Stefanie Vandevijvere1, Lana Vanderlee2. 1. Scientific Institute of Public Health (Sciensano), Brussels, Belgium. Stefanie.vandevijvere@sciensano.be. 2. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food formulation, labelling, and taxation policies may encourage food (re)formulation. However, most literature focuses on their impact on consumer behaviours. This review summarizes the impact of various nutrition policies on food (re)formulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Food (re)formulation targets (particularly mandatory policies) have been associated with positive reformulation of targeted products. Limited evidence (mostly from Health Star Ratings and the Tick) demonstrates that some labelling policies effectively incentivize food reformulation. No peer-reviewed evidence has examined warning labels and taxes on sugar in drinks, but limited grey literature evaluation suggests that those policies have stimulated reformulation to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of nutrition policies on food (re)formulation is insufficiently studied. The impact of such policies on (re)formulation is likely greater when they are mandatory, aligned with other regulations, and thoroughly monitored and evaluated. Policies targeting (re)formulation have important limitations and broader food system policies will additionally be needed to significantly improve diets.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food formulation, labelling, and taxation policies may encourage food (re)formulation. However, most literature focuses on their impact on consumer behaviours. This review summarizes the impact of various nutrition policies on food (re)formulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Food (re)formulation targets (particularly mandatory policies) have been associated with positive reformulation of targeted products. Limited evidence (mostly from Health Star Ratings and the Tick) demonstrates that some labelling policies effectively incentivize food reformulation. No peer-reviewed evidence has examined warning labels and taxes on sugar in drinks, but limited grey literature evaluation suggests that those policies have stimulated reformulation to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of nutrition policies on food (re)formulation is insufficiently studied. The impact of such policies on (re)formulation is likely greater when they are mandatory, aligned with other regulations, and thoroughly monitored and evaluated. Policies targeting (re)formulation have important limitations and broader food system policies will additionally be needed to significantly improve diets.
Authors: Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard; William Hooton; Julia Critchley; Simon Capewell; Marissa Collins; Helen Mason; Maria Guzman-Castillo; Martin O'Flaherty Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Sara N Bleich; Christina D Economos; Marie L Spiker; Kelsey A Vercammen; Eric M VanEpps; Jason P Block; Brian Elbel; Mary Story; Christina A Roberto Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ellis L Vyth; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Annet Jc Roodenburg; Johannes Brug; Jacob C Seidell Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Anna H Grummon; Marissa G Hall; Jason P Block; Sara N Bleich; Eric B Rimm; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Anne Barnhill Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2020-05-11
Authors: Małgorzata Kosicka-Gębska; Marzena Jeżewska-Zychowicz; Jerzy Gębski; Marta Sajdakowska; Katarzyna Niewiadomska; Robert Nicewicz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Caitlin M Lowery; Mercedes Mora-Plazas; Luis Fernando Gómez; Barry Popkin; Lindsey Smith Taillie Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 5.717