| Literature DB >> 28196115 |
Saruna Ghimire1, Binaya Kumar Baral2, Karen Callahan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Demographic transition in Nepal, like in many developing countries, has resulted in a burgeoning elderly population whose health status is not currently monitored. One pillar of health is adequate nutrition. Yet, little is known about the nutritional health status of the elderly in Nepal. The financial, material, and personnel limitations in Nepal's health delivery services necessitate health screening instruments that require minimal clinical staff and resources. To our knowledge, no such nutritional assessment tool has been validated in Nepal. Therefore, our aims are two-fold: To assess the nutritional status of the elderly population in one typical Nepali village, Okharpauwa, in Nuwakot District, Nepal; and concurrently, to validate the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) tool.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28196115 PMCID: PMC5308814 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the 242 elderly participants.
| Characteristics | Participants |
|---|---|
| 21.4 ± 3.9 | |
| 69.8±7.4 | |
| Male | 111 (45.9) |
| Female | 131 (54.1) |
| Upper caste | 138 (57.0) |
| Janajati | 77 (31.8) |
| Dalit | 27 (11.2) |
| Hindu | 181 (74.8) |
| Buddhist | 58 (24.0) |
| Christian | 3 (1.2) |
| Literate | 53 (21.9) |
| Informal | 14 (5.8) |
| Illiterate | 175 (72.3) |
| Married | 165 (68.2) |
| Separated | 11 (4.5) |
| Widowed | 66 (27.3) |
| Never | 105 (43.6) |
| Current | 93 (38.6) |
| Former | 43 (17.8) |
| Never | 168 (69.4) |
| Infrequent | 62 (25.6) |
| Frequent | 12 (5.0) |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
Fig 1Scatter plot and Spearman correlation coefficient (r) of BMI and total MNA score.
BMI, body mass index; MNA, mini nutritional assessment.
Fig 2ROC curves of the Nepalese version of the MNA tool according to BMI.
ROC, receiver operating characteristic; BMI, body mass index; AUC, area under ROC curve.
Nutritional status of participants and associated factors.
| Normal Nutritional Status n = 27, 11.2% | At Risk of Malnutrition n = 157, 64.9% | Malnourished n = 58, 24.0% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.43 ± 1.46 | 20.33 ± 2.07 | 13.68 ± 2.8 | <0.001 | |
| 24.35 ± 3.22 | 22.05 ± 3.55 | 18.39 ± 3.39 | <0.001 | |
| 69.48 ± 3.78 | 69.39 ± 7.42 | 70.91 ± 8.59 | 0.4 | |
| Male | 19 (17.1) | 72 (64.9) | 20 (18.0) | 0.008 |
| Female | 8 (6.1) | 85 (64.9) | 38 (29.0) | |
| Upper caste | 19 (13.8) | 84 (60.9) | 35 (25.4) | 0.02 |
| Janjatis | 5 (6.5) | 60 (77.9) | 12 (15.6) | |
| Dalit | 3 (11.1) | 13 (48.1) | 11 (40.7) | |
| Hindu | 24 (13.3) | 111 (61.3) | 46 (25.4) | 0.22 |
| Buddhist | 3 (5.2) | 44 (75.9) | 11 (19.0) | |
| Christian | 0 | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | |
| Literate | 13 (24.5) | 35 (66.0) | 5 (9.4) | 0.001 |
| Informal | 2 (14.3) | 8 (57.1) | 4 (28.6) | |
| Illiterate | 12 (6.9) | 114 (65.1) | 49 (28.0) | |
| Married | 25 (15.2) | 108 (65.5) | 32 (19.4) | 0.01 |
| Separated | - | 8 (72.7) | 3 (27.3) | |
| Widowed | 2 (3.0) | 41 (62.1) | 23 (34.8) | |
| Never | 11 (10.5) | 71 (67.6) | 23 (21.9) | 0.18 |
| Current | 13 (14.0) | 52 (55.9) | 28 (30.1) | |
| Former | 3 (7.0) | 33 (76.7) | 7 (16.3) | |
| Never | 18 (10.7) | 107 (63.7) | 43 (25.6) | 0.71 |
| Infrequent | 7 (11.3) | 41 (66.1) | 14 (22.6) | |
| Frequent | 2 (16.7) | 9 (75.0) | 1 (8.3) | |
a ANOVA test for mean differences between nutritional status groups. All others are Chi-square tests.
b Mean ± SD
The burden of malnutrition: Current and prior research results in South Asia among rural populations.
| Location and Year of Study | Number of participants | Normal nutritional status | At risk of malnutrition | Malnourished |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okharpauwa, Nepal. 2016 (current) | 242 | 11.2% | 64.9% | 24% |
| Pharping, Nepal. 2012 [ | 300 | 18% | 51% | 31% |
| Matlab, Bangladesh. 2006 [ | 457 | 12% | 62% | 26% |
| Assam, India. 2015 [ | 360 | 30% | 55% | 15% |
| Belagavi, India. 2016 [ | 190 | 33.7% | 43.7% | 22.6% |