Inhong Kim1, Jong-Sik Moon2, Jin-Woo Oh3. 1. Research Center for Energy Convergence Technology, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea. 2. BK21 Plus Division of Nano Convergence Technology, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea. 3. Research Center for Energy Convergence Technology, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea ; BK21 Plus Division of Nano Convergence Technology, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea ; Department of Nanoenergy Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241 Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Recently, M13 bacteriophage has started to be widely used as a functional nanomaterial for various electrical, chemical, or optical applications, such as battery components, photovoltaic cells, sensors, and optics. In addition, the use of M13 bacteriophage has expanded into novel research, such as exciton transporting. In these applications, the versatility of M13 phage is a result of its nontoxic, self-assembling, and specific binding properties. For these reasons, M13 phage is the most powerful candidate as a receptor for transducing chemical or optical phenomena of various analytes into electrical or optical signal. In this review, we will overview the recent progress in optical sensing applications of M13 phage. The structural and functional characters of M13 phage will be described and the recent results in optical sensing application using fluorescence, surface plasmon resonance, Förster resonance energy transfer, and surface enhanced Raman scattering will be outlined.
Recently, M13 bacteriophage has started to be widely used as a functional nanomaterial for various electrical, chemical, or optical applications, such as battery components, photovoltaic cells, sensors, and optics. In addition, the use of M13 bacteriophage has expanded into novel research, such as exciton transporting. In these applications, the versatility of M13 phage is a result of its nontoxic, self-assembling, and specific binding properties. For these reasons, M13 phage is the most powerful candidate as a receptor for transducing chemical or optical phenomena of various analytes into electrical or optical signal. In this review, we will overview the recent progress in optical sensing applications of M13 phage. The structural and functional characters of M13 phage will be described and the recent results in optical sensing application using fluorescence, surface plasmon resonance, Förster resonance energy transfer, and surface enhanced Raman scattering will be outlined.
In general, a bio-chemical or a bio-optical sensor is a device to detect chemical or optical change in its biological medium. When the chemical or physical phenomena are measured, the quantitative information for the chemical and/or physical state within medium are provided by converting that into electrical or optical signal. Thus, a bio-chemical or a bio-optical sensor is a kind of a transducer using biomaterials that is used as a receptor for detection or measurement. Recently, bio-chemical or -optical sensors monitoring various substance or chemical constituent that is of interest such as nitro compound, peptide, nucleic acid, polymer, toxin, neurochemicals have been developed [1-15]. Alongside with these advances in biosensor applications, receptor materials that make it possible to transduce biological phenomena have also been extensively investigated in many fields. In these sensors, receptors are either integrated within or closely associated with a transducer interface providing the corresponding output [1]. In addition, transducers normally do not have specificity against a target analyte [16]. For that reason, the development of a sensor that is able to selectively detect target analytes is required [1]. Moreover, target-specificity is also an essential factor in the novel sensor development.Recently, due to its nontoxic, self-assembling and specific binding properties, bacteriophage has been proven to be useful for the detection of target analytes in biomaterials by bio-chemical or bio-optical sensing applications. In addition, surface properties of bacteriophage, which is suitable as a receptor for the development of target-specific bio-sensor, can be controlled through genetic engineering. Employing this advantage, M13 bacteriophage (M13 phage) has expanded its use into novel research area, such as electrode, solar cell, environmental monitoring, plasmonics, cancer diagnosis, cell imaging, and functional device [17-25]. In this review, we will focus on the application of M13 phage as bio-optical sensor. Initially, we will explain the structural and functional characteristics of M13 phage. Next, the recent progress in optical sensing application of M13 phage, such as immunofluorescence assay, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), and surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) will be introduced. The simple physical and/or optical concept of the corresponding sensing application will also be outlined.
M13 phage for the immunofluorescence assay application
As mentioned above, M13 phage has often been used to manage various functional nanomaterials [18, 19, 24, 26–30]. In particular, since the shape of M13 phage is well-defined and can be modified genetically and chemically through the phage display technique to reveal functional peptides [31], M13 phage is particularly useful for various optical applications. Structurally, M13 phage has a cylindrical shape, 880 nm in length and 6.6 nm in diameter (see Fig. 1a) [32]. The single stranded DNA is covered with cylindrical coat made up of 2700 copies of the major coat protein (pVIII), and there are five copies each of the minor protein (pIII and pVI) and other minor proteins (pVII and pIX) at both ends of the cylinder, respectively [33]. Physically, pVIII protein has a helical structure and the shape of phage body is the fivefold rotational and twofold screw symmetry [31]. This precisely defined structure can provide regular molecular spacing. According to recent results, the average distances between two neighboring N-termini of pVIII proteins are 3.2 and 2.4 nm [34].
a Fluorescent labelling of phage through conjugation with ruthenium complexes. b Various time-lapse confocal microscopy images of phage conjugated fluorescent materals. Red [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ , green GFP, yellow colocalization of red and green fluorescence [37].
a Schematic diagram for tumor-targeting of SBP–M13–SWNT probe. b Absorbance spectrum of SWNTs in sodium cholate and SBP–M13–SWNT probe, respectively. c Fluorescence intensity of SBP–M13–SWNT in ovarian cancer cell culture. d Photobleaching fluorescence decay of FITC and SBP–M13–SWNTs, respectively. e Pharmacokinetic circulation study of SBP–M13–SWNT [38].
Recently, the plasmonic effect in a metallic surface has been widely studied as the method to enhance the optical signal. Surface plasmonic effect is known to enhance optical processes, such as the change in the reflective index of a molecule in a metal surface [39]. The origin of this phenomenon is attributed to the oscillation of the free conduction electrons, that is, surface plasmon (SP), induced by the interaction with the external electromagnetic field [40]. This unique phenomenon provides information for the fundamental interaction, such as the molecular binding between an antibody and a receptor.SPR is a surface field by the charge density oscillation in a metallic surface, where the free electrons of a conductor are responded by oscillating in resonance with the external electromagnetic wave [40]. In the dielectric/metal interface, the wave equation leads to a dispersion relation for SP which depends on the dielectric constant. Solving the Maxwell equations with a frequency dependent dielectric constant of metal and a dielectric material, the dispersion relation for SP is given by Eq. (1):where k
sp is the wave vector, ω is the optical frequency, c is the speed of light, ε
d and ε
m are the dielectric constants of dielectric material and metal, respectively [41, 42]. Since metals usually have negative dielectric constants in the UV/VIS range, this equation represents that the momentum of the SP mode is greater than that of a free-space photon at the same frequency: dielectric materials have the positive dielectric constant [43]. This charge density wave is known as the surface plasmon polariton (SPP), which is a non-radiative electromagnetic wave that propagates in the direction parallel to dielectric material interface and a transverse magnetic (TM)-polarized that magnetic field vector is perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Since the SPR frequency is sensitive to the values of the dielectric constant of a dielectric material [44], the SP oscillation is very sensitive to any change in this interface. For example, the resonant coupling with SP and electromagnetic field gives rise to the noble phenomena, such as the enhancement of molecular absorption.The commonly used SPR setups are shown in Fig. 4 [45]. In the Kretschmann configuration, the external electromagnetic field (optical wave) is generally incident through the prism coupler above the metal layer. Then, the photons induce an evanescent wave into the metal layer. While no transport of photons normally occurs through this wave, photons incident at a certain angle are able to pass through the field and excite surface plasmons (SPs) on the opposite side of the metal layer. Whenever analyte absorbs photon, a dip appears in the spectrum of the reflected light at that specific angle. This angle depends on the refractive index of the analyte and, is measured by a spectrometer [46].
Fig. 4
Commonly used configurations of SPR sensors: a prism coupler-based SPR system (the Kretschmann configuration), b grating coupler-based SPR system, c optical waveguide-based SPR system [45].
a The spectral shift of resonance peak for different types of phage films. b The SPR sensitivity comparison between phage films. c The selectivity of HPQ phage film for streptavidin FITC [64].
FRET has been most widely investigated in various applications of fluorescence, including medical diagnostics, DNA analysis, and bio-optical imaging [65]. After this phenomenon, named by Theodor Förster, was initially described in 1948 [66], FRET-based studies have expanded into other research areas with the help of advances in the fluorescence detection technique by the improved spectral resolution and high sensitivity. A typical aspect of these applications involves the selection of probe materials suitable for the optimization of the energy transfer. For this reason, many studies and developments associated with fluorescent materials applicable to FRET, such as organic dyes, conjugated polymers, semiconductor nanocrystals, and quantum dots (QDs), have been performed. For example, due to their electron affinity and high quantum efficiency, organics dyes are most commonly used as efficient fluorescent materials in FRET based on optical detection. For decades, it has been proven that organic dyes offer several unique advantages in FRET-based biomolecular imaging application [67-71]. Furthermore, due to their unique electrical and optical properties, conjugated polymers have also received more attention as probe materials in the investigation of the FRET mechanism. Conjugated polymers have a unique structure characterized by a π-orbital enabling exciton hopping along their backbone [65, 72–82]. In addition to the use of organic molecules, recent research has suggested that colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals or QDs are also useful for FRET applications [83-91], because they have many advantages as compared to conventional organic fluorophores, such as high extinction coefficient and size tenability [9, 14, 92–96].Although the fluorescent materials for FRET have noticeable advantages, such as high quantum efficiency and electron affinity, the optical properties of these materials do not guarantee the optimal energy transfer, because the carrier relaxation is affected by the quenching process which diminishes fluorescence intensity or by trapping excited carriers. This quenching process is originally caused by molecular contact, and the common molecular system generally has many quenchers. Thus, the appropriate work of the system design is very important for efficient FRET. Recently, in situ FRET based on the optical DNA detection scheme using conjugated polymer has been demonstrated by Bazan and many other researchers [97-102]. They suggested the excellent FRET design enabling the amplification of fluorescence signal through the fine tuning of the intermolecular distance by the electrostatic interaction between optical platforms. Thus, their result also implies that the optimal FRET is possible through a careful system design.In M13 phage based on sensor applications, M13 phage is commonly used as an alternatives to classical 1D nanoscaffolds, such as carbon nanotubes, while providing suitable constructs serving as heterogeneous supports of nanoparticles (NPs), a high surface area template for the co-anchoring of photo-activated molecular donors/acceptors, a spacer element to funnel and direct the sequential electron-transfers [103]. In particular, due to its due specific binding property and well-defined shape, M13 phage is useful as a platform or scaffold. Thus, we can easily expect that M13 phages can be used as optical platforms for FRET.In this section, we will introduce the use and potential of M13 phage in FRET-based optical sensor application. For this purpose, we will first explain the basic equations of FRET for understanding the essential concept of FRET. Then, we will account for the recent progress in FRET application based on M13 phage.Theoretically, FRET is the excitation energy transfer process from the excited donor molecule to an acceptor molecule by the dipole–dipole coupling and it is observable at the range of 10–100 Å as shown in the Jablonski diagram (see Fig. 8a) [104]. When a donor molecule is excited by incident light, the excited state energy of donor can be transferred to an acceptor molecule which is in close proximity. Then, this leads to a decrease in the donor’s fluorescence intensity and an increase in the acceptor’s emission intensity. Interestingly, the resonance energy transfer process non-radiatively occurs without the involvement of a photon, although the emission spectrum of donor molecules overlaps with the acceptor’s absorption spectrum. In addition, the energy transfer is a through-space interaction which is mostly independent from the intervening solvent and/or macromolecule.
a The structures of M13-β-CD, Ada-FITC, and Ada-RhB. b Schematic of the FRET based ratiometric fluorescent pH nanosensor. c Normalized absorption spectra of Ada-FITC (green solid) and Ada-RhB (red solid), normalized fluorescence spectra of Ada-FITC (green dot) and Ada-RhB (red dot), respectively. d Fluorescence spectra of the mixture of Ada-FITC and Ada-RhB (green) or M13-b-CD/Ada-FITC/Ada-(red) under 450 nm excitation. The inset shows the image of solution in the absence (green) and presence (yellow) of M13 phage. e pH dependence of M13-β-CD/Ada-FITC/Ada-RhB complex. f The peak emission ratio between Ada-FITC (515 nm) and Ada-RhB (580 nm) shows linear pH dependence [34].
a Tryptophan fluorescence emission spectra of native M13 phage and ZP-M13 under 295 nm excitation. b Molar extinction coefficient (absorption), c transient absorption at 400 nm, and d fluorescence spectra of ZnDPEG, ZP-M13-1, and ZP-M13-2 under 400 nm excitation. The insert in b shows a magnified emission spectrum around 550 nm, and the insert in d shows a magnified emission spectra of ZP-M13-2 [108].
a Schematics for exciton transporting mechanism in the genetically engineered M13 phage based light harvesting system. Magnified M13 phage surfaces show the energy-transfer networks between chromophore-binding sites for M13CF (left) and M13SF (right), respectively. Insets show schematic networks of energy transport by exciton hopping in the M13CF and the M13SF, respectively. b Absorption and emission spectra of free donor (DN) and free acceptor (AC). c Fluorescence spectra of donor under 495 nm. Significant fluorescence quenching is observed in the presence of M13 phage. The upper inset is a fluorescence microscope image of the M13SF-DN. The bottom inset shows the change in emission colour of donor molecule as FRET occurs [109].
SERS is a powerful spectroscopic technique enabling for a highly sensitive detection due to the significant amplification of Raman signal from molecules attached to the metallic surface with nanometer size [110, 111]. It has been widely used in various bio- or chemical sensing applications for probing of single molecules [111-113], molecular analysis [114], bio markers [115-119], and environmental monitoring [120, 121]. It has even been used in forensic science for detection of explosives, drugs, blood, DNA, and fingerprints [122], since the Raman spectra of pyridine on silver electrode were first observed in 1974 [123] and their mechanism was analyzed in 1977 [124]. In particular, the SERS field has dramatically progressed by virtue of a high sensitivity with theoretical signal enhancement factor of 1011 in an optimized substrate [110].Before discussing M13 phage-based SERS applications, we first explain the Raman effect and the theoretical mechanism of SERS. The Raman effect is an inelastic scattering process between a photon and a molecule. When light is incident in a molecule, some of the incoming photons are inelastically scattered from a molecule. These scattered photons have a different energy (frequency) as compared to that of incident photons by interaction with molecular vibrational energy states in molecules. This phenomenon appears to frequency-shifted signal (spectral shift to lower or higher energy) in the spectrum. It is called the Stokes scattering when scattered photons lose energy and the reverse process where photons gain the energy due to interacting with excited vibrational states is called anti-Stokes scattering [125]. In comparison to the Raman scattering or Raman, SERS is incorporated with metal nanostructures [126]. In the presence of nanostructures with coinage metals, the excitation of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) can induce the amplification of scattered electromagnetic field [110]. By |E
4| approximation, the SERS intensity is proportional to the fourth power of incident electric fields (E(ω
inc)): I
SERS ≈ |E(ω
inc)|4 [126]. In SERS, the enhancement of the Raman signal is explained by two mechanisms of electromagnetic [127] and chemical theories [128, 129]. The electromagnetic approach describes signal enhancement with the amplification in the electric field due to roughness or shape of the metallic surface. In general, an incident electromagnetic plane wave can excite localized surface plasmons confined to the metal surface. Then, the plasmon oscillation perpendicular to the surface can occur, scattering of photons by the resonance with an incident electromagnetic wave. Therefore, SERS is strongly influenced by the systems which can absorb the photon and store the electromagnetic energy into the surface plasmon, i.e., small metal features and gratings [127]. The theoretical electromagnetic enhancement factor is in the order of 1010–1011 [110]. In the chemical approach, the enhancement of the Raman signal results in the transient charge transfer by the electronic interaction between metal and adsorbate, since a new electronic state by chemisorption can serve as a resonant intermediate state in the Raman scattering [129]. In this case, theoretical chemical enhancement factors are in the order of 103 [110].Due to the specific binding property of M13 phage, it often used as an analytic material in the SERS applications for biosensing. Recently, Lee et al. reported a biosensor system that integrates SERS-active metal nanoparticles with DNA-modified M13 bacteriophage [130]. In this application, M13 phage is used as a platform for signal enhancement. The authors observed that the high capturing of SERS-active Au@Ag core–shell nanoparticles by single phage leads to the exponential enhancement in the Raman signal [130]. Therefore, they the DNA-phage system shows a 75-fold increase in the Raman signal as compared to that of DNA-antibody due to the high surface area of the phage.M13 phage can be used as a signal reporter for the SERS-based medical applications; for example, Nguyen et al. reported a new mesoporous SERS substrate using M13 phage modified with cysteine-rich peptides on the pVIII major coat protein for sepsis diagnosis [131]. In their new system, the authors prepared silica mesoporous templates for SERS through polymerization by mixing between M13 phage displaying cysteine-rich peptide and silica precursors. The authors carried out detection for three typical sepsis-specific biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and sTREM-1 based on principles of immunoassays (see Fig. 12) [131]. Therefore, they observed that the SERS spectrum shows distinct peaks for each tags and has the detection limit of 27, 103, and 78 pM for each sepsis-specific biomarker. Furthermore, Lentini et al. reported the SERS material based on Phage–Ag nanoparticles for identification of Histiocytic lymphoma cell line (U937) [132]. U937 is an in vitro model cell line for cancer diagnosis in biomedical research. In their contribution, the phage display technique of a 9-mer pVIII M13 phage is used to screen over U937 and silver nanoparticles are incubated with phage clones to acquire the SERS signal. Therefore, the authors found that assembled network between phage-displayed peptides with EIII1 alignment and Ag nanoparticles shows new Raman scattering peaks at 862.6, 1132, and 1154 cm−1 as compared to the fundamental feature of U937, as well as signal enhancement [132].
Fig. 12
a SERS spectra for three sepsis-specific biomarkers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and sTREM-1). b Detection of unspecific and cross-talk assay for the biomarker-based sepsis. c The detection limit based on concentration of each biomarkers is estimated by Linear fitting of peak intensities. [131].
In the above-mentioned M13 phage-based optical sensing applications, there are difficulties to directly compare the sensing performance. Specifically, intrinsically different sensing mechanisms and techniques are used, while sensitivity, selectivity, pros and cons of a biosensor are crucial factors. In addition, these techniques were applied to the different sensing ranges, for example, pg/mL to ng/mL level for SPR and ng/mL to μg/mL level for FRET [133]. To provide a more comprehensive picture of prior research, sensing parameters used in previous studies are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
M13 phage-based optical sensors
Sensing technique
Probe
Analyte
Detection limit
Ref.
Immunofluorescence assay
RGD peptideSPARC binding peptide
M13 bacteriophage
–pH 4.5–8.5
[36][38]
SPR
Salmonellar specific peptidesOligopeptideRGD peptideHPQ peptide
M13 bacteriophage
8.0 × 107 CFU/mL0.58 μM0.3 mg/mL10 fM
[58][60][36][64]
FRET
FITC and RhBAlexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 594Zinc porphyrins
In recent years, M13 bacteriophage has expanded its use into various novel research areas, such as fluorescence, SPR, and exciton transporting network. In these sensing applications, versatility of M13 phage is attributed to its nontoxic, well-defined shape, self-assembling, and specific binding properties. Considering the recent trend of the use of M13 phage in bio-optical applications, M13 phage is consequently the most powerful candidates that corresponds to the necessity of the development of sensor enabling detection of various analytes, such as explosives, proteins, DNA, cancers, bacteria, toxins, and metal ions. In addition, since M13 phage is robust, thermally and chemically stable, as well as easy to incorporate with other motifs, such as biomolecules or nanoparticles, via genetic engineering, it is very useful as a functional nanomaterial for more diverse applications. For this reason, M13 phage based on sensor will be consistently developed and lead to new optical sensing strategies for the rapid, accurate, selective, and sensitive detection of analytes incorporated with various spectroscopic methods.
Authors: Cláudia F B Coutinho; Lincoln F M Coutinho; Luiz H Mazo; Suzana L Nixdorf; Carlos A P Camara; Fernando M Lanças Journal: Anal Chim Acta Date: 2007-04-08 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: W Russ Algar; David Wegner; Alan L Huston; Juan B Blanco-Canosa; Michael H Stewart; Anika Armstrong; Philip E Dawson; Niko Hildebrandt; Igor L Medintz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yoo Min Park; Sun Young Lim; Soon Woo Jeong; Younseong Song; Nam Ho Bae; Seok Bok Hong; Bong Gill Choi; Seok Jae Lee; Kyoung G Lee Journal: Nano Converg Date: 2018-06-06