Literature DB >> 28202591

Non-classical phase diagram for virus bacterial coevolution mediated by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.

Pu Han1, Michael W Deem2,3,4.   

Abstract

CRISPR is a newly discovered prokaryotic immune system. Bacteria and archaea with this system incorporate genetic material from invading viruses into their genomes, providing protection against future infection by similar viruses. The condition for coexistence of prokaryots and viruses is an interesting problem in evolutionary biology. In this work, we show an intriguing phase diagram of the virus extinction probability, which is more complex than that of the classical predator-prey model. As the CRISPR incorporates genetic material, viruses are under pressure to evolve to escape recognition by CRISPR. When bacteria have a small rate of deleting spacers, a new parameter region in which bacteria and viruses can coexist arises, and it leads to a more complex coexistence patten for bacteria and viruses. For example, when the virus mutation rate is low, the virus extinction probability changes non-montonically with the bacterial exposure rate. The virus and bacteria coevolution not only alters the virus extinction probability, but also changes the bacterial population structure. Additionally, we show that recombination is a successful strategy for viruses to escape from CRISPR recognition when viruses have multiple proto-spacers, providing support for a recombination-mediated escape mechanism suggested experimentally. Finally, we suggest that the re-entrant phase diagram, in which phages can progress through three phases of extinction and two phases of abundance at low spacer deletion rates as a function of exposure rate to bacteria, is an experimentally testable phenomenon.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; bacteria; coevolution; extinction; phase diagram; virus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28202591      PMCID: PMC5332576          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  42 in total

1.  Heterogeneous diversity of spacers within CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats).

Authors:  Jiankui He; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 2.  CRISPR--a widespread system that provides acquired resistance against phages in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Rotem Sorek; Victor Kunin; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 3.  CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes.

Authors:  John van der Oost; Matthijs M Jore; Edze R Westra; Magnus Lundgren; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Csy4 is responsible for CRISPR RNA processing in Pectobacterium atrosepticum.

Authors:  Rita Przybilski; Corinna Richter; Tamzin Gristwood; James S Clulow; Reuben B Vercoe; Peter C Fineran
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Parasite Exposure Drives Selective Evolution of Constitutive versus Inducible Defense.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Stineke van Houte; Sam Oyesiku-Blakemore; Ben Makin; Jenny M Broniewski; Alex Best; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Alan Davidson; Mike Boots; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Strong bias in the bacterial CRISPR elements that confer immunity to phage.

Authors:  David Paez-Espino; Wesley Morovic; Christine L Sun; Brian C Thomas; Ken-ichi Ueda; Buffy Stahl; Rodolphe Barrangou; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Genetic recombination in bacteriophage phi chi 174.

Authors:  R M Benbow; A J Zuccarelli; G C Davis; R L Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  CRISPR-mediated phage resistance and the ghost of coevolution past.

Authors:  Pedro F Vale; Tom J Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  CRISPR interference directs strand specific spacer acquisition.

Authors:  Daan C Swarts; Cas Mosterd; Mark W J van Passel; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Viral diversity threshold for adaptive immunity in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Ariel D Weinberger; Yuri I Wolf; Alexander E Lobkovsky; Michael S Gilmore; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  5 in total

1.  How adaptive immunity constrains the composition and fate of large bacterial populations.

Authors:  Madeleine Bonsma-Fisher; Dominique Soutière; Sidhartha Goyal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Novel Sulfolobus Fuselloviruses with Extensive Genomic Variations.

Authors:  Junxia Zhang; Xiaowei Zheng; Haina Wang; Hongchen Jiang; Hailiang Dong; Li Huang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Optimal number of spacers in CRISPR arrays.

Authors:  Alexander Martynov; Konstantin Severinov; Iaroslav Ispolatov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Diversified local CRISPR-Cas immunity to viruses of Sulfolobus islandicus.

Authors:  Matthew D Pauly; Maria A Bautista; Jesse A Black; Rachel J Whitaker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Cost and benefits of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats spacer acquisition.

Authors:  Serena Bradde; Thierry Mora; Aleksandra M Walczak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.