Literature DB >> 28196200

Assessment of Surgical Learning Curves in Transoral Robotic Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx.

William G Albergotti1, William E Gooding2, Mark W Kubik1, Mathew Geltzeiler1, Seungwon Kim1, Umamaheswar Duvvuri3, Robert L Ferris1.   

Abstract

Importance: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is increasingly employed as a treatment option for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPSCC). Measures of surgical learning curves are needed particularly as clinical trials using this technology continue to evolve. Objective: To assess learning curves for the oncologic TORS surgeon and to identify the number of cases needed to identify the learning phase. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent TORS for OPSCC at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between March 2010 and March 2016. Cases were excluded for involvement of a subsite outside of the oropharynx, for nonmalignant abnormality or nonsquamous histology, unknown primary, no tumor in the main specimen, free flap reconstruction, and for an inability to define margin status. Exposures: Transoral robotic surgery for OPSCC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary learning measures defined by the authors include the initial and final margin status and time to resection of main surgical specimen. A cumulative sum learning curve was developed for each surgeon for each of the study variables. The inflection point of each surgeon's curve was considered to be the point signaling the completion of the learning phase.
Results: There were 382 transoral robotic procedures identified. Of 382 cases, 160 met our inclusion criteria: 68 for surgeon A, 37 for surgeon B, and 55 for surgeon C. Of the 160 included patients, 125 were men and 35 were women. The mean (SD) age of participants was 59.4 (9.5) years. Mean (SD) time to resection including robot set-up was 79 (36) minutes. The inflection points for the final margin status learning curves were 27 cases (surgeon A) and 25 cases (surgeon C). There was no inflection point for surgeon B for final margin status. Inflection points for mean time to resection were: 39 cases (surgeon A), 30 cases (surgeon B), and 27 cases (surgeon C). Conclusions and Relevance: Using metrics of positive margin rate and time to resection of the main surgical specimen, the learning curve for TORS for OPSCC is surgeon-specific. Inflection points for most learning curves peak between 20 and 30 cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28196200      PMCID: PMC5614443          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  14 in total

1.  Learning curve evaluation using cumulative summation analysis-a clinical example of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Nicholas E Gattas; Alan D White; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  The learning curve of an academic cardiac surgeon: use of the CUSUM method.

Authors:  R J Novick; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Population-Level Analysis.

Authors:  Michelle M Chen; Sanziana A Roman; Dennis H Kraus; Julie A Sosa; Benjamin L Judson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Transoral Endoscopic Head and Neck Surgery and Its Role Within the Multidisciplinary Treatment Paradigm of Oropharynx Cancer: Robotics, Lasers, and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  F Christopher Holsinger; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; J Scott Magnuson; William R Carroll; Kerry D Olsen; Lixia Daio; Eric J Moore; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Analysis of post-transoral robotic-assisted surgery hemorrhage: Frequency, outcomes, and prevention.

Authors:  Rajarsi Mandal; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Thomas M Kaffenberger; Garret W Choby; Seungwon Kim
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Learning curve for transoral robotic surgery: a 4-year analysis.

Authors:  Hilliary N White; John Frederick; Terence Zimmerman; William R Carroll; J Scott Magnuson
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Eric M Genden; Shaun Desai; Chih-Kwang Sung
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Transoral robotic surgery experience in 44 cases.

Authors:  Ray G F Blanco; Carole Fakhry; Patrick K Ha; Keri Ryniak; Barbara Messing; Joseph A Califano; John R Saunders
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; Wendy Snyder; Eric Sherman; Harry Quon
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Anaesthesia for transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  J Hawkins; I Ahmad
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 3.  Current Role of Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Wojciech Golusiński; Ewelina Golusińska-Kardach
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  N A Soomro; D A Hashimoto; A J Porteous; C J A Ridley; W J Marsh; R Ditto; S Roy
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  A novel surgeon credentialing and quality assurance process using transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial E3311.

Authors:  Robert L Ferris; Yael Flamand; F Christopher Holsinger; Gregory S Weinstein; Harry Quon; Ranee Mehra; Joaquin J Garcia; Michael L Hinni; Neil D Gross; Erich M Sturgis; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Eduardo Méndez; John A Ridge; J Scott Magnuson; Kerry A Higgins; Mihir R Patel; Russel B Smith; Daniel W Karakla; Michael E Kupferman; James P Malone; Benjamin L Judson; Jeremy Richmon; Jay O Boyle; Rodrigo Bayon; Bert W O'Malley; Enver Ozer; Giovana R Thomas; Wayne M Koch; R Bryan Bell; Nabil F Saba; Shuli Li; Elin R Sigurdson; Barbara Burtness
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 6.  Functional Organ Preservation Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer: Transoral Robotic Surgery and Beyond.

Authors:  Wojciech Golusiński
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Tumor phantom for training and research in transoral surgery.

Authors:  Michael Sramek; Yuan Shi; Erick Quintanilla; Xiaotian Wu; Aravind Ponukumati; David Pastel; Ryan Halter; Joseph Paydarfar
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.