Literature DB >> 30728863

Impact of Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes-Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI) in LMICs.

Fatima Ali1, Mohammad Qasim Mehdi1, Saleem Akhtar1, Nadeem Aslam1, Rashid Abbas2, Izat Shah2, Jabbir Abidi2, Sajid Arthur2, Zeenat Nizar2, Andrea Goodmann3, Lisa Bergersen3, Babar Hasan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of registries for collaborative quality improvement has been overlooked in low/middle-income countries (LMIC). Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) in Pakistan joined the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes-Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI) in March 2017 with the goal of leveraging international collaboration to improve patient care and institutional standards.
METHODS: The C3PO-QI key driver-based approach was used, with certain modifications, for process re-engineering in AKUH's congenital cardiac catheterisation laboratory (CCL) to reduce radiation exposure during cardiac catheterisation procedures (the primary outcome of C3PO- QI). Educating staff and standardising procedural documentation were the principal goals of the process re-engineering. Data survey was used to assess staff knowledge, attitude and practice before and after the initiative. Additionally, case demographics and outcomes were compared between AKUH and C3PO-QI centres.
RESULTS: There was an increase in appropriate recording of radiation surrogates (0%-100%, p=0.00) and in the percentage of cases that met the established benchmark of 'Ideal documentation' (35% vs 95%, p=0.001). There was also an increase in self-reported staff interest during the case (25% vs 75%, p=0.001). AKUH versus C3PO-QI data showed similar demographic characteristics. There was a slight over-representation of diagnostic cases (42% vs 32%) as compared with interventional (58% vs 68%) at AKUH. Furthermore, interventional procedures were predominately PDA and ASD device closures (n=19 and 15, respectively). The frequency of adverse events were the same between AKUH and collaborative sites.
CONCLUSION: Collaborative efforts between developed and LMIC CCL are significant in advancing system-level processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital heart disease; paediatric interventional cardiology

Year:  2019        PMID: 30728863      PMCID: PMC6340580          DOI: 10.1136/heartasia-2018-011105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Asia        ISSN: 1759-1104


  25 in total

Review 1.  Congenital heart disease in adults. First of two parts.

Authors:  M E Brickner; L D Hillis; R A Lange
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease Adjustment for Risk Method (CHARM).

Authors:  Lisa Bergersen; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Susan R Foerster; Audrey C Marshall; Doff B McElhinney; Robert H Beekman; Russel Hirsch; Jacqueline Kreutzer; David Balzer; Julie Vincent; William E Hellenbrand; Ralf Holzer; John P Cheatham; John W Moore; Grant Burch; Laurie Armsby; James E Lock; Kathy J Jenkins
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Management of grown up congenital heart disease.

Authors:  John Deanfield; Erik Thaulow; Carol Warnes; Gary Webb; Frantizek Kolbel; Andreas Hoffman; Keld Sorenson; Harald Kaemmer; Ulf Thilen; Margaret Bink-Boelkens; Laurence Iserin; Luciano Daliento; Eric Silove; Andrew Redington; Pascal Vouhe; Silvia Priori; Maria Angeles Alonso; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; Martin Cowie; Jaap Deckers; Enrique Fernandez Burgos; John Lekakis; Bertil Lindahl; Gianfranco Mazzotta; Joao Morais; Ali Oto; Otto Smiseth; Hans Joachim Trappe; Werner Klein; Carina Blömstrom-Lundqvist; Guy de Backer; Jaromir Hradec; Gianfranco Mazzotta; Alexander Parkhomenko; Patrizia Presbitero; Adam Torbicki
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Catheter interventions for congenital heart disease in third world countries.

Authors:  R Krishna Kumar; M J Tynan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  The challenge of congenital heart disease worldwide: epidemiologic and demographic facts.

Authors:  Pierre-Luc Bernier; Ada Stefanescu; Gordan Samoukovic; Christo I Tchervenkov
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu       Date:  2010

6.  Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab.

Authors:  George R Verghese; Doff B McElhinney; Keith J Strauss; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Paediatric heart care in India.

Authors:  R K Kumar; S Shrivastava
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  The incidence of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Julien I E Hoffman; Samuel Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of cardiology.

Authors:  Kathy J Jenkins; Robert H Beekman Iii; Lisa J Bergersen; Allen D Everett; Thomas J Forbes; Rodney C G Franklin; Thomas S Klitzner; Otto N Krogman; Gerard R Martin; Catherine L Webb
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.093

Review 10.  The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.

Authors:  Henri Justino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization (PREDIC3T).

Authors:  Brian P Quinn; Mary Yeh; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Fatima Ali; David Balzer; Oliver Barry; Sarosh Batlivala; Darren Berman; Susan Foerster; Bryan Goldstein; Michael Hainstock; Ralf Holzer; Dana Janssen; Michael L O'Byrne; Lauren Shirley; Sara Trucco; Wendy Whiteside; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.106

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.