Carolina P Quintana1, Tamara C Valovich McLeod2,3, Anne D Olson4, Nicholas R Heebner5, Matthew C Hoch5. 1. Department of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Services, California State University, 5275 N. Campus Dr. M/S SG28, Fresno, CA, 93740-8018, USA. carolinaquintana@mail.fresnostate.edu. 2. Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, A. T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA. 3. School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A. T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, USA. 4. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 5. Department of Athletic Training and Clinical Nutition, Sports Medicine Research Institute, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent literature has identified that the vestibular system is often involved following a sport-related concussion. Furthermore, the consequences of vestibular and ocular/oculomotor involvement have been explored and identified as potential predictors for prolonged recovery. Although vestibular and ocular/oculomotor involvement is common following head injury, the clinical assessment strategies for vestibular function are less commonly practiced in the sports medicine setting and have limited research. Therefore, despite the suspected link between vestibular consequences of concussion and prolonged recovery time, there is limited understanding on how these consequences affect outcomes following concussion and how to properly assess these functions. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this scoping review were to: (1) outline the current clinical assessment strategies for vestibular and ocular/oculomotor function in sports medicine to identify the best strategies for assessment, and (2) investigate the evidence regarding the influence of vestibular and ocular/oculomotor function on outcomes for patients with a sport-related concussion. METHODS: Two separate and independent reviews of the current literature were conducted to provide evidence for each specified objective. Studies for potential inclusion were identified through electronic database searches. Inclusion criteria for each objective were used to identify the most effective studies and inquiries to address the outlined objectives. RESULTS: The identified and included studies provided evidence-based information regarding the current assessment strategies as well as outcomes following concussion. CONCLUSION: Despite agreement among studies, there was limited evidence to support each aim, identifying a need for further exploration into these objectives.
BACKGROUND: Recent literature has identified that the vestibular system is often involved following a sport-related concussion. Furthermore, the consequences of vestibular and ocular/oculomotor involvement have been explored and identified as potential predictors for prolonged recovery. Although vestibular and ocular/oculomotor involvement is common following head injury, the clinical assessment strategies for vestibular function are less commonly practiced in the sports medicine setting and have limited research. Therefore, despite the suspected link between vestibular consequences of concussion and prolonged recovery time, there is limited understanding on how these consequences affect outcomes following concussion and how to properly assess these functions. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this scoping review were to: (1) outline the current clinical assessment strategies for vestibular and ocular/oculomotor function in sports medicine to identify the best strategies for assessment, and (2) investigate the evidence regarding the influence of vestibular and ocular/oculomotor function on outcomes for patients with a sport-related concussion. METHODS: Two separate and independent reviews of the current literature were conducted to provide evidence for each specified objective. Studies for potential inclusion were identified through electronic database searches. Inclusion criteria for each objective were used to identify the most effective studies and inquiries to address the outlined objectives. RESULTS: The identified and included studies provided evidence-based information regarding the current assessment strategies as well as outcomes following concussion. CONCLUSION: Despite agreement among studies, there was limited evidence to support each aim, identifying a need for further exploration into these objectives.
Authors: Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos; Erin Reynolds; Christopher D Murawski; Freddie H Fu Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Paul McCrory; Willem Meeuwisse; Jiří Dvořák; Mark Aubry; Julian Bailes; Steven Broglio; Robert C Cantu; David Cassidy; Ruben J Echemendia; Rudy J Castellani; Gavin A Davis; Richard Ellenbogen; Carolyn Emery; Lars Engebretsen; Nina Feddermann-Demont; Christopher C Giza; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stanley Herring; Grant L Iverson; Karen M Johnston; James Kissick; Jeffrey Kutcher; John J Leddy; David Maddocks; Michael Makdissi; Geoff T Manley; Michael McCrea; William P Meehan; Shinji Nagahiro; Jon Patricios; Margot Putukian; Kathryn J Schneider; Allen Sills; Charles H Tator; Michael Turner; Pieter E Vos Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Steven P Broglio; Michael W Collins; Richelle M Williams; Anne Mucha; Anthony P Kontos Journal: Clin Sports Med Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 2.182
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Douglas J Wiebe; Mark R Zonfrillo; Matthew F Grady; Roni L Robinson; Arlene M Goodman; Christina L Master Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; R J Elbin; Joseph M Furman; Cara Troutman-Enseki; Ryan M DeWolf; Greg Marchetti; Anthony P Kontos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Kristy B Arbogast; Riddhi P Ghosh; Daniel J Corwin; Catherine C McDonald; Fairuz N Mohammed; Susan S Margulies; Ian Barnett; Christina L Master Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 4.869