Literature DB >> 25783405

Learning curve evaluation using cumulative summation analysis-a clinical example of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Thomas P Cundy1, Nicholas E Gattas2, Alan D White2, Azad S Najmaldin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cumulative summation (CUSUM) method for learning curve analysis remains under-utilized in the surgical literature in general, and is described in only a small number of publications within the field of pediatric surgery. This study introduces the CUSUM analysis technique and applies it to evaluate the learning curve for pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RP).
METHODS: Clinical data were prospectively recorded for consecutive pediatric RP cases performed by a single-surgeon. CUSUM charts and tests were generated for set-up time, docking time, console time, operating time, total operating room time, and postoperative complications. Conversions and avoidable operating room delay were separately evaluated with respect to case experience. Comparisons between case experience and time-based outcomes were assessed using the Student's t-test and ANOVA for bi-phasic and multi-phasic learning curves respectively. Comparison between case experience and complication frequency was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: A total of 90 RP cases were evaluated. The learning curve transitioned beyond the learning phase at cases 10, 15, 42, 57, and 58 for set-up time, docking time, console time, operating time, and total operating room time respectively. All comparisons of mean operating times between the learning phase and subsequent phases were statistically significant (P=<0.001-0.01). No significant difference was observed between case experience and frequency of post-operative complications (P=0.125), although the CUSUM chart demonstrated a directional change in slope for the last 12 cases in which there were high proportions of re-do cases and patients <6 months of age.
CONCLUSIONS: The CUSUM method has a valuable role for learning curve evaluation and outcome quality monitoring. In applying this statistical technique to the largest reported single surgeon series of pediatric RP, we demonstrate numerous distinctly shaped learning curves and well-defined learning phase transition points.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CUSUM; Cumulative sum; Learning curve; Pediatric; Pyeloplasty; Robot-assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783405     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of Surgical Learning Curves in Transoral Robotic Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx.

Authors:  William G Albergotti; William E Gooding; Mark W Kubik; Mathew Geltzeiler; Seungwon Kim; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Global trends in paediatric robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric and Progressive Scholarly Acceptance analysis.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Simon J D Harley; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Sanjeev Khurana
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

4.  Robot-Assisted vs. Open Appendicovesicostomy in Pediatric Urology: A Systematic Review and Single-Center Case Series.

Authors:  Nikolai Juul; Emma Persad; Oliver Willacy; Jorgen Thorup; Magdalena Fossum; Susanne Reinhardt
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.569

5.  Learning Curve of C-Arm Cone-beam Computed Tomography Virtual Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy.

Authors:  Su Yeon Ahn; Chang Min Park; Soon Ho Yoon; Hyungjin Kim; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Retroperitoneal Approach for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Encouraging Preliminary Results With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair.

Authors:  Thomas Blanc; Jules Kohaut; Caroline Elie; Pauline Clermidi; Luca Pio; Caroline Harte; Enrico Brönnimann; Nathalie Botto; Véronique Rousseau; Pascale Sonigo; Christophe Vaessen; Henri Lottmann; Yves Aigrain
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Learning curve of uniportal video-assisted lobectomy: analysis of 15-month experience in a single center.

Authors:  Dania Nachira; Elisa Meacci; Venanzio Porziella; Maria Letizia Vita; Maria Teresa Congedo; Marco Chiappetta; Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella; Mahmoud Ismail; Elisabetta Gualtieri; Alfredo Cesario; Stefano Margaritora
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children: CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Zhe Wen; Huiying Liang; Jiankun Liang; Qifeng Liang; Huimin Xia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Evaluation of the Learning Curve of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bum Sik Tae; Ulanbek Balpukov; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.530

10.  Selective clamping hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: A novel technique.

Authors:  Bum Sik Tae; Byeong Jo Jeon; Nam Cheol Kim; Hoon Choi; Jae Hyun Bae; Jae Young Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-02-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.