Literature DB >> 28194067

Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Use of Glucose and pH for Bacterial Screening of Platelet Concentrates Compared to the Bact/Alert.

Farhad Razjou1, Hossein Timori Naghadeh1, Shirin Ferdowsi1, Abolfazl Dabirmoghadam1.   

Abstract

Bacterial contamination of blood components is the major infectious risk in transfusion medicine. Since platelets should be stored at room temperature that makes them an excellent growth medium for bacteria; it is mentioned as a major problem in transfusion medicine. Transfusion risk of a bacterial contaminated platelet concentrate is higher than viral pathogen such as HIV, HBV, HCV and HTLV. The objective of this study was to evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of use of glucose and pH for bacterial screening of platelet concentrates compared to the Bact/Alert. 1332 platelet concentrates were screened by the Bact/Alert system for aerobic and anaerobic bacterial contamination. Bacterial contamination was also evaluated by using urine reagent strips (Multistix10 SG Bayer) and culture methods. Moreover PH screening with a pH meter (Metrohm 744 Swiss) and glucose was also used for detection of bacterial contamination. The rate of bacterial contamination detected by the Bact/Alert system in platelet concentrates was 25 in 1332 (1.9 %). It contained 15 (1.1 %) for aerobic bacteria and 10 (.8 %) for anaerobic bacteria. 226 of 1332 were considered as containing bacteria by using urine reagent strips. Six of the 226 units were also positive by the Bact/Alert system. Three of those units were culture positive for aerobic bacteria and three for anaerobic. The result of platelet concentrates that underwent pH screening by use of pH meter and a pH portion of urine reagent strips was the same. The sensitivity and specificity of considering glucose alone for detection of bacterial contamination were 12 and 98 % respectively. For pH alone, these were 24 and 83 %. For glucose and/or pH, these were 24 and 83 %; and for combination of glucose and pH, these were 12 and 98 %. Our results showed use of glucose/pH strips would improve the safety of blood products and should be encouraged.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial contamination; Platelet concentrate; Reagent strips

Year:  2016        PMID: 28194067      PMCID: PMC5280850          DOI: 10.1007/s12288-016-0660-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus        ISSN: 0971-4502            Impact factor:   0.900


  13 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial contamination of blood components.

Authors:  Mark E Brecher; Shauna N Hay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Frequency of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates before and after introduction of diversion method in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Satake; Takako Mitani; Shinji Oikawa; Hideto Nagumo; Sayoko Sugiura; Hidemi Tateyama; Syuji Awakihara; Yoshiro Mitsutomi; Masato Muraoka; Kenji Tadokoro
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  Incidence of bacterial transmission and transfusion reactions by blood components.

Authors:  Gabriele Walther-Wenke
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Analysis of bacterial detection in whole blood-derived platelets by quantitative glucose testing at a university medical center.

Authors:  A Victoria McKane; Nancy Ward; Chris Senn; Julie Eubanks; Linda Wessels; Robert Bowman
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Detection of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates.

Authors:  R N I Pietersz; C P Engelfriet; H W Reesink; E M Wood; S Winzar; A J Keller; J T Wilson; G Henn; W R Mayr; S Ramirez-Arcos; M Goldman; J Georgsen; P Morel; P Herve; G Andeu; A Assal; E Seifried; M Schmidt; M Foley; C Doherty; P Coakley; A Salami; E Cadden; W G Murphy; M Satake; D de Korte; V Bosnes; J Kjeldsen-Kragh; C McDonald; M E Brecher; R Yomtovian; J P AuBuchon
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Detecting bacteria in platelet concentrates by use of reagent strips.

Authors:  J B Werch; Paulette Mhawech; C E Stager; E I Banez; Benjamin Lichtiger
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Use of a pH meter for bacterial screening of whole blood platelets.

Authors:  Mark H Yazer; Darrell J Triulzi
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 8.  Bacterial risk reduction by improved donor arm disinfection, diversion and bacterial screening.

Authors:  C P McDonald
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.019

9.  Culture-based bacterial detection systems for platelets: the effect of time prior to sampling and duration of incubation required for detection with aerobic culture.

Authors:  Shoji Ezuki; Kinuyo Kawabata; Takahiro Kanno; Hitoshi Ohto
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Rapid screening method for detection of bacteria in platelet concentrates.

Authors:  S Ribault; K Harper; L Grave; C Lafontaine; P Nannini; A Raimondo; I Besson Faure
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.