Literature DB >> 28202143

The missing women in STEM? Assessing gender differentials in the factors associated with transition to first jobs.

Sharon Sassler1, Jennifer Glass2, Yael Levitte3, Katherine M Michelmore4.   

Abstract

Women remain underrepresented in the STEM workforce. We assess explanations for women's underrepresentation in STEM jobs, focusing on a cohort that came of age in the 1980s and 1990s, when women dramatically increased their representation in the scientific labor force. Data are from the NLSY79, and our analysis focuses on members of this cohort who received a college degree, with an emphasis on those who completed a degree in a STEM field. Our analyses test the extent to which college major, expectations to work in STEM, and family expectations shaped transitions into STEM occupations within two years of degree completion. Among those majoring in STEM fields there were no gender differences in transitioning into STEM jobs, though there were sizable differences in transitions to STEM employment by field of study. Of note are gender differences in associations between family expectations and transitions into STEM employment. The most career oriented women, who expected to marry late and limit fertility, were no more likely to enter STEM jobs than were women who anticipated marrying young and having two or more children. The men most likely to enter STEM occupations, in contrast, adhered to significantly more conventional gender ideologies than their female counterparts, expecting to marry at younger ages but also to remain childless. Results of our regression decomposition indicated that marriage and family expectations and gender ideology worked in opposite directions for men and women. Nonetheless, the majority of the gender disparity in transitions into STEM jobs was related to women's underrepresentation in engineering and computer science fields of study.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Employment; Expectations; Family and work; Gender; Intentions; STEM; Values

Year:  2016        PMID: 28202143      PMCID: PMC5315093          DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Res        ISSN: 0049-089X


  15 in total

1.  The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008.

Authors:  David Cotter; Joan M Hermsen; Reeve Vanneman
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2011-07

2.  Immigrants and natives in U.S. science and engineering occupations, 1994-2006.

Authors:  Mariano Sana
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-08

3.  Preferences, constraints or schemas of devotion? Exploring Norwegian mothers' withdrawals from high-commitment careers.

Authors:  Sigtona Halrynjo; Selma Therese Lyng
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2009-06

4.  The new gender essentialism--domestic and family 'choices' and their relation to attitudes.

Authors:  Rosemary Crompton; Clare Lyonette
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Gender pay gap and employment sector: sources of earnings disparities in the United States, 1970-2010.

Authors:  Hadas Mandel; Moshe Semyonov
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2014-10

6.  How stereotypes impair women's careers in science.

Authors:  Ernesto Reuben; Paola Sapienza; Luigi Zingales
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  What's So Special about STEM? A Comparison of Women's Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Glass; Sharon Sassler; Yael Levitte; Katherine M Michelmore
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2013

8.  Fertility patterns of college graduates by field of study, US women born 1960-79.

Authors:  Katherine Michelmore; Kelly Musick
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2013-11-22

9.  Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood.

Authors:  Kimberley Ferriman; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-09

10.  Scientists want more children.

Authors:  Elaine Howard Ecklund; Anne E Lincoln
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Overcoming Barriers to Women's Career Transitions: A Systematic Review of Social Support Types and Providers.

Authors:  Tomika W Greer; Autumn F Kirk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers.

Authors:  Phyllis L Carr; Deborah Helitzer; Karen Freund; Alyssa Westring; Richard McGee; Patricia B Campbell; Christine V Wood; Amparo Villablanca
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors That Influence Career Choice among Different Populations of Neuroscience Trainees.

Authors:  Lauren E Ullrich; John R Ogawa; Michelle D Jones-London
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Gender inequalities among authors who contributed equally.

Authors:  Nichole A Broderick; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Increasing Diversity in Radiology and Molecular Imaging: Current Challenges.

Authors:  Brett Z Fite; Virginia Hinostroza; Lisa States; Alexandria Hicks-Nelson; Lucia Baratto; Kimberly Kallianos; Marina Codari; Brenda Yu; Priyanka Jha; Mana Shams; Tanya Stoyanova; Fanny F Chapelin; Anna Liu; Ali Rashidi; Fernando Soto; Yuri Quintana; Guido Alejandro Davidzon; Krzysztof Marycz; Iris C Gibbs; Daniel B Chonde; Chirag B Patel; Heike Elisabeth Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.484

6.  Gender does not make the difference: interest in STEM by gender is fully mediated by technical socialization and degree program.

Authors:  Sebastian Goreth; Christian Vollmer
Journal:  Int J Technol Des Educ       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  The confidence gap predicts the gender pay gap among STEM graduates.

Authors:  Adina D Sterling; Marissa E Thompson; Shiya Wang; Abisola Kusimo; Shannon Gilmartin; Sheri Sheppard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.