Literature DB >> 28192674

Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.

Rocio Garcia-Retamero1, Edward T Cokely2.   

Abstract

Background Effective risk communication is essential for informed decision making. Unfortunately, many people struggle to understand typical risk communications because they lack essential decision-making skills. Objective The aim of this study was to review the literature on the effect of numeracy on risk literacy, decision making, and health outcomes, and to evaluate the benefits of visual aids in risk communication. Method We present a conceptual framework describing the influence of numeracy on risk literacy, decision making, and health outcomes, followed by a systematic review of the benefits of visual aids in risk communication for people with different levels of numeracy and graph literacy. The systematic review covers scientific research published between January 1995 and April 2016, drawn from the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Medline, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were investigation of the effect of numeracy and/or graph literacy, and investigation of the effect of visual aids or comparison of their effect with that of numerical information. Thirty-six publications met the criteria, providing data on 27,885 diverse participants from 60 countries. Results Transparent visual aids robustly improved risk understanding in diverse individuals by encouraging thorough deliberation, enhancing cognitive self-assessment, and reducing conceptual biases in memory. Improvements in risk understanding consistently produced beneficial changes in attitudes, behavioral intentions, trust, and healthy behaviors. Visual aids were found to be particularly beneficial for vulnerable and less skilled individuals. Conclusion Well-designed visual aids tend to be highly effective tools for improving informed decision making among diverse decision makers. We identify five categories of practical, evidence-based guidelines for heuristic evaluation and design of effective visual aids.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data visualization; graph literacy; graphic usability; heuristic evaluation; numeracy; risk communication; risk literacy; shared decision making; visual aids

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28192674     DOI: 10.1177/0018720817690634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  49 in total

1.  Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Return-to-Player Percentage in Gaming Machines: Impact of Informative Materials on Player Understanding.

Authors:  Kate Beresford; Alexander Blaszczynski
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2020-03

3.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Eva Janssen; Mirta Galesic; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Benefits and harms of aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.

Authors:  Peter Nguyen; Jennifer McIntosh; Adrian Bickerstaffe; Sanjaya Maddumarachchi; Kara-Lynne Cummings; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.

Authors:  Meghan Reading Turchioe; Lisa V Grossman; Annie C Myers; Dawon Baik; Parag Goyal; Ruth M Masterson Creber
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A Systematic Review of Patient-Facing Visualizations of Personal Health Data.

Authors:  Meghan Reading Turchioe; Annie Myers; Samuel Isaac; Dawon Baik; Lisa V Grossman; Jessica S Ancker; Ruth Masterson Creber
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.

Authors:  Saangyoung E Lee; William C Brown; Mark W Gelpi; Adam J Kimple; Brent A Senior; Adam M Zanation; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.858

9.  Parental Risk Literacy is Related to Quality of Life in Spanish Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Dunia Garrido; Dafina Petrova; Edward Cokely; Gloria Carballo; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-07

10.  Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jennifer M Taber; Amy McQueen; Ashley J Housten; Jamie L Studts; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.