt Larsen; Britta Ortiz; Knud Juel Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Glenn M Chertow; Pamela G Coxson; Andrew Moran; James M Lightwood; Mark J Pletcher; Lee Goldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alyssa J Moran; Jiangxia Wang; Andrea L Sharkey; Erin A Dowling; Christine Johnson Curtis; Kimberly A Kessler Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Steven P Dehmer; Mary E Cogswell; Matthew D Ritchey; Yuling Hong; Michael V Maciosek; Amy B LaFrance; Kakoli Roy Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Benjamin Yarnoff; Emily Teachout; Kara MacLeod; John Whitehill; Julia Jordan; Zohra Tayebali; Laurel Bates Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Hye-Kyung Park; Yoonna Lee; Baeg-Won Kang; Kwang-Il Kwon; Jong-Wook Kim; Oh-Sang Kwon; Laura K Cobb; Norman R C Campbell; Drew E Blakeman; Cho-Il Kim Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2020-05
Authors: Ana Basto-Abreu; Ariela Braverman-Bronstein; Dalia Camacho-García-Formentí; Rodrigo Zepeda-Tello; Barry M Popkin; Juan Rivera-Dommarco; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 11.069