Literature DB >> 34363016

Genetic testing in ambulatory cardiology clinics reveals high rate of findings with clinical management implications.

David R Murdock1, Eric Venner1, Donna M Muzny1, Ginger A Metcalf1, Mullai Murugan1, Trevor D Hadley2, Varuna Chander1, Paul S de Vries3, Xiaoming Jia2, Aliza Hussain2, Ali M Agha2, Aniko Sabo1, Shoudong Li1, Qingchang Meng1, Jianhong Hu1, Xia Tian1, Michelle Cohen1, Victoria Yi1, Christie L Kovar1, Marie-Claude Gingras1, Viktoriya Korchina1, Chad Howard4, Daniel L Riconda5, Stacey Pereira6, Hadley S Smith6, Zohra A Huda2, Alexandria Buentello2, Patricia R Marino2, Lee Leiber4, Ashok Balasubramanyam7, Christopher I Amos8, Andrew B Civitello2, Mihail G Chelu2,9, Ronald Maag2, Amy L McGuire6, Eric Boerwinkle1,3, Xander H T Wehrens2,9,10, Christie M Ballantyne2, Richard A Gibbs11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in adults in the United States, yet the benefits of genetic testing are not universally accepted.
METHODS: We developed the "HeartCare" panel of genes associated with CVD, evaluating high-penetrance Mendelian conditions, coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk, LPA gene polymorphisms, and specific pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants. We enrolled 709 individuals from cardiology clinics at Baylor College of Medicine, and samples were analyzed in a CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory. Results were returned to the ordering physician and uploaded to the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: Notably, 32% of patients had a genetic finding with clinical management implications, even after excluding PGx results, including 9% who were molecularly diagnosed with a Mendelian condition. Among surveyed physicians, 84% reported medical management changes based on these results, including specialist referrals, cardiac tests, and medication changes. LPA polymorphisms and high polygenic risk of CAD were found in 20% and 9% of patients, respectively, leading to diet, lifestyle, and other changes. Warfarin and simvastatin pharmacogenetic variants were present in roughly half of the cohort.
CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of genetic information in routine cardiovascular health management and provide a roadmap for accompanying research.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34363016      PMCID: PMC8931845          DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01294-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.864


  44 in total

1.  Deaths: Leading Causes for 2018.

Authors:  Melonie Heron
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2021-05

2.  A new initiative on precision medicine.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Harold Varmus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Genome-wide studies of copy number variation and exome sequencing identify rare variants in BAG3 as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Nadine Norton; Duanxiang Li; Mark J Rieder; Jill D Siegfried; Evadnie Rampersaud; Stephan Züchner; Steve Mangos; Jorge Gonzalez-Quintana; Libin Wang; Sean McGee; Jochen Reiser; Eden Martin; Deborah A Nickerson; Ray E Hershberger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1 and simvastatin-induced myopathy: 2014 update.

Authors:  L B Ramsey; S G Johnson; K E Caudle; C E Haidar; D Voora; R A Wilke; W D Maxwell; H L McLeod; R M Krauss; D M Roden; Q Feng; R M Cooper-DeHoff; L Gong; T E Klein; M Wadelius; M Niemi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; John F Peden; Jemma C Hopewell; Theodosios Kyriakou; Anuj Goel; Simon C Heath; Sarah Parish; Simona Barlera; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Stephan Rust; Derrick Bennett; Angela Silveira; Anders Malarstig; Fiona R Green; Mark Lathrop; Bruna Gigante; Karin Leander; Ulf de Faire; Udo Seedorf; Anders Hamsten; Rory Collins; Hugh Watkins; Martin Farrall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Points to consider in the reevaluation and reanalysis of genomic test results: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Joshua L Deignan; Wendy K Chung; Hutton M Kearney; Kristin G Monaghan; Catherine W Rehder; Elizabeth C Chao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Atlas-CNV: a validated approach to call single-exon CNVs in the eMERGESeq gene panel.

Authors:  Theodore Chiang; Xiuping Liu; Tsung-Jung Wu; Jianhong Hu; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Simon White; Daniel Schaid; Mariza de Andrade; Gail P Jarvik; David Crosslin; Ian Stanaway; David S Carrell; John J Connolly; Hakon Hakonarson; Emily E Groopman; Ali G Gharavi; Alexander Fedotov; Weimin Bi; Magalie S Leduc; David R Murdock; Yunyun Jiang; Linyan Meng; Christine M Eng; Shu Wen; Yaping Yang; Donna M Muzny; Eric Boerwinkle; William Salerno; Eric Venner; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Polygenic Risk Score Identifies Subgroup With Higher Burden of Atherosclerosis and Greater Relative Benefit From Statin Therapy in the Primary Prevention Setting.

Authors:  Pradeep Natarajan; Robin Young; Nathan O Stitziel; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Usman Baber; Roxana Mehran; Samantha Sartori; Valentin Fuster; Dermot F Reilly; Adam Butterworth; Daniel J Rader; Ian Ford; Naveed Sattar; Sekar Kathiresan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Coronary heart disease mortality in treated familial hypercholesterolaemia: Update of the UK Simon Broome FH register.

Authors:  S E Humphries; J A Cooper; M Seed; N Capps; P N Durrington; B Jones; I F W McDowell; H Soran; H A W Neil
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.162

10.  Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations.

Authors:  Amit V Khera; Mark Chaffin; Krishna G Aragam; Mary E Haas; Carolina Roselli; Seung Hoan Choi; Pradeep Natarajan; Eric S Lander; Steven A Lubitz; Patrick T Ellinor; Sekar Kathiresan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genome Sequencing in the Parkinson Disease Clinic.

Authors:  Emily J Hill; Laurie A Robak; Rami Al-Ouran; Jennifer Deger; Jamie C Fong; Paul Jerrod Vandeventer; Emily Schulman; Sindhu Rao; Hiba Saade; Joseph M Savitt; Rainer von Coelln; Neeja Desai; Harshavardhan Doddapaneni; Sejal Salvi; Shannon Dugan-Perez; Donna M Muzny; Amy L McGuire; Zhandong Liu; Richard A Gibbs; Chad Shaw; Joseph Jankovic; Lisa M Shulman; Joshua M Shulman
Journal:  Neurol Genet       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Genetics.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Kipp W Johnson; Edward Choi; Scott Kaplin; Eric Venner; Mullai Murugan; Zhen Wang; Benjamin S Glicksberg; Christopher I Amos; Michael C Schatz; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 3.  Current state and future directions of genomic medicine in aortic dissection: A path to prevention and personalized care.

Authors:  Alana C Cecchi; Madeline Drake; Chrisanne Campos; Jake Howitt; Jonathan Medina; Scott M Damrauer; Sherene Shalhub; Dianna M Milewicz
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 1.222

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.