Literature DB >> 19686005

Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood.

Kimberley Ferriman1, David Lubinski, Camilla P Benbow.   

Abstract

Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students (275 men, 255 women) were assessed at ages 25 and 35 years. In Study 1, analyses of work preferences revealed developmental changes and gender differences in priorities: Some gender differences increased over time and increased more among parents than among childless participants, seemingly because the mothers' priorities changed. In Study 2, gender differences in the graduate students' life values and personal views at age 35 were compared with those of profoundly gifted participants (top 1 in 10,000, identified by age 13 and tracked for 20 years: 265 men, 84 women). Again, gender differences were larger among parents. Across both cohorts, men appeared to assume a more agentic, career-focused perspective than women did, placing more importance on creating high-impact products, receiving compensation, taking risks, and gaining recognition as the best in their fields. Women appeared to favor a more communal, holistic perspective, emphasizing community, family, friendships, and less time devoted to career. Gender differences in life priorities, which intensify during parenthood, anticipated differential male-female representation in high-level and time-intensive careers, even among talented men and women with similar profiles of abilities, vocational interests, and educational experiences. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19686005     DOI: 10.1037/a0016030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  25 in total

1.  Developing physician-scientists: a perspective.

Authors:  Nancy J Brown
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2013

2.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering.

Authors:  Nilanjana Dasgupta; Melissa McManus Scircle; Matthew Hunsinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.

Authors:  Jason M Sheltzer; Joan C Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.

Authors:  Francesca Gino; Caroline Ashley Wilmuth; Alison Wood Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Physician mothers' experience of workplace discrimination: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Alison S Rustagi; Jeanette S Torres; Elizabeth Linos; Victoria Plaut; Christina Mangurian; Esther Choo; Eleni Linos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-12

8.  The missing women in STEM? Assessing gender differentials in the factors associated with transition to first jobs.

Authors:  Sharon Sassler; Jennifer Glass; Yael Levitte; Katherine M Michelmore
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2016-09-28

9.  Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.

Authors:  Kira O McCabe; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-03-14

10.  Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica Degol
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.