Marios Arvanitis1, Clarissa M Koch2, Gloria G Chan3, Celia Torres-Arancivia3, Michael P LaValley4, Daniel R Jacobson5, John L Berk6, Lawreen H Connors2, Frederick L Ruberg7. 1. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Amyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Amyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts2Amyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts5Hematology/Oncology Section, Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts2Amyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Amyloidosis Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts6Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) is an underrecognized cause of heart failure (HF) in older individuals, owing in part to difficulty in diagnosis. ATTR can result from substitution of valine for isoleucine at codon 122 of the transthyretin (TTR) gene (V122I), present in 3.43% of African American individuals. Objective: To examine whether serum retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), an endogenous TTR ligand, could be used as a diagnostic test for ATTR V122I amyloidosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this combined prospective and retrospective cohort study performed at a tertiary care referral center, 50 African American patients 60 years or older with nonamyloid HF and cardiac wall thickening prospectively genotyped from September 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015, and a comparator cohort of 25 patients with biopsy-proven ATTR V122I amyloidosis recruited from September 1, 2009, through November 31, 2014, comprised the development cohort. Twenty-seven African American patients and 9 patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis comprised the validation cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures: Circulating RBP4, TTR, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and troponin I (TnI) concentrations and electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and clinical characteristics were assessed in all patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify optimal thresholds for ATTR V122I amyloidosis identification. A clinical prediction rule was developed using penalized logistic regression, evaluated using ROC analysis and validated in an independent cohort of cases and controls. Results: Age, sex, and BNP and TnI concentrations were similar between the 25 patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis (mean [SD] age, 72.2 [7.4] years; 18 male [72%]) and the 50 controls (mean [SD] age, 69.2 [5.7] years; 31 male [62%]). Serum RBP4 concentration was lower in patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis compared with nonamyloid controls (31.5 vs 49.4 µg/mL, P < .001), and the difference persisted after controlling for potential confounding variables. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis (mean [SD], 40% [14%] vs 57% [14%], P < .001), whereas interventricular septal diameter was higher (mean [SD], 16 [3] vs 14 [2] mm, P < .001). The ROC analysis identified RBP4 as a sensitive identifier of ATTR V122I amyloidosis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). A clinical prediction algorithm composed of RBP4, TTR, left ventricular ejection fraction, interventricular septal diameter, mean limb lead QRS voltage, and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction yielded excellent discriminatory capacity for ATTR V122I amyloidosis (AUC = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.00), whereas a 4-parameter model, including RBP4 concentration, retained excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99). The models maintained excellent discrimination in the validation cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: A prediction model using circulating RBP4 concentration and readily available clinical parameters accurately discriminated ATTR V122I amyloidosis from nonamyloid HF in a case-matched cohort. This clinical algorithm may be useful for identification of ATTR V122I amyloidosis in elderly African American patients with HF.
Importance: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) is an underrecognized cause of heart failure (HF) in older individuals, owing in part to difficulty in diagnosis. ATTR can result from substitution of valine for isoleucine at codon 122 of the transthyretin (TTR) gene (V122I), present in 3.43% of African American individuals. Objective: To examine whether serum retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), an endogenous TTR ligand, could be used as a diagnostic test for ATTR V122I amyloidosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this combined prospective and retrospective cohort study performed at a tertiary care referral center, 50 African American patients 60 years or older with nonamyloid HF and cardiac wall thickening prospectively genotyped from September 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015, and a comparator cohort of 25 patients with biopsy-proven ATTR V122I amyloidosis recruited from September 1, 2009, through November 31, 2014, comprised the development cohort. Twenty-seven African American patients and 9 patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis comprised the validation cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures: Circulating RBP4, TTR, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and troponin I (TnI) concentrations and electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and clinical characteristics were assessed in all patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify optimal thresholds for ATTR V122I amyloidosis identification. A clinical prediction rule was developed using penalized logistic regression, evaluated using ROC analysis and validated in an independent cohort of cases and controls. Results: Age, sex, and BNP and TnI concentrations were similar between the 25 patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis (mean [SD] age, 72.2 [7.4] years; 18 male [72%]) and the 50 controls (mean [SD] age, 69.2 [5.7] years; 31 male [62%]). Serum RBP4 concentration was lower in patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis compared with nonamyloid controls (31.5 vs 49.4 µg/mL, P < .001), and the difference persisted after controlling for potential confounding variables. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients with ATTR V122I amyloidosis (mean [SD], 40% [14%] vs 57% [14%], P < .001), whereas interventricular septal diameter was higher (mean [SD], 16 [3] vs 14 [2] mm, P < .001). The ROC analysis identified RBP4 as a sensitive identifier of ATTR V122I amyloidosis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). A clinical prediction algorithm composed of RBP4, TTR, left ventricular ejection fraction, interventricular septal diameter, mean limb lead QRS voltage, and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction yielded excellent discriminatory capacity for ATTR V122I amyloidosis (AUC = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.00), whereas a 4-parameter model, including RBP4 concentration, retained excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99). The models maintained excellent discrimination in the validation cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: A prediction model using circulating RBP4 concentration and readily available clinical parameters accurately discriminated ATTR V122I amyloidosis from nonamyloid HF in a case-matched cohort. This clinical algorithm may be useful for identification of ATTR V122I amyloidosis in elderly African American patients with HF.
Authors: Mathew S Maurer; Donna R Grogan; Daniel P Judge; Rajiv Mundayat; Jeff Packman; Ilise Lombardo; Arshed A Quyyumi; Janske Aarts; Rodney H Falk Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Frederick L Ruberg; Mathew S Maurer; Daniel P Judge; Steven Zeldenrust; Martha Skinner; Antony Y Kim; Rodney H Falk; Kin N Cheung; Ayan R Patel; Arian Pano; Jeffrey Packman; Donna Roy Grogan Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Teresa Coelho; David Adams; Ana Silva; Pierre Lozeron; Philip N Hawkins; Timothy Mant; Javier Perez; Joseph Chiesa; Steve Warrington; Elizabeth Tranter; Malathy Munisamy; Rick Falzone; Jamie Harrop; Jeffrey Cehelsky; Brian R Bettencourt; Mary Geissler; James S Butler; Alfica Sehgal; Rachel E Meyers; Qingmin Chen; Todd Borland; Renta M Hutabarat; Valerie A Clausen; Rene Alvarez; Kevin Fitzgerald; Christina Gamba-Vitalo; Saraswathy V Nochur; Akshay K Vaishnaw; Dinah W Y Sah; Jared A Gollob; Ole B Suhr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marianna Fontana; Silvia Pica; Patricia Reant; Amna Abdel-Gadir; Thomas A Treibel; Sanjay M Banypersad; Viviana Maestrini; William Barcella; Stefania Rosmini; Heerajnarain Bulluck; Rabya H Sayed; Ketna Patel; Shameem Mamhood; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Carol J Whelan; Anna S Herrey; Helen J Lachmann; Ashutosh D Wechalekar; Charlotte H Manisty; Eric B Schelbert; Peter Kellman; Julian D Gillmore; Philip N Hawkins; James C Moon Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jacquelyn L S Hanson; Marios Arvanitis; Clarissa M Koch; John L Berk; Frederick L Ruberg; Tatiana Prokaeva; Lawreen H Connors Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Angelos G Rigopoulos; Muhammad Ali; Elena Abate; Abdel-Rahman Torky; Marios Matiakis; Mammad Mammadov; Hannes Melnyk; Alexander Vogt; Renato de Vecchis; Boris Bigalke; Walter Wohlgemuth; Sophie Mavrogeni; Michel Noutsias Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Marios Arvanitis; Gloria G Chan; Daniel R Jacobson; John L Berk; Lawreen H Connors; Frederick L Ruberg Journal: Amyloid Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 7.141
Authors: Antonella De Lillo; Flavio De Angelis; Marco Di Girolamo; Marco Luigetti; Sabrina Frusconi; Dario Manfellotto; Maria Fuciarelli; Renato Polimanti Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: David R Murdock; Eric Venner; Donna M Muzny; Ginger A Metcalf; Mullai Murugan; Trevor D Hadley; Varuna Chander; Paul S de Vries; Xiaoming Jia; Aliza Hussain; Ali M Agha; Aniko Sabo; Shoudong Li; Qingchang Meng; Jianhong Hu; Xia Tian; Michelle Cohen; Victoria Yi; Christie L Kovar; Marie-Claude Gingras; Viktoriya Korchina; Chad Howard; Daniel L Riconda; Stacey Pereira; Hadley S Smith; Zohra A Huda; Alexandria Buentello; Patricia R Marino; Lee Leiber; Ashok Balasubramanyam; Christopher I Amos; Andrew B Civitello; Mihail G Chelu; Ronald Maag; Amy L McGuire; Eric Boerwinkle; Xander H T Wehrens; Christie M Ballantyne; Richard A Gibbs Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 8.864