Literature DB >> 28198573

Radiation dose benchmarks in pediatric cardiac catheterization: A prospective multi-center C3PO-QI study.

Priscila C Cevallos1, Aimee K Armstrong2, Andrew C Glatz3, Bryan H Goldstein4, Todd M Gudausky5, Ryan A Leahy6, Christopher J Petit7, Shabana Shahanavaz8, Sara M Trucco9, Lisa J Bergersen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to update benchmark values to use a quality measure prospectively.
BACKGROUND: Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project - Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI), a multi-center registry, defined initial radiation dose benchmarks retrospectively across common interventional procedures. These data facilitated a dose metric endorsed by the American College of Cardiology in 2014.
METHODS: Data was collected prospectively by 9 C3PO-QI institutions with complete case capture between 1/1/2014 and 6/30/2015. Radiation was measured in total air kerma (mGy), dose area product (DAP) (µGy*M2 ), DAP per body weight, and fluoroscopy time (min), and reported by age group as median, 75th and 95th %ile for the following six interventional procedures: (1) atrial septal defect closure; (2) aortic valvuloplasty; (3) treatment of coarctation of the aorta; (4) patent ductus arteriosus closure; (5) pulmonary valvuloplasty; and (6) transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation.
RESULTS: The study was comprised of 1,680 unique cases meeting inclusion criteria. Radiation doses were lowest for pulmonary valvuloplasty (age <1 yrs, median mGy: 59, DAP: 249) and highest in transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (age >15 yrs, median mGy: 1835, DAP: 17990). DAP/kg standardized outcome measures across weights within an age group and procedure type significantly more than DAP alone. Radiation doses decreased for all procedures compared to those reported previously by both median and median weight-based percentile curves. These differences in radiation exposure were observed without changes in median fluoroscopy time.
CONCLUSIONS: This study updates previously established benchmarks to reflect QI efforts over time. These thresholds can be applied for quality measurement and comparison.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiographic/fluoroscopic; comparative effectiveness/patient centered outcomes research; congenital heart disease; health care outcomes; imaging; pediatric intervention; pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28198573     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  13 in total

1.  Radiation Risk Categories in Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Tool to Aid in the Evaluation of Radiation Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian P Quinn; Aimee K Armstrong; Holly D Bauser-Heaton; Ryan Callahan; Howaida G El-Said; Susan R Foerster; Bryan H Goldstein; Andrea S Goodman; Todd M Gudausky; Jacqueline N Kreutzer; Ryan A Leahy; Christopher J Petit; Toby A Rockefeller; Shabana Shahanavaz; Sara M Trucco; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Preprocedural three-dimensional planning aids in transcatheter ductal stent placement: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Reid C Chamberlain; Jordan E Ezekian; Gregory M Sturgeon; Piers C A Barker; Kevin D Hill; Gregory A Fleming
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  Agapi Ploussi; Elias Brountzos; Spyridon Rammos; Sotiria Apostolopoulou; Efstathios P Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Anaesthesia for the paediatric patient in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory.

Authors:  N Tierney; D Kenny; D Greaney
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  The Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement Combined with Electrophysiology Procedures.

Authors:  Omar Abu-Anza; Luis Ochoa; Daniel McLennan; Prashob Porayette; Jennifer R Maldonado; Ian H Law; Osamah Aldoss
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Impact of Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes-Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI) in LMICs.

Authors:  Fatima Ali; Mohammad Qasim Mehdi; Saleem Akhtar; Nadeem Aslam; Rashid Abbas; Izat Shah; Jabbir Abidi; Sajid Arthur; Zeenat Nizar; Andrea Goodmann; Lisa Bergersen; Babar Hasan
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2019-01-10

7.  The Importance of Benchmark Radiation.

Authors:  Luiz Alberto Alberto Christiani
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Quality Initiative to Reduce Cardiac CT Angiography Radiation Exposure in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Fatima Ali; Arjumand Rizvi; Huzaifa Ahmad; Phillip McGonagill; Muneeb Khan; Rajesh Krishnamurthy; Zafar Jamil; Naila Nadeem; Mohammad Yousuf; Babar Hasan
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-05-16

9.  Estimating radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a potential for radiation reduction with air gap technique.

Authors:  Reid C Chamberlain; Alexis C Shindhelm; Chu Wang; Gregory A Fleming; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.093

10.  Standardizing Radiation Exposure during Cardiac Catheterization in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Data from a Multicenter Brazilian Registry.

Authors:  João Luiz Manica; Vanessa Oliveira Duarte; Marcelo Ribeiro; Adam Hartley; Ricardo Petraco; Carlos Pedra; Raul Rossi
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.