Alicia M Sufrinko1, Gregory F Marchetti2, Paul E Cohen1, R J Elbin3, Valentina Re4, Anthony P Kontos1. 1. UPMC Sports Medicine Concussion Program, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. John G. Rangos Sr. School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Office for Sport Concussion Research, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA. 4. Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A sport-related concussion (SRC) is a heterogeneous injury that requires a multifaceted and comprehensive approach for diagnosis and management, including symptom reports, vestibular/ocular motor assessments, and neurocognitive testing. PURPOSE: To determine which acute (eg, within 7 days) vestibular, ocular motor, neurocognitive, and symptom impairments predict the duration of recovery after an SRC. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with a mean age of 15.3 ± 1.9 years completed a neurocognitive, vestibular/ocular motor, and symptom assessment within 7 days of a diagnosed concussion. Patients were grouped by recovery time: ≤14 days (n = 27, 39.1%), 15-29 days (n = 25, 36.2%), and 30-90 days (n = 17, 24.6%). Multinomial regression was used to identify the best subset of predictors associated with prolonged recovery relative to ≤14 days. RESULTS: Acute visual motor speed and cognitive-migraine-fatigue symptoms were associated with an increased likelihood of recovery times of 30-90 days and 15-29 days relative to a recovery time of ≤14 days. A model with visual motor speed and cognitive-migraine-fatigue symptoms within the first 7 days of an SRC was 87% accurate at identifying patients with a recovery time of 30-90 days. CONCLUSION: The current study identified cognitive-migraine-fatigue symptoms and visual motor speed as the most robust predictors of protracted recovery after an SRC according to the Post-concussion Symptom Scale, Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing, and Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS). While VOMS components were sensitive in identifying a concussion, they were not robust predictors for recovery. Clinicians may consider particular patterns of performance on clinical measures when providing treatment recommendations and discussing anticipated recovery with patients.
BACKGROUND: A sport-related concussion (SRC) is a heterogeneous injury that requires a multifaceted and comprehensive approach for diagnosis and management, including symptom reports, vestibular/ocular motor assessments, and neurocognitive testing. PURPOSE: To determine which acute (eg, within 7 days) vestibular, ocular motor, neurocognitive, and symptom impairments predict the duration of recovery after an SRC. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with a mean age of 15.3 ± 1.9 years completed a neurocognitive, vestibular/ocular motor, and symptom assessment within 7 days of a diagnosed concussion. Patients were grouped by recovery time: ≤14 days (n = 27, 39.1%), 15-29 days (n = 25, 36.2%), and 30-90 days (n = 17, 24.6%). Multinomial regression was used to identify the best subset of predictors associated with prolonged recovery relative to ≤14 days. RESULTS: Acute visual motor speed and cognitive-migraine-fatigue symptoms were associated with an increased likelihood of recovery times of 30-90 days and 15-29 days relative to a recovery time of ≤14 days. A model with visual motor speed and cognitive-migraine-fatigue symptoms within the first 7 days of an SRC was 87% accurate at identifying patients with a recovery time of 30-90 days. CONCLUSION: The current study identified cognitive-migraine-fatigue symptoms and visual motor speed as the most robust predictors of protracted recovery after an SRC according to the Post-concussion Symptom Scale, Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing, and Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS). While VOMS components were sensitive in identifying a concussion, they were not robust predictors for recovery. Clinicians may consider particular patterns of performance on clinical measures when providing treatment recommendations and discussing anticipated recovery with patients.
Authors: Carolina P Quintana; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Anne D Olson; Nicholas R Heebner; Matthew C Hoch Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Gian-Gabriel P Garcia; Steven P Broglio; Mariel S Lavieri; Michael McCrea; Thomas McAllister Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: R J Elbin; Anthony P Kontos; Alicia Sufrinko; Mallory McElroy; Katie Stephenson-Brown; Samantha Mohler; Nathan R D'Amico; Michael W Collins Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Andrew R Mayer; Christopher Wertz; Sephira G Ryman; Eileen P Storey; Grace Park; John Phillips; Andrew B Dodd; Scott Oglesbee; Richard Campbell; Ronald A Yeo; Benjamin Wasserott; Nicholas A Shaff; John J Leddy; Rebekah Mannix; Kristy B Arbogast; Timothy B Meier; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Aaron M Sinnott; R J Elbin; Michael W Collins; Valerie L Reeves; Cyndi L Holland; Anthony P Kontos Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Andrew R Mayer; Christopher J Wertz; Cidney R Robertson-Benta; Sharvani Pabbathi Reddy; David D Stephenson; Andrew B Dodd; Scott J Oglesbee; Edward J Bedrick; Christina L Master; Mathew Grady; Nicholas A Shaff; Faith M Hanlon; Richard A Campbell; John P Phillips; Roger L Zemek; Keith Owen Yeates; Timothy B Meier; Rebekah Mannix; John J Leddy; Kristy B Arbogast; Grace Park Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: João Paulo Lima Santos; Anthony P Kontos; Sarrah Mailliard; Shawn R Eagle; Cynthia L Holland; Stephen J Suss; Halimah Abdul-Waalee; Richelle S Stiffler; Hannah B Bitzer; Nicholas A Blaney; Adam T Colorito; Christopher G Santucci; Allison Brown; Tae Kim; Satish Iyengar; Alexander Skeba; Rasim S Diler; Cecile D Ladouceur; Mary L Phillips; David Brent; Michael W Collins; Amelia Versace Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 4.003