Literature DB >> 28194376

One-year mortality of elderly patients with hip fracture surgically treated at a hospital in Southern Brazil.

Marcelo Teodoro Ezequiel Guerra1, Roberto Deves Viana1, Liégenes Feil1, Eduardo Terra Feron1, Jonathan Maboni1, Alfonso Soria-Galvarro Vargas1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the mortality rate at one-year follow-up of patients with hip fracture who underwent surgery at the university hospital of this institution.
METHOD: The authors reviewed 213 medical records of hospitalized patients aged 65 years or older, following to the order they were admitted to the orthopedics and traumatology service from January 2012 to August 2013.
RESULTS: One-year mortality rate was 23.6%. Mortality was higher among women, with a 3:1 ratio. Anemia (p = 0.000) and dementia (p = 0.041) were significantly associated with the death group. Patients who remained hospitalized for less than 15 days and who were discharged within seven days after surgery showed increased survival.
CONCLUSION: In the present sample of patients with hip fracture who underwent surgery, one-year mortality rate was 23.6%, and the main comorbidities associated with this outcome were anemia and dementia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Hip fractures; Mortality

Year:  2016        PMID: 28194376      PMCID: PMC5290128          DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


Introduction

Hip fractures are very common and serious events in elderly patients. A significant increase in the incidence of proximal femur fractures has been observed in recent decades, mainly due to the increase of the elderly population, since this incidence progresses with advancing age. This type of fracture accounts for 84% of bone lesions in people aged over 60 years; it is a public health issue and a major cause of mortality, disability, excessive medical and hospital expenses, and social and family problems in this population.2, 3, 4 Fractures of the proximal end of the femur include subtrochanteric and transtrochanteric fractures, as well as those in the femoral neck. Most often, trauma is low-energy and is related to factors such as malnutrition, impaired activities of daily living, decreased visual acuity and reflexes, sarcopenia, and – particularly – bone fragility.1, 5, 6 In most cases, surgery is indicated. Conservative treatment is chosen in cases of incomplete fractures without displacement or when there are no clinical conditions for surgery. A period between 24 and 48 h after the fracture is considered ideal for the surgical procedure to take place, considering the general health of the patient.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Several studies indicate advanced age, physical status, male gender, and delayed treatment as determining factors in mortality.6, 11, 13 Other factors related to an unfavorable outcome include non-ambulatory condition prior to fracture, cognitive deficiencies, occurrence of a second fracture, low functional level at time of discharge, and lack of bisphosphonates and vitamin D replacement.6, 14 Because fractures of the proximal end of the femur occur in patients with significant comorbidities and high risk of pre-operative complications, this condition has a high mortality rate when compared with other fractures.10, 11, 13, 15 An important indicator in the evaluation of care provided in health institutions, mortality rate can also be used for two other purposes: determining the performance of a hospital over time and monitoring the performance of a number of hospitals. Given the importance of this issue, this study aimed to determine the mortality rate in the first year of follow-up of elderly patients with hip fracture who underwent surgery at the university hospital of this institution and to identify the comorbidities associated with these patients.

Material and methods

This was a retrospective study conducted at the university hospital of this institution. The study included elderly patients (65 years or older) admitted with a fracture of the proximal end of the femur and surgically treated from January 2012 to August 2013. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. The research followed the recommendations of Resolution No. 196/96 of the National Health Council for Research in Human Beings, and was approved on 1/10/13 (CAAE: 21388913.1.0000.5349). Thus, no information that could identify individuals involved in the research will be published, ensuring the anonymity of the subjects and the privacy of information. The survey was conducted through a review of medical records and telephone contact with patients and their relatives. The information on death and its date were obtained through telephone contact or through the Canoas Health Department, when direct contact was not possible. Patients whose medical records were incomplete or who died prior to surgical treatment were excluded. Patients who underwent conservative treatment were not included. The following variables were studied: age, sex, comorbidities, type of fracture, surgical procedure, type of implant used, mean time between fracture and surgery, postoperative complications, and death. The cause of death was not assessed, as it had already been identified in a study conducted earlier in this service and because in most cases the cause of death was not directly related to the surgical procedure. Data were analyzed with tables, descriptive statistics, and chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, using SPSS software, version 13.0. A maximum significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05) was considered to be significant. The chi-squared test was used to assess the gender and age prevalence between groups, as well as the number of comorbidities. The other variables were evaluated using Fisher's exact and chi-squared tests.

Results

From January 2012 to August 2013, the medical records of 213 patients with fractures of the proximal end of the femur were selected for inclusion in the study. Of these, 12 were excluded due to incomplete medical records and two due to death prior to the surgery, which resulted in a final sample of 199 patients. Of the total sample, 153 were contacted directly and 46 through the Department of Health system; 47 (23.6%) patients died within a year and 152 (76.4%) remained alive. Table 1 shows the comparison between the survival group and death group according to age and gender of patients. The survival group was significantly associated with age 65–75 years; conversely, the death group was associated with age range of over 86 years (p = 0.021). There was no difference between groups regarding sex (p = 0.849).
Table 1

Comparison between the survival and death groups to sex and age of patients.

VariableGroup
pa
Death (n = 47)
Survival (n = 152)
Total (n = 199)
n%n%n%
Sex
 Female3472.31147514874.40.849
 Male1327.738255125.6



Age
 65–75919.15435.56331.70.21
 76–862042.66744.18743.7
 Over 861838.33120.44924.6

Source: Authors.

Chi-squared test.

Regarding the number of comorbidities per patient, it is observed that the presence of no comorbidities was associated with the survival group and that the presence of three comorbidities was associated with the death group (p = 0.004; Table 2). Two comorbidities were significantly associated with the death group: dementia (p = 0.041) and anemia (p = 0.000; Table 3).
Table 2

Comparison between the survival and death groups according to the number of comorbidities presented.

Nο⋅ of comorbiditiesGroup
pa
Death
Survival
Total
n%n%n%
None12.13221.13316.60.4
One1327.74529.65829.1
Two1429.84730.96130.7
Three16342214.53819.1
More than three36.463.994.5
Total47100152100199100

Source: Authors.

Chi-squared test.

Table 3

Comparison between the survival and death groups according to the presence of comorbidities.

ComorbiditiesGroup
pa
Death (n = 47)
Survival (n = 152)
Total (n = 199)
n%n%n%
DM1327.735234824.10.560
SAH3370.29260.512562.80.300
Stroke817117.2199.50.53
NIHD714.91811.82512.60.616
IHD510.653.31050.58
Dementia817106.61890.41
Depression48.542.6840.91
COPD12.142.652.51.000
CRF24.342.6630.628
Neoplasia24.3127.91470.526
Anemia81710.794.50.000
Hypothyroidism48.53273.50.55
Dyslipidemia12.153.3631.000
Smoking/alcohol use24.363.9841.000
Others36.42113.82412.10.208

Source: Authors.

IHD, ischemic heart disease; NIHD, non-ischemic heart disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SAH, hypertension; CRF, chronic renal failure.

Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.

The most prevalent fracture in the study group was transtrochanteric (56.8%), followed by femoral neck (37.7%) and subtrochanteric fractures (5%). Among the osteosynthesis implants, the most widely used was the dynamic hip screw, in 42.7% of cases. Table 4 indicates that three variables were associated with both groups: time between fracture and discharge (p = 0.018), time between surgery and discharge (p = 0.003), and osteosynthesis implant (p = 0.011). Regarding the variable of time between fracture and discharge, it was observed that the survival group was significantly associated with time <15 days and the death group, with time >30 days (p = 0.018). In the variable of time between surgery and discharge, the survival group was associated with time <7 days and the death group, with time 8–15 days and >15 days (p = 0.003). As for the implant used for osteosynthesis, dynamic hip screw was significantly associated with the survival group, and cemented partial hip prosthesis, with the death group (p = 0.011).
Table 4

Comparison of the study variables between the survival and death groups.

VariableResponseGroup
pa
Death (n = 47)
Survival (n = 152)
Total (n = 199)
n%n%n%
FractureFemoral neck2246.85334.97537.70.450
Trochanteric2246.89159.911356.8
Subtrochanteric36.474.6105
Femoral neck + trochanteric1710.5
Time of fracture/surgeryUp to 7 days510.62919.13417.10.352
8–15 days2042.66442.18442.2
Over 15 days2246.85938.88140.7
Time of fracture/admissionUp to 7 days3574.510468.413969.80.578
8–15 days919.141275025.1
Over 15 days36.474.6105
Time of fracture/dischargeUp to 15 days715.64831.65527.90.18
16–30 days2351.1795210251.8
Over 30 days1533.32516.44020.3
Time of surgery/dischargeUp to 7 days2555.612380.914875.10.3
8–15 days1124.4159.92613.2
Over 15 days920149.22311.7
OsteosynthesisDCS919.1159.92412.10.11
DHS1429.87146.78542.7
Cannulated screw53.352.5
PFN12.195.9105
Short PFN24.353.373.5
Cemented PHR81795.9178.5
Cementless PHR612.842.6105
Cemented THR24.3117.2136.5
Cementless THR510.62214.52713.6

Source: Authors.

DCS, dynamic condylar screw; DHS, dynamic hip screw; PFN, proximal femur nail; PHR, partial hip replacement; THR, total hip replacement.

Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.

Regarding complications, sepsis in the postoperative period was significantly associated with the death group (p = 0.001). Among other comorbidities studied, there was no significant relationship with the death group (Table 5).
Table 5

Comparison between the survival and death groups according to the presence of complications in the postoperative period.

ComplicationsGroup
pa
Death (n = 47)
Survival (n = 152)
Total (n = 199)
n%n%n%
UTI36.41711.22010.10.418
BPN612.8117.2178.50.370
SSI48.574.6115.50.464
Osteosynthesis infection12.121.331.51.000
Osteosynthesis rupture/dislocation12.153.3631.000
Delirium24.353.373.51.000
Sepsis without focus81732115.50.001
ARF12.132421.000
Anemia12.153.3631.000
PTB36.421.3520.87
Others36.432630.145

Source: Authors.

BPN, bronchopneumonia; SSI, surgical site infection; ARF, acute renal failure; UTI, urinary tract infection; PTB, pulmonary thromboembolism.

Chi-squared test.

Discussion

This study investigated the mortality of elderly patients who underwent surgery for fractures of the proximal end of the femur after one year of follow-up. The results showed a mortality rate of 23.6%, associated with variables such as age, comorbidities, osteosynthesis, time between fracture and discharge, and time between surgery and discharge. By presenting these data, the authors aim to encourage the improvement of the quality of the current services, initially by making health officials, hospital administrators, doctors, and other professionals aware of the real problem that these conditions represent. A higher incidence was observed in female patients (74.4%); this finding is consistent with the literature, which indicates a ratio of two to five women for every man.1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 The mean age of patients included in the study was 79.84 years, similar to that found in the literature.1, 3, 17, 21, 22 One-year mortality rates show great variability in the literature.2, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 The mortality rate in the present study was 23.6%. Ricci et al. analyzed 202 patients and observed a mortality rate of 28.7% after one year of follow-up. In turn, Pereira et al. observed a rate of 35% in a sample of 246 patients with hip fracture. In a study conducted in Italy, Meessen et al., with a sample of 828 patients, observed a mortality rate of only 20.7%. In the present study, it was observed that mortality rate was higher in patients older than 86 years. Pugely et al., in a prospective study of 4331 patients, showed a similar increase in mortality in patients over 80 years with hip fracture, which was significant for their overall mortality rate. The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, stroke, anemia, and dementia. This profile is consistent with that observed in several studies, in accordance to natural aging process.1, 9, 16, 17, 24 Although hypertension and diabetes mellitus combined accounted for over 80% of prevalence, these comorbidities are not determinant of an unfavorable outcome. Anemia and dementia were significantly associated with the death group, and are mentioned in the literature as factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality.20, 25, 26, 27, 28 In the present study, an increase was observed in mortality among patients with three comorbidities prior to the fracture. Studies show that the number of previous diseases influences the mortality of patients with proximal end of femur fractures and that the presence of two or more comorbidities is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The ideal time between fracture and surgical treatment has been widely discussed in the literature. The ideal time for surgery is considered to be between 24 and 48 h after fracture.9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 22 In the present study, the mean interval from fracture to surgery was 16.19 days, with a minimum of two and maximum of 100 days. Despite the disagreement with the literature, the death group was not associated with delay of surgery. As this is a tertiary hospital, there is a bias regarding time between fracture and surgery. As this hospital does not have an emergency care unit, patients are first treated at an emergency department and only after stabilization transferred to the definitive treatment. The authors believe that this generates a significant bias in the outcome of these patients, since the treatment is rarely performed in its ideal form due to the system itself. Time between fracture and discharge was significant in this analysis. Patients who remained hospitalized for over 30 days presented a higher mortality rate. Astur et al. reported an increase in mortality of more than five times in patients who were hospitalized for over ten days when compared with those who remained less than ten days. The time between surgery and discharge was statistically significant in the analysis, but this relationship was not observed in the literature. Osteosynthesis was shown to be relevant to survival and mortality of patients. The use of dynamic hip screws was significantly associated with the survival group. The literature, however, does not indicate a difference between the type of implant used and the mortality of patients with proximal femoral fractures.18, 21 Regarding complications, only 10% were linked to surgery and the osteosynthesis implant used. The most prevalent clinical complications were urinary tract infection (10.1%), nosocomial pneumonia (8.5%), sepsis (5.5%), and delirium (5.5%), all frequently cited in the literature.10, 13, 14, 16, 24 Sepsis was significantly associated with the death group (p = 0.001). In a study published in 2014, Gibson et al. demonstrated that one-third of patients with proximal femoral fracture admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis died in the unit and another one-third died outside the unit before discharge.

Conclusion

In this sample of patients with hip fracture who underwent surgery, the mortality rate at one year was 23.6%; the major comorbidities significantly associated with this outcome were anemia and dementia.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  24 in total

1.  Patients with hip fracture admitted to critical care: epidemiology, interventions and outcome.

Authors:  Alistair A Gibson; Alasdair W Hay; David C Ray
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Factors influencing length of stay and mortality after first and second hip fractures: an event modeling analysis.

Authors:  Sameer K Khan; Steven P Rushton; Anis Dosani; Andrew C Gray; David J Deehan
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Incidence rates of fragility hip fracture in middle-aged and elderly men and women in southern Norway.

Authors:  Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Gudrun Rohde; Irene Johnsrud; Inger Marie Skoie; Villy Johnsen; Marc Hochberg; Glenn Haugeberg
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Effects of older age and multiple comorbidities on functional outcome after partial hip replacement surgery for hip fractures.

Authors:  Lukman Shebubakar; Errol Hutagalung; Subroto Sapardan; Bambang Sutrisna
Journal:  Acta Med Indones       Date:  2009-10

5.  Effects of dementia on postoperative outcomes of older adults with hip fractures: a population-based study.

Authors:  Dallas P Seitz; Sudeep S Gill; Andrea Gruneir; Peter C Austin; Geoffrey M Anderson; Chaim M Bell; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 6.  A systematic review of pre-operative anaemia and blood transfusion in patients with fractured hips.

Authors:  L J Potter; B Doleman; I K Moppett
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Increased age is not associated with higher incidence of complications, longer stay in acute care hospital and in hospital mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients.

Authors:  D-A Eschbach; L Oberkircher; C Bliemel; J Mohr; S Ruchholtz; B Buecking
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Excess mortality after hip fracture among the elderly in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Chang-Bi Wang; Chien-Fu Jeff Lin; Wen-Miin Liang; Chi-Fung Cheng; Yu-Jun Chang; Hsi-Chin Wu; Trong-Neng Wu; Tsai-Hsueh Leu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  EVALUATION OF THE MORTALITY RATE ONE YEAR AFTER HIP FRACTURE AND FACTORS RELATING TO DIMINISHED SURVIVAL AMONG ELDERLY PEOPLE.

Authors:  Guilherme Ricci; Maurício Portal Longaray; Ramiro Zilles Gonçalves; Ary da Silva Ungaretti Neto; Marislei Manente; Luíza Barbosa Horta Barbosa
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06

10.  EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSES OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES AMONG THE ELDERLY.

Authors:  José Soares Hungria Neto; Caio Roncon Dias; José Daniel Bula de Almeida
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
View more
  11 in total

1.  Morbidity and mortality after fragility hip fracture in a Saudi Arabian population: Report from a single center.

Authors:  Mir Sadat-Ali; Moaad Alfaraidy; Abdulaziz AlHawas; Ahmed Abdallah Al-Othman; Dakheel A Al-Dakheel; Badar K Tayara
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Predictive Factors of Death after Surgery for Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fracture.

Authors:  Jurandir Antunes Filho; Armando D'Lucca de Castro E Silva; Adriano Fernando Mendes Junior; Felipe Jader Coelho Pereira; Igor Gerdi Oppe; Elmano de Araújo Loures
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

3.  Nutrition and Inflammation Influence 1-Year Mortality of Surgically Treated Elderly Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective International Multicenter Case Series.

Authors:  William Belangero; Jorge Daniel Barla; Daniel Horacio Rienzi Bergalli; Carlos Mario Olarte Salazar; Daniel Schweitzer Fernandez; Miguel Angel Mite Vivar; Alejandro Zylberberg; Guido Sebastian Carabelli; Maurício Kfuri
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-01-23

4.  The Relationship between the Lee Score and Postoperative Mortality in Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Marcelo Teodoro Ezequiel Guerra; Luiz Giglio; João Mauro Mendina Morais; Giovanna Labatut; Monica Cavanus Feijó; Carlos Eduardo Peixoto Kayser
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

5.  Do we really need a surgery for hip fractures in elderly patients? Mortality rate and influencing factors.

Authors:  Kyu-Tae Hwang; Jun-Ki Moon; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  One-Year Postfracture Mortality Rate in Older Adults With Hip Fractures Relative to Other Lower Extremity Fractures: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Andrea Dimet-Wiley; George Golovko; Stanley J Watowich
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  Comorbidities, clinical intercurrences, and factors associated with mortality in elderly patients admitted for a hip fracture.

Authors:  Stephanie Victoria Camargo Leão Edelmuth; Gabriella Nisimoto Sorio; Fabio Antonio Anversa Sprovieri; Julio Cesar Gali; Sonia Ferrari Peron
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2018-08-02

8.  Outcomes of Fast-Track Multidisciplinary Care of Hip Fractures in Veterans: A Geriatric Hip Fracture Program Report.

Authors:  Vikas Kulshrestha; Munish Sood; Santhosh Kumar; Pramila Sharma; Yash Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12

9.  EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF IN HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURE.

Authors:  José Guilherme Lollo Correa; Fernando Brandão Andrade-Silva; Sileno Fortes; Kodi Edson Kojima; Jorge Dos Santos Silva; Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

10.  [Perioperative complications and mortality in elderly patients following surgery for femoral fracture: prospective observational study].

Authors:  Talita de Almeida Barbosa; André Moreira Fogaça de Souza; Fábio Caetano Oliveira Leme; Letícia Dalla Vecchia Grassi; Fabio Bussolan Cintra; Rodrigo Moreira E Lima; David Nicoletti Gumieiro; Lais Helena Navarro E Lima
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.