Literature DB >> 15987358

Use of a pH meter for bacterial screening of whole blood platelets.

Mark H Yazer1, Darrell J Triulzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of blood products is a leading cause of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Transfusion services are now compelled to employ methods of detecting bacteria in platelet (PLT) components. The use of pH screening of whole-blood PLTs (WBPs) was evaluated with a pH meter at the time of issue as a surrogate test for bacterial contamination. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All WBPs selected for transfusion in May through September 2004 were tested individually for pH at time of issue. Those with a pH value of less than 7.0 were cultured in an automated culture system for 5 days. The white blood cell (WBC) and PLT counts in 56 representative WBP units that failed pH screening were compared to WBP units with acceptable pH values.
RESULTS: Of the 37,060 WBP units that underwent pH screening, 405 had a pH value of less than 7.0 (1.1%). Four of those units were culture positive (1.0%) for Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, diphtheroids, and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Only one cocomponent red blood cell (RBC) unit was culture-positive and grew the same bacteria (S. aureus) as the WBP unit. The rate of pH failure increased with WBP storage length with the greatest rate of pH failures occurring in 5-day-old WBPs. The units that failed pH screening had significantly more WBCs and PLTs than units with acceptable pH values.
CONCLUSION: pH screening of WBPs at issue prevented transfusion of bacterially contaminated WBPs and RBCs. This method, however, results in significant PLT wastage. Higher WBC and PLT content likely explains pH failures not due to bacterial contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15987358     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  3 in total

1.  What every physician should know about transfusion reactions.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakdash; Mark H Yazer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Use of Glucose and pH for Bacterial Screening of Platelet Concentrates Compared to the Bact/Alert.

Authors:  Farhad Razjou; Hossein Timori Naghadeh; Shirin Ferdowsi; Abolfazl Dabirmoghadam
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  From the donor's arm to blood product: a study on bacterial contamination of apheresis platelet concentrates.

Authors:  Anna Maria Leo; Maria Monica Salvadego; Maria Grazia Piva; Graziano Ruffato; Sara Valverde; Ernesto Trabuio; Francesco Antico; Gianluca Gessoni
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.443

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.